Tag Archives: no featured image

Yesirree! ‘We the People’ are Pushing Back

Twisted_Sister_photo_largeOriginally posted at Clash Daily

Remember when Barack Obama came on the scene promising to “fundamentally transform the United States of America”? What was evident from the beginning was that the man doing the promising, although able to deliver flowery, inspirational speeches, did not have the necessary credentials that rational people usually demand from a prospective leader. That’s why superficially smitten voters elected an unqualified person with a shadowy, secretive past, and in the process called a disaster down on not only their heads, but everyone else’s as well.

Nonetheless, and notwithstanding his best efforts, of late a dilemma has arisen for the president. After five years of wreaking mayhem on a public that, until recently, was usually more than willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, sort of like the horrendous Obamacare enrollment website, there seems to be a “glitch” that Mr. Obama didn’t factor into his equity-for-all equation.

This particular “glitch” is that Americans, no matter who they are or who they voted for, on the whole are not reacting favorably to being a.) pushed around; b.) dictated to; or c.) herded like cattle to the slaughter.

Ever since the colonies decided to shake off the encumbrances placed upon them by an oppressive monarchy, the victors of the American Revolution have built into their radar an acute sensitivity to the threat of falling captive to despotism a second time. That’s why many of those who wore the Barack Obama 2008 and 2012 balloon hats and who “cried their eyelashes off” when the first African-American president was elected and who eagerly boarded the “Hope and Change” Express are having buyer’s remorse.

Those who welcomed Barack Obama with open arms, not once, but twice, are beginning to feel the return embrace turn into a stranglehold.

At first, the noose Obama purposely placed loosely around America’s neck was barely noticeable, but as days turned into weeks and weeks into months and months into years, that liberal lasso has incrementally garroted America’s corporate neck. Now, the beast of burden that Obama captured with the intent to do his socialist bidding is beginning to struggle against the yoke being placed by someone who falsely perceives himself to be the all-knowing, all-powerful Master.

And while this time around no one has picked up muskets or stormed the Barack Bastille, what is happening is that on everything from guns to registering for Obamacare, people are registering their resistance by staunchly refusing to comply with the directive coming down from the head of the collective.

The jobless rate is now the worst it’s been in thirty-five years, which is one reason Barack Obama is now enjoying only a 39% approval rating. That, along with the unremitting anti-Second Amendment rhetoric and the insistent “share the wealth” cheerleading, is now being reflected in data which shows that Americans are thirty-four times more likely to purchase a gun than to sign up for Obamacare.

This curious 30-ish up for us and down for him trend indicates that without an out-and-out insurrection taking place, by simply refusing to conform, the American people stand poised to win the war for autonomy that Barack Obama started.

In other words, this isn’t Boston, and that splashing you hear isn’t tons of tea hitting the water. It’s the sound of Obama’s restrictive, unconstitutional policies being flung overboard by a resistance that is rising up “from sea to shining sea.”

Still, Barack Obama remains tenacious and resolute. Up until now, he has refused to budge even an inch from his high and lofty progressive perch.

Meanwhile, as he sits up there weighing his diminishing options, public dissent is mounting. Regrettably for this president, just as he has proven to be incapable of doing anything about anything, let alone the abysmal mess he’s made of everything from the economy to healthcare, thus far he’s come up wanting for a scheme to forcibly mandate Americans to relinquish more of our rights.

Increasingly, Obama is unable to force a free people to bend to his will, and he’s about to find out from polite, passively-resistant Americans what the definition of “Hope and Change” really is. With our arms crossed and our lips pursed tightly like children refusing a mouthful of peas, it looks like Democrats and Republicans alike are done swallowing what Barack Obama is dishing out.

Ultimately, the message America is conveying to the person who thinks he’s in charge is that where “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” reign, it’s not him, but “we the people” who will determine our destiny.

Remember when Barack Obama came on the scene promising to “fundamentally transform the United States of America”? What was evident from the beginning was that the man doing the promising, although able to deliver flowery, inspirational speeches, did not have the necessary credentials that rational people usually demand from a prospective leader. That’s why superficially smitten voters elected an unqualified person with a shadowy, secretive past, and in the process called a disaster down on not only their heads, but everyone else’s as well.

Nonetheless, and notwithstanding his best efforts, of late a dilemma has arisen for the president. After five years of wreaking mayhem on a public that, until recently, was usually more than willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, sort of like the horrendous Obamacare enrollment website, there seems to be a “glitch” that Mr. Obama didn’t factor into his equity-for-all equation.

