Originally posted at The Blacksphere
Regardless of our political disagreements with Michelle and Barack Obama, it’s hard to deny that the couple have been blessed with two adorable daughters, Malia who just turned 15-years-old, and Sasha who turned 12-years-old a few weeks back.
Malia turned 15 on the 4th of July, and she’s turning out to be a lovely young woman who carries herself with quiet grace and aplomb.
Happy Birthday Malia!
There is one thing though. When most Americans look at Miss Malia and feisty little Sasha, what they see are two fresh-faced innocents. These girls are young maidens with the world at their fingertips and life’s joys before them as they grow before the nation’s eyes from little girls into women.
Barack Obama, their father, and their mother Michelle, likely view their daughters the same way – virginal, precious, and unscathed.
However, the sad truth is that American girls are not extended the same courtesy from the President and First Lady.
Instead, 12 and 15-year-olds are viewed by the left as sex-crazed animals in need of publicly funded sex education, government gifts of contraception, and, if need be, surreptitious transportation to abortion clinics where invasive procedures are administered on them, paid for with taxpayer monies, without parental consent.
This 4th of July Malia will have a birthday party and probably enjoy a giant slice of buttercream-iced cake decorated with pastel-colored flowers that symbolize her sweetness and purity. Along side that sugary confection will be a pile of brightly wrapped presents that hopefully will bring Obama’s oldest daughter much joy.
a shame it would be if Malia’s parents gifted her instead with a year’s supply of Plan B, and a cell phone with a speed dial that connects directly to the nearest ‘mistake-proof’ Planned Parenthood clinic – just in case. To even think such a thing about the President’s sweet girl is, quite frankly, crude and unseemly.
That’s why, this year, on Malia Obama’s birthday the nation is requesting that Mr. and Mrs. Obama extend to our preteen and teenage daughters the same respect and dignity we believe is rightly due Sasha and Malia.
Recently it was revealed that in New Zealand, a sick, twisted, female pedophile preyed upon an 11-year-old boy who was a schoolmate of the woman’s child.
The degenerate lured the child into repeated sexual encounters by offering him beer.
How did this scenario play out? What happened, did little Henry say, “Mom can I go over to Johnny’s to play after school?” And did his mom say, “Sure honey, just make sure you’re home in time for dinner?” Did Henry reply, “Thanks Mom?”
What Henry apparently didn’t tell mom was that it was Johnny’s mother he’d be playing with, not Johnny.
So then what happened? Did Henry and Johnny walk home to Johnny’s house after school to be greeted by Johnny’s mom, who helped them off with their backpacks and then skipped the milk and cookies and got right to the beer and debauchery?
What did she do to keep Henry occupied while she seduced and raped his little friend, give him a beer too?
And that’s not the worst of it. Over a couple of months, this particular pervert did this repeatedly until she became impregnated with the 11-year-old boy’s child, to whom she gave birth when her lover was 12.
Besides the disturbing nature of a female sexual predator – who’s a mother herself – raping a little boy, it highlights the often-overlooked danger of sexualized children, poor parenting, and female predators.
Moreover, in the U.S., where government proudly facilitates children’s sex lives with condoms and abortions without parental notification, the scenario could easily have been the other way around.
As an entrée to statutory rape, little Susie’s soccer dad could ply Susie’s adorable friend Janie with rum and Coke after the soccer game.
Lucky for Susie’s dad, if little 11-year-old Janie should happen to conceive a child, which is definitely possible, Susie’s dad has the U.S. government and President Barack Obama to thank for assisting him in covering his crime by making Plan B abortifacients available to females of any age.
Thus, while a little boy in Auckland fathering a child with his schoolmate’s mom is shocking, so is a dad in the U.S. impregnating his daughter’s BFF.
The difference is that, thanks to liberal politicians obsessed with sex, dismissive of childhood innocence, and determined to destroy lives both born and unborn, in America the crime of statutory rape has recently become easier to hide.
Originally posted at The Blacksphere
Michelle skipped the Xi Jinping visit because she’s such a dedicated mom that she chose instead to stay home with her young daughters to close out the school year and to celebrate Sasha’s 12th birthday.
Barack’s a dedicated dad too, because just in time for Sasha’s coming of age the president agreed to lift the age limit on abortion pills, making it possible for girls Sasha and Malia’s age to buy abortifacients if the need arises.
The morning-after pill, previously only available without a prescription to women 17 and older, has been the subject of a court ruling demanding that Plan B be sold to all females, without proof of age or point-of-sale restrictions. That’s right, over-the-counter abortion pills for even girls who are victims of statutory rape!
In April US district Judge Edward Korman said the US Food and Drug Administration’s decision to put age limits on sales had been “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.”
Before the 2012 election, Barack Obama supported age restrictions on the sale of emergency contraception and even invoked his daughters in citing the reasons why he thought removing age limits was a problem. But that was then, this is now.
President Obama, bastion of personal conviction, is clearly a man hostile toward social conservatives, anxious to undermine the authority of parents, and always willing to end the lives of the unborn “miracles,” which must be why he changed his mind.
An ecstatic Annie Tummino, coordinator of National Women’s Liberation, believes “Women cannot be on equal footing with men if we can’t decide when and if we will bear a child.” In other words, if women want to be on equal footing with men, they need to be able to kill their children.
After hearing the news that Obama’s all for underage abortion, activist Annie proclaimed with unspeakable joy:
This decision by the administration affirms what feminists have been fighting for all along: the morning-after pill should be available to females of all ages, on the shelf at any convenience store, just like aspirin or condoms.
Now on Aisle 11: Over-the-counter abortion pills, glittery nail polish, and bubble gum-flavored lip gloss!
We all know the Obama administration has always been emergency-contraceptive-committed. So it’s nice to know that if Obama is in California strolling Rancho Mirage with Xi Jinping, and Michelle is off Mom dancing with Jimmy Fallon, at least if the Secret Service drops the first daughters off at CVS to buy some Plan B One-Step, they won’t need documentation of any kind.
Good to know – because if Obama’s little girls make a “mistake,” even if Mom and Dad are off seizing parental control from other Americans, neither one of them would want their precious underage daughters to be “punished with a baby.”
Originally posted at American Thinker
Plan B is not just a controversial morning-after pill; it’s also an effort on Michelle Obama’s part to paint anyone who doesn’t agree with her husband’s restrictive gun measures as people who are willing to force children to live their lives in terror. Michelle attempted to paint that picture during an interview with Lee Cowan on “CBS Sunday Morning,” when she dredged up sob stories from her gun violence visit to Chicago last month.
The first lady said that after delivering her speech on gun violence in April, she was amazed at the extent to which Chicago’s children were forced to live in subjugation to the fear of being shot. Thus, the unspoken premise of Michelle Obama’s comments is that the cure for children in Chicago being dominated by the fear of being killed by a stray bullet is to subjugate the entire nation’s Second Amendment rights.
Michelle shared that students at Harper High School in Englewood, Illinois told her, “Every day they wake up and wonder whether they’re going to make it out of school alive.” Mrs. Obama said, “I mean, every single kid worries about their own death, or the death of someone, every single day.” Michelle Obama uttering those words is a prime example of liberal duplicity. This is a woman who supports 3,500 babies a day being aborted, and she’s preaching to us about teenagers who, no thanks to her or her husband, miraculously made it out of the womb alive — not making it out of school alive?
To add insult to injury, Mrs. Obama then said “we” have an “obligation to these kids” to try again. When Mrs. Obama uses words like “obligation to these…” anything, it’s a clear sign that hubby, on behalf of some victimized group, believes he is bound to a higher authority than Congress and is probably out searching desperately for some way to circumvent the law.
Michelle Obama, savior of America’s children, then pointed out, “We have millions of kids living in these kinds of circumstances who are doing everything right.” What she forgot to mention was that, despite restrictive gun laws already in place, children living in Chicago “who are doing everything right” will still be victimized by those in Chicago, children or otherwise, who will continue to do everything wrong.
Bordering on tears, the first lady went on to say: “And we, as a nation, have to embrace these kids and let them know that we hear them, and see them.” Disregard that “we as a nation” part, because rest assured, Mrs. Obama believes that no one except her and her husband hear and see the fearful children of Chicago. And only those who adhere to the liberal vision have the power and authority to quell anxiety by finding a way to restrict the ability of the nation’s gun owners to exercise their right to “keep and bear arms.”
Ratcheting up the sympathy factor yet another notch, Michelle then shared with a sycophantic Lee Cowan that “One kid told me he felt like he lived in a cage, because he feels like his community is unseen, unheard and nobody cares about it.” What that caged kid probably hasn’t realized just yet is that the first lady of the United States comes to Chicago regularly to use the “unseen, unheard” and uncared-for children of the Windy City as stage props to help push a progressive gun agenda.
Speaking of guns, Barry visited Mexico where, thanks to him and Eric Holder, it’s even worse than Chicago when it comes to gun violence. Careful not to mention beheadings and machetes in his speech, Obama did suggest to a rapt audience of Mexican students that gun control would save lives on both sides of the border. Ohhh… so that explains why the president decided not to control gunrunners taking illegal high-capacity rifles from one side of the border to the other.
In a rare moment of honesty, Obama did acknowledge his own involvement in supplying Mexico with guns when he said, “Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States.” No Shiite, Sherlock.
Then the president gave the crowd an impromptu refresher course on the U.S. Constitution, saying, “I think many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms. And as president, I swore an oath to uphold that right, and I always will.” While pushing amnesty in Mexico, what he didn’t do was explain how United States immigration law works. Trawling for future voters, the president chose to conveniently skip that particular lesson.
Instead, immediately following the mini-course on the Second Amendment came the ‘but’ portion of the president’s speech, which is also known as the unofficial ‘Obama clarification.’ That’s where an unspoken ‘but’ cues the president to insert an addendum that corrects what he perceives to be one of the fundamental flaws in the Constitution.
Obama then said “At the same time (which is really a ‘but’), as I’ve said in the United States, I will continue to do everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms,” (which are really ‘Barack Obama-approved modifications’) “that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people,” (that would be law-abiding Americans) “that can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It’s the right thing to do.”
Sorry, Mr. President, it’s a little too late to ‘do the right thing.’ Why wasn’t that option proposed prior to illegally arming drug cartels with AK-47s? Who knows, maybe some of those guns have even made their way up to Illinois where your wife is now claiming we need to make an effort to “embrace… hear and see” Chicago’s terrified children who live each day in fear of being shot.
Originally posted at Live Action News
As the USDA prepares to administer the final death knell to sugary school snacks and a 32-ounce soda is deemed more dangerous to a 16-year-old girl than having an IUD inserted into her uterus by a school staffer, in the Big Apple, morning-after pills are being handed out like candy in public high schools.
Recently, Susan Edelman of the New York Post reported that under the Freedom of Information Act the newspaper had obtained records that revealed that Plan B, or the “morning after pill,” is one of many weapons being used in soda-Nazi Mayor Bloomberg and the New York City Department of Health Reproductive Health Project’s pro-choice arsenal.
The school “reproductive health” program, “CATCH — Connecting Adolescents to Comprehensive Health,” is the vehicle being used to wage a “citywide attack against the epidemic of teen pregnancy, which spurs many girls — most of them poor — to drop out of school.”
At the time the school initially informed parents of their intent to hand out birth control pills and miscarriage-inducing drugs, purportedly there was minimal parental disapproval. As a result, unless parents signed an opt-out form, NYC high school nurses were free to dispense goodies to their daughters from a large inventory of different types of birth control.
So, while Bloomberg was busy disparaging Big Gulps, “40 separate ‘school-based health centers’ doled out [to minors] 12,721 doses of Plan B in 2011-12,” which was a jump “up from 10,720 in 2010-11 and 5,039 in 2009-10.”
Although proponents of the morning-after pill claim that Plan B does not destroy life, Jeanne Monahan of the Family Research Group says that Plan B can causes a pharmaceutically-induced abortion. Monahan maintains, “It’s not a drug that prevents life; it’s a drug that destroys life. If we define life as beginning at fertilization or conception, then this drug can be an abortifacient.” `
As if the Plan B statistics aren’t harrowing enough, the report also stated:
Besides ‘emergency contraception,’ about 40 school-based clinics have dispensed prescriptions for birth-control pills, intrauterine devices (IUDs), hormone-delivering injections and Patch and NuvaRing — covering a total 93,569 monthly cycles through June 2012.
Handouts of birth-control packets rose from 6,027 in 2009-10 to 10,462 last year. Depo-Provera injections rose from 1,213 to 2,117. Staffers also insert plastic IUDs in the uterus, where they can remain for years.
Last year, thanks to the New York City-founded nonprofit prescription service NYCRx, in-school mini clinics received $390,861 worth of contraceptives. In addition, the “city spent $2.7 million … this fiscal year [on the] school-based health centers [that] run under contract with local hospitals.”
So, sexually active adolescents without health insurance can all breathe a sigh of relief because in New York City, birth control is free!
After mentally processing the alarming statistics, Mona Davids, president of the NYC Parents Union and parent to a 14-year-old New York City high school student, claimed she was “in shock.”
What Ms. Davids doesn’t seem to grasp is that Mayor Bloomberg is deeply concerned about the future of New York City’s children – 40% of whom never make it out of the womb.
Of the 6,300 teens that got pregnant last year, fully half of those pregnancies were terminated. Of the other half, 70% dropped out of school. Clearly, to pro-abortion/pro-education advocates like Michael Bloomberg, dropping out of school and accepting responsibility for your actions is a choice considered much worse than murdering an unborn child.
Mona Davids, who happens to be black, also pointed out that most school-based health centers are located in low-income neighborhoods. An appalled Ms. Davids rightly observed: “This was population control on blacks and Latinos without our knowledge.” Bingo!
Establishing mini abortion clinics on school property accomplish a whole range of goals. They undermine parental authority, overlook promiscuity and, if need be, provide birth control and abortion services to address the results of sexual activity in teens. But, as Mona Davids so aptly observed, there is a more sinister goal afoot, one that carries out the work of Planned Parenthood founder/eugenicist Margaret Sanger who, in 1914, instituted in Harlem one of New York City’s first abortion clinics.
Davids accused the New York City mayor and his unpublicized program of “purposely [keeping] the public and parents in the dark with his agenda.” Then, the concerned mom posed a question that would be interesting to hear bi-lingual El Bloombito answer in both Spanish and English, which is: “What gives the mayor the right to decide, without adequate notice, to give our children drugs that will impact their bodies and their psyches?”
That’s an easy one. Like most liberals, Michael Bloomberg falsely believes he has the right to usurp parental rights because he’s convinced he knows better about things like Pepsi being more detrimental to health and wellbeing than a child getting a drug without parental knowledge.