FIVE SOLDIERS ARE BURIED: Obama is Line Dancing

f_chattanooga_shooting_funeral_150724Originally posted at CLASH Daily

After its 15 minutes of fame, the deadly shooting in Chattanooga has officially been relegated to the annals of Barack Obama’s disastrous history. So-called “domestic terrorist” Mohammod Abdulazeez, who worked on behalf of international terrorism, is dead and his autopsy is complete. The five soldiers cut down at the Naval Marine Reserve Center in Chattanooga have been, or are in the process of, being laid to rest.

After having his arm twisted for five days to lower the flag to half-mast in honor of the five American soldiers who died in that gun-free zone, rather than attend a handful of military funerals the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces decided, prior to his Martha’s Vineyard vacation, to jet off on a two-day trip to Kenya right after a terrorist attack.

The ongoing display of rude indifference toward tragedy is not at all out of the ordinary for Barack Obama. After all, this president is notorious for ignoring situations that reflect upon his incompetence, especially if his glaring ineptitude ultimately results in the death of innocent people.

Yet, Obama does find time to attend the funerals of those whose demise either affirms or advances his progressive aspirations.

For example, Barack Obama cried at civil rights activist’s Dorothy Height’s funeral. Then, for President Nelson Mandela’s stadium wake, Obama flew to South Africa for ten hours took a selfie with a sexy blonde and had his funerary remarks translated by a mentally ill, fraudulent deaf interpreter.

The president also made time to attend former Democratic Speaker of the House Tom Foley’s (D-WA) funeral, dropped in on Hawaiian liberal Democrat Senator Daniel Inouye’s memorial, and showed up to pay his final respects to former KKK member Robert Byrd (D-WV).

More recently Obama eulogized Joe Biden’s son Beau Biden and also eulogized and sang “Amazing Grace” at the service honoring the life and death of Senator Clementa Pinckney, the murdered pastor of Charleston, NC’s Mother Emanuel AME Church.

But when the body of Carson Holmquist, a 27-year-old decorated Marine Sergeant, husband, and father to a two-year-old son, was returned home to Grantsburg, Wisconsin for burial, Barry O’Bama, who identifies as Irish when visiting Ireland, was nowhere to be found. Instead, the president was in his ancestral homeland of Kenya, identifying as Kenyan, basking in adoration, and dining with African relatives.

In Massachusetts, as people waving American flags while the hearse carrying the remains of 40-year-old fallen Marine Sergeant Thomas Sullivan passed paid their respects by lining the streets of Springfield, Obama was otherwise engaged – lecturing President Kenyatta on how Kenyan anti-sodomy laws are discriminatory.

In Georgia, around the time a funeral cortège escorted the body of 21-year-old Marine Lance Corporal Skip Wells from the Atlanta airport to his home in Cobb County, Obama was in Nairobi making jokes about his detractors wondering whether he came to Kenya to look for his birth certificate.

And while U.S. Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Randall Smith’s body slowly approached his final resting place in Chattanooga National Cemetery and the body of 37-year-old husband and father Marine Staff Sgt. David Wyatt headed toward National Cemetery in Madison, Tennessee, Barack Obama was 7,500 miles away partying at a state dinner with Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and First Lady Margaret Kenyatta.

As taps were being played for five murdered soldiers in Tennessee, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Connecticut and Georgia, Barack Obama was on stage accompanying popular Kenyan afro-pop band Sauti Sol.

Then, as Sargent Carson Holmquist’s widow tried to explain to her weeping two-year-old son that daddy was never coming home again, accompanied by his sister Auma, the president was enjoying the Nairobi youth orchestra and choir, making numerous self-congratulatory toasts, and participating in an impromptu line dance.

 YouTube Preview Image

Unfortunately, Barack “My Brother’s Keeper” Obama’s brother George, who lives in a shack in Nairobi on $2 a month, was not on the guest list.

Speaking of Obama’s brother, Kenyan family relations call to mind the president’s colorful Luo tribe descendants. Luos have a male rite of passage wherein, as a sign of virility, men voluntarily have six bottom teeth pulled. If removing half a dozen teeth enhances the testosterone level of men with a backbone deficit, maybe before Barack Obama heads home he should submit his six to voluntary extraction.

Either way, teeth in or teeth out, the president choosing to travel to Kenya while five American heroes lay stretched out in flag-draped coffins again demonstrates President Barack Obama’s stunning level of contempt for the American people.

Obama coaches Ethiopia on honesty and political debate

obama-ethiopia_0Originally posted at American Thinker

Barack “Son of the Soil” Obama wrapped up his “Nudge Africa toward Gay Rights” tour.  Next stop: summer vacation in Martha’s Vineyard.  Before heading home, Obama shared insights that are not only contradictory, but downright terrifying.

It was during a joint news conference with Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn, after pushing for peace in civil war-torn South Sudan, that Obama the race-baiter, responsible for stoking the flames of unrest in the U.S., urged Ethiopian leaders to refrain from imposing restrictions on the press and political debate.

Obama, who, when it comes to Tea Party activists, Fox News, and conservative talk radio doesn’t exactly practice what he preaches, reminded his hosts that “[w]hen all voices are being heard, when people know they are being included in the political process, that makes a country more successful.”

After a question from Darlene Superville about Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, who recently said that Obama’s Iran deal is equivalent to marching the Israelis toward “the door of the oven,” it didn’t take long for the negotiator to contradict his own advice about the benefits of political discussion.

After an “all voices” soliloquy and after saying that the Iran debacle was a “good deal,” the president immediately exploited Superville’s question to criticize what he referred to as “rhetoric” from the other side.  Obama brought up Washington politics and called Huckabee’s comments “part of just a general pattern … that would be considered ridiculous if it weren’t so sad.”