This particular “glitch” is that Americans, no matter who they are or who they voted for, on the whole are not reacting favorably to being a.) pushed around; b.) dictated to; or c.) herded like cattle to the slaughter.

Ever since the colonies decided to shake off the encumbrances placed upon them by an oppressive monarchy, the victors of the American Revolution have built into their radar an acute sensitivity to the threat of falling captive to despotism a second time. That’s why many of those who wore the Barack Obama 2008 and 2012 balloon hats and who “cried their eyelashes off” when the first African-American president was elected and who eagerly boarded the “Hope and Change” Express are having buyer’s remorse.

Those who welcomed Barack Obama with open arms, not once, but twice, are beginning to feel the return embrace turn into a stranglehold.

At first, the noose Obama purposely placed loosely around America’s neck was barely noticeable, but as days turned into weeks and weeks into months and months into years, that liberal lasso has incrementally garroted America’s corporate neck. Now, the beast of burden that Obama captured with the intent to do his socialist bidding is beginning to struggle against the yoke being placed by someone who falsely perceives himself to be the all-knowing, all-powerful Master.

And while this time around no one has picked up muskets or stormed the Barack Bastille, what is happening is that on everything from guns to registering for Obamacare, people are registering their resistance by staunchly refusing to comply with the directive coming down from the head of the collective.

The jobless rate is now the worst it’s been in thirty-five years, which is one reason Barack Obama is now enjoying only a 39% approval rating. That, along with the unremitting anti-Second Amendment rhetoric and the insistent “share the wealth” cheerleading, is now being reflected in data which shows that Americans are thirty-four times more likely to purchase a gun than to sign up for Obamacare.

This curious 30-ish up for us and down for him trend indicates that without an out-and-out insurrection taking place, by simply refusing to conform, the American people stand poised to win the war for autonomy that Barack Obama started.

In other words, this isn’t Boston, and that splashing you hear isn’t tons of tea hitting the water. It’s the sound of Obama’s restrictive, unconstitutional policies being flung overboard by a resistance that is rising up “from sea to shining sea.”

Still, Barack Obama remains tenacious and resolute. Up until now, he has refused to budge even an inch from his high and lofty progressive perch.

Meanwhile, as he sits up there weighing his diminishing options, public dissent is mounting. Regrettably for this president, just as he has proven to be incapable of doing anything about anything, let alone the abysmal mess he’s made of everything from the economy to healthcare, thus far he’s come up wanting for a scheme to forcibly mandate Americans to relinquish more of our rights.

Increasingly, Obama is unable to force a free people to bend to his will, and he’s about to find out from polite, passively-resistant Americans what the definition of “Hope and Change” really is. With our arms crossed and our lips pursed tightly like children refusing a mouthful of peas, it looks like Democrats and Republicans alike are done swallowing what Barack Obama is dishing out.

Ultimately, the message America is conveying to the person who thinks he’s in charge is that where “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” reign, it’s not him, but “we the people” who will determine our destiny.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/11/yesirree-people-pushing-back/#zHObF15opmmrShic.99

Serial Philanderer Bill Clinton Lectures Barack Obama about Commitment

BillC-300x157Originally posted at The Blacksphere

If ever there was a guy who really shouldn’t have anything to say about “commitment,”serial philanderer Bill Clinton is that guy.

Clinton talking about commitment is sort of like a stripper lecturing on modesty, an alcoholic sharing the many merits of  teetotalism, or Billy Rae Cyrus and Dina Lohan giving a seminar on how to raise wholesome daughters.

Yet, behaving like the full-fledged liberal hypocrite he is, Slick Willy, without even a modicum of hesitation, has taken to the interview circuit to lecture Barack Obama about keeping his commitments.

The former president, who the press continues to treat like a brilliant elder statesman, shared his great and wondrous insight into Barack Obama’s broken pledge to the American people that if they ‘liked their insurance plans they could keep their insurance plans.’

Seems Mr. Clinton is of the opinion that when a person makes a pledge, they should honor that pledge, except, of course, if the obligation happens to be the matrimonial kind. Which in Bill Clinton’s case obviously doesn’t count.

Attempting to bring clarity to the chaos in a recent interview with Carlos Watson of Ozy Media, preaching the Gospel of “Your word is your bond,” Mr. Clinton, who allegedly supports Obamacare, actually uttered the following:

“So I personally believe, even if it takes a change to the law, the president should honor the commitment the federal government made to those people and let them keep what they got.”

[youtube]http://youtu.be/Y9yVy-RXhxQ[/youtube]

So now Barack Obama, who wouldn’t know a commitment if it was a falling Styrofoam Greek column and it hit him on the head, is being lectured about commitment by the man whose commitment to his wife has been fodder for late-night TV comedians for decades?

Sorry, but if preaching is in order, maybe someone should remind Bill Clinton of what Jesus said in Luke 16:10:

“Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much.”

That’s why Bill Clinton, who has repeatedly proven he cannot be trusted with the “little,” has no right to be lecturing anyone, even a lying deceiver like Barack Obama, about being on the up-and-up with the “much.”

Why is this relevant?

Because the man who lied to the entire country and has been publicly unfaithful in his marriage, both of which he would probably consider small potatoes compared to what Obama is currently being criticized for, suddenly feels qualified to counsel the President to keep his word to 300 million people.

In the final analysis, either these people are oblivious to their hypocrisy, in complete denial, or so arrogant they’re convinced that the fact that what they say bears absolutely no resemblance to what they do is nobody’s business.

Bollywood Dancer Michelle Obama Does the Twirl

Michelle Obama

Originally posted at The Blacksphere

Fresh off of Diwali Bollywood dancing in the State Room, Michelle ‘Priorities in Order’ Obama hosted a “first ever” Careers in Film Symposium at the White House.

This at a time when four million panicked Americans who’ve been kicked to the curb by their health insurance companies were trying to figure out how to pay for policies with fewer options that cost more.

In addition to students from Washington, D.C., Boston, and New York, The View’s Whoopi Goldberg was also in attendance.  Joining Whoopi were Gossip Girl actress/Obama shill Blake Lively, top Hollywood producer/Obama bundler Harvey Weinstein, Long Walk to Freedom star, the stunning British actress who played Winnie Mandela, Naomi Harris, former football scholarship recipient/current Fruitvale Station writer/director Ryan Coogler, director/screenwriter/producer/son of a former executive editor of The New York Times, David Frankel, and Oprah Winfrey’s BFF, Gayle King.

During the mini-seminar, Mrs. Obama discussed some of the stars’ claws to fame.

Adding color to the event, Mrs. Obama unwittingly provided new insight into Whoopi Goldberg’s  liberal leanings when she explained that as a result of the talk show host’s dyslexia, “there were people again and again who would call her dumb. They would call her slow.” Ah ha!

Things got so real that at one point, Michelle told the students to “own it” and to “shake it off.” She even discussed Harvey Weinstein’s missing eyeball, which sent the message, ‘if Harvey can raise a ton of money for Democrats with one eyeball, so can you!’

The purpose of the conference was to give false hope to students, most of whom, thanks to Barack Obama, will never get a job, let alone break into show business.

Also thanks to Barack Obama,  cancer patients were being abruptly unhooked from their chemo bags.  Meanwhile, Harvey Weinstein and company were talking to students about:

[c]areers in film and an opportunity to learn about animation, special effects, makeup, costume, directing, music and sound effects, as well as hear from leaders in the film industry about how their education helped them succeed.

Remember that famous fly that always lands on Obama’s face in the East Room?  This time it had something more appropriate to land on during the “education helped them succeed” portion of the festivities, because a few of the successful stars that ‘education helped succeed’ never even went to college.

Alan Menken talked about and shared some music from his musical score for Beauty and the Beast.  Mr. ‘Brown Nose’ Menken, exhibiting a hearty flair for the fictional, used some fantastical wordplay when he called Mr. and Mrs. Obama (ahem) “Beauty and the Chief.”

As for effusive ‘Belle of the Ball’ Michelle, well, she let on that the acting bug must have bit her when she awarded the Oscar for Best Picture to Ben Affleck for Argo. Ergo, when not spending her time dreaming up ways to impose her will on a resistant American public, it seems Mrs. Obama may spend a lot of time standing  in front of a full length mirror convincing herself, “I could have been a contender.”

After listening to Menken talk about the score to Beauty and the Beast, Mrs. Obama, aka the “Beauty,” in a very melodramatic and animated way, with eyes closed and hands crisscrossed over her heart,  told the enchanted crowd she was inspired to rush upstairs and slip on one of her $10,000 haute couture ball gowns.

[youtube]http://youtu.be/zuBqvX4BbZs[/youtube]

Then, the First Whirling Dervish told her rapt audience that just the thought of Beauty and the Beast moves her, in a “Let’s Move!” way, in that ball gown, to “twirl and twirl.”  Luckily for her, if she twirls herself into a state of nausea and loses her lunch, at least she’s covered by Obamacare.

Speaking of Obamacare, be it a Beauty and the Beast or a “Beauty and the Chief,” Mrs. Obama’s “twirl and twirl” sentiments were very apropos, because a ‘twirling’ beachball is what Mac users are experiencing when they try to log on to an Obamacare enrollment site.

As for everybody else, well, they’re ‘twirling’ their thumbs while trying to enroll on an Exchange.  So the notion of ‘twirling’ is very timely.

Then, speaking to a roomful of people her husband has piled thousands of dollars of debt upon, and who will remain on their parent’s health insurance until middle age, the first lady urged everyone to get an education, which she probably doesn’t realize would require most of them to take out a student loan.

Michelle Obama encouraged the more ambitious young thespian types to continue “chasing their dreams in film, but to never forget the importance of education and the ability to overcome adversity.”

What she didn’t say was whether that “adversity” will be delivered compliments of the Beauty’s Beast… er, I mean Beauty’s Chief.

Dead Fish on Capitol Hill

Originally posted at American Thinker

It’s official! The water in Washington DC is toxic, and we have 535 members in the 113th Congress and a disaster of a president… oops, sorry… 1,000 dead fish in the National Mall pond to prove it.

The site of the dead fish is Constitution Gardens, which is located in West Potomac Park near Constitution Avenue and 17th Street NW.

In addition to the fetid pond filled with decomposing fish corpses, that’s also the area in the park that features a memorial to the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, all of whom, although not floating in the pond, risk triggering an earthquake because they’re likely rolling over in their graves.

According to the National Park Service, 1,000 putrefying fish were found in Constitution Gardens Pond. In response, rather than address the noxious stench and the ongoing contamination of the document for which the pond is named, the National Park Service chooses to blame construction in the area for the slimy, bloated carcasses stinking up Capitol Hill.

Although 1,000 dead fish seems like a lot, park officials say that the number is not unusual for that particular pond. Therefore, rather than concoct a phony dead fish scandal, the Park Service maintains that it has “long stressed the importance of redesigning the pond to maintain a better ecological balance.” In other words, ‘never let a good crisis go to waste,’ thank the Lord for foul-smelling deceased fish showing up on the National Mall, and let’s use their untimely deaths as an excuse to further the green agenda.

According to the Park Service, the pond is at the top of the list for construction upgrades. Not for nothing, but the pond isn’t the only thing in need of a major upgrade.

Moreover, it’s not “ecological balance” Washington DC needs. What’s overdue is cleansing the warm-and-fuzzy bipartisan environment in 2014 by loading up the political pond with fiercely partisan conservative piranhas.

Biblically speaking, throughout history God has voiced His opinion through many different kinds of animals. Once, He even used a talking ass to send a message, which, with Barack Obama in the White House, might have been much more appropriate than dead fish.

Nonetheless, lately America has witnessed some strange phenomena in Washington DC: flies landing on the President’s face; vermin scampering around the Rose Garden; and a biblical-level invasion of stink bugs. And while DC pest control officials once attempted to relocate rats, it looks like it’s too late to relocate the fish. So how about we bury the dead ones, drain the political fishpond, and repopulate the joint with fish those 56 signers would be proud of?

Cult of Liberalism: Political Jonestown Has Come to America

cult

Originally posted at Clash Daily

Liberals are always the first ones to deride and mock people of faith. To those on the left, all religions are equivalent to a cult. Yet, secular or not, liberals themselves are the most cult-like of all Americans.

For example, modern-day progressives would never admit that Jim Jones of Jonestown fame adhered to the same socialist utopian ideologies as their esteemed leader Barack Obama.

Moving from California to Guyana in the late 1970s with the express purpose of setting up a religious utopia, Peoples Temple leader Jim Jones established a communal agricultural project.

Jones preached about the virtues of establishing and furthering a social gospel. What Jim Jones forgot to mention was that the “Apostolic Socialism” gospel he preached was really communism.

Sounding a lot like Karl Marx, Jones taught that, “Those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be brought to enlightenment — socialism.”

Jones extolled a version of a gospel that sounds a lot like what Americans have been hearing from another social justice promoter named Barack Obama. “If you’re born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you’re born in sin,” said Jones, “but if you’re born in socialism, you’re not born in sin.”

“Level the playing field,” anyone? How about “sharing the wealth?”

To his credit, Jim Jones never covered up crucifixes when speaking in Christian venues, nor did he accuse his followers of clinging to guns and religion while quoting Scripture out of context every chance he got. Instead, Jim Jones derided Christianity openly. Jim Jones insisted that patriarchal religious institutions and the Bible were tools used to subjugate both women and non-whites. Sound familiar?

Jones built Jonestown and called it the “Peoples Temple Agricultural Project.” Jonestown was promoted as a means to create both a “socialist paradise” and a “sanctuary” from the media scrutiny in San Francisco.

The primary purpose of Jonestown was to establish an altruistic communist society disguised as a religious community. According to Jones, “I believe we’re the purest communists there are.”

Jones openly admitted: “I’m so purely socialistic and some of my family is so purely socialistic, some of the members of this glorious Temple are so purely socialistic, that you’d be glad to work to see that everyone had the same kind of house, the same kind of cars … People are so afraid of socialism. They’re so terrified. They say, ‘What’ll it do to us?’ Why, you poor people.”

At first, Jim Jones attracted people, many of whom were black, to the Peoples Temple through speeches disguised as religious sermons that focused on tolerance, social responsibility, and community.

Preying on the broken, hurting, and homeless, “Alternate Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple,” sponsored by the Department of Religious Studies at San Diego State University, writes: “Jim Jones appeared to be a great person, and he convinced so many people that he was doing great things in the community. He united the races, and combated the racist attitude, which may have lingered within members. He supported the poor and elderly people in the community.”

As Jim Jones’ following grew, his sermons on fairness and acceptance were disproven by his own hypocrisy, evidenced by his increasing demands for cult-like devotion and unquestioning compliance. Members were confined to the compound, overworked, and increasingly indoctrinated.

Jones’ grip on his followers was so strong that, in 1978, after murdering California Congressman Leo Ryan, three members of the media, and one defector of the compound, 900 or so of his followers, including 300 children, joined him in mass suicide, which was the largest deliberate single-event death toll in American history, until September 11th 2001.

Now, in the political realm, the past is repeating itself. Liberal devotees are exhibiting a religious zeal they themselves would normally mock in others.

For five years the left has evangelized poor minorities into believing one man is able to deliver the Nirvana they seek and are told they have been wrongly denied. There is talk of fairness, accusations of racism, an anti-capitalistic sentiment, calls for community commitment, and persecution directed at traditional organized religion. All that’s missing is the South American jungle.

Even more disturbing is that, with an eerie similarity to Jonestown’s cult-like enthusiasm, anti-religion liberals are eagerly lining up to partake of a cyanide-laced socialistic healthcare plan being fed to them by a charismatic leader named Barack Obama. And while Obama is certainly not encouraging mass suicide, in essence, the end result will be larger and more devastating.

Not Joking: Hillary ‘Benghazi’ Clinton Accepts the Liberty Medal

medalOriginally posted at CLASH DAILY

For the last 20-plus years, Hillary Clinton has been champing at the bit to assume the position of first female president of the most powerful nation in the history of the world. Let’s face it – Ms. Rodham has more than proven that she thinks very highly of herself and is of the opinion that she’s smarter and more qualified than any man, including her philandering husband, to run the United States of America.

Every breath she’s taken and every move she’s made has been with her eye on the prize. It’s likely that: while other women dream of commonplace things, Hillary fantasizes about putting her hand on the Bible on a cold windy day in January 2017 and swearing to uphold the Constitution, knowing that she won’t.

As she inches closer and closer to her lifelong dream, Mrs. Clinton probably thinks that having her as president is so appealing to most people that any mistakes she’s made, from the decades-old Whitewater scandal to her culpability in the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, are mere incidentals when compared to the prospect of having her in charge.

In Hillary’s mind, her pluses far outweigh the ‘What difference does it make’ controversies that have her guilty ‘Madame Secretary’ fingerprints all over them.

It is precisely that attitude that endows Hillary Clinton with the brazen effrontery, on the anniversary of 9/11 and the sodomizing and murder of an American ambassador in Libya, to accept the 2013 Liberty Medal.

Before handing out awards to a woman who promised to investigate and then bring to justice the parties responsible for what happened in Benghazi, shouldn’t someone broach the subject of why the investigation into the death of four Americans seems to have been kicked to the curb?

The reason is that Hillary’s got more important things on her mind. She’s got big, highfalutin things to do and places to go. That’s why the late Christopher Stevens and the other three Americans who died that tragic night, Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty and diplomat Sean Smith, are just bumps on the road to the presidency.

That’s also how, in Philadelphia at the National Constitution Center, Mrs. Clinton could shamelessly accept an award as hundreds of trained seals applauded her greatness. Clinton, an ambitious, self-promoting manipulator and prevaricator, was honored and recognized for her sterling career in public service, as well as her advocacy for women’s rights. The problem is that Hillary’s impressive contributions are more about a self-serving agenda than self-sacrificial service.

Up at the podium, never once mentioning Benghazi, “overwhelmed by the tribute,” and speaking like the great sage of wisdom and experience she perceives herself to be, Hillary reminded the acolytes that she knows better than anyone that the U.S. needs to work toward balancing national security with human rights issues in Syria.

Then the partisan Piranha called for bipartisan unity in Washington DC, something she’s never contributed to and likely has no plans to do so in the future.

Said Hillary, “When we fail to make progress on the challenges facing our people at home, our standing in the world suffers.” America is now getting improving-our-world-standing advice from a woman whose husband, when he was president, was canoodling in the Oval Office with a Cuban cigar and a chunky intern.

Moreover, someone should ask Hillary: What happens to our standing in the world when four Americans are killed in a terrorist attack and the Obama administration falsely blames an absurd, anti-Muslim film, gets found out, and goes on to silence witnesses and act as if nothing happened?

But all is not lost! Speaking out from the midst of the crowd came a sole voice, crying out in the wilderness, demanding answers from a Liberty Medal winner trying desperately to forget, screaming: “Benghazi!

Benghazi! Benghazi!” And so, as she goes flailing about trying to remediate her sullied reputation in time for 2016, it should be our patriotic duty to make sure that every time the self-aggrandizing Hillary shows her guilty face, she’s reminded of her betrayal of those four Americans in Benghazi.

Pelosi Shares Profundities With a Five-Year-Old

boy_crying_1-630x420Originally posted at CLASH DAILY

Nancy “Women dying on the floor” Pelosi, aka Mimi to her grandchildren, recently had a conversation with her five-year-old grandson that was chock full of Pelosi profundities. This time it was about the unrest in Syria.

According to the House Minority Leader, as she was leaving San Francisco, probably en route to Washington DC to inflict more mayhem, her wide-eyed kindergartener grandson said to her, “Mimi, war with Syria, are you yes war with Syria, no war with Syria?”

In her usual incoherent manner, Granny Pelosi shared that she answered the little rug rat in the following way: “We’re not talking about war; we’re talking about action. Yes war with Syria, no with war in Syria.” Huh?

If the kid wasn’t confused before, “no boots on the ground: word play must have really jumbled his pint-sized brain.

Then, because liberals are the inventors of moral relativism, as if it mattered, Nancy asked the tyke, “Well, what do you think?”

The grandson, who shall remain nameless, said, “I think no war,” which makes sense. After all, the kid has listened to Mimi incessantly spout anti-war rhetoric since the day he was born.

Moreover, seeing as how Grandma has made a complete turnaround on weapons of mass destruction, thank God this kid wasn’t around to see Mimi on Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show in 2005 when she said that G.W. Bush had to “make up that story about weapons of mass destruction. Because that was the only thing that would sell to the American people, and that wasn’t true.”

Grandma Nancy shared that she disagreed with the little boy’s “no war” position and told him so, saying, “Well, I generally agree with that but you know they have killed hundreds of children, they’ve killed hundreds of children there.”

Then, Ms. Pelosi forged ahead with her usual duplicity when she pointed out that the frightened child also asked, “Were these children in the United States?”

In an effort to inject empathy into the discussion, Ms. Pelosi informed the petrified scamp that (unless they’re in a medical waste bag at Planned Parenthood), “they’re children wherever they are.”

Wait! Pro-choice Pelosi is all torn up over dead children “wherever they are?” With that in mind, one can’t help but wonder what the son of her child would think if he found out that his gran is a huge proponent of killing 3,000 children a day right here in America.

Either way, smart gavel-swinging grandmas can explain to their grandchildren that going to war is understandable if it’s on behalf of dead children. However, in Nancy Pelosi’s case it was wise that she refrained from sharing with her lil’ guy her belief that killing babies is not only acceptable, its “sacred ground.”

Finishing up her incomprehensible insights into “civilized behavior,” nouveau war-hawk/late-term abortion advocate Nancy Pelosi said this about her chat with her five-year-old grandbaby:”So I don’t know what news he’s listening to or — but even a five year old child has to — you know, with the wisdom of our interest has affected our interests or it affects our interests because, again, it was outside of the circle of civilized behavior.”

So according to Nancy Pelosi, “It was humanity [that] drew a line decades ago that [she] thinks if we ignore, we do so to the peril of many other people who can suffer.” Or something.

Except of course if that line includes Saddam Hussein moving sarin gas across the border into Syria or Americans disposing of the 1.5 million crumpled corpses of aborted babies killed each year. In that case, Nancy needs to differentiate for her grandson how the former was a made-up story about weapons of mass destruction sold to the American people that wasn’t true, and how the latter is a woman’s choice she heartily supports.

Obama the Clown is Off Limits

Originally posted at American Thinker

It’s a sad state of affairs when America stands by while 3,000 babies are aborted daily, twiddle their thumbs while the Benghazi 4 lay in cold, dark graves, go about their business while the IRS targets American citizens, and keep right on talking while the NSA monitors their phone calls.  Then, after being lackadaisical about serious things, people are up in arms about a rodeo clown showing up at the Missouri state fair in an Obama mask.

 

Talk about misplaced indignation!  If America wants to get upset about something, how about the president assigning a taxpayer-financed security detail to his dog and then flying the pooch from Washington DC to Martha’s Vineyard?

 

Not only that, but while government stands poised to grant amnesty to illegals, release drug offenders from prison, and allow people to vote without identification, the rodeo clown with the Obama mask has been banned from ever performing at the state fair again.   As if that’s not enough, fair officials are contemplating whether to take further action against the Missouri Rodeo Cowboy Association for doing the unthinkable and allowing a clown to dress up like Obama.

 

Never mind that during the bull-riding segment, most of the spectators found the Obama clown with an upside down broomstick attached to his backside hilarious. When the audience was asked if they wanted to see Obama, whom most people think is full of bull, “run down by a bull,” the high-spirited crowd responded enthusiastically in the affirmative.

Majority opinion doesn’t matter, because sadly there was a liberal do-gooder at the rodeo with his wife and a Taiwanese boy who was their charge for the day.  Leave it to a liberal to mention that they were playing mom and dad to a Taiwanese boy.

Perry Beam and wife Lily, both of whom probably yucked it up when David Letterman relentlessly razzed G.W. Bush and Tina Fey attempted to make Sarah Palin look like a moron, were outraged because even though there were no burning crosses, white hoods, or lynch mobs, they felt like they were at a Ku Klux Klan rally.

Remember when the HBO series Game of Thrones had George W. Bush’s head on a stake during a beheading scene, and nary a liberal said a word?

Nevertheless, the touchy Mr. Beam maintains that the announcer, Mark Ficken, “whipped the audience into a lather” by suggesting that “Obama [be] run down by a bull.” Mr. Ficken is also the superintendent of schools, or at least he used to be.

Beam alleged that the clown was “bobbling the lips on the mask and the people went crazy,” which Perry the Presidential Protector also identified as a racist act.

After the huffy Mr. Beam stirred up trouble by posting the unsuspecting clown’s picture on Facebook and informing a few liberal blog sites, rather than defend the all-in-good-fun clown the fair officials, in a written statement, acquiesced to political correctness.

Although “This ain’t [their] first rodeo,” fair officials banned the clown and publicly stated that the prankster had engaged in an “unconscionable stunt” and that a clown dressed up as the country’s biggest buffoon acting clownish was “inappropriate and not in keeping with the Fair’s standards.”

“It’s not unheard of for a rodeo clown, depending on how he reads his audience, to play politics a little bit,” said Jim Bainbridge, the senior public relations coordinator at the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association. “But this crossed a line.”

A Barack Obama clown playing politics with an amused audience is now prohibited in a country that allows a whole host of things that are truly reprehensible, most of which occur with the Clown-in-Chief’s hearty approval.

Bainbridge said, “when you’re suggesting that the president” — who is injuring everyone from unborn babies to senior citizens — “should be injured, it kind of gets to a level of hostility that is inappropriate.”

Besides, Obama’s level of injury and hostility is real; the rodeo performer was just clowning around.

In other words, instead of telling little whiney boy Perry Beam to go stuff it, the Missouri State Fair Commission, rodeo announcer Mark Ficken, and the rest of the easily guilted-into-submission individuals associated with the incident quickly buckled under the pressure, lawyered up, and banned the poor schlub in the Obama mask from ever working at the state fair again.

No doubt Perry Beam, Racist Hunter, is proud of himself.  As for the cowards who run scared whenever a histrionic liberal yells “Racism!” — shame on you!

The Medal of Freedom Free-for All

presidential_medal_of_freedom

Originally posted at American Thinker

On the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy’s establishment of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Barack Obama, the guy who’s done more to obstruct freedom than any American president in history, will be the one handing out the medals.  Having Barack Obama dispense freedom medals is on par with Hitler lighting Shabbat candles or Bill Clinton hosting a couples’ seminar on the joys of marital fidelity.

Nonetheless, according to the White House website, the purpose of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which is the nation’s highest civilian honor, is to pay tribute to those who’ve made “meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.”

President Obama had this to say about the Medal of Freedom:

The Presidential Medal of Freedom goes to men and women who have dedicated their own lives to enriching ours. This year’s honorees have been blessed with extraordinary talent, but what sets them apart is their gift for sharing that talent with the world. It will be my honor to present them with a token of our nation’s gratitude.

The individuals due to receive the medal are supposedly selected by the president or recommended to him by the Distinguished Civilian Service Awards Board.  Judging from the list, it’s easy to see that when choosing the 2013 recipients, Barack Obama was guided by his own personal opinion.

This year’s group is made up of the following luminaries: liberal politicians from the left-of-left wing to the just plain old RINO left wing; one liberal journalist, plus a Berkeley-schooled psychologist; a departed Obama-supporting female astronaut and a living Jimmy Carter-supporting coal miner’s daughter; a Cuban musician; a Berkeley-schooled Mexican scientist; a black athlete; a female Democrat judge; a deceased LGBT activist; and a couple of civil-rights leaders.

Although the group consists of many standouts, three in particular have Barack Obama’s fingerprints all over them, the first being former President Bill Clinton.  If Bill Clinton deserves anything, it would be a medal for freeing the Oval Office from the confines of presidential dignity.

While Commander-in-Chief Clinton cavorted with a chubby intern, lied about it, perjured himself under oath, and was impeached, now that the “vast right-wing conspiracy” has been fully exposed, he’s one of 16 candidates for a Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Barack Obama had to be behind giving Bill Clinton a medal.  After all, what better way for the present occupant of the White House to make his sorry self look good than to give a medal to someone just as sorry?

Therefore, Bill Clinton deserves a Medal of Freedom for freeing Barack Obama from a future of indignity associated with being a God-awful president.

Then there’s feminist Gloria Steinem.  How she got on the list is a Ms-tery.  It must be because Obama respects Gloria for dedicating her life to America’s enrichment by fighting for the right to deprive children in the womb of the right to be born.

Seventy-nine-year-old Gloria proudly wears an “I had an abortion” T-shirt, openly boasting about aborting her own child who, had he or she lived, would be 57 years old today.

Ms. Steinem fondly reminisced about that abortion:

I used to sit and try and figure out how old the child would be, trying to make myself feel guilty. But I never could! … Speaking for myself, I knew it was the first time I had taken responsibility for my own life. I wasn’t going to let things happen to me. I was going to direct my life, and therefore it felt positive.

Who can argue with Obama choosing to give a medal to Steinem for being so cold, heartless, and self-serving that she makes a guy who believes in allowing babies born alive in botched abortions to die without warmth, hydration, or oxygen seem like a pillar of compassion?

Hence, Gloria Steinem deserves a Medal of Freedom for decades of freeing fetuses from the wombs of women who refuse to be deterred from directing their own self-absorbed lives.

Last but not least, we have Oprah Winfrey.  Besides being a gazillionaire and a media magnate of gargantuan proportions (shh, don’t you say it), Oprah was one of Barry’s biggest supporters in 2008.  She probably secretly credits herself for singlehandedly catapulting Barack Obama from the mean streets of Chicago into the family residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Among her many achievements, Oprah is an actress, broadcast journalist, and talk show host who, in a similar way to how Gloria Steinem’s dead baby was Gloria’s new lease on life, considered the untimely death of the newborn infant she delivered at 14 years old a “second chance.”

Oprah Winfrey deserves a Medal of Freedom, all right, but not for her varied accomplishments, nor for her outstanding ability to bring home the bacon.  Rather, she should take a medal for involuntarily freeing her false eyelashes from her eyelids during Barack Obama’s 2008 acceptance speech in INVESCO Field.

Anyone who can be so moved by Barack Obama’s “transcendent” oratory that the salty droplets gushing from her tear ducts dissolves her eyelash glue and destroys a perfectly good set of Ardell Demi Lashes deserves a medal.

Couple the eyelash episode with being identified as Oprah, which sort of resembles the name Obama, and Winfrey may very well have shown up the other 15 recipients and earned herself not one, but two Medals of Freedom.

With the award ceremony months away, there’s still time for Commissioner of Liberty Barack Obama to hand out medals to a few more freedom-lovers.

Let’s see…how about Queen of Free Birth Control Sandra Fluke, MSNBC Head Lesbian Rachel Maddow, IRS official Lois Lerner, ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, and the no-longer-closeted basketball player/newly-christened homosexual icon, Jason Collins?  Meanwhile, Barack Obama is probably trying to concoct a way to give one of those medals to his number-one choice — himself.

%d bloggers like this: