Tag Archives: prochoice

Hillary the ‘Organ Grinder’ Grinds Up the Big Apple

posted at American Thinker

After the Washington Post published a political cartoon featuring Ted Cruz and his daughters Caroline, 7, and Catherine, 4, Hillary, the organ grinder, took her “dancing monkey” family for a walk in the Big Apple.

Hillary pounded the pavement with Bill; pro-choice daughter Chelsea, toting a female zygote who, thus far, has successfully survived the first trimester; and cherubic granddaughter Charlotte, who also outlasted the womb and is now a little over a year old.

In addition to the obvious stars of the show, the group dragged along hedge fund/investment banker son-in-law Marc Mezvinsky.

Trying desperately not to call attention to herself, Hillary, while holding onto the baby stroller like a walker, promenaded about, wearing a brightly colored Kashmir Company embroidered jacket she bought in Afghanistan in 2003.  The colors on the jacket were so intricate that it actually stirred up images of the carpet fibers found on Clinton friend and associate Vince Foster’s corpse when his body was found dumped in Fort Marcy Park.

Referred to in the press as a “festive walk,” in addition to perusing a bookstore and eating ice cream, the ex-president and his presidential-hopeful wife, the former carpetbagger senator from the State of New York, smiled and waved to admirers.

Unlike 8 million sitting ducks who inhabit a city notorious for strict gun laws, the woman who called gun rights advocates “terrorists” was safely surrounded on all sides by heavily armed security on hand to protect the organ grinder and her quartet of monkeys from being shot at again by Bosnian snipers.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post published and retracted the holiday-themed caricature drawn by editorial cartoonist and Planned Parenthood Award winner Ann Telnaes.  Ann’s Christmas cartoon featured Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), dressed like Santa, as an organ grinder, and his two daughters dressed as dancing monkeys.

Prior to the Washington Post pulling the cartoon, Telnaes justified mocking Ted Cruz’s small daughters in the following way:

But when a politician uses his children as political props, as Ted Cruz recently did in his Christmas parody video in which his eldest daughter read (with her father’s dramatic flourish) a passage of an edited Christmas classic, then I figure they are fair game.

The Cruz ad referenced hot-button issues like failed Obamacare, Lois Lerner, and the IRS scandal, as well as a missing server belonging to a certain grandma prancing around New York with a pretentious smile on her face.

That’s why; the liberal syndicated cartoonist was probably motivated more out of anger about the message in the spot-on parody than by the two little girls reading funny political Christmas stories with their dad.

Anyway, if the subject matter is really what the satirist is looking for, instead of drawing pictures of the children of Hispanic politicians as the dancing monkeys of a Mexican organ grinder, how about a cartoon depicting an ISIS sympathizer/San Bernardino jihadi bride named Tashfeen Malik?

Remember Tashfeen?  She’s the K-1 fiancée visa chick who slipped by DHS.  Then, prior to her and her husband blowing away 14 people at a Christmas buffet, much like a desperate politician using a granddaughter to impress the Baby Boomer set, Tashfeen hid her radicalism from her neighbors by carrying her six-month-old daughter around.

Then again, maybe the woman who calls herself a “pushy Pulitzer prize winning editorial cartoonist” is only looking to portray the family as props and children that like to mimic Mom and Dad.  If that’s the case, then Chelsea, Bill, Marc, little Charlotte, and the “clump of cells” due to be born this summer, if all goes well, are “fair game.”

For starters, Ann should definitely take note of Mrs. Mezvinsky.

This is a lady who is an expert at imitating her mother.

Take, for instance, Chelsea, like Hillary, pretending to see a long lost friend in every gathering.  Not only that, but before impersonating Mom’s fake smile, and pointing excitedly to a person in the crowd who doesn’t exist, Chelsea always claps along to the song that Hillary struts around in time to.

Granted, unlike Caroline Cruz’s father, Hillary Clinton does not speak with the “dramatic flourish” that is signature Ted.  However, Mrs. Clinton does speak with a delayed didactic tone that Chelsea seems to have picked up on and employed while doing things like getting paid $600,000 a year to work as a fake entry-level “special correspondent” at NBC.

Ann did creatively dress Cruz up in a Santa outfit.  So why not do a whole series on the grandma in the Afghani coat of many colors under which, if she wanted to, Hillary could hide her Benghazi incompetence, her squeaky-clean server, and all those missing emails?