On the topic of “voices being heard,” Obama shared with the press corps that “a sitting senator called John Kerry Pontius Pilate,” and because all roads eventually lead back to hypersensitive Obama, the president also shared that another senator (Ted Cruz) who “happens to be running for president suggest[ed] that I’m the leading state sponsor of terrorism.”

Acting more like he was on the campaign trail than addressing issues like civil war and freedom of the press, the hyper-partisan president continued to demean his political adversaries:

These are leaders in the Republican Party… there’s been a recognition that these issues are too serious, that issues of war and peace are of such grave concern and consequence that we don’t play fast and loose that way.  We have robust debates, we look at the facts, there are going to be disagreements.  But we just don’t fling out ad hominem attacks like that, because it doesn’t help inform the American people.

In other words, sound the alarm, use hyperbole to describe Iran’s genocidal intentions towards Israel, call Kerry out as the clown he is, and the predictable Barack Obama will use his bully pulpit to define political debate as “flinging out ad hominem attacks.”

When Obama opined that “rhetoric like this … may be … just an effort to push Mr. Trump out of the headlines but it’s not the kind of leadership that is needed for America right now,” the narcissistic attention-seeking president was directly denouncing Huckabee and Cruz.

The president then criticized The Donald for his negative comments about John McCain, whose Vietnam War torture and patriotism didn’t particularly impress Barack Obama when he recently defended Vietnam swift boat veteran John Kerry.

Obama claimed that Trump’s boldfaced honesty, which is primarily directed at Obama, “arises out of a culture where those kinds of outrageous attacks have become far too commonplace and get circulated nonstop through the internet and talk radio and news outlets.”

Even the Ethiopians had to be scratching their heads.  Wasn’t this the guy who just urged Ethiopian leaders to refrain from imposing restrictions on the press and to encourage political debate?

The Whiney One went on to say that he noticed that those who were upset about Trump’s “outrageous statements” about McCain stay quiet when similar “outrageous statements” are made about the outrageous one doing the whining.

Peeved that anyone dare criticize his horrendous Iran deal, Obama tore into Republicans, alleging that “[t]he point is we’re creating a culture that is not conducive to good policy or good politics.  The American people deserve better.”

Precisely!

The president also hinted that if the 2016 president-elect isn’t an adequate replacement, he might have to overstay his tenure.  In a hair-raising admission, the always honest and dignified Barack Obama told his Ethiopian hosts:

In 18 months, I’m turning over the keys — I want to make sure I’m turning over the keys to somebody who is serious about the serious problems the country faces and the world faces.  And that requires on both sides, Democrat and Republican, a sense of seriousness and decorum and honesty.  And I think that’s what the voters expect, as well.

That’s when someone, anyone, should have requested a clarification of what Obama means when he says, “I want to make sure I’m turning over the keys to somebody who is serious about the serious problems the country faces and the world faces.”

How Mr. Obama plans to “make sure” and what he’ll do if “somebody” doesn’t meet his seriousness measures should give every American nightmares.

The president also encouraged Ethiopia to pursue “ethical journalism.”  You know what kind of ethical journalism – the kind that Clinton Foundation contributor George Stephanopoulos embodies, or the type of fawning “ethical” professional journalism that gives the guy offering Ethiopia advice a pass.  Yeah, that kind of journalism.

Obama shared that the U.S. government is committed to “nurturing” journalists “for democratic discourse” – which in itself is a scary thought – “young journalists,” he said, “to come up and help this country [with the help of the government] understand what’s going on.”

Then, the guy who nearly bit off chief CBS White House correspondent Major Garrett’s head over a valid question and who just spent an inordinate amount of time complaining about those who suggest he’s made mistakes or has limitations said, “And for us, it’s very important to be criticized because we also get feedback to correct our mistakes and limitations.”

Jihadi John is Smarter than the Average Liberal

Jihadi-JohnOriginally posted at American Thinker

Who would have thought that the notorious ISIS remover of heads, the man behind the ski mask, Jihadi John, would prove to be smarter than the average liberal?

Remember John?  He’s the guy who struck fear in the hearts of the world when he was pictured on video carving off the heads of ISIS prisoners/journalists and aid workers like James Foley and Steven Sotloff, David Haines, Alan Henning, and Peter Kassig.

Clad entirely in black from head to toe, Mohammed Emwazi, aka Jihadi John, would stand in the hot desert sun beside kneeling victims dressed in outfits similar to Hillary Clinton’s infamous Home Depot orange pants suit. Head cocked to the side, knife in hand gesturing and pointing at the camera, Jihadi John would calmly speak perfect English with a distinct British accent and then would patiently wait until his victims were done spewing a forced propaganda spiel. Then, with the cameras rolling, John would saw off their heads.

Now, British and American Special Forces are searching for and want Jihadi John dead or alive.

It seems the ISIS executioner, who enthusiastically participated in beheading prisoners of the Islamic state, worries his own head will be removed and he is running for his life. Apparently the publicity he’s gotten has made Jihadi John quake in his Ninja boots, fearful that the militant ISIS murderers are done with him and will kill him and bury his headless body in a mass grave.

Sounds like liberalism: use up supporters and then visit upon those useful idiots the very terrorism they endorsed.

Prior to mastering Butchery 101, Mr. Emwazi was a student at the University of Westminster studying information systems and business management. Then Emwazi was radicalized and became the masked face of ISIS terror. Now, to avoid suffering a fate similar to the ones he inflicted on others, Jihadi John is somewhere in Syria hiding from both the good and bad guys both of whom are searching for him across the Middle East.

So why is Jihadi John smarter than the average liberal?

As a group, liberals believe that their support for progressive policies such as ObamaCare, climate change, the right to choose and so on somehow exempts them from the blight liberalism creates when those policies are implemented.

Liberals rally around high taxes but hate paying them; they applaud ObamaCare, but will be the first ones to whine when they’re denied health care services or evaluated by a death panel.  Liberals love Obama’s plan to forcibly integrate neighborhoods, as long as it’s not theirs; they’ll march on behalf of illegal immigration until someone they love is killed by a drunk illegal driving without a license, and they will champion an Iran deal until Iran gets the bomb, at which point they’ll be found quaking and quivering in a renovated bomb shelter somewhere.

In other words, like Jihadi John, liberals can dish it out but they can’t take it.

Never realizing that the end result will involve the devaluing and maybe even the loss of their own life, liberals decry the so-called racial profiling of potential terrorists, defend the right to choose abortion and, of late, even justify selling the organs of aborted babies. Then when terrorism threatens their life, or in the future an Obama organ collector suggests that to promote fairness liberals should volunteer a spare kidney to one who has none, the liberals who rallied for organ sharing will be the first to protest.

Somewhere inside their hollow, empty souls, liberals like to inflict, but hate to be inflicted upon.

Those on the left like to force others to give, never thinking that the implication of compulsory giving will also affect their own lives. Liberals are ardent supporters of government, but seem to think supporting the government edicts being imposed on the masses somehow exempts them from the negative impact of what they’re helping to promote.

In other words, liberals are the Jihadi Johns of a government version of ISIS: they believe they can support what progressivism imposes on America and never become a victim of those oppressive policies themselves.

Liberals believe they can lop off heads and keep their own — but they’re wrong, and the real Jihadi John was wise enough to recognize it. That’s why he’s smarter than the average liberal: Jihadi John hightailed it into the desert and is currently on the run somewhere trying desperately to keep his head.

Obama Admonishes Africa on Homosexuality

 obama-in-kenyaOriginally posted at American Thinker
 

Son of Kenya,” Barack Obama, proved once again that his patience with people, nations, and world leaders that disagree with his view of the world registers a big fat zero on the liberal Tolerance Meter.  When Obama finds out anyone (other than a Muslim) disagrees with his social policy focus, it becomes his personal mission to convince them otherwise.

And if the mere awesomeness of his presence fails to change minds, Obama will attempt to humiliate his ideological adversaries into submission by getting in their face.

For example, after Barack ‘LGBTQ’ Obama was specifically asked by the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya to leave his gay pride light show back at the White House, true to form, the self-important agitator disrespected his hosts and brought up the touchy subject of gay rights in Kenya, where homosexuality is illegal.

Funny, when Bibi Netanyahu came to the U.S. to share a message with Congress that Iran with a nuke is a threat to the world, the Israeli Prime Minister was roundly spurned because the president’s fondness for Iran trumps his alliance with Israel. In other words, if Obama’s opinion differs from yours, he either issues a public slur, as he did to President Kenyatta, or he’ll snub you, as he does every chance he gets to Benjamin Netanyahu.

However, there is one exception to the slur/snub rule.  When Obama dropped in to pay his condolences to dead Saudi King Abdullah, while there he neither chastised Sharia law nor brought up stoning or beheading homosexuals.

Yet, on the other hand, for some reason Barack O seems determined to validate homosexuality on a continent that has literally been ravaged by HIV/AIDs and vehemently rejects that lifestyle.During a 2013 visit to Senegal, a nation where homosexuals end up in jail if they’re lucky and lose their heads if that luck runs out, the president publicly dressed down Macky Sall when he called for Senegal to grant gays equal rights. Sall responded to the Punk from Pennsylvania Avenue by politely informing the patron of eclectic sexual preferences that in Senegal “We are still not ready to decriminalize homosexuality.”

Question: Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with changing anti-sodomy legislation in East African nations?  Moreover, what right does Obama have to stick his mole-afflicted nose into African social policy and rule of law?

What is it with this guy?  It’s not enough for him to be changing our Constitution and pushing around 320+ million Americans?

Apparently not, because at a joint press conference in Nairobi in one of his typical sanctimonious lectures, Obama felt the need to reprimand the leader of Kenya on gay rights by telling him, “When you start treating people differently not because of any harm they are doing to anybody, but because they are different, that’s the path whereby freedoms begin to erode.”

Hold up right there!

Barack Obama is sermonizing about paths to eroding freedoms?  Isn’t this the president that habitually mistreats people that disagree with him politically or ideologically? Not only that, but in Kenya, a nation that participated in the East African slave trade, the president pushed the gay agenda by – get ready – playing the race card.

The president said, “And when a government gets in a habit of people treating people differently, those habits can spread.” Then, to a nation of people in awe of his success as a black man, Obama criticized America and hinted at the mistreatment of blacks during slavery and segregation by saying that “As an African-American, I am painfully aware of what happens when people are treated differently under the law.”

Without flinching, Kenyatta pushed back and replied to the wronged world leader:

The fact of the matter is Kenya and the U.S. share so many values: common love for democracy, entrepreneurship, value for families — these are some things that we share. But there are some things that we must admit we don’t share. Our culture, our societies don’t accept.

So, the alleged “smartest guy in the room” traveled all the way to Kenya where homosexuality is “largely considered to be taboo and repugnant to [the] cultural values and morality,” and felt it was his duty to scold the leadership for none other than anti-sodomy laws.

Moreover, Obama chose to push homosexuality in Kenya, a country that is 83% Christian and has the fourth-largest HIV epidemic in the world. What kind of instigator does something like that?

Does the president know or care that according to UK-based international HIV and AIDs charity AVERT, in Kenya in 2012 an “estimated 1.6 million people were living with HIV, and roughly 57,000 people died from AIDS-related illnesses?”

In other words, despite Kenya enduring an extreme HIV epidemic, Obama promoted a sexual proclivity that contributes to the spread of HIV. What next? Barack goes to West Africa and suggests to recovering Ebola victims that refusing to share body fluids is discriminatory?  Why not bring some Bavarian Cream donuts to an obesity clinic, or push pot legalization at rehab?

