Obama’s Unscrupulous Selma Speech

la-na-obama-selma-post-presidency-20150306Originally posted at American Thinker

Under the guise of commemorating justice, on the 50th Anniversary of the Bloody Sunday March in Selma, Alabama, Barack Obama engaged in his usual artful deception by exploiting the event to further his agenda.

While placing the subtext of blame upon the shoulders of racist white men, to make a self-serving point concerning illegal immigration Obama used black Americans as beasts of burden to haul the weight of his reprimand.

For starters, historical revisionist Barack Obama left out the fact that those doing the beating in Selma were members of the Democratic Party. The president dared not reveal that, 50 years later, both he and his political cronies are now politically and economically billy-clubbing the very people he pretends to defend.

Keynote speaker Obama opened the discourse by extolling civil rights leader/Martial Law advocate John Lewis (D-GA).  Predictably, before long, Obama’s words started to sound more like he was discussing his own struggles as a ‘fundamental transformer’ than commemorating a half-century old injustice.

Identifying with freedom marchers at Selma, Obama began to compare the struggle for civil rights with the need for unnamed oppressors to accept his “idea of a just… fair… inclusive… generous America.”

At one point, the president went so far as to side with phone-buddy Kanye West by mentioning that white newsman Bill Plante confirmed Kanye’s Beyoncé vs. Beck and Taylor Grammy assertion when he said that on the day of the original Selma march, “white people lowered the quality of the [hymn] singing.”

Then, what came across as a leftist jab to the jaw of those who disagree with his illegal immigration policy, Obama said, “We are well-served to remember that at the time of the marches, many in power condemned rather than praised them.”

“Back then, they were called Communists, half-breeds, outside agitators, sexual and moral degenerates, and worse,” Obama explained, “Their faith was questioned. Their lives were threatened. Their patriotism was challenged.

Then he asked:

What could more profoundly vindicate the idea of America than plain and humble people — the unsung, the downtrodden, the dreamers not of high station, not born to wealth or privilege, not of one religious tradition but many – coming together to shape their country’s course?

Rest assured that when Barack Obama names ‘dreamers… shaping [the] country’s course… [and]… America being not yet finished,’ and when he proposes “closely align[ing] with our highest ideals” what he is really referring to is a nation remade entirely upon progressive principles.

Moreover, know this: when this president speaks of “a more perfect union,” and then says this is “a roadmap for citizenship and an insistence in the capacity of free men and women to shape our own destiny,” the underlying theme is a cry for an America flooded to overflowing with illegal immigrants.

Take for instance his reference to “pick[ing] up torches and crossing the bridge,” which was followed by his hinting at the moral equivalency between coyotes on jet skis smuggling illegals across the Rio Grande and those who legally migrate to America.

By equating illegal immigrants with Iwo Jima and the moonwalk and obscuring insinuation behind commendation, Barack Obama managed to successfully use Selma to denigrate two of America’s greatest accomplishments.

Then, mid-speech, the president justified stirring racial tensions when playing the “race card,” brought up the “long shadow… [of]… this nation’s racial history,” the inequity of black incarceration, and the need for voting rights, something he apparently believes illegals deserve.  Subsequently, while skirting his own policy contribution to a situation he stressed was indicative of racial injustice, Obama broached the volatile subject of black poverty.

Quickly returning to illegal immigration, Mr. Obama introduced his own selfish agenda into a moral issue by sharing his skewed view of “American exceptionalism.”

The president seemed to suggest that individuals who cling to the rule of law simply do not understand that those who risk everything to realize the promise of citizenship are the ones who truly love and believe in America.

According to President Obama, American exceptionalism contains the “imperative of citizenship.”

That’s why Obama implied that border jumpers are somehow on par with black Revolutionary era heroes like Crispus Attucks or U.S. refugees such as Holocaust survivors, Soviet defectors, and the Lost Boys of Sudan, and why he believes true Americans “brave the unfamiliar” by doing things like “stowing away on ships.”

Forgetting to state that both freemen and black slaves as well as Scottish stonecutters built the White House, Obama, raised in Indonesia and schooled at Columbia and Harvard, said “We the people” are “slaves who built the White House.”

Then, after likening the plight of MS-13 gang members to Holocaust survivors, Obama related DREAMers in the military to “the Tuskegee Airmen, Navajo code-talkers, and Japanese-Americans who fought for this country even as their own liberty had been denied.”

The black civil-rights crowd, who view equal rights for sexual orientation as vastly different from race, must surely have appreciated the mental imagery Obama concocted when he identified Selma with the LGBT community saying, “We are the gay Americans whose blood ran on the streets of San Francisco and New York, just as blood ran down this bridge.”

When paraphrasing, “You are America… Unencumbered by what is, and ready to seize what ought to be,” America’s first community activist president again paid homage to his late mentor, Saul Alinsky, who often spoke of “the world as it is and the world as it ought to be.”

Before suggesting that “Yes We Can” belonged in the same context as “We the People… [and]… We Shall Overcome,” the Mt. Rushmore hopeful mocked those who revere an iconic American identity when he said that America is “Not stock photos or airbrushed history or feeble attempts to define some of us as more American than others.”

Barack Obama ended his sermon by once again reminding those in attendance that our “union is not perfect,” and by quoting Isaiah 40:31, a Scripture he botched at the National Prayer breakfast in 2013.

Renewed in strength, tireless transformationist Barack Obama said he considers himself among the “we”… who “abhor unfairness, and despise hypocrisy… give voice to the voiceless, and tell truths that need to be told.”