Then there’s Bill; he’s the grandpa who, when not on Orgy Island with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, or in Chappaqua with the alleged “Energizer Bunny,” protectively steers his granddaughter’s stroller and pretends to enjoy wandering around Manhattan with the woman to whom he is unfaithful.

Ann could also sketch a caricature of straggler-in-law Marc, who, along with Bill, took his rightful place following behind the world’s most famous female organ grinder who, if she stands by her philosophy, should encourage her daughter to hand over baby Charlotte and her baby sister to be raised by the “village.”

With that in mind, Ann Telnaes should be all over the flimflam Clinton family tour, which made the Cruz Christmas ad seem like cold, hard authenticity.

But if none of those ideas ring true, surely Ann Telnaes can come up with at least one cartoon featuring Hillary grinding the organ, while Bill the organ grinder dances on a leash.

Either way, when the cigar smoke clears, imperious Hillary, wearing sunglasses, wrapped in a multi-colored Mao-collared coat, dragging political props on a stage-managed march through Manhattan provided more subject matter for a political cartoon than two sweet little girls ever could.

Is Tashfeen Malik Any Different Than a Pro-Choice Woman?

Originally posted at American Thinker

ht_malik_farook_airport_BUGGED_BG_lf_151206_4x3_992156901047.jpg.CROP.rectangle3-largeRecently, Barack Obama mocked Republicans when he said that those opposing his refugee resettlement plans are “scared of widows and orphans.” The president’s comment was in response to GOP presidential hopefuls who, out of fear of ISIS infiltration, expressed concern in the last debate about Obama’s reckless plans to transport busloads of Syrian refugees into America.

The implication of the president’s  ‘widows and orphans’ comment was that the female gender is less likely to exploit the refugee crisis on behalf of ISIS.

Then, just when deranged hermit Robert Lewis Dear had effectively diverted America’s attention from the women of Planned Parenthood who were dismembering and marketing baby body parts, along comes female Pakistani soldier of the Caliphate, Tashfeen Malik.

Described by family lawyers as a “90-pound… soft-spoken… caring… housewife,” one would expect Tashfeen, whose name means ‘sympathetic’ in Arabic, to exude “sugar and spice and everything nice.” Sadly, she was anything but nice. Although a member of the “fairer sex,” Tashfeen built IEDs in her garage.

Together with her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, the radicalized mommy had amassed things like Sippy Cups, diapers, and 5,000 rounds of ammunition inside her home. Furthermore, leaving aside more traditional hobbies for women such as macramé and quilting, judging from the stockpile of weapons, it appears as if Tashfeen expended most of her spare time training to inflict “unspeakable carnage” on infidels.

And here, all along, most people thought women fainted at the sight of blood.

After pledging her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook and erasing her family’s digital footprint, the jihadi bride dropped off her 6-month-old baby girl with her mother-in-law, and then hurried off to help her husband murder his coworkers.

For the sin of standing around a buffet table eating Christmas cookies at a center for people with developmental disabilities, the radicalized extremists killed fourteen people, and wounded twenty-one more. Soon after the attack, the duo led the police on a high-speed chase with Malik behind the wheel that ended with the couple dying in a hail of bullets.

In a December 5, 2015 article in the Washington Times author Kellan Howell points out that according to a report from George Washington University’s Program on Extremism: “Ten of the 71 recruits for the Islamic State arrested in the U.S. since 2014 have been women… [and that]… women in the militant group’s ranks [are] increasing.”

So much for Barack Obama’s ‘don’t be worried about the widows and orphans’ theory.

Even still, despite public disbelief, the most astounding thing about the rabid killer Malik hanging her body armor in the closet next to her party burka is that some people are surprised a woman would do such despicable things.

Female stereotypes like to portray women as loving, gentle, selfless, and peaceful. Yet the truth is, many are hateful, vicious, and self-centered.

Think about it; if the feminine segment of American society were really what some falsely perceive them to be, 60 million additional human beings — 86% of whom were aborted for convenience — might still be alive today.

Sorry to have to be the bearer of bad tidings, but Tashfeen’s behavior is not the exception to the rule. In fact, this jihadi bride’s blatant disregard for human life only confirms the type of wanton terror some women are capable of.

Tasheen travelled to the U.S. on a K1 fiancée visa.  Once here, the young woman’s sole intent was not to marry, settle down, and raise her baby girl, but to build pipe bombs, amass a cache of weapons, and then use them to ambush and kill as many vulnerable people as possible. The Mommy Terrorist’s life’s goal was jihad and false convictions took precedence over raising her child.

Sound familiar? After funding Planned Parenthood to the tune of $500 million per year, Americans should not be surprised that a diminutive woman, driven by a perverted ideology, blew 14 people away.

Now, the obvious question that needs to be answered is whether Tashfeen’s murderous tirade is any different than the evil exhibited every day by 4,000 self-absorbed women who, rather than head toward a Christmas party with an AK-47, seek out an abortion clinic with the sole intent of ambushing a vulnerable child in the womb?

After witnessing the religious zealotry of those who support full access to abortion, and after hearing the “fairer sex” defend carving up and selling baby parts while calling it a “war on women,” Americans should not be surprised that someone like Tashfeen is capable of doing such a brutally horrific thing.

That’s why; rather than be appalled at the jihadi bride, Americans should recognize that women can be more vicious then men.

In this case, the only difference between pro-choice and ISIS womenfolk is that the latter dress up in vastly different attire. In addition, unlike the more reservedright-to-choose crowd, womanly soldiers to the Caliphate take their directives from a revered manual, and prefer executing their victims in a more public setting.

Either way, whether a jihadi bride or not, women who murder their babies are just as devoted to the slaughter of the defenseless as was Tashfeen Malik.

CULTURE OF DEATH VICTIM: Pro-Choice Pastor Clementa Pinckney

roof-300x180Originally posted at CLASH Daily

Barack Obama is slated to deliver the eulogy at the funeral of his friend, South Carolina Democratic Senator Pastor Clementa Pinckney. Pinckney was assassinated along with eight other church members following a church Bible study attended by Dylann Roof, the white supremacist lunatic who pumped bullets from a .45 caliber pistol into nine openhearted churchgoers.

Immediately following the murders, the nation was touched by the response from the victims’ families, who extended mercy and forgiveness to Roof and encouraged the 21-year-old to seek Christ and repent. The nation was deeply moved by the outreach coming from the grieving families and saw their response as a step toward racial healing that the nation, of late, is sorely in need of.

But all that is about to end, because President Barack Obama is going to take to the pulpit at the historic black church Mother Emanuel A.M.E. in Charleston. Rest assured that in addition to quoting Scripture out of context, the president, just as he did in Tucson and Newtown, will use the pastor’s memorial as an occasion to advance his aggressive gun control agenda and reignite the racial tension that has been smoldering since Baltimore.

Besides the deaths of these nine people, compounding the tragedy is the lack of realization that neither race nor guns is at the root of what happened in Charleston. In fact, if the president was forthcoming, he would apologize to the pastor’s family, to the families of all those who died, and to America for personally setting a tone that insists that the value of life is based solely on personal choice.

For many in black Christian circles, politics take precedence over the Scripture that is unambiguous about how the God that Pastor Pinckney preached about every Sunday feels about the sanctity of life. Pastor Pinckney was a Democrat and supported the vile practice of abortion, but what the late pro-abortion pastor didn’t anticipate prior to being targeted was that he too would become a victim of a dogma that degrades the value of life.

Every day, with the approval of Obama, his political party, and men like Pastor Pinckney, 3,000-4,000 babies, both black and white, are coldly disposed of. Babies, all of whom, as Apostle Paul says in Galatians 1:15, are “set apart from their mother’s womb and called … by grace.”

To Dylann Roof, who believed “N_____s are stupid and violent,” Paul’s words held no meaning. Somewhere along the line, Roof believed the lie that the human beings he unapologetically disposed of were not worthy to live, and responded by exercising his right to choose in the most perverted of ways. So, in what should have been a womb-like environment of safety, Roof exercised his right to abort what God ordained.

And as gruesome as what happened at the hands of a hate-filled madman seems to civilized people, in abortion mills all over the country equally casual killings take place all day, every day. The difference is that the carnage Americans witnessed in a blood-soaked church hall is both tangible and real.

That’s why it’s important to recognize that Charleston isn’t about race, nor is it about the Confederate flag, nor is it about the availability of guns. The deaths in Charleston are the result of policies and ideologies run amok that give man, rather than God, the right to determine who lives and who dies.

President Barack Obama should accept some of the responsibility, because his pro-death ideology is partly to blame. The truth is that the president lost his friend Clem because Dylann Roof felt that the right to choose meant that, based merely on the color of their skin, he could blow away nine innocent people.

And so as the slain pastor and the other eight victims are laid to rest, instead of moralizing about gun control and racial injustice, a more fitting eulogy for Clementa Pinckney would be for Barack Obama to apologize for his part in cultivating a culture of death.

A Culture of Death Hero

Recently incarcerated Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell was so committed to his craft that after looking around the doctor’s “filthy…poorly run” operating room, if a woman seeking an abortion changed her mind Kermit would sometimes anesthetize the unwilling and carry out the abortion anyway.

In addition to performing unwanted procedures on unconscious women, the proprietor of the Family Women’s Medical Society has been charged with eight counts of murder, infanticide, and abuse of a corpse. So far, the list of the dead includes a woman named Karnamaya Mongar, who Gosnell over-anesthetized, and seven infants who died in what are being called “grisly infanticides.”

According to the grand jury’s report, “Time and again, late-term babies were delivered alive — fully intact and breathing — and then killed. Gosnell called it ‘ensuring fetal demise.’ The way [Dr. G] ensured fetal demise was by sticking scissors into the back of the baby’s neck and cutting the spinal cord. He called that ‘snipping.’ Over the years, there were hundreds of ‘snippings.’’’

Judging from the jars filled with the body parts of fetuses, dead babies were Gosnell’s primary goal, and dead and maimed women were the unfortunate result or collateral damage.

The Kermit Gosnell “family practice,” which according to some women was so “filthy” that women sat on “blood-stained recliners,” included his wife, sister-in-law and a team of abortion clinic workers all charged with “practicing medicine without a license or covering up” the criminal activity going on inside the clinic. Dr. Gosnell must have figured, what does it matter if an executioner is licensed or not, either way the results are the always the same.

With Kermit Gosnell’s prosecution on the horizon, hundreds, maybe thousands of murdered babies will never have the opportunity to testify on their own behalf and neither will the late Karnamaya Mongar.  However, some women are starting to step forward to relate stories of physical harm and forced abortion in what the grand jury is now calling a “baby charnel house.’’

In pro-abortion America, “choice” is a dearly beloved right. However, inside the walls of Kermit Gosnell’s death factory, the final choice was not always the woman’s. When it came to abortion, Kermit felt he had the right to exercise his personal preference on the reluctant.

Case in point: Davida Johnson.  Ms. Johnson was 21 years old when she decided to visit Dr. Gosnell’s less-than-sterile clinic with plans to exercise her right to choose. After thinking through the decision, miraculously Davida “had a change of heart,” and headed for the exit. Before she made it out the door, the doctor took it upon himself to restrain and drug Davida, induce labor, and forcibly extract and destroy the infant.

Davida now claims she told Gosnell: “‘I don’t want to do this,’ and he smacked [her]. They tied [her] hands and arms down and gave [her] more medication.”  When Johnson woke up, she was no longer pregnant and didn’t “know if Gosnell killed her child in the abortion or in the snipping technique he used to kill babies shortly after birth.”

Because of Davida’s disturbing experience, the woman alleges she suffered four miscarriages and deals with “psychological issues [and] mental illness.”  Now, on behalf of her dead child, Ms. Johnson is asking hard questions like: “Did he do that to mine? Did he stab him in the neck? Because I was out of it. I don’t know what he did to my baby.”

Drugged women, bloody blankets, forced abortions, the corpses of dead fetuses – all are Dr. Gosnell’s trademarks.  In addition, the grand jury report claims Gosnell “spread venereal disease among [patients] with infected instruments, perforated wombs and bowels,” tore cervixes, and exposed women to life-threatening infection and blood loss.  The deplorable list includes two women who claim that after submitting the frail frames of their unborn children to Kermit, one required a hysterectomy and the other is physically handicapped after requiring open-heart surgery.

With each passing day, the Kermit Gosnell horror story continues to reveal the unthinkable. Yet, one can’t help but wonder why a public supposedly supportive of abortion rights expects so much from a person whose career is murder for money. Kermit may just be the type of guy who finds it difficult to control killing within the boundaries of the law one minute and, in the next, control himself and revere life.

Thus, it would be interesting to know if, in the shadows of abortion clinics across the nation, those a little tidier about their work secretly feel Dr. Gosnell’s crime was being lackadaisical, storing one too many body parts in the freezer and, above all, calling unwanted attention to incognito Kermit Gosnells by daring to get caught.

%d bloggers like this: