Tag Archives: San Francisco

NO TIME FOR KATHRYN STEINLE! Obama Focused on Martha’s Vineyard

gty_obama_vacation_ordering_jc_140711_4x3_992Originally posted at CLASH Daily

While the Obama family packs for their summer vacation, Kathryn Steinle’s devastated loved ones are preparing to pay their final respects to the girl with the winning smile.

Kathryn is the San Francisco woman murdered by a five-time deported illegal who was munching on Cheetos when he was arrested for firing a bullet that landed in the late woman’s back. After enjoying a meal with her father Jim and a family friend at Perry’s restaurant on San Francisco’s Embarcadero, Kathryn made the fatal mistake of taking an evening stroll in a sanctuary city.

To escape federal immigration law, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez was also there, only he was skulking around the City by the Bay waiting for the day when he could vote without having to provide proof of citizenship or ID.

Totally oblivious to the impending danger, Ms. Steinle was snapping photos when the illegal alien with multiple aliases and several birth dates showed up on Pier 14. That night Juan Sanchez came to Pier 14 to shoot sea lions which, although a moot point, also breaks federal and state law. After being arrested and released seven times before, Sanchez must have figured, and rightly so, that American laws, whether crossing the border or shooting sea lions, were nothing he needed to worry about.

In the end, protected wildlife was not harmed. Instead, a lovely 32-year-old woman minding her own business was mortally wounded with a bullet in her back, and bled out begging for her father’s help.

After being arrested and admitting he shot Steinle, Juan Francisco now sits in a prison cell dressed in a taxpayer-provided Hillary-Clinton-orange pantsuit with matching jailhouse crocs.

Since his arrest, the accused has revised his original sea lion story. Sanchez now claims that he is an innocent victim of happenstance. In broken English, Juan Francisco explained to a reporter that he found a gun under a bench wrapped in a T-shirt, and how, when he picked up the T-shirt, the gun accidentally fired three bullets, one of which severed Kathryn Steinle’s aorta.

So now Americans are expected to believe that Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez is clever enough to find his way back across the border five times, savvy enough to have multiple aliases and birth dates, but too dense to realize he picked up a gun and shot someone in the back?

Then again, in fairness to a newcomer, maybe the alleged shooter, here to do jobs Americans won’t do, just got mixed up. That would explain how after being deported five times Sanchez ended up back in the US. It could be that just like he picked up a gun, he picked up a map, and instead of ending up in Juarez, Juan Francisco misread it and fortuitously ended up in San Francisco.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, safely hidden behind a fence with reinforced spikes, the president has more important things to attend to than runaway guns “acting stupidly” and causing innocent illegals to be accused of murders they didn’t mean to commit.

Although he has time to breathlessly do everything from appearing at the mic to opine on things like gangbanging thugs dying at the hands of law enforcement to making personal phone calls to free-contraceptive activists like Sandra Fluke, thus far Chief Law Enforcement official Barack Obama has had no time to publicly acknowledge or offer condolences for Kathryn Steinle’s murder.

Instead, Obama is busy lobbying for bad guys, stirring up racial animosity, promoting nonexistent climate change, preparing to “fundamentally transform” the criminal justice system, celebrating the US Supreme Court’s overthrow of the US Constitution, and coming up with a half-assed alibi for why he authorized more than 30,000 violent illegal felons of Sanchez’s ilk to be released onto America’s streets.

Moreover, it’s summer, for God’s sake.

That’s why, despite Barack Obama’s reckless immigration policies being responsible for Kathryn Steinle’s coffin being slowly lowered to her final resting place, neither the president nor his family, entourage, or personal manicurist have allowed reality to deter them from eagerly looking forward to their upcoming annual multimillion dollar getaway in Martha’s Vineyard.

Dying on the Sidewalk of Nancy Pelosi’s Sanctuary City

image33-420x260Originally posted at American Thinker

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) once said that regardless of legal status, “north and south in this hemisphere… we are all Americans.” Based on that absurd statement, it stands to reason that Nancy Pelosi would be the Grand Diva of the sanctuary city that gave 45-year-old illegal alien Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez asylum from deportation.