Either way, in addition to sex workers and intravenous drug abusers, according to AVERT, “HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Kenya is almost three times that among the general population.”

Those sorts of statistics may be why President Kenyatta responded to the haughty one by politely stating, “It is very difficult for us to be able to impose onpeople that which they themselves do not accept.” Then again, refusing to “impose onpeople that which they themselves do not accept” is probably a hard concept for adespotically-inclined leader like Barack Obama to grasp.Nonetheless, unlike Barack, Kenyatta stressed, “This is why I repeatedly say for Kenyans today the (gay rights issue) is generally a non-issue. We want to focus on other areas.”

But fret not; after Obama is done with his current Admonishing Africa Tour, he will head back to the U.S. where he can focus on other areas too, like decisively eroding freedom, and under U.S. law, treating differently anyone that dares to disagree with him.

Are ‘The Cubs of the Caliphate’ Headed for America’s Classrooms?

347Originally posted at American Thinker

President Obama defends the right of American women to abort their children and thus far has refused to denounce Planned Parenthood using “less crunchy” techniques to harvest baby body parts to help pay for Lamborghinis.  And yet, approximately 7,000 miles away, members of the Islamic State would rather not abort their sons and daughters.  No, instead ISIS chooses to raise up an army of lethal combatants its members refer to as “Cubs of the Caliphate.”

In a video recently released by ISIS’s media wing in Iraq entitled “The Cubs of Dijla,” young members of the caliphate army dressed in military fatigues recite verses from the Quran.  Boys as young as three years old look directly into the camera and issue fair warning to the Islamic state’s enemies that pint-sized death and destruction are headed their way.

One cherub-faced little one asks the question: “Where are the martyrs?  Where are the suicide attackers?”  Then the same lad, who should be playing soccer, not shooting rifles, before firing a gun that’s taller than he is, says, “Give me my weapon.”

While America disarms our military and our complacent president all but ignores five soldiers being gunned down by an terrorist here in the U.S., the approximately 10-minute propaganda clip released by ISIS features young cubs training with rifles and sitting in a classroom being indoctrinated with sharia law.

ISIS is shrewd, and undoubtedly determined to get suicide bombers into the U.S.  Therefore, in addition to learning AK-47 marksmanship, how to pack a sandwich-sized bomb into a Ninja Turtle backpack, and how to decapitate with a plastic picnic knife, there’s a good chance the cherubic cubs being trained in Syria and Iraq – who could easily double for Central American refugees – are also learning how to speak Spanish.

Talk about schooling!

Back home in America, besides implicitly supporting the abortion of children and the harvest of baby body parts, having his arm twisted for a whole week before finally lowering the flag at the White House in honor of the five soldiers murdered in a terrorist attack, ignoring illegal felons shooting bystanders in the back with stolen guns, and tweeting kudos to Caitlyn Jenner, Barack Obama is doubling down on throwing the door wide open for the young ISIS cubs depicted in the video to practice what they learn in school right here in America.

According to the U.S. Border Patrol, between October 2014 and March 2015, 15,647 unaccompanied children attempted to enter the country illegally.  Last summer, more than 30,000 unaccompanied children were processed out of federal facilities and into the United States to live with sponsors, many of whom are illegal, too.  Thousands of little angelic-looking boys and girls came to America as refugees, not all of whom were Spanish-speaking.

Many of these mini-migrants were then placed into classrooms with our children all around the nation.

All ISIS would have to do is transport an adorable Cub of Dijla to the U.S.-Mexican border.  Little Abisali can then cross over into the arms of an Islamic extremist sponsor who may or may not be legal, and with the help of the same administration that is fine with aborting 4,000 babies a day, Abisali will end up in a classroom sitting next to Dylan and Cheyenne.

Either that, or after learning how to speak Spanish, Abisali could just pretend to be a refugee named Guillermo from Guatemala.

Whichever – as the school year commences, besides worrying about the threat of Latin-American-imported Enterovirus D-68 paralyzing dozens and causing more fatalities, as chilling a thought as it might be, with the help of the Obama administration, American children could be getting a public-school education with a child soldier/aspiring suicide-bomber who is hell-bent on entering paradise a martyr.

Over in Dijla, Iraq, school-age children are being groomed to shoot, behead, and, as long as they take a few infidels with them, blow themselves up for Allah.  Meanwhile, here in America, our president is practically begging for ISIS to export their adorable Allah-obsessed kiddies.  And after these loveable little jihadis meander over the southern border into our classrooms, American youngsters who somehow managed to evade having their aborted livers sold by Planned Parenthood will now be at risk for schoolyard executions carried out by their new playmates.

So the next time Barack Obama uses the words “children” and “urgent humanitarian situation” in the same sentence, keep in mind that, among the hordes he’s beckoning over the border, there could be a few “Cubs of the Caliphate,” who, after beheading Syrian soldiers, managed to master Spanish.

Cash-4-Cadavers: What’s So Shocking about Selling Baby Parts?

2100f9d5f60818095f8a73dcdfa89305fdeeb1d1b84d0aa8545bba74a6ec6be3_largeOriginally posted at American Thinker

When it comes to ghoulish zeal, Dr. Hannibal Lecter has nothing on Planned Parenthood’s Dr. Deborah Nucatola, except for maybe a few fava beans to accompany his talk of consuming a man’s liver. Whether or not the red wine Dr. Nucatola swigged with her salad was a nice Chianti remains unknown.  A morsel of information that should give pause to Obamacare fans is the realization that the esteemed doctor is also the senior director of medical services at Barack Obama’s favorite taxpayer-funded women’s health clinic/death factory, Planned Parenthood.

Recently, Dr. Nucatola caused quite a stir after being caught on an undercover video nonchalantly stuffing her gullet with crunchy croutons and swilling red wine while discussing crushed bones and baby body parts with two people she mistakenly thought were representatives from a biologics company.

Quite frankly, while talk of forceps-positioning, ultrasound guidance, and preservation of pancreas tissue isn’t exactly appetizing and can be disturbing to mere laypersons, for those of us who expect nothing less from baby murderers, the most surprising thing about the whole Nucatola body-parts disclosure is the fact that some people seem shocked. In a secular society where right and wrong are based on personal beliefs, who’s to say that selling fetal tissue is wrong or immoral?

Therefore, all things considered — including moral relativism — the most surprising part of the Cash-4-Cadavers controversy is that ordinary people who are generally unfazed by 4,000 babies a day being brutally slaughtered are suddenly horrorstruck that babies, after being dismembered with America’s approval, have had their hearts and livers sold for a price.

Isn’t being appalled by an abortion mill selling baby parts for profit sort of like being terrified when realizing Leatherface of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre wears human skin as a facemask, or being shaken up by the story of Ilse Koch, the notorious “Beast of Buchenwald,” making lampshades out of tattooed skin?

What’s clear is that those upset by the recent Planned Parenthood revelations are much more comfortable when the remains of aborted humans are quietly packed into red biohazard bags and shipped off to the crematorium for sanitary out-of-sight, out-of-mind disposal.

What has upset the public so much is Dr. Nucatola’s dispassionate visual of what is actually scraped into those biohazard bags.  So for those who are technically on the side of reproductive rights, the thought of selling bits and pieces of what’s customarily thrown away just seems wrong.

If truth were to be told, based on Dr. Nucatola’s description, Planned Parenthood is just a spiffier version of the notorious Kermit Gosnell’s Women’s Medical Society abortion clinic in Philadelphia.  Women’s Medical is where unintentionally born-alive babies, rather than being left to die a slow, agonizing death, were put out of their misery by having their spinal cords snipped with dirty scissors.

Granted, Planned Parenthood has sexier slogans, more famous advocates, nicer scrubs, more sterile stirrups, and better post-abortion snacks.  Not only that, but before being sentenced to life in prison, Kermit stored his victims in the freezer or tried to stuff their broken bodies down the toilet.  Rather than take the creepy Jeffrey Dahmer/Kermit Gosnell route, glamorous Barack Obama pals Cecile Richardson and her unapologetic bunch, under the pretense of benevolent tissue donation for medical research, choose instead to sell babies aborted at 20 weeks gestation.

For pragmatists who expect nothing more or less from baby killers, Planned Parenthood selling baby body parts isn’t shocking at all; it’s merely a murder-for-money capitalistic venture that is neither regulated nor demonized by Barack ‘You didn’t build that’ Obama.

Moreover, Barack Obama supporting a business that sells human flesh is also not a big shocker.

Lest we forget, this is a president more upset by CBS White House correspondent Major Garrett asking him how he could celebrate his nuke deal when four Americans are still rotting in an Iranian jail than he is by an innocent American being shot in the back by a five-times deported illegal alien or an organization he supports making Josef Mengele look like Mehmet Oz.

In fact, this may be news to the likes of right-to-choose activists like Barack Obama, Lena Dunham, Scarlett Johansson, and the star-studded “I had an abortion” mob, but Planned Parenthood harvesting and peddling the tissue of dead babies is no different than ISIS trying to sell Western journalist James Foley’s headless body for a million dollars, Uganda sacrificing children at the behest of witchdoctors, or China allocating the organs of death-row prisoners.

Yet, notwithstanding those and many other similarities, there are still die-hard pro-choice advocates who, in response to Dr. Nucatola’s revelations, seem more offended by the manner in which the truth was revealed than they are disgusted by the actual truth that was revealed.  Nonetheless, in the wake of the baby-parts-for-profit disclosure, America should expect to see these deluded individuals double down on defining child sacrifice and tissue and organ trafficking as necessary to ensure women health.

But for the moment, there continues to be widespread public shock over Dr. Nucatola’s remarks.

In response one can’t help but wonder: What exactly do most Americans think goes on in an abortion clinic when two living entities enter the facility and only one emerges? Do Americans view selling dismembered dead babies as worse than dissecting them while they’re still alive? And why, after abortion has been acceptable to America for 40+ years, are so many people disturbed by what happens to the legal victims of terminated pregnancies after they’re killed?

Meanwhile, as outraged as Americans are in reaction to the horror that’s been laid bare, the blood of 60 million baby lambs being silently slaughtered for convenience stains the hands of a nation whose sin is the same as those who watched the smoke rising from the chimneys at Auschwitz while professing not to know what was going on inside.

The ‘Fundamental Transformation’ of America’s Neighborhoods

Venezuela_housing300_867126080Originally posted at American Thinker

America is now learning that on the painful road to ‘fundamental transformation,’ Barack Obama has plans to diversify suburbia. The president’s suburban justice plan is one where HUD tracks the racial and religious composition of American neighborhoods and then, doing away with the choice of established populations, makes changes to reflect Barack Obama’s vision for a fairer, more equitable nation.

The policy that accomplishes this progressive goal is aptly dubbed “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” (AFFH). A 2013 FOX News article titled “Obama administration using housing department in effort to diversify neighborhoods” claims that in conjunction with the federal government HUD will remake neighborhoods using data gathered from a “discrimination database.”

In turn, “zoning laws, housing finance policy, infrastructure planning and transportation to alleviate alleged discrimination and segregation” will be determined by government decree.

The progressive utopian assumption must be that people become smarter or richer based on where they live. Simply put, rather than respect the theory of social evolution, liberals continue to blame zip codes for the economic demise of those they imagine would otherwise be the fittest. Thus, to solve shared problems that have nothing to do with geography, the Obama transformation team is moving forward with the plan to usher low-income people into the midst of middle- and higher-income classes.

That’s why, as part of the liberal quest to establish heaven on earth, every American will be forced to live in a neighborhood designed by government totalitarians. Meanwhile, those who “spread the despair” around will continue to peacefully dwell in exclusive enclaves paid for with wealth they’ve pilfered from the pockets of those whose lives they’ve made miserable.

And here’s how it will happen: the federal government will track neighborhoods according to race, class, and ethnicity. Then, the feds will descend, rezone the area, and proceed to transform American suburbs into the equivalent of Venezuela. The hope is that flooding established communities with lower-income people that represent the racial, religious, and economic makeup of the government’s choosing will result in the ultimate exorcism of injustice.

Sound impossible? According to an article in the Seattle Times titled “Get rid of single-family zoning? These conversations shouldn’t be secret“, Seattle Mayor Ed Murray’s advisory committee on housing’s co-chair drafted a letter that said this “We can still be a city for everyone, but only if we give up our outdated ideal of every family living in their own home on a 5,000 square foot lot.”

Can anyone say eminent domain?

For those who still don’t get it, this is not about hardworking black and Latino Americans buying and moving into white neighborhoods where they are welcome to live as free citizens, this is about the government socially engineering what they perceive to be WASP neighborhoods with a deluge of third-world types and refugees from Muslim countries who, once here, open bodegas and build mosques.

And if that’s not disturbing enough, after the complexion, religion and language of a neighborhood has been altered to the government’s liking, according to the 64-page White House Task Force (emphasis on force) on New Americans April 2015 “Strengthening Communities by Welcoming All Residents: A Federal Strategic Action Plan on Immigrant and Refugee Integration” prospectus, Barack Obama has plans to safeguard against the residents balking. To make sure “newcomers” are greeted in a friendly manner, Obama’s blueprint proposes the imposition of “Welcoming Communities.”

Question: How does government strong-arm a community to be welcoming?

At any rate, Obama maintains that if an unauthorized, unsanctioned hardworking but undocumented person has a family and wants to stay in America, instead of an ‘illegal,’ he or she should be characterized as a “new American.” For those of us presently having our neighborhoods overrun with undocumented intruders, that excuse is sort of like saying if a home invader has a family and empties the dishwasher and runs the vacuum after raiding the jewelry drawer, homeowners should view home invasion in a positive light.

Meanwhile Barack Obama has a double-spiked fence encircling his residence.

Either way, the president’s goal is to “further strengthen the federal government’s integration efforts by making them more strategic and deliberate.” That step requires “[e]nergetic AmeriCorps VISTA members” be dispatched into American communities to “implement local integration plans.”

For those who are unfamiliar with AmeriCorps, they are the domestic equivalent of the Peace Corps. AmeriCorps members are recruited and supported by the federal government and AmeriCorps is defined as a “civil society program.” The government determines what a ‘civil society’ is and then ObamaCorps, er… I mean AmeriCorps troops are enlisted to enforce liberal diktats under the guise of community service.

Then there’s AmeriCorps VISTA. Rest assured that if poverty-fighting AmeriCorps VISTA is being asked to report in, poverty is coming to middle class neighborhoods and according to Obama’s transformative federal plan, economic destitution is about to be equitably allocated.

And if brown-shirt and patent leather-booted community organizers marching lockstep through American suburbs weren’t enough to chill your block party beer keg to the core, in addition to guaranteeing that newcomers have preferential access to housing, healthcare and education, arbiters of the civil society will also serve as Refugee Job Developers whose business will be to advance “immigrant-focused career-pathways programs.

In an environment where 92 million Americans are currently out of the labor force, AmeriCorps responsibilities will include “identifying and partnering with local employers willing to hire newly arrived refugees with limited English skills.”

Translation: the federal government’s goons have been given the mission to ensure that low-skilled newcomers be given employment opportunity preference over citizens whose blood, sweat, and tears built this soon-to-be-remade nation.

Then, as an added bonus, after the communities are fully organized, AmeriCorps will spend time installing government-funded “community solar” panels, which, among other things, will use taxpayer monies to save the planet while providing clean solar power to renters or others with limited financial means.

And so Obama’s remodeling of America is progressing along nicely. Illegal aliens, who swarm over the border like ants at a picnic have been granted the kinder, gentler moniker “new Americans” and based on the makeup of long-established communities HUD is currently indicting neighborhoods for bias.  In addition, plans are also being made to bus into the suburbs cultures and peoples who have already declared that they have no plans to assimilate.

After that, the only hurdle left is seeing the day when illegal “new Americans,” like a modern-day Ruby Bridges, are escorted around town by community organizers/solar panel installers who, on behalf of President Obama, will be also charged with the job to coerce the conquered receiving community to be more welcoming.

Winning ‘Hearts and Minds’ with Obama and Geraldo

Heart-and-BrainOriginally posted at American Thinker

Recently, two well-known public figures made massively ludicrous comments, both of which laid bare the amazing inconsistency of how liberals think. The first of the two remarks issued forth from the mouth of President Obama, who, while on a visit to the Pentagon, shared deep thoughts about a battle the world is currently in the process of losing.

Here’s some of what Mr. Obama had to say:

Ultimately, in order … to defeat terrorist groups like ISIL and al Qaeda it’s going to also require us to discredit their ideology [and] the twisted thinking that draws vulnerable people into their ranks[.] … Ideologies are not defeated with guns; they’re defeated by better ideas [and] a more attractive and more compelling vision.

Obviously, misguided mega-narcissist Barack believes that with “heart and mind”-altering techniques, the threat from ISIS, whose goal is to bring to pass a 1,300-year-old apocalyptic prophecy, will ultimately be neutralized.

And trust me – no one is going to convince this dude otherwise.

One would think that if the president were working on a generational “hearts and minds” campaign, somewhere along the line he would have had his own “heart and mind” changed about at least one of his deeply held yet delusional left-wing beliefs. Instead, unbending Barack is notorious for digging in, doubling down, and being virtually immovable when it comes to having his “heart and mind” changed about the nonsensical philosophies he ardently clings to.

And while winning “hearts and minds” is important, Obama is concurrently engaged in conveying messages about the issues he, like ISIS, is religiously devoted to.

Case in point: within the body of his Pentagon speech, after discussing winning “hearts and minds,” Obama exhibited his usual dogged determination to placate Muslim-American sensibilities. So rather than laying out plans to conquer ISIS, the president made sure to insert a goodly amount of commentary wherein he alluded to right-wing extremism and placed Americans on a par with terrorists.

Then, proving again that Obama’s “twisted thinking” will never change, the president made mention of the shooting in Charleston.

By infusing a speech about “winning hearts and minds” with references to racism and xenophobia in America, and by insisting on sticking his finger into festering wounds rather than winning people over, the guy with the better ideas accomplished the opposite.

Nonetheless, a poised and self-assured Obama undoubtedly feels that he alone possesses the verbal skills necessary to morally convince ISIS that beheading infidels is “twisted thinking.” The problem is that the one doing the moralizing seems to have forgotten that he supports the slaughter of 4,000 unborn babies a day, and does so with the same religious fervor as ISIS hacking and burning their way through Syria and Iraq.

In other words, unless the plan is to replace one bad idea with another, how in God’s name is a “twisted thinker” like abortion advocate Obama, of all people, going to discredit a perverted line of thought that involves cutting out beating hearts and detaching heads?

Moreover, this is a president whose “more attractive and more compelling vision” includes a virtually open border that gives Muslim extremists easy access to massacre members of the community that he celebrated by lighting up the White House in rainbow colors in honor of gay pride.

And Barack Obama feels he’s qualified to pontificate to ISIS about better ideas?

Never mind the fact that the “heart and mind” of America’s Grand Progressive Philosopher shall not be moved when it comes to things such as “sharing the wealth,” climate change, and the “fundamental transformation” of America. Not to mention a multitude of lawless endeavors to institute undemocratic initiatives that include the ever-unpopular Obamacare, the forcible diversification of America’s suburban neighborhoods, and Obama’s ongoing attempts to hamstring the First and Second Amendments.

Moreover, what’s apparent here is that this president doesn’t grasp the concept that by his own rigid adherence to liberal ideology, he proves that changing “hearts and minds” is an approach bound to fail. After all, if a better idea were all that is needed to eradicate toxic belief systems, liberalism would already be long forgotten. But it’s not.

Speaking of the blight of liberal thought, there’s the other half of the dumb-and-dumber duo of liberal contradiction: Fox News senior correspondent Geraldo Rivera.

Typically, Geraldo Rivera can be found physically assuming a 90-degree angle in gale-force winds or donning riot gear while being lowered by helicopter to interview thugs who assault police officers with bricks.

In addition to being Fox’s man on the scene, Rivera is also notorious for offering the contrarian view to all things conservative. That’s what the senior correspondent did in the wake of Kathryn Steinle’s murder when Sean Hannity hosted the grieving parents of three victims also murdered by illegal immigrants.

After hearing that two died in drunk driving accidents and one was shot in the head while sitting at a stoplight, Geraldo, whose “heart and mind” position is just as dogmatic as Obama’s, persisted in defending illegal immigration.

World-class debater Geraldo argued that if we “put up a wall 100 miles high people like this murderer in San Francisco will get a 100 mile [and] one foot fence to climb it.” Geraldo asserted that determined Mexican criminals would always find a way to circumvent a border wall.

Wait! Doesn’t Geraldo also maintain that gun control would prevent determined criminals from gaining access to guns? Much like “heart and mind”-winner Barack Obama, Geraldo’s position on a border wall contradicts his argument about guns.

So, notwithstanding Geraldo’s self-negating points of view concerning guns and borders, without a wall to keep criminal cretins out, the determined will just continue to cross the border and, once on the American side, will continue to kill innocent people with illegal guns.

As for the obstinate occupier of the White House, when not busy stirring up trouble inside America, the winner of “hearts and minds” is determined to advance his doomed mission to deter ISIS from crucifying and beheading their way to world domination.

NO TIME FOR KATHRYN STEINLE! Obama Focused on Martha’s Vineyard

gty_obama_vacation_ordering_jc_140711_4x3_992Originally posted at CLASH Daily

While the Obama family packs for their summer vacation, Kathryn Steinle’s devastated loved ones are preparing to pay their final respects to the girl with the winning smile.

Kathryn is the San Francisco woman murdered by a five-time deported illegal who was munching on Cheetos when he was arrested for firing a bullet that landed in the late woman’s back. After enjoying a meal with her father Jim and a family friend at Perry’s restaurant on San Francisco’s Embarcadero, Kathryn made the fatal mistake of taking an evening stroll in a sanctuary city.

To escape federal immigration law, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez was also there, only he was skulking around the City by the Bay waiting for the day when he could vote without having to provide proof of citizenship or ID.

Totally oblivious to the impending danger, Ms. Steinle was snapping photos when the illegal alien with multiple aliases and several birth dates showed up on Pier 14. That night Juan Sanchez came to Pier 14 to shoot sea lions which, although a moot point, also breaks federal and state law. After being arrested and released seven times before, Sanchez must have figured, and rightly so, that American laws, whether crossing the border or shooting sea lions, were nothing he needed to worry about.

In the end, protected wildlife was not harmed. Instead, a lovely 32-year-old woman minding her own business was mortally wounded with a bullet in her back, and bled out begging for her father’s help.

After being arrested and admitting he shot Steinle, Juan Francisco now sits in a prison cell dressed in a taxpayer-provided Hillary-Clinton-orange pantsuit with matching jailhouse crocs.

Since his arrest, the accused has revised his original sea lion story. Sanchez now claims that he is an innocent victim of happenstance. In broken English, Juan Francisco explained to a reporter that he found a gun under a bench wrapped in a T-shirt, and how, when he picked up the T-shirt, the gun accidentally fired three bullets, one of which severed Kathryn Steinle’s aorta.

So now Americans are expected to believe that Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez is clever enough to find his way back across the border five times, savvy enough to have multiple aliases and birth dates, but too dense to realize he picked up a gun and shot someone in the back?

Then again, in fairness to a newcomer, maybe the alleged shooter, here to do jobs Americans won’t do, just got mixed up. That would explain how after being deported five times Sanchez ended up back in the US. It could be that just like he picked up a gun, he picked up a map, and instead of ending up in Juarez, Juan Francisco misread it and fortuitously ended up in San Francisco.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, safely hidden behind a fence with reinforced spikes, the president has more important things to attend to than runaway guns “acting stupidly” and causing innocent illegals to be accused of murders they didn’t mean to commit.

Although he has time to breathlessly do everything from appearing at the mic to opine on things like gangbanging thugs dying at the hands of law enforcement to making personal phone calls to free-contraceptive activists like Sandra Fluke, thus far Chief Law Enforcement official Barack Obama has had no time to publicly acknowledge or offer condolences for Kathryn Steinle’s murder.

Instead, Obama is busy lobbying for bad guys, stirring up racial animosity, promoting nonexistent climate change, preparing to “fundamentally transform” the criminal justice system, celebrating the US Supreme Court’s overthrow of the US Constitution, and coming up with a half-assed alibi for why he authorized more than 30,000 violent illegal felons of Sanchez’s ilk to be released onto America’s streets.

Moreover, it’s summer, for God’s sake.

That’s why, despite Barack Obama’s reckless immigration policies being responsible for Kathryn Steinle’s coffin being slowly lowered to her final resting place, neither the president nor his family, entourage, or personal manicurist have allowed reality to deter them from eagerly looking forward to their upcoming annual multimillion dollar getaway in Martha’s Vineyard.

Dying on the Sidewalk of Nancy Pelosi’s Sanctuary City

image33-420x260Originally posted at American Thinker

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) once said that regardless of legal status, “north and south in this hemisphere… we are all Americans.” Based on that absurd statement, it stands to reason that Nancy Pelosi would be the Grand Diva of the sanctuary city that gave 45-year-old illegal alien Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez asylum from deportation.

In the past, Pelosi also warned America that if Republicans stopped ObamaCare funding for abortion ‘women would die on the floor.’

Thus far, not one woman has “died on the floor” because of Republican policy. However, what has happened is that in Pelosi’s very own Democrat-controlled sanctuary city, on a warm summer evening, a young woman perished on the sidewalk after being shot by an undocumented alien who found refuge under the wings of Nancy Pelosi-approved lax immigration policy.

It seems that while Mrs. Pelosi was actively trying to warn prochoice women about the dangers of being denied funding to murder their unborn children, with her approval, illegal menace Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez was lurking around San Francisco.

After being deported and dropped off south of the border five times, thanks to Obama’s nonexistent border security, Juan, like a boomerang, kept returning.

Apart from being in the U.S. illegally, “Sanchez has seven prior felony convictions, four of which were for drug charges.” The Mexico native’s felony “convictions took place in states including Texas, Oregon and Arizona.” Yet somehow, San Francisco Bay authorities released Sanchez.

With that in mind, here’s a question for Obama:  Um, excuse me Mr. President, but did Sanchez happen to be one of the 36,000 criminal illegal-alien violent felons awaiting deportation who were released by your empathetic, illegal immigration-loving administration?

As we wait for that answer, maybe America should contemplate the fact that if Juan Francisco was one of the thousands released, then there’s a good chance armies of similar undocumented menaces are rambling around in all “57” of the states Barack Obama managed to drop in on.

Nonetheless, in Lopez-Sanchez’s case, despite all the time and money spent on him and his repeated felonious actions, the illegal alien must have felt confident in his ability to continue to defy the law.  In fact, so secure was he that, on a walk in the evening light on Pier 14 in San Francisco, with plans to shoot sea lions from the bridge Mr. Sanchez brought along an illegal firearm.

By the way, sneaking into the U.S. is illegal, and so is shooting protected marine wildlife.

Nevertheless, Sanchez, who thus far has seen no need to remain in the shadows, keep a low profile, or obey American laws, pressed on with the plan to lean over the side of a bridge and illegally plant bullets in a sea lion or two –- or as Barack Obama might more sensitively describe it, share the many layers of ethnic diversity by fishing Mexican-style in a city that appreciates colorful cultural contributions.

Sadly, at about the same time, 32-year-old sales rep/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo student Kate Steinle, after finishing dinner with her father Jim, decided to also take an evening stroll on the same bridge.

That’s when the 5x deported Mexican illegal’s gun, which may or may not turn out to be ill-gotten contraband compliments of Obama’s Fast & Furious scheme, accidentally discharged, and instead of a bullet landing in the head of a sea lion, it hit Kathryn square in the back.

After Steinle’s heart stopped twice, she died, not on the floor like Nancy Pelosi predicted would happen to women thanks to prolife policy, but in a hospital in her parents’ arms.

An illegal immigrant barred from having a gun shoots at sea lions and accidentally kills a young woman minding her own business and Obama, who lives in a constant state of indignation about the Second Amendment, has nothing to say?

Equally silent is San Francisco’s very own Nancy Pelosi. Nancy conjured up a fantasy scenario about imaginary women dying on the floor and vowed to protect a woman’s right to murder children, and did it while bestowing symbolic citizenship on and asylum to illegals whose major contribution to America thus far has been ever-mounting death and destruction.

Hence, without further ado, Americans have a moral duty to demand that liberal Democrat apologists who support illegal immigration finally account for the gross recklessness that has resulted in yet another senseless, untimely death.