And while that sounds magnificent, underneath all the flowery rhetoric, this president promotes inequity, personifies hypocrisy, funds and supports silencing the voice of the voiceless and, even if his life depended on it, is completely incapable of telling the truth.

Share
Tags: , , , , ,

Hillary Clinton’s gives odd comments at pro-abortion event on “all of our people” living up to “God-given potential”

Hillary-Clinton-Shutterstock-Licensed-672x372Originally posted at Live Action News

Hillary Clinton raised eyebrows at the EMILY’s List 30th anniversary gala in Washington DC. EMILY’s List is a pro-choice organization that prides itself on “igniting change…[by] getting pro-choice Democratic women elected to office.” The organization oppose all restrictions on abortion and has been vocal in support of late-term and even partial birth abortion in which a child is fully delivered except for their head before being killed by inserting a sharp object at the base of the skull. In 2002, EMILY’s List wrote off supporting Democrat Mary Landrieu after she voted against partial birth abortion despite an other long record of supporting other abortion procedures.

According to Stephanie Schriock, the group’s president, Grandma Hillary was feted with the ‘We Are EMILY Award’  for her leadership “as a fighter for women and families.’”

The former Secretary of State had attention grabbing word choice when she commended the audience, referring to the group as  a “room full of women and men who recognize the importance of making sure that all of our people have a chance to live up to their God-given potential.”

YouTube Preview Image

Hillary then played the Grandma Card, saying that the glow she had was not from high blood pressure resulting  from being embroiled in an email scandal,  but instead, from “a six months in…grandmother glow,” which she told the group is “better than any spa treatment…I highly recommend it.”

Wait! Who exactly is Hillary recommending give birth?

Clearly, Grandma Clinton doesn’t recognize the dichotomy she poses when she advocates for of most barbaric abortions while simultaneously recommending EMILY’s List  daughters give birth to grandchildren.

Either way, Hillary “ignited change” at a death-affirming function for a 30-year-old group that works hard to promote feticide.  While there Mrs. Clinton referenced the Creator and applauded the “God-given potential” of  mothers who chose to deny 53 million children their God-given right to life.

And to drive the point home, at a gala for an organization that believes in aborting 3,000 Charlottes a day, Hillary Clinton confused the issue by referencing  her own six-month-old grand baby Charlotte who, unlike the babies a glowing Hillary approves of aborting, made it out of Chelsea’s womb alive.

Share
Tags: , , , ,

NUKES AND PIZZA! How Obama can Help ISIS Be More Politically Correct

pizza-300x180Originally posted at Clash Daily

Barack Obama is negotiating with Iran and moving America toward an agreement that allows the terrorist state to obtain a nuke on a “phased plan.” A “phased plan” with Tehran is like reassuring potential victims that a psychopathic murderer is on the loose in their neighborhood with a Nerf gun, but not to worry because cops have a “phased plan” to provide the killer with a machete.

In other words, with the help of Barack Obama, Iran will graduate from being unable to annihilate Israel or do serious damage to the US, to being a formidable danger. And while that will certainly be disastrous in some ways, if Iran does lob a nuke at America, while widespread radiation poisoning will stress the system, all the dead people will lead to huge savings on healthcare.

Meanwhile, with Iran under control, ISIS still remains somewhat of a threat to the world.
In fact, right now ISIS’s attention seems to be directed toward Syrian Christians, 90 of whom they just kidnapped and will likely either decapitate or set ablaze, which, based on Barack Obama’s lackadaisical reaction to such atrocities, falls under the Hillary Clinton motto of “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

However, based on some of the dangers ISIS is broadcasting via Twitter, there do seem to be a few things the president can do to quell the problem, such as a kinder, gentler application of outreach and social justice.

At the recent “Solution to Violent Extremism” summit, Obama pointed out that he’s of the opinion that terrorists have genuine complaints and believes “legitimate grievances” can be addressed by communicating, engaging, mentoring, educating, partnering with, and supporting genocidal jihadists.

In an ironic twist, ISIS actually validated Obama’s strategy, indicating that remediation of the reprobate does have some credibility.

Take for instance ISIS’s recent vow to conquer Rome and “throw homosexuals off of [the] leaning tower of PIZZA.” In some circles such a proclamation might be disturbing, but to Obama, threats are often just desperate cries for help that need to be responded to in thoughtful ways.

Clearly, ISIS confusing Pisa (or pizza) with Rome indicates the group has members who are geographically challenged. But with Obama in charge, ISIS could be marching in the right direction once and for all. Besides, who better than the president who traveled to 57 states – not counting Hawaii and Alaska – to inform the terrorist group that the Tower of Pisa is located in the city of Pisa, which is four hours from the city they are threatening to conquer and pillage?

Moreover, promising to throw gays off an ancient south-leaning building may require specific intervention that, in lieu of an appropriate jobs program, includes things like architectural diversity, how to grasp geographic whereabouts, sensitivity training, education, and healthy eating.

Another red flag is that ISIS has chosen a building that falls into the disabled/handicapped category, which indicates the group is exploiting a structure that has already suffered 822 years of being the butt of jokes. Insensitive cartoonists have mocked architect Bonanno Pisano for eons, saying that he either had one short leg or a crooked neck.

Either way, the bottom line is that if ISIS wants to grow in respectability, they can’t give preferential treatment to members of the exclusive LGBT community.

ISIS singling out gays and lesbians as recipients of special treatment could be interpreted as favoritism. Choosing only one group over other historically underrepresented groups of people lacks the type of fairness Barack Obama specializes in.

It’s unclear what ISIS is eating, but it’s a dead giveaway that by mistaking Pisa for pizza, ISIS has pizza on the brain. Thankfully, after addressing ISIS’s tactlessness, helping them to get their geographic bearings, and schooling them on how to be more inclusive, there’s still education and healthy living.

Threatening to throw homosexuals off the “leaning tower of PIZZA” is sort of like ISIS threatening to throw adulteresses off the 47th floor of the Waldorf Salad Hotel.

Still, there’s a good chance that Michelle Obama, maven of healthy school lunches and superintendent of America’s “culture of health”, could address the ISIS pizza issue and make respectful and culturally-sensitive food suggestions to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on how to steer his soldiers toward healthier choices.

Last but certainly not least is the misspelling of Pisa, which indicates that Abu Abdulla Britani, also known by his twitter handle @abu_britani2, who tweeted out:

tweet

…may very well be a hapless victim of educational inequality.

State Department spokesperson Marie Harf has already informed America that “we can’t kill our way” out of war against ISIS. That’s why free community college may be the answer to steering enthusiastic young men like Abu Britani away from career goals that include “conquering Rome and establishing the justice of shariah.”

And what better way to shore up our reputation with the terrorist state of Iran than to suggest giving ISIS combatants refugee status in America with the promise of free community college?

So there you have it. Barack Obama’s War on Terror includes a bomb for Tehran and some politically-correct suggestions on how to school ISIS on civility.

Share
Tags: , , , , ,

Obama’s MyPlate Solution to Violent Extremism

fsfdsdsdsOriginally posted at American Thinker

Liberals love logos. Liberal politicians who were formerly academics love visual-learning tools even more. After all, what’s better than a PowerPoint presentation that boils the complicated and serious down to a five- or six-point slide show incorporating progressive problem-solving propositions?

For instance, in 2010 Michelle Obama was aggressively haranguing the feds to change dietary guidelines. To help the incompetent masses choose foods that the first lady felt we should all be eating whether we like it or not, the USDA website introduced MyPlate, and for Spanish-speaking illegals currently on food stamps, MiPlato.

MyPlate was an elementary-looking multi-colored wheel-type logo that was divided into food groups.  The goal of the MyPlate initiative was to remind dimwitted Americans that Mama Obama knows best, and just like coloring within the lines with crayons is recommended, when it comes to food it is also recommended to stay within the boundaries of Michelle’s off-kilter wedges.

The MyPlate logo even included a fork, which may have been a friendly reminder that the government advises against eating with one’s hands.

Currently, MyPlate drives America’s public school lunch program and is the reason calorically-deprived children are tweeting photos of hideous and unpalatable government-approved lunches, accompanied by the sarcastic hashtag #thanksMichelleObama, at the rate of about 40 per minute.

Meanwhile, parents of the children complaining about the foul hot dog rolls are on their own, and based on their BMIs are not even close to adhering to MyPlate government guidelines. Unfortunately, just like those who oppose submitting to the notoriously “skimpy… moldy… mysterious” ObamaCare mandates, resistance is futile, which is why efforts to rein in the defiant are being kicked up a notch.

The feds are now advising, in a nice way of course, that Americans, for their own good, adopt a “plant-based diet.”

To ensure that advice takes root, government has gone from making friendly suggestions to officially “transforming our food system.” In other words, those responsible for the liberal “culture of death” are now promoting themselves as authorities on a “culture of health.”

According to the 571-page Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) report submitted to Health and Human Services (HHS), the keepers of ObamaCare, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the co-conspirators in the failed MyPlate initiative, “Government at local, state, and national levels, the health care system, schools, worksites, community organizations, businesses, and the food industry all have critical roles in developing creative and effective solutions.”

Judging from the dietary dissertation, a word to the wise: Keep within the confines of Michelle’s friendly food wedges, because the government has plans to mete out punishment for disobedience by taxing desserts and imposing trained obesity “interventionists” at worksites. In addition, there are plans to electronically monitor the length of time couch potatoes spend in front of the television, which is data bureaucrats undoubtedly plan to analyze when deciding whether to grant or deny medical treatment.

One might call the “plant-based” initiative community-organized food policing.

And while all this kindly government-logo-embellished, food-counseling central control is disturbing enough, an even more alarming state of affairs concerning violent extremism employs a similar kind of nonsense to deal with the problem of terrorism.

While ISIS/ISIL marauds its way toward Europe, chopping off heads, immolating caged men, and raping and selling little girls into slavery, in Washington DC the White House feverishly worked on the problem by hosting a summit to counter violent extremism in America.

Curiously, Obama’s solutions do not include tracking terrorists who harbor “legitimate grievances” with the same intensity as it does hunting down sugar and salt-eating sofa spuds, nor does it suggest dispatching workplace “interventionists” to monitor and apprehend those plotting to blow up shopping malls and elementary schools.

Utilizing a similar government template to the one that has repeatedly failed, Barack Obama and the U.S. State Department must be hoping to eradicate violent extremism without offending actual violent extremists. So dedicated are they to that end, and to rooting out Bible-toting “bitter clingers,” the political-correctness-obsessed White House called in a Muslim imam to open the summit with a prayer directed at finding and rehabilitating every terrorist — except the Islamic kind.

Then the community organizer and the U.S. State Department came up with an expressive #CVESummit optic that at first glance resembles the crown of thorns worn by the God worshipped by menacing right-wing Christian conservative types.

However, for the average godless American the simplistic logo bears a resemblance to the familiar healthy-eating Michelle Obama MyPlate which, in circular format, recommends incorporating fruits, grains, protein, vegetables, and dairy into one’s diet.

The violent extremist emblem seems to imply that concern, compassion, and warm hugs result in fewer severed heads.

The problem is that while the proposed violent extremism resolution presented a buffet of friendly ideas, for some reason conference participants, including the president, chose to omit language that identified the truly imminent danger – genocidal Islamic fanatics.

Instead, on the community level, it proposed disarming the Obama and DHS-perceived domestic right-wing extremist threat via communicating, engaging, mentoring, educating, partnering with, and, above all, affectionately supporting jihadi wannabes.

Much like equal portions of protein and carbs, the Obama ‘Solution to Violent Extremism’ circle of love incorporates coffee klatching; sitting on a park bench chatting; expressing ‘I-♥-terrorists’ sentiments; sharing one of those moldy Michelle Obama school lunches; emailing, or better yet, “partnering” with violent extremists, the latter of which might require Sandra Fluke-type government funding for the appropriate supplies.

As it turns out, just like everything central control touches, this newest logo-driven, feel-good endeavor is another pathetic foretelling of what will eventually be for the American people a disaster far worse than the government’s failed foray into healthy school lunches.

Regrettably, rather than further the Obama-food-police-espoused “culture of health,” Government Central has now refocused on yet another frivolous effort. This time though, with redesigned logos and more kitschy slogans, instead of confronting the lethal threat of Islamic terrorism, once again, Barack Obama is aiding and abetting the growing “culture of death.”

Share
Tags: , , , ,

ISIS — ‘If It Doesn’t Fit, You Must Acquit’

SimpsonOriginally posted at American Thinker

Barack Obama steadfastly refuses to identify radical Islam as the driving force behind the mayhem massacring its way through the Middle East and nearing Europe with an eye toward America. With shovels in hand, blades sharpened, and petrol cans filled to the brim, it feels as if the enemies of all that is good and holy have been given an unspoken approbation to accomplish their malevolent ends.

The most disturbing thing about that scenario is that approval to do so has been subtly granted by a malicious president whose lack of outspoken condemnation can only be interpreted as unspoken commendation.

The only way to describe how infuriating and confusing the current state of affairs is in America is to imagine how it would feel to be in a courtroom with a serial killer who murdered someone you love. Then imagine hearing the judge, without explanation, slam down the gavel, drop all the charges, and allow the killer to go free. After hearing the judge’s verdict, then imagine the psychopath turning, locking eyes with you, winking, and giving the stunned courtroom an evil grin.

Although a harsh comparison, it’s not so far-fetched when discussing the lack of castigation Barack Obama has expressed for serial killers such as Kermit Gosnell, the late-term abortion doctor who snipped the spinal cords of full-term, born-alive babies in his Philadelphia clinic.

In Obama’s world, beheading whimpering babies’ in the name of choice is apparently an acceptable activity.

On the international level, the president, no fan of Israel, has also refused to condemn Palestinian terrorists who threw a Molotov cocktail at a car full of Israelis merely because they were Jewish. Sitting in a seat of self-exalted judgment, Obama is also perversely tepid in his criticism of Iran, a nation that has made it clear that once secret negotiations with the White House are complete and they have the bomb they’ve been dreaming of, they will immediately commence attempting to wipe the Jewish nation off the face of the earth.

If one observes closely, Obama’s opinion is made evident not only in what he says, but in what he doesn’t say.

Already proving that if he can sully the reputations of political enemies, law enforcement officials, crusading right-wing extremist “bitter clinger” Christians, or land-grabbing Israeli Jews, Obama is more than willing to have his gavel come down on the side of the guilty.

Yet if the opportunity arises to condemn the alleged killer of innocent Muslims or to presume innocence based solely on race or ethnicity, Obama can be counted on to seize it.

Meanwhile, 21 Coptic Christians were martyred on a Libyan beach and Barack Hussein took almost four days, $2.5 million, and a completed golf trip to acknowledge that the blood that seeped into the sand and sea flowed from the headless bodies of ‘People of the Cross.’

As for the Jews killed in a Paris market, Obama referred to them as a “bunch of folks in a deli in Paris… randomly” shot to death by “a bunch of violent vicious zealots.”

For most, it’s disheartening that the President of the United States reduces murdered Jews to “a bunch of folks in a deli” and turns their executioners, shouting “Allahu Akbar,” into “a bunch of violent vicious zealots.”

Therefore, irate would be a mild term to describe the indignation many Americans feel as injustices are meted out over and over again by a president whose philosophical leaning seems to be to exonerate the guilty at the expense of the innocent.

And as inexplicable an attitude as that might be to some, while referring to another famous murder trial in a 2008 interview on ABC Barack Obama gave a glimpse into the reason he refuses to condemn the likes of genocidal jihadists and instead chooses to disparage our ally Israel and write friendly letters to the Ayatollah of Iran.

On ABC’s “Nightline”, then-candidate Obama spoke to Terry Moran about race relations and said this:

You remember when, during the O.J. trial… black and white culture just had these completely opposite reactions and nobody understood it. I’m somebody who was pretty clear that O.J. was guilty.

So the president thought it was “pretty clear that O.J. was guilty.”

But then Obama admitted:

And I was ashamed for my own community to respond in that way, but I also understood what was taking place, which was that reaction had more to do with a sense that somehow the criminal justice system historically had been biased so profoundly that a defeat of that justice system was somehow a victory.

How’s that for insight into why President Obama, in the name of fair-mindedness, has habitually been on the side of unfairness for the last six years?

The president seemed to say that although shameful, the black community’s reaction to the O.J. verdict was justified and his acquittal was some kind of recompense for a justice system that has been “historically biased.” So according to Barack Obama’s twisted sense of social justice, a butcher who nearly beheaded two people successfully beating the justice system and getting away with murder is a victory against profound historical bias.

So when Barack Obama writes in an op-ed regarding the White House Summit on Violent Extremism that terrorists whose religion he refuses to name have “legitimate grievances” against those he views as oppressors, his shameful non-reaction to beheading, shooting, burning, and threatening to unleash a nuclear bomb on Israel starts to make sense.

It also explains why, just like irrelevant shrunken gloves took center stage at the O.J. trial, while Islamic terrorists burn 45 Kurds alive in cages, domestic terrorists and homegrown violent extremists are being talked about at yet another useless White House “summit.”

Clearly, what’s at work here is that, in Barack Obama’s mind, Judaism and Christendom, in all their white and oftentimes European glory, have always been biased against Islam.  Therefore, regardless of how much barbarism and blood is required to defeat those powerful institutions, with a wink and an evil grin an arrogant Barack Obama believes that ISIS, like O.J., merits a belated victory.

 

Share
Tags: , , , , , ,

OBAMA’S, HARF’S ISIS SOLUTION: A Jobs Program?

194123_5_Originally posted at Clash Daily

Just when Americans thought it couldn’t get any more absurd, Marie Harf of the US State Department, the girl with the over-sized eyeglasses who plays tag-team with Jen Psaki, the redhead who often looks like a deer caught in the headlights, proved the sane and logical wrong.

Chatting with Chris Matthews, Marie enlightened the MSNBC host/Obama shill as to the “root causes” of boorish ISIS warriors beheading, burying alive, and burning their way toward Europe and the US via the Middle East.

Marie informed a rapt Chris that the Obama administration disagrees with the rational opinion that barbarians are best snuffed out. Intermittently adjusting her spectacles, Harf informed the cable news host that “We cannot win this war by killing [ISIS].”

Based on that statement, one can’t help but wonder whether Marie and her boss Barry lament the US winning the Second World War by A-bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

So does this mean that godless evolutionists no longer believe in survival of the fittest?

Or maybe “Kill or be killed” no longer applies to situations where murderous wolves are planning to rip out the jugular of any human being who identifies with the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob or calls him/herself a “Person of the Cross”.

According to Harf, “We cannot kill our way out of this war,” because like the late Michael Brown, Ismaayil Brinsley, and even Trayvon Martin have proven, unjust “root causes” outside the control of the oppressed can lead certain individuals to act like barbarians.

The “Root causes” theory must be what drives Obama to silently approve of the pillaging and mayhem that follow the killing of a police officer or why, in the case of ISIS, liberals absolutely refuse to condemn their horrific mass murders.

Based on Marie Harf’s comments on Hardball, Obama and Co. must have attended a colloquium to discuss the ISIS problem and determined at an academic-like roundtable discussion that the primary root cause for the orgy of genocidal jihad occurring in Iraq and Syria is lack of opportunity and jobs.

So wait – ISIS saws off heads, burns and buries people alive, and Marie Harf of the US State Department suggests a change of heart would occur if radical Islamists, intent on ushering in the 12th imam, were enrolled in a jobs program?

That’s when Chris got a tingle up his leg – but not the kind he got from Obama – and rightly pointed out: “If I were ISIS, I wouldn’t be afraid right now… They can keep finding places where they can hold executions … And nothing we do right now seems to be directed at stopping this.”

Then Chris asked the lovely and always vivacious Marie, “Are we killing enough of them?”

Sounding very much like Neville Chamberlain, whose mantra was “We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will,” Marie replied, “We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that lead people to join these groups, whether it’s lack of opportunity for jobs, whether […]”

In a brief moment of lucidity, Matthews shot back:

We’re not going to be able to stop that in our lifetime or fifty lifetimes. There’s always going to be poor people. There’s always going to be poor Muslims, and as long as there are poor Muslims, the trumpet’s blowing and they’ll join. We can’t stop that, can we?

Apparently, according to Marie, yes, yes we can!

Ms. Harf told Chris that, while the people of the cross’s blood spills into the sand and the sea, the Obama administration, which has weakened the American economy and decimated the US job market, has plans to “work with countries around the world to help improve their governance…[and]… help them build their economies so they can have job opportunities for these people [.]”

So here we are, folks. European Jews are being threatened, spat upon, and beckoned by Bibi Netanyahu to run for their lives into the Ark called Israel while Christians are being decapitated in broad daylight while calling upon the name of Jesus. Meanwhile, a blonde bimbo Obama administration spokes-babe suggests that enrolling ISIS in a jobs program is the answer to genocidal jihad.

If that’s the case, maybe the president should first offer ISIS sanctuary in a Muslim-friendly nation called America. In fact, with the promise of immediate amnesty, he can round up ISIS and airlift them on US cargo planes. Obama can quell their fears by giving the devout refugees a toll-free number to report anyone subjecting them to religious bigotry or threatening the men in the black Ninja outfits with deportation.

Then the president can suggest hiring career-minded ISIS trainees for occupations such as butchersbakers, and gravediggers. Better yet, how about giving the ISIS imports a “shovel ready” job at the IRS tracking down uncooperative, opinionated conservatives and then granting the new hires permission to deal with the insubordinates in any way they see fit?

If those efforts fail to quench the new ISIS immigrants’ thirst for blood, to soothe the savage beasts there are always food stamps, free health care, and a seat of honor next to Al Sharpton at Obama’s next State of the Union address.

Share
Tags: , , , ,

Venezuela’s Government-Run Healthcare Morgue

Morgue_(1)Originally posted at American Thinker

The best way to scare wayward teens straight is to take them to prisons, morgues, and the scenes of fatal car crashes. The idea is to show out-of-control kids the end result of their stupidity, be it with their involvement in what the CDC calls the “national epidemic” of drug addiction, or a propensity toward a life of crime, alcohol abuse, or even promiscuous sex.

With that in mind, one can’t help but wonder whether it’s too late for America to be “Scared Straight,” because from the look of things, in the area of healthcare reform, our nation may be beyond help.

Let’s remember –- before ObamaCare was signed into law the warnings were many, most of which were ignored.  Since then, Obama has watched beheadings and immolations with the cold distance of a seasoned executioner, all the while attempting to convince Americans that their health and well-being is his top priority.

Sarah Palin warned of death panels and was mercilessly mocked, only to be vindicated when it was found out that American veterans were already dying on waiting lists, in government-run and funded VA hospitals. Now as the Affordable Care Act, which is ending up to be not so affordable, kicks in, the federal government is discussing reimbursing Medicare for “end of life discussions” that encourage the elderly and the infirm to reject costly treatment and sign on for glamorized pill-iative, I mean palliative care.

In addition, Johnson & Johnson, which has been involved in the implementation of ObamaCare from the start and has opined endlessly about controlling healthcare costs, has started an ambitious project to predict who will get a disease. Being peddled as a preventative/curative effort, the more realistic among us can only wonder whether the results of this venture will help the government determine who ultimately receives lifesaving care and who not to waste the money on.

The results of those endeavors remain to be seen, as well as whether the elderly mothers of future Jane Sturms, who Obama implied were a “waste” despite their “joy of living,” will be denied pacemakers based on their age.

Meanwhile, if there is still time to jolt America awake with more day-to-day concerns, maybe taking a look at the socialized healthcare issues of Venezuela will be our nation’s version of a scared-straight visit to the federally-run healthcare morgue.

The late Hugo Chávez, proponent of socialized everything, once said something similar to what Obama’s actions tacitly lend credibility to, which is that “healthcare is a human right.”  Chávez said:

Privatization is a neoliberal and imperialist plan. Health can’t be privatized because it is a fundamental human right, nor can education, water, electricity and other public services. They can’t be surrendered to private capital that denies the people from their rights.

And so, the Venezuelan government controls water and electricity. Despite all that government oversight, regrettably, the people of Venezuela often find themselves in the dark because according to César Batiz in an article in the Americas Quarterly, since the nation nationalized the electrical grid, the “government has failed to build enough new power plants and to maintain existing ones.”

Although America is approximately 1,500 miles away from Venezuela, that sounds similar to how the hospital and doctor shortage is shaping up since ObamaCare became law.

As for public health services, Venezuela has high instances of Dengue fever, especially in areas that lack the potable water and trash collection. Although Chávez said that water is a human right and that the water supply is best overseen by the régime, there are water shortages and rationing.

And just as all these other human rights have turned out in Venezuela, so too is the non-privatized fundamental human right of government-provided healthcare ending up to be a forecast of what America can expect when Obama’s fundamental transformation of the U.S. healthcare system is complete.

Currently, Venezuela is suffering from a drug shortage so dire that the shelves in the pharmacies and the hospitals are completely bare.

So perhaps Americans, who get antsy if they have to wait more than 10 minutes for Amoxicillin for a kid’s earache, should consider an ObamaCare scared-straight fieldtrip to a Caracas pharmacy, where there is no Vitamin C, no folic acid, and no acetaminophen. Meanwhile, thanks to superior government-provided public health services, 35,000 Venezuelans infected with mosquito-transmitted viruses like Chikungunya have no Tylenol to treat severe joint pain.

So much for government-enforced human rights.

According to an article by Sergio Held titled “Tweeting for Treatment in Venezuela”, the country is also “facing a critical shortage of basic medical supplies.” Adding insult to injury, pharmacists must keep their stores open eight hours a day even though the shelves are bare, because if they close the benevolent human rights-oriented Venezuelan government suspends their license.

Not only are very sick people being denied essential medicines to survive, the Venezuelan healthcare infrastructure is collapsing because of money the government owes drug companies and other healthcare providers. While Hugo the Late considered privatization of healthcare to be denying basic human rights, 15% of Venezuela’s cancer patients are dying for lack of radiotherapy treatment and breast cancer victims are waiting to have tumors removed at a large Venezuelan medical facility, which on a smaller scale can certainly be likened to America’s VA waiting list where U.S. veterans died from lack of treatment.

And so, much like a group of at-risk juvenile delinquents who think jail is no big deal find out with a trip to a penitentiary that they’re wrong, maybe it’s time for Americans to take a good hard look at Venezuela and be scared straight into doing something about Obamacare before it’s too late.

Share
Tags: , , ,

GRAMMY AWARDS 2015: Grannies, Gays and God’s Grace

beyonce_perfOriginally posted at CLASH Daily

If you’re a hedonist, this year’s Grammy Award show rocked! For starters, last year Madonna, dressed like a cowboy, officiated a gay wedding; she showed up this year wearing a Granny-ass hammock and not much else.

An aging Angus Young in his traditional schoolboy outfit helped open the worship service with AC/DC’s very fitting “Highway to Hell” anthem. Then, not to be outdone, Hozier and an embarrassingly enthusiastic Annie Lenox, before segueing into “I Put a Spell on You,” sang the disturbing ode to gay sex, “Take Me to Church.”

When the Sovereign Queen Beyoncé won a Grammy for her song “Drunk in Love”, which features the lyrics “I’ve been drinking, get filthy when that liquor get into me,” and “Last thing I remember is our beautiful bodies grinding up in the club,” she thanked God in her acceptance speech.

Sam “Stay With Me” Smith, the openly gay Brit and Boy George of 2015, ruled the night, winning four Grammys. Accepting the record of the year trophy, Sam said “I want to thank the man who this record is about, who I fell in love with last year. Thank you so much for breaking my heart because you got me four Grammys.” Then he sang with Mary K. Blige.

Don’t get me wrong, there were some not-too-objectionable things going on, such as Kanye and Kim dressed in Jean Paul Gaultier on the red carpet, discussing West’s Yeezy Boost sneakers. Kanye promised that, at $300 a pop, the footwear would address classism.

L.L. Cool J hosted, and there was the high-spirited exhibitionist Taylor Swift dancing with such obnoxious abandon it’s easy to understand why the girl has trouble getting a date.

John Legend and his irritating wife model Chrissy Teigen, who admitted on the red carpet that they once had sex at an Obama event, were mouthing the lyrics to songs they clearly didn’t know.

Gwen Stefani and Adam Levine did an elegant duet, and the always “Happy” Mr. Pharrell Williams and his canary yellow sneakers livened up the show.

The singer-songwriter, rapper, record producer, and fashion designer seems like a nice enough guy. But when did Pharrell, who seems happily unaware that, thanks to Barack Obama, most of America is unhappy, trade his signature Royal Canadian Mounties hat for shorts?

Speaking of #‎ItsonBarackObama, he appeared via video to give a public service message to America about rape and domestic abuse with his #‎Itsonus‬ campaign. Barack’s the guy who’s fine with women being genitally mutilated, married off at nine years-old, beheaded, shot, burned, stoned, and above all aborted – just don’t hit ’em! Not to mention his being unperturbed about the looming prospect of Iran acquiring a nuke and blowing the state of Israel off the map.

Dressed in white, pastor’s daughter Katy Perry backed her hero up. Katy, the girl who was wearing devil’s horns and flashing the satanic salute during AC/DC’s performance, sang “By the Grace of God,” a ballad supposedly about domestic violence.

And all this took place as the violent, misogynist ode to sadomasochistic sex, “50 Shades of Grey,” is about to hit the big screen. The movie’s soundtrack includes songs by Beyoncé, Annie Lennox, and Sia in a ginormous white wig, all of whom were featured at the same Grammy Awards show that spent an inordinate amount of energy denouncing violence against women.

Disregarding old men being abused by young women, Jessie J, dressed in a see-thru black fishing net, sang “You’ve Lost that Lovin’ Feeling” to Tom ‘Cialis’ Jones, and Lady Gaga, who left her meat dress home, sang standards while rubbing her ample décolletage on a delighted 88 year-old Tony Bennett.

Other Grammy 2015 highlights included Sir Paul McCartney looking out of place, strumming his guitar with no mic and watching as Kanye adjusted his droopy drawers, and Rihanna, sans a Chris Brown-administered black eye, bounced around the stage singing “FourFiveSeconds.”

Stevie Wonder got a standing ovation he had no clue he was receiving, and an aging Prince, dressed in an orange-is-the-new-black jumpsuit, made a curious reference to the late Michael Brown of Ferguson, Missouri fame, saying, “Albums still matter. Like books and black lives, albums still matter.”

Clearly, Prince didn’t think through his wardrobe choice. Either that or he was unaware that if Michael had managed to steal Darren Wilson’s gun and shoot the police officer, a similar outfit is what Mr. Brown would be wearing in jail.

The show included lots of hoodies and ignorant “hands up” protest references, but not one mention of the two NYPD officers blown away in their police cruiser by Ismaayil Brinsley.

At one point, Madonna was introduced by that sweaty “badass…bitch’” Miley Cyrus and her cohort Nicki ‘Bloated Butt’ Minaj. Thankfully, “All About That Bass” Madge donned some much-needed shorts.

The decrepit diva attempted to relive the 1980s with a horde of horned men and did an embarrassingly clumsy number that looked more like she was auditioning for a Tena pad commercial than performing on the Grammys.

An out-of-place looking Beck, who beat Beyoncé by winning album of the year, was publicly dissed by Kanye and sang with Gwyneth Paltrow’s ex-husband Chris Martin.

Gwyneth, who refuses to be upstaged, dragged her girly parts away from her steam-cleaning machine long enough to introduce her “beautiful friend” Beyoncé, who went from being “drunk in love” to singing the sober Gospel song “Take My Hand Precious Lord.”

Beyoncé took to the stage in all her majestic glory to prove to the world that she, not Ledisi, should have played Mahalia Jackson in the movie Selma.

Wrapping up, country superstar Miranda Lambert cursed and was censored while singing “Little Red Wagon,” Nicole Kidman still can’t move her face, and the 2014 dead people slide show touched many hearts. But more importantly, for degenerates, gay rights activists, Obama fanatics, and cop-killer sympathizers, as always, this year’s Grammy Awards show really delivered.

Share
Tags: , , , , ,

IGNORAMUS MICHAEL MOORE: Tweeting More Foolishness

Michael-MooreOriginally posted at Clash Daily

A few days after the CDC admitted that the “overseas” imported measles epidemic that is creeping across America with the same determination as Enterovirus D-68, which killed 15 and paralyzed and sickened hundreds, like grease rising to the top of chicken soup America-hating Michael Moore has reared his obnoxious head again. This time it’s not to slam American heroes; it’s to give travel advice to illegal aliens hoping to sneak across the border unimpeded into Arizona.

After watching a colorful Katy Perry, dressed like a flame-thrower riding a red-eyed tiger that looked like a demonic Transformer, sing “I Kissed a Girl” to a confused Lenny Kravitz, having what appeared to be fireworks shoot out her butt, and riding a shooting star rivaled only by Gwyneth Paltrow’s genital steam-cleaning apparatus, Michael, aka Jabba the Hutt, seized the opportunity to criticize border patrol agents and endorse illegal immigration.

Here’s what the bloated buffoon said this time:
michael-more1-770x339

So apparently in @MMFlint’s opinion, border patrol agents are “vigilantes” that “harass” innocent illegals who, if they could only be flown directly into Arizona, could bypass the whole ordeal.

First Michael Moore took to Twitter and accused military snipers of being cowardly murderers on a joy ride, implying that a Navy SEAL’s idea of good time is to shoot innocent people in the back. Then he accused Clint “Make My Day” Eastwood of threatening to kill his sorry ass.

Now, sitting somewhere in one of his nine homes, praising Marxism and thinking up incendiary things to say, Michael, who clearly despises America and the military, makes the snide suggestion that Third-World types should skip sneaking into Arizona and instead bypass border security by being airlifted.

As outrageous as Michael’s idea may sound, while that other illegal-loving liberal, Barack Obama, is in charge, flying in illegal aliens is a maneuver that is not out of the range of possibility.

Barack is of the same mindset and has already proposed giving refugee status to certain groups.

Obama’s genius idea is that, rather than have criminal interlopers endure the dangerous trek across the border trying to avoid the coyotes and the human smugglers, why not send cargo planes to pick up what he calls “refugees?”

Using refugee status as a cover would ensure that individuals with MDR-TB, Enterovirus D-68, measles, scabies and other Third World goodies to spread around, as well as culturally diverse MS-13 gang members, drug addicts, child molesters, rapists, and an occasional Islamic terrorist thrown into the mix can be dropped off all across America.

So, as far as liberal insanity goes, Michael the Hutt is on the same page as the president, who wants to seed American neighborhoods and classrooms with every possible type of disease and danger he can dredge up and dump off.

So with that in mind, not that Katy Perry’s steam-powered, Gwyneth Paltrow-inspired flying machine could lift that large lump of lard, but if it could, maybe it could pick up Michael Moore by the seat of his stained boxer shorts and fly him directly to Cuba and drop him off.

And maybe, while the Super Bowl half-time flying machine is at it, how about doing America a solid and making a double-duty stop at the White House to pick up another pusillanimous passenger for the trip?

Share
Tags: , , , ,

Dr. Obama’s orders: Get the measles vaccine

Dr-ObamaOriginally posted at American Thinker

Employing a time-tested Cloward-Piven tactic, President Obama has created another crisis and, right on schedule, has also come up with a brilliant solution.

In an interview with NBC’s Savannah Guthrie where the president bragged about turning the White House into a distillery, shared his opinion on deflated balls, and advised against cheating, “If you break the rules, then you break the rules” (as if he should talk), Dr. Obama advised parents to “get your kids vaccinated.”

This is a man who, expressly for the purpose of philosophical and political expediency, has deliberately placed the children of America in danger by exposing them to diseases long eradicated from our midst.  In Obama’s sick, twisted world, and in an effort to foster fairness, he has knowingly allowed illegals into this country who are infected with illnesses that have put everyone, but most especially vulnerable children, trapped in classrooms or visiting theme parks like Disneyland, at great risk.

Here parents take their children on a long-anticipated vacation, and instead of coming home with just a memento from Space Mountain, they come home with a raging case of red measles.  Or, worse yet, you send your kids off to school, and they step off the school bus with a respiratory virus like Enterovirus D-68, which has killed 15 Americans, most of whom were children.

And who’s responsible?  Unfortunately, it’s the person now advising us on how to prevent contracting the illnesses he’s at fault for exposing us to.

Here’s what the expert on everything who really knows nothing had to say to a gushing Guthrie on the subject of vaccines:

I understand that there are families that in some cases are concerned about the effect of vaccinations. The science is, you know, pretty indisputable. We’ve looked at this again and again. There is every reason to get vaccinated, but there aren’t reasons to not.

Right about now, the bigger concern is what other dangerous policy or self-serving maneuver the guy giving the medical counsel has up his sleeve.

Not only that, but having a climate-change fearmonger who denies that the Taliban are terrorists lecture us about the indisputable findings of anything, let alone vaccines, is laughable.  Moreover, who is the “we’ve” Obama is referring to as having “looked at this again and again”?  Himself and Valerie Jarrett?

On the subject of measles and vaccines, Obama finished up by advising:

You should get your kids vaccinated. It’s good for them, but we should be able to get back to the point where measles effectively is not existing in this country.

“Is not existing in this country”?  Somebody, please, plug in the Teleprompter.

So, according to Obama, get your kids vaccinated, because the person exposing them to deadly viruses insists that “it’s good for them,” which is kind of like Bill Clinton, a visitor to Jeffrey Epstein’s “Underage Sex Island,” advising parents on how to protect their children from sexual predators.

How infuriating is it that the president has set the eradication of measles back 14 years by knowingly reintroducing a virus that hasn’t really been on the CDC radar since the year 2000?  Then, to make matters worse, he places the onus back on Americans to take the responsibility for getting the nation “back to the point where,” as Obama eloquently notes, “measles effectively is not existing in this country.”

Share
Tags: , , , , ,