In the past, Pelosi also warned America that if Republicans stopped ObamaCare funding for abortion ‘women would die on the floor.’

Thus far, not one woman has “died on the floor” because of Republican policy. However, what has happened is that in Pelosi’s very own Democrat-controlled sanctuary city, on a warm summer evening, a young woman perished on the sidewalk after being shot by an undocumented alien who found refuge under the wings of Nancy Pelosi-approved lax immigration policy.

It seems that while Mrs. Pelosi was actively trying to warn prochoice women about the dangers of being denied funding to murder their unborn children, with her approval, illegal menace Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez was lurking around San Francisco.

After being deported and dropped off south of the border five times, thanks to Obama’s nonexistent border security, Juan, like a boomerang, kept returning.

Apart from being in the U.S. illegally, “Sanchez has seven prior felony convictions, four of which were for drug charges.” The Mexico native’s felony “convictions took place in states including Texas, Oregon and Arizona.” Yet somehow, San Francisco Bay authorities released Sanchez.

With that in mind, here’s a question for Obama:  Um, excuse me Mr. President, but did Sanchez happen to be one of the 36,000 criminal illegal-alien violent felons awaiting deportation who were released by your empathetic, illegal immigration-loving administration?

As we wait for that answer, maybe America should contemplate the fact that if Juan Francisco was one of the thousands released, then there’s a good chance armies of similar undocumented menaces are rambling around in all “57” of the states Barack Obama managed to drop in on.

Nonetheless, in Lopez-Sanchez’s case, despite all the time and money spent on him and his repeated felonious actions, the illegal alien must have felt confident in his ability to continue to defy the law.  In fact, so secure was he that, on a walk in the evening light on Pier 14 in San Francisco, with plans to shoot sea lions from the bridge Mr. Sanchez brought along an illegal firearm.

By the way, sneaking into the U.S. is illegal, and so is shooting protected marine wildlife.

Nevertheless, Sanchez, who thus far has seen no need to remain in the shadows, keep a low profile, or obey American laws, pressed on with the plan to lean over the side of a bridge and illegally plant bullets in a sea lion or two –- or as Barack Obama might more sensitively describe it, share the many layers of ethnic diversity by fishing Mexican-style in a city that appreciates colorful cultural contributions.

Sadly, at about the same time, 32-year-old sales rep/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo student Kate Steinle, after finishing dinner with her father Jim, decided to also take an evening stroll on the same bridge.

That’s when the 5x deported Mexican illegal’s gun, which may or may not turn out to be ill-gotten contraband compliments of Obama’s Fast & Furious scheme, accidentally discharged, and instead of a bullet landing in the head of a sea lion, it hit Kathryn square in the back.

After Steinle’s heart stopped twice, she died, not on the floor like Nancy Pelosi predicted would happen to women thanks to prolife policy, but in a hospital in her parents’ arms.

An illegal immigrant barred from having a gun shoots at sea lions and accidentally kills a young woman minding her own business and Obama, who lives in a constant state of indignation about the Second Amendment, has nothing to say?

Equally silent is San Francisco’s very own Nancy Pelosi. Nancy conjured up a fantasy scenario about imaginary women dying on the floor and vowed to protect a woman’s right to murder children, and did it while bestowing symbolic citizenship on and asylum to illegals whose major contribution to America thus far has been ever-mounting death and destruction.

Hence, without further ado, Americans have a moral duty to demand that liberal Democrat apologists who support illegal immigration finally account for the gross recklessness that has resulted in yet another senseless, untimely death.

Nancy Pelosi Should Quit and Follow Her Passions

imagesOriginally posted at American Thinker

Minority Leader Nancy “Nip/Tuck” Pelosi, the woman who strutted around Washington, D.C. with a king-sized gavel when Obamacare was passed into law, is 74 years old.  Now, in the aftermath of the trouncing the Democrats took during the midterm election, an obvious question has arisen as to whether the granny with the gavel should hang up her dream of another go-round as House minority leader.

