Originally posted at Live Action News
In the longest chapter in the Bible, Psalm 119, in the 160thÂ verse it is believed it was the psalmist David who wrote: â€œThe sum of your word is truth,Â and every one of your righteous rules endures forever.â€
If those who profess Christianity understood that the â€œsumâ€ of Godâ€™s Word is truth, they might be more careful to make sure that the verses from the Scripture they quote are not cherry-picked and that uncomfortable, inconvenient sayings are not ignored.
There are certain well-known political superstars that habitually inject pseudo-religiosity into pet policy initiatives and emphasize caring for the poor and feeding the hungry while misapplying Scriptures such as â€œAm I my brotherâ€™s keeper?â€ Meanwhile, the Scriptures having to do with the sanctity of God-ordained life are consistently ignored.
Jesus commanded His followers to care for the poor and feed the hungry. Yet there are many influential politicians who donâ€™t understand the contradiction posed when they emphasize feeding and caring for the poor in His name, but simultaneously sanction exterminating the unborn despite His disapproval.
If, as Scripture says, our existence is predestined by God, and He â€œchose us in Him before the creation of the worldâ€ (Ephesians 1:4), then killing in utero what He fashioned for life, for any reason whatsoever, is understandably not on the Biblical list of approved rights.
When Jesus said, â€œtruly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to â€¦ even the least of them, you did it to Meâ€ â€“ surely the helpless unborn would be much better described as â€œthe leastâ€ than the poor and hungry who, although underprivileged, made it out of the womb alive.
But then again, to some policymakers itâ€™s political expediency that matters, not godly approval.
Take for instance the likely Democrat nominee for president in 2016, Hillary Clinton. In an effort to sculpt her image into a presidential one, the former Secretary of State is pulling out all the stops. She touted her foreign policy experience at the University of Connecticut and is promoting her upcoming book, â€œHard Choicesâ€ â€“ a story whose title sounds more like something her philandering husband would choose for his own tome about his adulterous antics in the White House.
Adding a much-needed folksy vibe to Hillaryâ€™s pre-2016 image, next year Grandma Clinton will conveniently be burping a new grandbaby on the campaign trail.
Kicking it up a notch, Ms. Rodham Clinton decided it might be a good idea to bringÂ out her Methodist upbringing in front of 7,000 members of the United Methodist Church in Louisville, Kentucky.
Recently in Louisville, Clinton talked about her personal faith to the United Methodist Women, the denomination’s 800,000-member female mission group that focuses on women, children and youth. The theme of the gathering was â€œMake it Happen.â€ Its emphasis: Jesus feeding 5,000 people with just loaves of bread and two fish. Prior to her appearance, Selby Ewing, communications director for the women attending the conference, said â€œ[Hillaryâ€™s] appearance here transcends politics.â€ Ewing pointed out that â€œOur tagline is putting faith, hope and love into action.â€
The problem is that Hillary is also an avid supporter of abortion, which every day affects 3,000 women and children.
Besides, if the sum of Godâ€™s Word is truth as the Bible says it is, regardless of Hillaryâ€™s rationale for supporting worldwide feticide, slaughtering 60 million pre-ordained human beings in America alone isn’t something the Jesus Christ Mrs. Clinton claims to walk with would view as an acceptable position.
The United Methodist Church, whose subsidiaries have been known to donate large sums of money to Planned Parenthood, in their Book of Discipline, without coming right out and saying it, subtly grants leeway for members searching for reasons to justify abortion:
Our belief in the sanctity of unborn human life makes us reluctant to approve abortion. But we are equally bound to respect the sacredness of the life and well-being of the mother, for whom devastating damage may result from an unacceptable pregnancy.
In response to those who prefer a liberal interpretation, 17thÂ Century English Presbyterian minister and Biblical commentator Matthew Henry wrote something Hillary Clinton and the abortion supportingÂ segment of the Methodist sisterhood should take time to ponder: â€œThose whose hearts stand in awe of God’s word, will rather endure the wrath of man, than break the law of God.â€
Nonetheless, Methodist founders George Whitefield and John and Charles Wesley would be appalled at the modern Methodist churchâ€™s lack of outright condemnation for abortion, which explains why the women at the conference were thrilled to hear from a political proponent of Molech, the Old Testament Semitic idol to whom the book of Leviticus forbade the Israelites to sacrifice their children.
In 1667, English poet John Milton wrote of Molech in Paradise Lost and described the calf-like bronze god as a â€œfrightening and terrible demon covered with mothers’ tears and children’s blood.â€ Four centuries later, the abortion that Hillary Clinton endorses is an act that is also â€œcovered with mothers’ tears and children’s blood.â€
In his letter to Timothy, Paul the Apostle warned that â€œGod’s spirit specifically tells us that in later days there will be men who abandon the true faith and allow themselves to be spiritually seduced by teachings of demons, teachings given by men who are lying hypocrites, whose consciences are as dead as seared fleshâ€ (1 Tim 4:1-2).
Considering that her core beliefs fail to respect the sanctity of human life, Hillary Rodham Clinton appearsÂ to embraceÂ her faith while rejecting the Bible’s bold proclamation of “loving the least.”