Hillary the ‘Organ Grinder’ Grinds Up the Big Apple

posted at American Thinker

After the Washington Post published a political cartoon featuring Ted Cruz and his daughters Caroline, 7, and Catherine, 4, Hillary, the organ grinder, took her “dancing monkey” family for a walk in the Big Apple.

Hillary pounded the pavement with Bill; pro-choice daughter Chelsea, toting a female zygote who, thus far, has successfully survived the first trimester; and cherubic granddaughter Charlotte, who also outlasted the womb and is now a little over a year old.

In addition to the obvious stars of the show, the group dragged along hedge fund/investment banker son-in-law Marc Mezvinsky.

Trying desperately not to call attention to herself, Hillary, while holding onto the baby stroller like a walker, promenaded about, wearing a brightly colored Kashmir Company embroidered jacket she bought in Afghanistan in 2003.  The colors on the jacket were so intricate that it actually stirred up images of the carpet fibers found on Clinton friend and associate Vince Foster’s corpse when his body was found dumped in Fort Marcy Park.

Referred to in the press as a “festive walk,” in addition to perusing a bookstore and eating ice cream, the ex-president and his presidential-hopeful wife, the former carpetbagger senator from the State of New York, smiled and waved to admirers.

Unlike 8 million sitting ducks who inhabit a city notorious for strict gun laws, the woman who called gun rights advocates “terrorists” was safely surrounded on all sides by heavily armed security on hand to protect the organ grinder and her quartet of monkeys from being shot at again by Bosnian snipers.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post published and retracted the holiday-themed caricature drawn by editorial cartoonist and Planned Parenthood Award winner Ann Telnaes.  Ann’s Christmas cartoon featured Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), dressed like Santa, as an organ grinder, and his two daughters dressed as dancing monkeys.

Prior to the Washington Post pulling the cartoon, Telnaes justified mocking Ted Cruz’s small daughters in the following way:

But when a politician uses his children as political props, as Ted Cruz recently did in his Christmas parody video in which his eldest daughter read (with her father’s dramatic flourish) a passage of an edited Christmas classic, then I figure they are fair game.

The Cruz ad referenced hot-button issues like failed Obamacare, Lois Lerner, and the IRS scandal, as well as a missing server belonging to a certain grandma prancing around New York with a pretentious smile on her face.

That’s why; the liberal syndicated cartoonist was probably motivated more out of anger about the message in the spot-on parody than by the two little girls reading funny political Christmas stories with their dad.

Anyway, if the subject matter is really what the satirist is looking for, instead of drawing pictures of the children of Hispanic politicians as the dancing monkeys of a Mexican organ grinder, how about a cartoon depicting an ISIS sympathizer/San Bernardino jihadi bride named Tashfeen Malik?

Remember Tashfeen?  She’s the K-1 fiancée visa chick who slipped by DHS.  Then, prior to her and her husband blowing away 14 people at a Christmas buffet, much like a desperate politician using a granddaughter to impress the Baby Boomer set, Tashfeen hid her radicalism from her neighbors by carrying her six-month-old daughter around.

Then again, maybe the woman who calls herself a “pushy Pulitzer prize winning editorial cartoonist” is only looking to portray the family as props and children that like to mimic Mom and Dad.  If that’s the case, then Chelsea, Bill, Marc, little Charlotte, and the “clump of cells” due to be born this summer, if all goes well, are “fair game.”

For starters, Ann should definitely take note of Mrs. Mezvinsky.

This is a lady who is an expert at imitating her mother.

Take, for instance, Chelsea, like Hillary, pretending to see a long lost friend in every gathering.  Not only that, but before impersonating Mom’s fake smile, and pointing excitedly to a person in the crowd who doesn’t exist, Chelsea always claps along to the song that Hillary struts around in time to.

Granted, unlike Caroline Cruz’s father, Hillary Clinton does not speak with the “dramatic flourish” that is signature Ted.  However, Mrs. Clinton does speak with a delayed didactic tone that Chelsea seems to have picked up on and employed while doing things like getting paid $600,000 a year to work as a fake entry-level “special correspondent” at NBC.

Ann did creatively dress Cruz up in a Santa outfit.  So why not do a whole series on the grandma in the Afghani coat of many colors under which, if she wanted to, Hillary could hide her Benghazi incompetence, her squeaky-clean server, and all those missing emails?

Then there’s Bill; he’s the grandpa who, when not on Orgy Island with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, or in Chappaqua with the alleged “Energizer Bunny,” protectively steers his granddaughter’s stroller and pretends to enjoy wandering around Manhattan with the woman to whom he is unfaithful.

Ann could also sketch a caricature of straggler-in-law Marc, who, along with Bill, took his rightful place following behind the world’s most famous female organ grinder who, if she stands by her philosophy, should encourage her daughter to hand over baby Charlotte and her baby sister to be raised by the “village.”

With that in mind, Ann Telnaes should be all over the flimflam Clinton family tour, which made the Cruz Christmas ad seem like cold, hard authenticity.

But if none of those ideas ring true, surely Ann Telnaes can come up with at least one cartoon featuring Hillary grinding the organ, while Bill the organ grinder dances on a leash.

Either way, when the cigar smoke clears, imperious Hillary, wearing sunglasses, wrapped in a multi-colored Mao-collared coat, dragging political props on a stage-managed march through Manhattan provided more subject matter for a political cartoon than two sweet little girls ever could.

Does being ‘Schlonged’ make Hillary a ‘Bimbo Eruption?’

CXg_SMOUsAABatLOriginally posted at American Thinker

Everyone knows that presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has been married for 40 years to former president Bill Clinton. And although Bill and Hill are motivated by very different goals, the couple is a lot alike in their single-minded commitment to whatever it is they’re individually pursuing.

For one, Bill is legendary and thus far unrivaled for his reputation as a ravenous womanizing tomcat.  But as renowned as her hubby’s appetite for extramarital undertakings may be, he is matched, and maybe even surpassed, by Hillary’s voracious hunger for political power.

When it comes to the pursuit of that power, Hillary Clinton hunts down positions of authority with the same intensity that her horndog husband exhibits when chasing skirts. Of late, the mere thought of finally grasping the golden ring called the U.S. presidency has Hillary looking more excited than Bill did when he was photographed sandwiched between two brothel workers from the Bunny Ranch at a charity event.

Likewise Bill, whose reprobate behavior makes Charlie Sheen look like Fred Rogers, has been unwavering in his carnal pursuits. So, in other words, while hubby was carving notches on his belt, Hillary was gathering unto herself constituents who prefer estrogen to veracity.+

Clinton works hard to convince America that a pantsuit on a woman ensures the intestinal fortitude to go toe-to-toe with Vladimir Putin and a nuclear Iran.  Yet in an effort to divert attention from her own dysfunctional marriage, and despite being publicly humiliated for 40 years by her hubby, Hillary plays the victim by accusing political adversaries of what she prefers to overlook in her own husband.

For example, during her 2000 bid for the New York’s junior senatorial seat, Hillary’s debate opponent, Republican congressman Rick Lazio, supposedly invaded her space when he approached her podium and asked the former first lady to sign a campaign finance pledge. Hillary’s staff worked overtime to portray this move as virtual assault and battery.  Looking for any opportunity to turn Lazio’s advantage into a deficit, the Clinton campaign portrayed the New York legislator as a “menacing” bully who treats males different than females.

That Academy Award-worthy performance was as Machiavellian as her husband Bill’s, who, when not sharing family stories at Save the Childrenfundraisers, boards the Lolita Express and flies with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein to Orgy Island.

Moreover, and notwithstanding making light of Slick Willy being accused of everything from indecent exposure to rape at that time, after successfully convincing voters that a man asking for her signature at a political debate was sexist — Hillary won the election.

Those sorts of Clinton strategies are diabolical because Mrs. Clinton was, and is, well aware that Bill preys upon women, but rather than focus on her marriage, Hillary accuses other men of things she should acknowledge in her own husband.

But then again, the truth is that, especially when dealing with a “brazen genius” like Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump, Mrs. Clinton could use a pantsuit leg up.  That’s why being a perpetually-offended woman might be a powerful weapon in 2016.

In fact, a shrewd calculation may be the reason Hillary conveniently forgot to mention that her husband, based solely on his reputation as an adulterous fornicator, earned a starring role in an ISIS propaganda/recruitment video.  Instead, the woman who habitually gets her video stories confused insisted at the last Democratic debate that anti-Muslim videos starring Donald Trump were being used in the Middle East to recruit for ISIS.

After Trump found out that Hillary accused him of being a conscription tool for the Islamic state, the Republican presidential frontrunner quickly demanded that she issue an apology.  Instead of saying “what difference, at this point, does it make,” Mrs. Clinton decided that now was as good a time as any to conjure up a sexism distraction. And what better way for the wife of a notorious womanizer to change the subject than to fault another man for the very thing her misogynist hubby excels in?

So here’s what Hillary did.

On a bathroom break during the Democratic debate, Clinton lingered long enough in the ladies’ bathroom to make the news. True to form, stream-of-consciousness Trump said Hillary’s longer-than-usual time in the commode was too “disgusting” to talk about.  Clinton did not hesitate to seize the opportunity to spin Trump’s comment into an accusation of sexism.

Working it like a pro, the feminist icon’s camp argues that Trump’s comment about her in the bathroom, doing God knows what “with a cloth or something,” is what is “derogatory” and “disgusting.”  Meanwhile, Hillary is exempt from the standard Donald Trump is being held to, as both she and her supporters insist that her remark about Trump being ISIS’s biggest recruitment tool is neither one of those things.

Earth to the $2 billion Alzheimer’s advocate: Islam’s treatment of women is what’s “derogatory” and “disgusting.” Hence, if Donald Trump were the male chauvinist pig that the lady who couldn’t retrace her steps from the bathroom back to the debate podium says he is, ISIS would be commending Mr. Trump as a male hero, not using his face as a recruitment tool to rile up radical jihadis.

Nonetheless, it appears that going forward, Hillary Clinton will look to spin every comment into a sexism accusation.

So, with that in mind, after Trump pronounced that Hillary was “schlonged” by Obama in 2008, maybe Mrs. Clinton could explain at the next debate why she labeled the women her husband schlonged with the sexist title “bimbo eruptions.”

WE’RE DOOMED: Barack Obama Learns About His Belly-Button Lint from Bear Grylls

bear_3426448bOriginally posted on CLASH Daily

Recently, a friend recommended I tune into NBC’s “Running Wild with Bear Grylls”. Seems that instead of “running wild” in Washington DC, Barack Obama, on a climate change junket North, spent a carefully-scripted afternoon “running wild” (if you want to call it that) in Alaska’s Kenai Fiords National Park with extreme survivalist, Bear Grylls.

Bear’s welcoming demeanor gave Barack the opportunity to learn about using belly button lint to kindle a fire, and how to eat food cooked on a piece of slate.

Grateful to be included in the “running wild” episode, the president got so excited, he lost his head and admitted he lives in a “bubble,” which confirmed the general consensus that he’s out-of-touch.

Obama also confessed that he does not have, and cannot operate a Smartphone, after which he tried and failed to take a selfie.

With that in mind, maybe one of Obama’s advisors should inform the president that claiming to possess the power to slow the rising sea while being unable to operate a Smartphone, could tend to cause a person to lose credibility.

Anyhow, while he was in Alaska, Bear and Barack did talk about angry grizzlies. In fact, that segment is where Obama divulged that Michelle, who he said prefers nice sheets to being outdoors, looks scary look when she gets mad.

The male bonding included discussion about the dangers of disturbing fornicating bears, which may explain why Obama avoids tangling with Vladimir Putin. Then, before swigging out of a canteen, Obama actually chatted about the downside of drinking ones own urine.

After Bear brewed gas-suppressing catkin tea for the president, Obama informed the world that flatulence is not a problem he struggles with. What would have made for great TV is if Bear Grylls had thought to confirm or debunk the “snore-y…stinky” president’s gas assertion with Michelle, and then double-checked whatever Michelle told him with the pilot of Marine One.

Father of three, Bear Grylls asked the president about juggling the presidency and raising two young girls. Obama said that “living over the store” makes it easier for him to spend time with Sasha and Malia, and might explain why the Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu, was once left sitting alone in the White House meeting room while Dad rushed upstairs for dinner.

The usually politically correct president got so caught up in the moment, he blurted out that a “cracker” would have made the half-eaten wild salmon that Grylls said still “smelled of bear breath” more palatable.

The president rambled on a bit about the cold water from a melting glacier, extolled the merits of “persistence,” bragged about being “ripped,” and reminisced about growing up the Hawaiian-born son of a single mother.

Then, after rustling up some of Sasha’s favorite s’mores for Grylls, who seemed less than impressed with Obama’s culinary skills, nouveau survivalist, Obama crowed to Bear that he’s “skinny but tougher than [he] looks.”

In the end, Barry did seem to appreciate the experience of spending time in Seward, Alaska.

But for those of us who assign a mere man more credit than he deserves, watching the president awkwardly ramble about in the great outdoors, devoid of the trappings of power, and bereft of the podium he’s usually hiding behind, was eye-opening.

Lest we forget, it was “fundamental transformer” who made the world believe that he had the power to heal the planet, but based on his obsession with recruiting the world to address global warming, Obama proves the powers he publicized simply do not exist.

Barack Obama is mortal flesh like the rest of us, and he, like the rest of us, is as transitory as the tuft of silken bear hair that blew out of his hand after being held for a brief moment.

In fairness, Obama did bow his head as Grylls prayed a prayer at the end of the show. In the prayer, Bear Grylls asked the “Lord to … forgive us when we fall short and help us to be strong in You”, to which the president responded: “Amen.”

Still, seeing the president standing in the shadow of the Exit Glacier, which formed during the Little Ice Age, “fundamentally transformed”, at least in my mind, a man who regularly reeks of pompousness into somebody finite and frail.

The sight of God’s creation in Alaska made prominent the power of the One who spoke into being the planet, Obama, a withering blade of grass, believes he has the power save.

So, in addition to finding out that belly button lint makes an excellent kindling tool, watching Obama “run wild” with Bear Grylls reminded me that God and God alone is the one with the power – not Barack Obama.

Is it Time to ‘Refresh the Tree of Liberty?’

liberty-tree-tattooOriginally posted at American Thinker

Thomas Jefferson was aware that “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Now, by doling out what little is left of America’s wealth to foreign interlopers, those that fit into the tyrant category are shaking the tree of liberty with a decision that includes crediting back payments for time worked illegally in the U.S.

In other words, as part of Obama’s ‘fundamental transformation,’ America has transitioned from a nation who once threatened to fine employers for hiring illegals into a nation crediting illegals with back Social Security payments for work done illegally.

And if rewarding illegals isn’t outrageous enough, with the help of a Congress complicit in furthering the abuse of power, via a $1.1 trillion omnibus budget deal the president plans to further frustrate the efforts of blue-collar Americans desperate to find a job by awarding work visas to 3 million illegal employees.

Of late, these sorts of outrages are not the exception, but the rule. The travesty is that, while silently capitulating to unspeakable indignation, those who nurture the tree of liberty are being made to feel somehow obliged to assume a subservient position to those who either don’t belong in this country or who are heading here to inflict harm.

In hopes of directing the masses, Barack Obama subjects our nation to a litany of course-corrective sermons, where he who knows nothing about “American values” lectures endlessly about “American values.” Clearly, this ongoing effort is not to cultivate freedom, but rather to deconstruct the American view of the world in hopes of helping the stubborn to see America ‘not as it is, but as Obama and his ilk believe it should be.’

Take for instance the manipulative effort of those who demand restraint by citing the need to protect the lives of civilians in bombing raids targeted to exterminate ISIS. Has anyone thought to ask the #ShoutYourAbortion/baby-organ-market crowd how having empathy for the offspring of our enemy, many of whom will grow up to be deadly killers, equates to endorsing the unfettered slaughter of 4,000 American babies a day?

Meanwhile, as we await a terse retort from the proponents of tyranny about how fetuses aren’t human beings, the “do not,” “cannot,” and “not allowed to” list grows longer, not to mention the weight of oppression becoming heavier.

Moreover, if the current state of affairs is evaluated logically, the effort currently underway has to be to create a nation of people who dutifully accept unacceptable things like hordes of illegal felons wandering America’s streets and a Syrian-refugee crisis that threatens to negatively impact all our lives.

What other explanation could there be for citizens to stand by and watch five terrorists exchanged for one military deserter, or for Americans to stomach our children being exposed and infected with deadly Third World diseases? Why else would sane people yield to living side by side with nomadic nemeses who, when not collecting Social Security checks, spend time in the garage building pipe bombs?

Whatever the reason, there’s no denying that liberty’s tree is tilting toward docile capitulation to the overbearing imposition of a community organizer who has methodically reorganized America into a community of demoralized bondservants.

With that in mind, maybe it’s time for the electorate to be reminded that a budget has just been passed that metes out social justice in the form of funding for baby chop-shops, shores up ObamaCare, validates climate change chicanery, and places the wants and needs of illegal immigrants above the challenges facing stressed-out Americans.

Not only that but those we’ve entrusted with safeguarding this nation think so little of the citizenry that they’ve also sanctioned spending $1.6 billion to resettle ISIS-infiltrated refugees in our neighborhoods, which might mean that Americans could be facing a form of tyranny far worse than the Islamic state.

But despite all that, the powers of persuasion have still been able to do things like convincing many that, although a Pakistani jihadist who murdered 14 innocent Americans was improperly screened, the federal system is well-prepared to weed out refugees with falsified passports.

Therefore, what needs to take place in America requires more than acknowledging Congress’s betrayal of the public trust or speaking out against the president’s calculated effort to curtail our First and Second Amendment rights.

This isn’t about recognizing the absurdity of being asked to believe that our mortal enemies will become our friends if we treat them as if we’re walking on shards of glass. Nor is it a matter of rejecting Obama’s appeal to embrace the falsehoods that independence requires servitude, weakness is synonymous with peace, lies are factual, and that tolerating a government-arranged mass looting is how generosity is expressed.

Instead, it’s about the American people finally wresting from the clutches of oppression that which was purchased for us with the blood of patriots who recognized tyranny and then refreshed the tree of liberty accordingly.

Obama’s Christmas ‘Gift’ For America — It’s Coming Straight From Central America

After an irregular entry into Mexico near Ciudad Hidalgo, to move north through the country, to the US border, many Central and South American migrants begin their journey in Arriaga, Chiapas, Mexico, the railhead of the freight train known as 'La Bestia' (The Beast), climbing atop of the rail cars, exposed to the elements and extortion by criminal gangs lying in wait along the route. The number of adolescents who attempt the perilous journey on the 'Beast', many fleeing gang wars and violence in their home countries, has risen dramatically since around October of 2013. ACNUR adolescent aid alien Arriaga authority beast border boundary car caravan Chiapas citizen commerce convoy danger diaspora economy El Salvador emigrant employment exodus expatriate expatriation foreign foreigner freight globalization government Guatemala guide Honduras immigrant immigration improvement industry informal international Latin America line locomotion market Mexico migrant migrant emigration migration money movement national newcomer nonnative OIM opportunity outsider passenger photography policy poor poverty primitive public railroad relief relocation resettling seat settler teenager train transport tropical UN violence

Originally posted at CLASH Daily

In Ellis County, Texas, not to be confused with Ellis Island, New York, the U.S. Federal government is busy imposing on the residents 300 – 700 “unaccompanied minors” from Central America.

The mostly male newcomers, between the ages of 12- and 18- years old, are being housed in the Lakeview Camp and Conference Centers in Rockwall and Maypearl, Texas. Currently, both campsites are accepting tenants and are in the process of being transformed into “miniature cities” outfitted to accommodate the influx of unlawful sojourners.

It was during a conference call with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that officials like Judge Carol Bush first learned that the minors were headed to the Lone Star state. According to the judge, officials were told by the feds that a large number of “unaccompanied minors” from Central America were slated to be resettled in Ellis County for 21-days.

For those who worry about things like Latin America-imported Enterovirus D-68, which recently killed 12 American children, disease will not be a problem. Prior to being relocated, HHS took it upon themselves to vaccinate the hordes arriving from sunny Third World locations such as: El SalvadorGuatemalaHonduras, and Nicaragua.

The freshly inoculated youth will be shuttled from a border holding facility to a Texas Christmas holiday site where the newly arrived revelers will spend time partying on the taxpayer’s dime.

That’s right, while American veterans die on VA hospital waiting lists and huddle homeless and unemployed in the street, “unaccompanied minors” will be swimming in an indoor pool, playing soccer, enjoying arts and crafts, and by learning to speak English, preparing to flood the U.S. job market to do “jobs Americans would love to be doing.”

In fact, the menfolk even have a Dallas attorney named Domingo Garcia who is in the process of organizing a legal team to represent the future Democrat voters.

Garcia said his goal is to “Make sure their legal rights are protected, that they’re in a comfortable place, and even though they are separated from their families that they have a Christmas that teaches them what American values are like.”

When Mr. Garcia says “American values,” does he mean values such as respect for the borders of a sovereign nation? And since when do illegals have legal rights?

Maybe this attorney just means that, in his opinion, and the opinion of the Obama administration, America’s laws are fundamentally biased, worthy of being disregarded, and that those who break, oh, let’s say, immigration law deserve to be compensated with an all expense paid holiday in a resort-like facility complete with an indoor pool?

And if legality is no longer an American value, then when Garcia says “legal rights,” does he mean that illegals have a legal right to be comfortable after breaking into America?

Not only that, what’s also odd is that Garcia suggested illegals be allowed to commemorate a politically incorrect holiday like “Christmas.” Or could it be that cultural diversity exempts illegals from having to exclude “Christ” from a holiday that’s been largely secularized for regular American citizens?

Either way, culturally-Catholic/Central American-themed Christmas or not, the legal counsel for the illegal “unaccompanied minors” still worries that if the 12- 18-year-olds are eventually sent home, they will be “Subject to the predators, the gang members, the criminals that [may be] waiting for them.”

What Garcia did not mention was whether or not he’s also concerned about Texas residents living in the vicinity of the campground being endangered by prospective “predators, gang members, and criminals.”

Has Garcia even considered the possibility that along with 12-year-old Guillermo and his brother 17-year-old Juan an unaccompanied Cub of the Caliphate or two could have also strolled along side them all the way into Texas?

Furthermore, let’s be frank, it is highly unlikely that a federal government that couldn’t vet one ISIS-terrorist named Tashfeen Malik took the time to properly vet 300- 700 Central American campers.

The U.S. federal government failed to investigate a blushing bride who, after posting her affection for ISIS on social media, gained access into the U.S. on a K-1 visa. Then, after giving birth 6 months ago in an American hospital, that same Jihadi bride went on to slaughter 14 innocent people in San Bernardino, California.

And we’re supposed to believe the same government that sends checks to dead people and had difficulty tracing Hillary Clinton’s email server is going to carefully screen a thousand teenaged boys?

Therefore, in light of the government’s proven inability to screen newcomers adequately, and Garcia’s obvious naivety as to whom he might be representing in court, Texans who live in close proximity to the Central American Campground are uneasy – and rightly so.

Those who in live the vicinity, as well as responsible public officials, are apprehensive about the issues that can arise when 700 testosterone-infused/culturally challenged juvenile boys, deprived of parental oversight, are deposited into the heart of Texas.

Not to mention that the merrymakers are being lodged on the grounds of a campground that is largely unsecured.

Whatever ends up happening, and irrespective of who these teenagers are, what they have done in the past, or plan to do in the future, or who may have infiltrated their ranks – one thing is certain — Domingo Garcia can rest easy because DHS isn’t sending anyone back to Central America.

Quite the contrary, thousands more Central American campers, with a few ISIS stragglers likely mixed in, are being waved north. And if things go according to Barack Obama’s “fundamentally transformative” plan, multitudes more should arrive in Texas in time to spend Christmas bathing in an indoor pool.

In Ellis County, Texas, not to be confused with Ellis Island, New York, the U.S. Federal government is busy imposing on the residents 300 – 700 “unaccompanied minors” from Central America.

The mostly male newcomers, between the ages of 12- and 18- years old, are being housed in the Lakeview Camp and Conference Centers in Rockwall and Maypearl, Texas. Currently, both campsites are accepting tenants and are in the process of being transformed into “miniature cities” outfitted to accommodate the influx of unlawful sojourners.

It was during a conference call with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that officials like Judge Carol Bush first learned that the minors were headed to the Lone Star state. According to the judge, officials were told by the feds that a large number of “unaccompanied minors” from Central America were slated to be resettled in Ellis County for 21-days.

For those who worry about things like Latin America-imported Enterovirus D-68, which recently killed 12 American children, disease will not be a problem. Prior to being relocated, HHS took it upon themselves to vaccinate the hordes arriving from sunny Third World locations such as: El SalvadorGuatemalaHonduras, and Nicaragua.

The freshly inoculated youth will be shuttled from a border holding facility to a Texas Christmas holiday site where the newly arrived revelers will spend time partying on the taxpayer’s dime.

That’s right, while American veterans die on VA hospital waiting lists and huddle homeless and unemployed in the street, “unaccompanied minors” will be swimming in an indoor pool, playing soccer, enjoying arts and crafts, and by learning to speak English, preparing to flood the U.S. job market to do “jobs Americans would love to be doing.”

In fact, the menfolk even have a Dallas attorney named Domingo Garcia who is in the process of organizing a legal team to represent the future Democrat voters.

Garcia said his goal is to “Make sure their legal rights are protected, that they’re in a comfortable place, and even though they are separated from their families that they have a Christmas that teaches them what American values are like.”

When Mr. Garcia says “American values,” does he mean values such as respect for the borders of a sovereign nation? And since when do illegals have legal rights?

Maybe this attorney just means that, in his opinion, and the opinion of the Obama administration, America’s laws are fundamentally biased, worthy of being disregarded, and that those who break, oh, let’s say, immigration law deserve to be compensated with an all expense paid holiday in a resort-like facility complete with an indoor pool?

And if legality is no longer an American value, then when Garcia says “legal rights,” does he mean that illegals have a legal right to be comfortable after breaking into America?

Not only that, what’s also odd is that Garcia suggested illegals be allowed to commemorate a politically incorrect holiday like “Christmas.” Or could it be that cultural diversity exempts illegals from having to exclude “Christ” from a holiday that’s been largely secularized for regular American citizens?

Either way, culturally-Catholic/Central American-themed Christmas or not, the legal counsel for the illegal “unaccompanied minors” still worries that if the 12- 18-year-olds are eventually sent home, they will be “Subject to the predators, the gang members, the criminals that [may be] waiting for them.”

What Garcia did not mention was whether or not he’s also concerned about Texas residents living in the vicinity of the campground being endangered by prospective “predators, gang members, and criminals.”

Has Garcia even considered the possibility that along with 12-year-old Guillermo and his brother 17-year-old Juan an unaccompanied Cub of the Caliphate or two could have also strolled along side them all the way into Texas?

Furthermore, let’s be frank, it is highly unlikely that a federal government that couldn’t vet one ISIS-terrorist named Tashfeen Malik took the time to properly vet 300- 700 Central American campers.

The U.S. federal government failed to investigate a blushing bride who, after posting her affection for ISIS on social media, gained access into the U.S. on a K-1 visa. Then, after giving birth 6 months ago in an American hospital, that same Jihadi bride went on to slaughter 14 innocent people in San Bernardino, California.

And we’re supposed to believe the same government that sends checks to dead people and had difficulty tracing Hillary Clinton’s email server is going to carefully screen a thousand teenaged boys?

Therefore, in light of the government’s proven inability to screen newcomers adequately, and Garcia’s obvious naivety as to whom he might be representing in court, Texans who live in close proximity to the Central American Campground are uneasy – and rightly so.

Those who in live the vicinity, as well as responsible public officials, are apprehensive about the issues that can arise when 700 testosterone-infused/culturally challenged juvenile boys, deprived of parental oversight, are deposited into the heart of Texas.

Not to mention that the merrymakers are being lodged on the grounds of a campground that is largely unsecured.

Whatever ends up happening, and irrespective of who these teenagers are, what they have done in the past, or plan to do in the future, or who may have infiltrated their ranks – one thing is certain — Domingo Garcia can rest easy because DHS isn’t sending anyone back to Central America.

Quite the contrary, thousands more Central American campers, with a few ISIS stragglers likely mixed in, are being waved north. And if things go according to Barack Obama’s “fundamentally transformative” plan, multitudes more should arrive in Texas in time to spend Christmas bathing in an indoor pool.

Hillary’s latest iteration preaches ‘love and kindness’

Originally posted at American Thinker

It was during the 2008 election that Hillary Clinton portrayed herself as the hard-hitting person America needed in the White House to answer the phone at 3:00 am.  This time around, in response to Republican Donald Trump’s hard-hitting talk, Hillary has modified that image.

Recently, while speaking to a crowd in Iowa, Mrs. Clinton replied to a question about how to confront hate and fear by saying: “We’ve got to do everything we can to weed out hate and plant love and kindness.”

Judging from that reply, it appears that the former secretary of state, who notoriously answered a question about an American ambassador being sodomized and murdered in a terrorist attack with “what difference at this point does it make,” has added a hearty dose of Oprah Winfrey to her more recentimage upgrades.

And here senior adviser for strategic communications to U.S. secretary of state Marie Harf had America convinced that a jobs program was all it would take to turn even the most violent terrorist into a mild-mannered citizen of the world.

Meanwhile, wasn’t it Hillary who blamed the uncovering of her husband’s infidelity on a “vast right-wing conspiracy”?  And isn’t it a testy Hillary who doesn’t take kindly to being pressed by reporters with questions she doesn’t want to answer?

Yet while campaigning in Salem, New Hampshire recently, it was Hillary who remarked, “It may be unusual for a presidential candidate to say we need more love and kindness in this country, but I think that’s exactly what we need.”

This is coming from the woman who has been accused of being “extremely abusive and condescending” toward the Secret Service.

Then again, while Ms. Hillary does fancy herself the doyenne of empathetic social policy, according to the long list of women her husband groped and attempted to sexually molest, the former first lady was the one who “terrorized” every one of his victims for accusing Bill of sexual abuse.

Now, behaving like none of those well-documented affronts ever happened, Hillary is making it a habit of ending her public spiels with a challenge to her audience to add “love and kindness” to their daily lives.

And, rest assured, Hillary probably lives up to her own solicitation.

That is, as long as no one brings up things like her evolution on gay marriage, her husband’s influence on her policy stands, how those confidential emails disappeared, Benghazi, or her defense of a man who raped a 12-year-old girl.

For now, Hillary is toning down her tough girl persona by attempting to draw a stark contrast between herself and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.  Trump is the guy who dared to suggest that there are some illegal Mexicans who are rapists and pedophiles, and that ISIS-infiltrated Syrian refugees are a threat to national security – all of which is true.

That’s why, if transforming her image is the goal, Mrs. Clinton needs to try harder.  After all, Hillary did ignore Bill hitching a ride on pal Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express” and was heard giggling on tape over her decision to defend a child rapist she knew was guilty.

As for Syrian refugees, similar to how Christopher Stevens was forging relationships in Libya, the former secretary of state believes that welcoming in refugees benefits America’s fight against radical extremism by forging ties with the Muslim communities where ISIS refugees will be building IEDs and storing munitions.

In the interim, the presidential hopeful’s new Rodney King-like “can’t we all just get along” warm and fuzzy approach is effectively winning over women, who, as a gender, are renowned for responding positively to New Age rhetoric.

Democratic pollster Margie Omero says that Hillary talking about love and kindness “very much tracks with … a lot of women voters.”  Margie claims that women tell her they want to “go back to a time in which we’re being nicer to each other.  Politics has become too coarse.”

It’s likely that the “love and kindness” message appeals to the womenfolk because, every chance she gets, Hillary pledges unwavering support for abortion provider Planned Parenthood, an organization that kills and then carves up babies and sells their body parts in a loving and kind way.

Terry Matre, a female therapist from West Des Moines, thanks to Hillary’s group cuddle language, recently had an epiphany and agrees:

I had hesitation about what I thought was a kind of hardness in her but she doesn’t have that in person. When you think about what Donald Trump is saying and then you think about her, you’re like, my God what took me so long.

Let’s just say there’s a pretty good chance that Terry wouldn’t be feeling the love if she had a run-in with Bill brandishing his Grand Reserve Gurkha and then, like Juanita Broaddrick, was threatened by Hillary to keep her mouth shut.

So, there it is!  Hillary Clinton is refashioning her public image by peddling her own unique brand of loving kindness.

Yet the truth is that in her decades-long unstoppable pursuit of power, in addition to leaving dozens of women abused by her husband in her wake, Hillary Clinton has told unspeakable lies, spearheaded much corruption, and stepped over numerous rotting corpses.

 

Obama Says Climate Change Contributes Terrorism…But What About THIS?

Barack Obama has definitively stated that he is of the opinion that climate change contributes to terrorism. But thus far, what the president has failed to address is whether the cause and effect relationship between climate change and terrorism works both ways

And who better to marry the topics of terrorism and weather than the one who implied he had the Messianic ability to “slow the rising oceans” and “heal the planet?”

In the wake of the COP21 the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, one can’t help but wonder why the president didn’t address the carbon footprint that results from ISIS incinerating humans beings for sport.

In fact, while the president was in France blaming terrorism on global warming, jihadists were in Syria hanging people upside down on spits and roasting them like pigs.

Here the president was center stage at an international climate change conference in a city that, after being attacked by ISIS, has barely buried their dead. That’s why; Paris was a fitting place for Obama to explore whether ISIS burning people alive in metal cages pollutes the air.

Before jumping headlong into the subject of human bonfires, the president could have begun by examining more benign topics such as exploding metal implants and hot ash, both of which are spectator safety concerns affecting curious bystanders at public executions.

Granted, when broaching the subject of environmentally friendly killings, even crucifixion and beheading can get a little tricky.

For example, who would have thought that there’s an ecological downside to beheading dozens of people on a beach? Clearly, ISIS is unaware that once the blood starts flowing, pristine oceans are polluted with human blood that contains concentrations of environmentally hazardous chemicals.

That’s why, because blood kills wildlife, and makes the ocean unhealthy for swimming in full burqua; it’s always a bad idea to spill rivers of blood on a beach.

Nonetheless, right before discussing how cremating Christians in a furnace with properly ventilated flue benefits the environment; the president could have said that, as a group, terrorists really could be ecologically savvier and a little more green-minded.

For example, because it takes a couple of hours to turn a 150-pound person, made up of 65% water, into a pile of ash, in the future, ISIS should really look for more efficient ways of disposing of Shia spies and Jordanian pilots.

Another point ISIS is probably unaware of is that when you place an adult male into a cage with the intent to burn him alive, after the flame licks its way up the gasoline trail, and after the victim is fully engulfed in flames, the compounds that are present quickly decompose and calcify.

For that reason the president had a moral obligation to explore the topic of crematory science.

If America’s green president surmises that ISIS is even remotely concerned about leaving a carbon footprint, short of granting them carbon credits, his duty was to apprise the terror group that after a person is fully ignited, and the gut wrenching screams start to wan, air quality is quickly compromised by human cremains blowing into the atmosphere.

According to a faculty research source at the University of Virginia: “Both the fumes expelled during cremation and the mineralized remains of the skeleton … are possible sources of toxic waste.” Not to mention the carbon footprint produced by the noxious ash that results when a dyed flame-resistant orange jump suit goes up in flames.

Looking back, Obama squandered an opportunity to convey in a dispassionate, non-judgmental manner, details about some of the more offensive contaminants that are spewed into the atmosphere when human flesh is exposed to extreme heat.

For instance, whenever a body is burning, things like lead, lithium, and arsenic all waft into the air. In turn, the residue from charred flesh ends up leaving a footprint larger than the late Jihadi John’s lace-up boot on the back of a person he’s about to behead.

By not broaching the subject of gaseous emissions that form during cremation, Obama missed an opening to scare ISIS green.

Unfortunately, the president is no longer in Paris. Therefore, his chance to warn the Islamic state about some of the more troublesome secretions that come from incinerated corpses, such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, sulphur dioxide, hydrogen chloride gas, hydrogen fluoride, and mercury, has vanished like dissipating vapor.

Barack also muffed the chance to fulfill his prophetic calling to “heal the planet.”

Instead of talking about how contaminants from barbequed bodies react with volatile acids to form, please God no, carcinogenic polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), the president chose instead to dine on a menu “fit for a king” at L’Ambroisie’s.

By failing to give equal time to how extremist ideology impacts climate change, and by not presenting a contrasting view, the ecologically-sensitive guy whose flight to France expended enough fuel to gas up 72 cars for a year, wasted an opening to “level the eco-friendly playing field.”

In the end, when the smoke clears and the toxic dust settles, it’s likely that Barack Obama will continue to blame climate deniers for worldwide jihad, and secretly applaud anyone, including ISIS, for helping curtail air pollution by eliminating humans who exhale CO2.

Is Tashfeen Malik Any Different Than a Pro-Choice Woman?

Originally posted at American Thinker

ht_malik_farook_airport_BUGGED_BG_lf_151206_4x3_992156901047.jpg.CROP.rectangle3-largeRecently, Barack Obama mocked Republicans when he said that those opposing his refugee resettlement plans are “scared of widows and orphans.” The president’s comment was in response to GOP presidential hopefuls who, out of fear of ISIS infiltration, expressed concern in the last debate about Obama’s reckless plans to transport busloads of Syrian refugees into America.

The implication of the president’s  ‘widows and orphans’ comment was that the female gender is less likely to exploit the refugee crisis on behalf of ISIS.

Then, just when deranged hermit Robert Lewis Dear had effectively diverted America’s attention from the women of Planned Parenthood who were dismembering and marketing baby body parts, along comes female Pakistani soldier of the Caliphate, Tashfeen Malik.

Described by family lawyers as a “90-pound… soft-spoken… caring… housewife,” one would expect Tashfeen, whose name means ‘sympathetic’ in Arabic, to exude “sugar and spice and everything nice.” Sadly, she was anything but nice. Although a member of the “fairer sex,” Tashfeen built IEDs in her garage.

Together with her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, the radicalized mommy had amassed things like Sippy Cups, diapers, and 5,000 rounds of ammunition inside her home. Furthermore, leaving aside more traditional hobbies for women such as macramé and quilting, judging from the stockpile of weapons, it appears as if Tashfeen expended most of her spare time training to inflict “unspeakable carnage” on infidels.

And here, all along, most people thought women fainted at the sight of blood.

After pledging her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook and erasing her family’s digital footprint, the jihadi bride dropped off her 6-month-old baby girl with her mother-in-law, and then hurried off to help her husband murder his coworkers.

For the sin of standing around a buffet table eating Christmas cookies at a center for people with developmental disabilities, the radicalized extremists killed fourteen people, and wounded twenty-one more. Soon after the attack, the duo led the police on a high-speed chase with Malik behind the wheel that ended with the couple dying in a hail of bullets.

In a December 5, 2015 article in the Washington Times author Kellan Howell points out that according to a report from George Washington University’s Program on Extremism: “Ten of the 71 recruits for the Islamic State arrested in the U.S. since 2014 have been women… [and that]… women in the militant group’s ranks [are] increasing.”

So much for Barack Obama’s ‘don’t be worried about the widows and orphans’ theory.

Even still, despite public disbelief, the most astounding thing about the rabid killer Malik hanging her body armor in the closet next to her party burka is that some people are surprised a woman would do such despicable things.

Female stereotypes like to portray women as loving, gentle, selfless, and peaceful. Yet the truth is, many are hateful, vicious, and self-centered.

Think about it; if the feminine segment of American society were really what some falsely perceive them to be, 60 million additional human beings — 86% of whom were aborted for convenience — might still be alive today.

Sorry to have to be the bearer of bad tidings, but Tashfeen’s behavior is not the exception to the rule. In fact, this jihadi bride’s blatant disregard for human life only confirms the type of wanton terror some women are capable of.

Tasheen travelled to the U.S. on a K1 fiancée visa.  Once here, the young woman’s sole intent was not to marry, settle down, and raise her baby girl, but to build pipe bombs, amass a cache of weapons, and then use them to ambush and kill as many vulnerable people as possible. The Mommy Terrorist’s life’s goal was jihad and false convictions took precedence over raising her child.

Sound familiar? After funding Planned Parenthood to the tune of $500 million per year, Americans should not be surprised that a diminutive woman, driven by a perverted ideology, blew 14 people away.

Now, the obvious question that needs to be answered is whether Tashfeen’s murderous tirade is any different than the evil exhibited every day by 4,000 self-absorbed women who, rather than head toward a Christmas party with an AK-47, seek out an abortion clinic with the sole intent of ambushing a vulnerable child in the womb?

After witnessing the religious zealotry of those who support full access to abortion, and after hearing the “fairer sex” defend carving up and selling baby parts while calling it a “war on women,” Americans should not be surprised that someone like Tashfeen is capable of doing such a brutally horrific thing.

That’s why; rather than be appalled at the jihadi bride, Americans should recognize that women can be more vicious then men.

In this case, the only difference between pro-choice and ISIS womenfolk is that the latter dress up in vastly different attire. In addition, unlike the more reservedright-to-choose crowd, womanly soldiers to the Caliphate take their directives from a revered manual, and prefer executing their victims in a more public setting.

Either way, whether a jihadi bride or not, women who murder their babies are just as devoted to the slaughter of the defenseless as was Tashfeen Malik.

Barack Obama cheers America by singing ‘Jingle Bells’

u-s-president-barack-obamaOriginally posted at American Thinker

In keeping with the holiday spirit, one day after 14 people in San Bernardino, California were slaughtered like animals while standing around a buffet table eating Christmas cookies, on the Ellipse south of the White House, Barack Obama and the first family attended the 93rd annual National Christmas Tree lighting ceremony in D.C.’s President’s Park.

As the national tree lit up, Obama yelled: “Five, four, three, two, one.  Merry Christmas, everybody!”

Joining in were his two lovely daughters, Sasha and Malia; high-spirited wife, Michelle; and ever-present mother-in-law, Marian.

Thankfully, Barack did not allow 14 bullet-riddled bodies lying in a morgue stop him from enjoying the star-studded festivities.  After all, this is America, and in America, despite terrorism, there are still things to get excited over.

Take for instance, Michelle and Miss Piggy reading “The Night Before Christmas” together.

Then there’s the exciting Academy Award-winning actress Reese Witherspoon, who hosted the tree-lighting event.  Minus the perpetually angry Neil Young, the late 1960s folk rock group David Crosby, Stephen Stills, and Graham Nash even showed up to sing “Silent Night.”

Also celebrating the season with the president were the “irresistible” rock band Fall Out Boy; Andra Day, a glamorous Rihanna look-alike donned in a glittery 1930s-style gold headscarf; and a California hip-hop artist named Aloe Blacc, who managed to stay warm at the event by wrapping himself in a scarf handmade by a fan in Uganda.

The only thing missing from the party was Michelle Obama dancing to “Uptown Funk” performed to the beat of “Rocking Around the Christmas Tree” by Mary K. Blige.

In fairness, the president did take a moment to mention the 14 dead and 21 wounded in the California terrorist attack when he said:

Their loss is our loss, too, for we’re all one American family. We look out for each other in good times, and in bad. And they should know that all of us care about them this holiday season.

Now see!  That proves, for those who doubt, that Barack Obama attending a Christmas party after 14 people were mowed down at a Christmas party was not in bad taste.

After the tragedy that took place less than 24 hours prior, the whole affair was likely just an effort by an exquisitely sensitive president to buoy the spirits of a grief-stricken nation.

In fact, consoling the downtrodden had to be the primary reason Obama decided, albeit reluctantly, to slip into Al Green mode.

Standing beside a socialist Santa Claus, the president struck up the band, pointed his bony finger like a conductor’s baton, and proceeded to lead the revelers in a jolly rendition of “Jingle Bells.”

Meanwhile, in San Bernardino, California, the names and pictures and personal life stories of those who will never go to another tree lighting ceremony, or sing “Jingle Bells” ever again, were made public by authorities.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEbOnfds4I4[/youtube]

Chicago mother tosses newborn from 8th floor window

2E74263000000578-0-image-a-30_1447550758240-636x372Originally posted at LiveAction News

In yet another example of blatant disregard for the sanctity of life, minutes after giving birth, a young woman, frightened of her Pakistani Muslim parent’s response to her pregnancy, threw her newborn from the eighth-floor window of a Chicago high-rise.

Sadly, flinging infants to their death seems to be a popular new way to dispose of unwanted children.

Recently in New York there have been three similar cases where mothers murdered their infants by pitching them out of apartment house windows.

The mothers were Rashida Chowdhury of Richmond Hill, Jennifer Berry of Yonkers, and Tenisha N. Fearon of the Bronx. (Fearon’s baby girl was 6-months-old when she plunged six floors to her death.)

690376d52524a6bd78587882ee49b358The most recent mother is Mubashra Uddin, who threw her 25-minutes-old baby girl from a window in a bedroom she shared with her younger sister. At around 11:20 pm, the infant was found dying from fractures to the skull, spine, and ribs. The naked and bloody newborn had landed on the grass where she was found by a passerby still breathing and struggling to stay alive. After being rushed to Weiss Memorial Hospital, at 12:25 am, the baby died of extensive blunt force trauma which included a lacerated liver and bowel.

According to officials from the Cook County sheriff’s office, the 19-year-old DeVry University A-student tossed her full-term, 7 pound 11-ounce daughter out of her bedroom window because she heard her mother walking towards her room.

Except for one close friend and the father of the child, Uddin had kept her pregnancy a secret from everyone by wearing loose clothing. That’s why, immediately after giving birth, rather than put her baby’s life before her own, Miss Uddin chose to protect herself from parental disapproval by murdering her newborn child.

When police arrived at the Uddin family apartment, despite finding a dead baby in the street below, bloody sheets, bloody scissors and blood on the floor, the woman denied everything. However, once in police custody, the young mother eventually admitted “multiple times” on video to dropping her baby out of a window to the concrete sidewalk below.

For killing “Baby Jane Uddin,” Uddin, who was initially hospitalized and held without bail, is being charged with first-degree murder. According to her family lawyer Adam Sheppard, her “family is standing by her,” and, after the fact, she seems both “contrite” and “humble.”

According to police sources, the motive for Uddin disposing of the newborn like trash was fear of her East Indian family’s reaction to her having a child with her African-American boyfriend (of whom the family disapproved).

Judge Peggy Chiampas said the teen should be held without bond while she was in the hospital having a surgical procedure. After her release from the hospital, at a  hearing where Uddin was again denied bail and told she would be held until she is tried for murder, Judge James Brown said that “Dropping a baby out of an eighth-story window to its eventual death is exceedingly evil and exceedingly cruel.”

Chiampas also said that family circumstances, which apparently played into the infant’s death, would be considered. In other words, it appears that to some, if a woman decides to toss a baby out an 8thfloor window, culturally diverse child-rearing, racism, and downright ignorance should be considered an excuse to grant lesser charges.

Meanwhile, Illinois has a safe haven law which permits infants up to 30 days old to be dropped off at safe locations, including hospitals, with no questions asked.

That means ‘contrite and humble,’ honor roll college student Uddin – who was clever enough conceal her pregnancy from her parents for nine months, and had three-months-shy-of-a-year to figure out how to deliver her baby to a safe haven – simply decided to kill her instead.