So, at a Capitol News conference, in response to a question about the suggestion that the millionaire politician should either take her hefty pension and head home to the City by the Bay or at least pass the House minority leader position to someone younger, Nancy played the trusty sexism card and threw in a smidgeon of ageism accusations for good measure.

Dressed in a tailored soldier blue suit with an uncooperative collar lined in canary yellow, at one point, Nancy became so angry with reporters while trying to say, “As a woman, is there a message here?” that her top lip kept getting stuck on her caps.  In fact, judging by Pelosi’s bulging eyes and garbled speech, it was hard to tell whether her $20,000 necklace was strangling her, she had been hitting the Johnny Walker Red, or she was just majorly ticked off.

The very irate Mrs. Pelosi challenged the press, asking, “When was the day that any of you said to Mitch McConnell, when they lost the Senate three times in a row … ‘aren’t you getting a little old, Mitch?  Shouldn’t you step aside?’

“Have any of you ever asked him that question?

“So, I don’t understand why that question should even come up,” Pelosi said.

Maybe the question hasn’t come up because although soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is not the most vivacious person in Washington, D.C., at least when you put the man in front of a mic he doesn’t say ridiculous things like “Every week we don’t pass a stimulus package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs,” or “Unemployment benefits are creating jobs faster than practically any other program.”

Regardless of McConnell’s age or lack of charisma, he would be hard-pressed to outdo Pelosi’s pièce de résistance: “We have to pass the [health care] bill so you can find out what is in it.”

And that’s just scratching the surface.  Nancy has also provided fodder for jokes by saying that Republicans want to see “women dying on the floor,” that immigration laws are “un-American,” and that she believes natural gas is a cheap alternative to fossil fuel – which is natural gas.

All these things, plus the septuagenarian’s growing inability to express a point without twitching, flapping her hands, and/or stammering, indicate that regardless of whether or not she believes that the Democratic caucus still put their faith in her or that she still (God help us all) has a mission to accomplish, the truth is that Nancy Pelosi should absolutely step down.

Instead, as with all liberal women, Nancy’s response is to play “the war on women card.”  Then, after accusing those who thought she should think about retiring of being sexists, a flustered Nancy stressed that “[her] life and who [she is] is not dependent on being here” or on the cover of TIME magazine.

If that’s true, then why is the minority leader refusing to pass the baton?

Nancy also said, “I have the liberty…if you want me to be here, I’m happy to be here.  If you don’t, I’m proud of what we’ve done together.”

Huh?

Anyway, what Granny Pelosi said is true.  Thanks to a health care policy that has stripped millions of their insurance plans and their jobs, unlike the rest of us, pro-choice Nancy does have the liberty to make a choice most Americans are being denied.

Which raises the question: why is Mrs. Pelosi being a defensive “Negative Nancy”?  Especially since, when union leader James Hoffa, Jr. accused Obamacare of standing to “destroy the foundation of the 40-hour work week,” it was an optimistic Nancy Pelosi who told CNN’s “State of the Union” host Candy Crowley that joblessness ushers in “liberation.”

Doesn’t Nancy remember saying that losing a 40-hour work week frees up Americans to “pursue … happiness … [and] … follow passion?”

Why does Nancy view the suggestion that she should step down or scale back her working as sexism and ageism?  Wasn’t it Ms. Nancy who said that being unemployed is “about wellness … prevention … a healthy America?”

That’s why Leader Pelosi should apply her jobless theory to herself and embrace unemployment with the eager anticipation of someone on the cusp of finding newfound independence and contentment!

With her time freed up, think of all Nancy could do!  The former speaker/minority leader could spend afternoons stomping grapes in one of her Napa Valley vineyards, or she could string imitation Tahitian pearls, or maybe she could follow her true passion by volunteering to answer phones at her favorite plastic surgeon’s Botox clinic.

Nancy Pelosi ought to submit to her own counsel and willingly retire her minority leadership, take down her congressional shingle, and head back to Rice-a-Roniville.  Then maybe she’ll be able to identify with the 100 million Americans who, thanks to the stunning accomplishments of the party Nancy represents, are also now free to follow their passions.

Michelle Obama’s Not-Quite-Right Fundraising Story

Fundraising

Originally posted at The Clash Daily

Hopping aboard a taxpayer-funded airplane, Mrs. Obama recently scooted out to California to work the fundraising circuit. Michelle dropped in at the luxurious Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco for a DNCC women’s luncheon where she urged big-money donors to “dig deep” and “max out.”

The main purpose of Michelle’s trip was to raise money to finance the 2014 mid-term elections so that those who share Obama’s twisted anti-American values can help the president drive the final nail in America’s coffin. According to the first lady, Obama wants to lift up the middle class and restore opportunity to those who, since he was elected, have lost all hope for the future.

Michelle seems convinced that Americans “working 40 or 50 hours a week” who are now “stuck in poverty” can count on those who caused the mess to fix it.

During her stem-winder Michelle brought up the usual “there but for the grace of God go I” baloney that neither she nor Barack actually believe. She also stressed that “Our young daughters are counting on us to fight for their rights and freedoms,” which is code for abortion rights.

The first lady promoted the American Dream that, thanks to her husband, is fast becoming a socialistic nightmare, and applauded the ACA, which seriously hurts the five million Americans who lost their health insurance if they should receive a “terrible diagnosis” or have a “horrible accident.”

Michelle conveyed visual examples of Americans “falling off a cliff” and going without “food and medicine or a roof over [their] heads,” all situations that have intensified while Obama’s been playing president for the last five years.

To advance the liberal agenda, Michelle implored, “there is something that all of you can do right now… you can write a check…  And if you’ve written one… write another one…  Write a big old check.  Write the biggest check that you can possibly write.”

Then, Michelle goaded donors to “Leave San Francisco. Leave this bastion. Go out into the wilderness” – door-to-door and solicit the “bitter clinger” vote.

But amidst all the usual fundraising hogwash, what stood out the most were the glaring contradictions concerning how to achieve success in America.

How can a Princeton/Harvard-educated woman jet hither and yon, for free, on a jet paid for by the American taxpayer, beg for handouts from the rich to further “social justice” and then say, “[w]e don’t believe in handouts.  We don’t believe that anyone should get a free ride”?

Then, to convince donors to contribute money to elect liberals she believes will give the less-privileged a “fair shot,” Michelle Obama tells her own “working-class kid from the South Side of Chicago” hard-luck story of growing up in a family that wasn’t rich.

If her story is true, it was her father’s hard work, a stable family life, and personal determination that helped Michelle Obama eventually graduate law school. That means regardless of her circumstances, the first lady’s accomplishments had nothing to do with government giving her a “fair shot.” In reality, Michelle is where she is today because she was a “kid with … big dreams,” a measure of individual resolve, and responsible parents.

Yet Mrs. Obama continues to promote the lie that government central can impart something to America’s children that bureaucratic bolstering has proven it does not have the power to do. In fact, Michelle is so committed to perpetuating that falsehood that she didn’t tell just one hardscrabble story, she told two!

Next, she shared the plight of Troy Simon, a young man with a troubled childhood from “a struggling family in New Orleans.” At 14 years of age, “Troy still couldn’t read.  Troy couldn’t write.  Troy couldn’t even count very well.”

According to Michelle, Troy “got to work…buckled down at school,” caught up, applied to college, and is now a sophomore at Bard College majoring in American Literature. In other words, Troy Simon turned his life without government prodding, handouts and free rides.

At some point Troy decided that he wanted to succeed, and went about it without Joan Baez singing at a tony San Francisco hotel or Michelle Obama telling rich people to cough up another huge check. That’s why someone should politely inform Mrs. Obama – who indicts America by implying there is a lack of opportunity whenever she says, “Not in America. That’s not who we are” – that Troy Simon’s achievement is exactly who America is.

Clearly, Michelle does not recognize the confusion caused by pushing the nanny state using gutter-to-glory stories of personal triumph. Nonetheless, she continues to say, “I can’t help but think how their story could be my story.  But I also remember that my story can be their story if we give these kids a chance.”

Whether Michelle Obama realizes it or not, Troy Simon’s story is her story. That’s why, the next time the first lady is out fundraising, hard work, self-determination, and the wisdom to avail oneself of America’s unparalleled opportunity is the story she ought to be sharing.

 

During her stem-winder Michelle brought up the usual “there but for the grace of God go I” baloney that neither she nor Barack actually believe. She also stressed that “Our young daughters are counting on us to fight for their rights and freedoms,” which is code for abortion rights.

The first lady promoted the American Dream that, thanks to her husband, is fast becoming a socialistic nightmare, and applauded the ACA, which seriously hurts the five million Americans who lost their health insurance if they should receive a “terrible diagnosis” or have a “horrible accident.”

Michelle conveyed visual examples of Americans “falling off a cliff” and going without “food and medicine or a roof over [their] heads,” all situations that have intensified while Obama’s been playing president for the last five years.

To advance the liberal agenda, Michelle implored, “there is something that all of you can do right now… you can write a check…  And if you’ve written one… write another one…  Write a big old check.  Write the biggest check that you can possibly write.”

Then, Michelle goaded donors to “Leave San Francisco. Leave this bastion. Go out into the wilderness” – door-to-door and solicit the “bitter clinger” vote.

But amidst all the usual fundraising hogwash, what stood out the most were the glaring contradictions concerning how to achieve success in America.

How can a Princeton/Harvard-educated woman jet hither and yon, for free, on a jet paid for by the American taxpayer, beg for handouts from the rich to further “social justice” and then say, “[w]e don’t believe in handouts.  We don’t believe that anyone should get a free ride”?

Then, to convince donors to contribute money to elect liberals she believes will give the less-privileged a “fair shot,” Michelle Obama tells her own “working-class kid from the South Side of Chicago” hard-luck story of growing up in a family that wasn’t rich.

If her story is true, it was her father’s hard work, a stable family life, and personal determination that helped Michelle Obama eventually graduate law school. That means regardless of her circumstances, the first lady’s accomplishments had nothing to do with government giving her a “fair shot.” In reality, Michelle is where she is today because she was a “kid with … big dreams,” a measure of individual resolve, and responsible parents.

Yet Mrs. Obama continues to promote the lie that government central can impart something to America’s children that bureaucratic bolstering has proven it does not have the power to do. In fact, Michelle is so committed to perpetuating that falsehood that she didn’t tell just one hardscrabble story, she told two!

Next, she shared the plight of Troy Simon, a young man with a troubled childhood from “a struggling family in New Orleans.” At 14 years of age, “Troy still couldn’t read.  Troy couldn’t write.  Troy couldn’t even count very well.”

According to Michelle, Troy “got to work…buckled down at school,” caught up, applied to college, and is now a sophomore at Bard College majoring in American Literature. In other words, Troy Simon turned his life without government prodding, handouts and free rides.

At some point Troy decided that he wanted to succeed, and went about it without Joan Baez singing at a tony San Francisco hotel or Michelle Obama telling rich people to cough up another huge check. That’s why someone should politely inform Mrs. Obama – who indicts America by implying there is a lack of opportunity whenever she says, “Not in America. That’s not who we are” – that Troy Simon’s achievement is exactly who America is.

Clearly, Michelle does not recognize the confusion caused by pushing the nanny state using gutter-to-glory stories of personal triumph. Nonetheless, she continues to say, “I can’t help but think how their story could be my story.  But I also remember that my story can be their story if we give these kids a chance.”

Whether Michelle Obama realizes it or not, Troy Simon’s story is her story. That’s why, the next time the first lady is out fundraising, hard work, self-determination, and the wisdom to avail oneself of America’s unparalleled opportunity is the story she ought to be sharing.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/02/michelle-obamas-quite-right-fundraising-story/#QdyLvaL6jmQPiTOc.99

Liberals Litter on Earth Day

Originally posted at American Thinker blog

There are many things about liberals that are infuriating, but one of the most aggravating is their unabashed hypocrisy.  From the President of the United States to Earth Day revelers in a San Francisco park, what sets liberals apart from sane people is that they rarely do what they demand from everyone else.  It’s almost as if the left’s ideology embraced a tenet that if you preach about it, and if you look and talk the part, you’re instantly exempt from actually doing what it is you promote.

In other words, liberals are like grown up Boy Scouts who love to wear the uniform and recite the oath, but refuse to live by it.

That talk-but-won’t-walk tendency is exemplified when the President talks down the moneyed class and then fills his campaign coffers with gifts from rich people.  It’s Michelle Obama hawking healthy food and publicly eating anything but.  It’s the mentality that tries to force generosity by way of government mandate on people who already give, initiated by folks like Joe Biden whose charitable contributions totaled all of 1.5% of his 2011 annual income.

Time and again, liberals prove that secretly they adhere to the motto: “For thee, but not for me.” And nothing illustrated that philosophy like this year’s Earth Day in Fort Mason and Dolores Park in San Francisco.   Spurred by the desire to participate in a 42-year-old event, eco-minded activists from all over descended on green San Francisco’s Marina District parks in commemoration of Earth Day. The goal was to draw attention to the global effort to protect the planet, but when the planet-protectors left the premises it was littered with piles of refuse.

Planet-conscious people left behind empty liquor bottles, beer cans — including the rings that could choke Jonathan Livingston Seagull to death — as well as pieces of broken-up furniture.

This isn’t a unique situation; green-minded Obama supporters were so overwhelmed with joy on the day of President’s inauguration in 2009 that they lost their heads and left 100 tons of garbage strewn across the National Mall.

Can these be the Chevy Volt drivers who pack their groceries in cloth bags and fill recycle bins with glass and aluminum and would rather be flogged with a cat-o’-nine tails than sip from a Styrofoam cup?  When they gather en masse to support a pro-environment politician or attend a global Earth Day celebration, greenies leave it looking like a garbage dump. Perhaps it is a case of the 99 percent giving the Volt-owning one percenters a bad name.

Apparently the symbolism of participating in a group event is all the identity a liberal needs to feel like something was accomplished.  In all they do, it appears as if they believe exhorting others to adopt their political philosophy fulfills the requirement for personal action on their part. When liberals gather for Earth Day and then leave mountains of trash scattered all over a public park, they must feel they have a right to do so, because the mere fact that they care about the planet is worth more in their minds than cleaning up the disgusting mess they generated and then left behind.

But then again, leaving behind messes is what liberals do best. Take Barack Obama for example. While he hasn’t literally littered the country with empty Bud suitcases or tossed cigarette butts out the window of his armored limousine, what he has made is a mess of our economy and foreign policy.

Pelosi’s Bitter Fruit

Bedecked in one of many $10,000 golf ball-sized pearl necklaces, multimillionaire and part-time viticulturist Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi dazzled the audience at a United Steelworkers event where she expressed revulsion over “income inequality in America.”

The keynote speech addressed the “disparity of income and the gap between the rich and the poor, as well as the need for jobs.” America’s matron of fairness spoke on behalf of the Democrat Party’s plan to equalize the wealth of the nation, saying:

We’re talking about addressing the disparity of income where the wealthy people continue to get wealthier and some other people are falling out of the middle class when we want to bring many more people into the middle class.

If what Nancy shared with the USW is any indication of what lies ahead for America, Joe the Plumber had better hide more than his copper pipes because liberals have a strategy in the works to carve up all facets of private capital. According to the Speaker, who by the way is worth anywhere from $14,753,883 to $83,084,990, the left plans to deal directly with “the disparity of income where wealthy people continue to get wealthier.”

To the delight of union workers, Ms. Nancy also conveyed that “disparity is not just about wages alone… [but]… about ownership and equity.”  According to Pelosi, “fairness in our country” can only be realized if the government establishes parameters as to how much Americans can earn and possess, as well as the amount of equity an individual should accrue if selling personal property.

Pelosi’s “disparity is about ownership and equity” statement is quite shocking, especially coming from a person who owns the Zinfandel Lane Vineyard and the Skellenger Lane Vineyard in California’s Napa Valley.  If Nancy really plans to forge ahead as an exemplar of fairness, can wine-loving proletariats across America look forward to receiving a piece of Pelosi’s vineyard pie?

Not quite, because despite Nancy spouting the rhetoric of property and equity reallocation, getting the Speaker to ever agree to willingly share personal wealth is highly unlikely.  Although diametrically opposed to the concept of the fundamental natural right of individuals to pursue “life, liberty and property,” the liberal idea of wealth redistribution appears to be solely directed toward the common folk while granting a level of dispensation to the elite. Therefore, it’s unlikely Nancy will be divvying up pearls and possessions to further fairness in America anytime soon

It’s becoming more and more apparent that the left has a collective definition of “life, liberty and personal happiness.” The liberal vision is for the masses to be dictated to by an oppressive bureaucracy whose goal is to further fairness at the expense of individual sovereignty. Thus the Speaker’s speech to the steelworkers only underscored how the overbearing policies of the left impose on America a dictatorial form of governmental extortion.

Take for example Barack Obama sanctimoniously chastising the nation for desiring to retain what is rightfully acquired through God-given freedom and hard work. Coupled together with the President’s aggressive social agenda, Pelosi’s words only give further insight into the objective of the left’s ongoing crusade to deny Americans access to Creator-endowed rights

The left’s intention is not surprising, because liberals take offense to any hint of God-infused politics. Yet with the same zeal, secular politicians of Pelosi’s ilk proselytize for policies and legislation that inflict on America a gospel of government and do so with an air of evangelical superiority.

The hypocrisy and inherent contradiction are exemplified by Nancy Pelosi, who identifies with the pro-choice mentality: “Keep your laws off my body.”  However, in attempting to promote socialism, Pelosi refuses to “Keep laws off money and personal property.” The very leaders that want to exploit the law to impose their idea of fairness are the very same leaders who oppose the law being forced on them for moral reasons.

Wealthy, propertied leaders like Nancy Pelosi who condemn Americans for acquiring personal property are on a par with corrupt clergymen who preach holiness and chastity on Sunday and Monday through Friday live secret lives of perversion.

The Speaker’s speech presents America with an obvious question: How exactly does vineyard owner/millionaire Nancy Pelosi plan on “addressing the disparity of income?”   Who exactly decides what is fair or unfair?  Is Nancy willing to begin the process of “fair” redistribution by allotting 27 cents apiece of the $83 million in personal Pelosi wealth to 300 million less-fortunate Americans?

If the wealthy, of which Nancy Pelosi is one, invest money in “entrepreneurial packages” and make money, then why did Pelosi invest $50,000-$100,000 in T. Bone Pickens’ Clean Energy Fuel Corp? Isn’t the pressing issue that the left believes needs to be addressed by the federal government “wealthy people continuing to get wealthier?”

Furthermore, how does Nancy plan to handle the disproportionate ownership and the equity earned by being a property owner? Will Nancy begin demonstrating “fairness” by meting out one Zinfandel grape to each and every American?

The Speaker of the House and the Democrat Party treat the nation similar to a Pelosi family vineyard. The left’s oppressive policies are attempting to tie America to a trellis of social justice in order to establish collective growth.  Pruning, managing and regulating the size of the crop is part of a bureaucratic plan to distribute the fruit, or “spread the wealth,” in what is deemed by liberals to be a fair and equitable way.

What Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama fail to realize is that the blight of socialism is in the process of destroying production and is presently turning out a national harvest of extremely bitter fruit.

%d bloggers like this: