Tag Archives: Margaret Sanger

This Year’s Margaret Sanger Award Goes to Nancy Pelosi

sanger-toomanyabortedOriginally posted at American Thinker

Any woman willing to call late-term abortion “sacred ground” and make false accusations that the opposing political party voting for the Protect Life Act would leave pregnant women “dying on the floor” deserves an award named after someone as demonically-inspired as eugenicist Margaret Sanger, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is that woman.

Pelosi is scheduled to deliver remarks at the Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s “Stronger Together” Annual Gala in Washington DC Thursday.  The PPFA gala is where abortion activists gather annually over fruit salad and popovers to celebrate the right to dispose of living human beings. 

According to Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, “in recognition of her leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement over the course of her career,” Nancy Pelosi will be given the Margaret Sanger Award, which Planned Parenthood considers its “highest honor.”

Cecile Richards, who defines baby-killing as healthcare, is the woman who, during a recent interview with Jorge Ramos on the Fusion TV Network, expressed the opinion that the question of when life begins is not relevant to the abortion debate. 

What an honor this will be for Nancy to be recognized as the latest heroine of the abortion mill that slaughtered 327,166 human beings in 2012 alone, and whose annual recognition represents the ideals and values of Margaret Sanger, a self-proclaimed feminist who was ahead of her time as she attempted to contribute to humanity through fostering racial hatred and genocide. 

A committed socialist, Margaret Sanger once said, “My own personal feelings drew me toward the individualist, anarchist philosophy…but it seemed necessary to approach the idea by way of Socialism.”  Sanger said:

This is the great day of social planning. We have come to believe in planning the production and distribution of goods. We plan methods of governing cities, states, and the nation. We plan jobs, and leisure-time activities, and vacations. We plan almost everything, big and little, except families. It can scarcely do any harm and it may do a vast amount of good to engage in thoughtful, planning of our population, a population with a still larger percentage of happy families.

Sound familiar?

An active worker for the Socialist Party, Sanger believed “the more radical the ideas the more conservative you must be in your dress.” Think: community organizer Barack Obama, who, per Saul Alinsky, “dresses his crusades in vestments of morality,” and Nancy Pelosi, who lobbies for abortion rights and then receives communion at St. Vincent de Paul’s in San Francisco.

As a practicing Catholic, Nancy can step right up with pride and accept accolades in the form of an award with a woman’s name on it whose view of the Catholic Church’s teaching on contraception was that church doctrine “…enforces subjugation by turning [a] woman into a mere incubator.”

For Margaret Sanger, eugenics was an avenue to improve the human race by discouraging people with genetic defects or undesirable traits, blacks, immigrants and poor people, whom she called “human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning…human beings who never should have been born.”

Now wait just a minute! Does it matter that this year’s Margaret Sanger Award winner is all for granting amnesty to “human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning…human beings who never should have been born?”

Another irony is that Italian-American Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi, who believes deporting illegal immigrants is “just wrong,” had grandparents named Maria and Tommaso who immigrated to America from Italy. If Margaret Sanger had had her eugenic way with Maria Foppiani-Petronilla, Mrs. Pelosi wouldn’t be here, let alone receiving an award.

In February 1919 in The Birth Control Review, the prolific Sanger published an article entitledBirth Control and Racial Betterment.” That means, besides Nancy Pelosi, there’s another politician who supports improving the human race through free birth control and an abortion clinic on every corner: our very own mixed-race President Barack Obama, who would probably also be amongst those of the black race Margaret Sanger deemed unfit to be born.

In 1934, Sanger wrote an article entitled “America Needs a Code for Babies: Plea for Equal Distribution of Births.” Mrs. Sanger’s ‘baby code’ said that people with “bad genes,” or dysgenic groups, should be given a choice between sterilization and segregation.  Those who willingly chose sterilization would be rewarded for contributing to a superior race.

In Article 6, Sanger suggested issuing parenthood permits that would be valid for no more than one birth.

One birth! Paul Pelosi subjugated this year’s Margaret Sanger Award winner into agreeing to gestate five children in her incubator.  Then poor Nancy passed through the “vale of death alone” and gave birth to five of Paul’s children without a single Margaret Sanger parenthood permission slip. For those five reasons alone, Nancy Pelosi should be disqualified from receiving any praise from Planned Parenthood. 

Despite being lionized by socialist liberals, Margaret “every child a wanted child” Sanger’s legacy is one of murder, racism, revulsion for the handicapped, intrinsic disgust for the male gender, and a form of twisted radicalism that viewed God-ordained marriage and the miracle of life with contempt.

Sanger met her maker in 1966. At 82 years of age, history’s most famous female eugenicist went the way of the most famous male eugenicist, and all the innocent babies she lobbied to eliminate before her. 

Yet the diabolical activities that she lived and died and ultimately had to answer for have continued to this day, to the extent that almost half a century later the likes of Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi view it as a compliment to receive a Planned Parenthood prize in memory of a so-called birth control pioneer.

Margaret Sanger’s pathetic life was committed to curing what she viewed as the “urgent problem” of how to “limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.” Nancy Pelosi accepting an award associated with the vile woman who inspired Planned Parenthood confirms, at least in this particular case, that mental deficiency really does impact society in a negative way.

Why not an ‘Abortion Advocacy Medal of Distinction’ for Barack Obama?

Obama 2012

Originally posted at LiveAction News

Amid the Gosnell hubbub, according to Jay Carney, President Obama canceled his plans at the last minute to deliver the keynote speech at Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s annual fundraising dinner.  Instead, he has chosen to speak to PPFA supporters on the morning following the fundraiser.  It’s certainly likely that Obama is still interested in helping raise baby-killing money, not to mention reaffirming that he has no problem with slaughterhouses as long as they have nice waiting rooms and the attendants wear colorful scrubs.  The difference is that this time he’s chosen to do it in a low-key way.

Held in Washington DC, the theme of the event this year is “Time for Care,” because everyone who’s anyone knows that the perfect way to show you care is to fill red biohazard bags with 300,000 lifeless infants a year.

Full of effusive gratitude, Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards recently said this about Barack Obama:

He understands that access to birth control and preventive health care are economic issues for women and their families. We fought alongside him to ensure that women’s health access was expanded in the landmark Affordable Care Act, and now we have to fight hard to ensure that the full promise of health care reform is realized for millions of women.

In other words, Cecile is expressing personal thanks to the president for dedicating the first two years of his presidency to securing taxpayer-funded free birth control, morning-after pills, and above all, free abortion, with the occasional ‘healthcare’ mammogram thrown in for cover.

Cecile Richards appreciates Obama for his support because she feels that he “has done more than any president in history for women’s health and rights.” When it comes to lasting legacies, what could be better than an inscription on a placard hung in the Barack H. Obama Library that touts his support for the slaughter of innocents?

Barack Obama missing the dinner is probably disappointing, but Dr. Ruth Westheimer will still be there!  For her “lifelong commitment to empowering women and men to talk openly and honestly about sex and sexual health,” Dr. Ruth will be awarded the Margaret Sanger Award, which is Planned Parenthood’s highest honor, named after the well-known eugenicist.  Let’s not forget, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, started the organization based on a racist philosophy which held that “The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it” – and even more so if those infant family members happened to be black.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is also an honoree.  There is a possibility the mayor will be accompanied by Barack Obama’s “brainstorming” border security expert/liberal Hollywood shill, Eva Longoria.  For his dedication to protecting women’s healthcare in the City of Los Angeles, Antonio is due to receive the “Care. No Matter What” award.

Dr. LaVerne Tolbert, a former Planned Parenthood board member, claims that:

In California, children are targeted for abortions through school-based clinics and school-linked clinics…Girls are taken off campus to a Planned Parenthood clinic, where abortions are performed without parental consent or notification.

Well, those revelations certainly explain the “No Matter What” aspect of Villaraigosa’s award. “No matter what” the age and “no matter what” mom and dad may think, esteemed California officials are there to make sure that “no matter what,” no one and nothing stands in the way of exercising reproductive rights.

As for Barack Obama, keynote speech cancellation aside, after five years of ensuring access to abortion this president is head and shoulders above the 43 presidents who have gone before him.  Therefore, it would certainly be appropriate, in honor of courageous late-term abortionists everywhere, if Planned Parenthood bestowed upon anti-Born Alive Act Barack in absentia a new award called the ‘Abortion Advocacy Medal of Distinction.’

Nonetheless, whether pro-choice or pro-life, either way one would be hard-pressed to deny that Barack Obama has certainly earned Planned Parenthood accolades.  After all, this cancellation is the first time the president has allowed concerns about public reaction to pictures of crumpled newborns in garbage cans to force him to disappoint likeminded acolytes.  Besides, over the years, whenever it’s needed, Barack Obama has faithfully scoffed at critics of abortion and taken a firm but polite stand on the side of unrighteousness.

It’s those types of sterling pro-choice community credentials that make it surprising that Barack Obama has decided to pay heed to the controversy surrounding the grisly trial underway in Philadelphia.  Not to worry though, since this president has proven time and again that he strongly supports the iconic abortion provider, because unlike no-frills killer Kermit Gosnell, Planned Parenthood has built a first-rate reputation for killing and disposing of babies in both a sanitary and timely manner — except when it doesn’t.

‘Big Apple’ dispensing abortifacients like candy

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAOriginally posted at Live Action News

As the USDA prepares to administer the final death knell to sugary school snacks and a 32-ounce soda is deemed more dangerous to a 16-year-old girl than having an IUD inserted into her uterus by a school staffer,  in the Big Apple, morning-after pills are being handed out like candy in public high schools.

Recently, Susan Edelman of the New York Post reported that under the Freedom of Information Act the newspaper had obtained records that revealed that Plan B, or the “morning after pill,” is one of many weapons being used in soda-Nazi Mayor Bloomberg and the New York City Department of Health Reproductive Health Project’s pro-choice arsenal.

The school “reproductive health” program, “CATCH — Connecting Adolescents to Comprehensive Health,” is the vehicle being used to wage a “citywide attack against the epidemic of teen pregnancy, which spurs many girls — most of them poor — to drop out of school.”

At the time the school initially informed parents of their intent to hand out birth control pills and miscarriage-inducing drugs, purportedly there was minimal parental disapproval. As a result, unless parents signed an opt-out form, NYC high school nurses were free to dispense goodies to their daughters from a large inventory of different types of birth control.

So, while Bloomberg was busy disparaging Big Gulps, “40 separate ‘school-based health centers’ doled out [to minors] 12,721 doses of Plan B in 2011-12,” which was a jump “up from 10,720 in 2010-11 and 5,039 in 2009-10.”

Although proponents of the morning-after pill claim that Plan B does not destroy life, Jeanne Monahan of the Family Research Group says that Plan B can causes a pharmaceutically-induced abortion. Monahan maintains, “It’s not a drug that prevents life; it’s a drug that destroys life. If we define life as beginning at fertilization or conception, then this drug can be an abortifacient.” `

As if the Plan B statistics aren’t harrowing enough, the report also stated:

Besides ‘emergency contraception,’ about 40 school-based clinics have dispensed prescriptions for birth-control pills, intrauterine devices (IUDs), hormone-delivering injections and Patch and NuvaRing — covering a total 93,569 monthly cycles through June 2012.

Handouts of birth-control packets rose from 6,027 in 2009-10 to 10,462 last year. Depo-Provera injections rose from 1,213 to 2,117. Staffers also insert plastic IUDs in the uterus, where they can remain for years.

Last year, thanks to the New York City-founded nonprofit prescription service NYCRx, in-school mini clinics received $390,861 worth of contraceptives.  In addition, the “city spent $2.7 million … this fiscal year [on the] school-based health centers [that] run under contract with local hospitals.”

So, sexually active adolescents without health insurance can all breathe a sigh of relief because in New York City, birth control is free!

After mentally processing the alarming statistics, Mona Davids, president of the NYC Parents Union and parent to a 14-year-old New York City high school student, claimed she was “in shock.”

What Ms. Davids doesn’t seem to grasp is that Mayor Bloomberg is deeply concerned about the future of New York City’s children – 40% of whom never make it out of the womb.

Of the 6,300 teens that got pregnant last year, fully half of those pregnancies were terminated.  Of the other half, 70% dropped out of school. Clearly, to pro-abortion/pro-education advocates like Michael Bloomberg, dropping out of school and accepting responsibility for your actions is a choice considered much worse than murdering an unborn child.

Mona_Davids_pic

Mona Davids, who happens to be black, also pointed out that most school-based health centers are located in low-income neighborhoods. An appalled Ms. Davids rightly observed: “This was population control on blacks and Latinos without our knowledge.”  Bingo!

Establishing mini abortion clinics on school property accomplish a whole range of goals. They undermine parental authority, overlook promiscuity and, if need be, provide birth control and abortion services to address the results of sexual activity in teens.  But, as Mona Davids so aptly observed, there is a more sinister goal afoot, one that carries out the work of Planned Parenthood founder/eugenicist Margaret Sanger who, in 1914, instituted in Harlem one of New York City’s first abortion clinics.

Davids accused the New York City mayor and his unpublicized program of “purposely [keeping] the public and parents in the dark with his agenda.” Then, the concerned mom posed a question that would be interesting to hear bi-lingual El Bloombito answer in both Spanish and English, which is: “What gives the mayor the right to decide, without adequate notice, to give our children drugs that will impact their bodies and their psyches?”

That’s an easy one.  Like most liberals, Michael Bloomberg falsely believes he has the right to usurp parental rights because he’s convinced he knows better about things like Pepsi being more detrimental to health and wellbeing than a child getting a drug without parental knowledge.

Boldfaced Liberal James Lee

Every once in awhile a bonafide nut case makes an appearance on the scene and succinctly articulates what liberals intrinsically accept as true.  At the center of a recent hostage crisis radical environmentalist James Lee, although unhinged, embodied the true spirit of liberal ideology.

If the staid mask were removed from the contingency of liberals presently in charge of the nation, Americans would be shocked to see a saner version of James Lee, but nonetheless just as dangerous.

Lee admitted that the inspiration to shoot up the NBC/Discovery Channel came from the always debonair, immensely respected environmental icon and planetary preacher ex-vice president Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth.” Lee’s muse recently instigated the lunatic fringe by saying that the climate crisis “is still growing because we are continuing to dump 90 million tons of global-warming pollution every 24 hours into the atmosphere — as if it were an open sewer.”

In response to Gore hysteria, Lee penned a revealing save-the-planet misanthropic manifesto whose content sounds strangely similar to the left’s political platform.

James Lee submitted a written diatribe to a television network he viewed “as a purveyor of ideas he considered environmentally destructive.”  Sound familiar?   Lee’s irate inventory included dictatorial demands to integrate propaganda and mind control into Discovery/TLC programming.

The gunman’s suggested indoctrination station readjustments included network support for mass human sterilization, military disarmament, and radical environmental awareness.

In addition to the obvious “big three,” Lee hit upon familiar liberal themes such as demanding the Discovery Channel help “correct and dismantle the dangerous US world economy,” focus on anti-capitalist and Darwinian theory, and above all do away with any mention of what Lee called “disgusting religious cultural roots and greed.” Religious faith and individual success are two notions liberals, through legislation not guns, are attempting to eradicate via secular-socialist policy.

Lee suggested “forums of leading scientists who understand and agree with the Malthus-Darwin science and the problem of human overpopulation.”  Malthus believed if need be population growth could be curtailed by “resorting to reduced health care, tolerating vicious social diseases or impoverished living conditions, warfare, or even infanticide.”

To discuss the link between over population and pollution, Lee’s proposed forum would welcome scientists such as John Holdren, Obama’s Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy.  In Holdren’s book Ecoscience, co-authored with Malthus aficionados Paula and Anne Ehrlich, Holdren exhibits zero regard for ethical consequences and makes “how to limit human population” central to the discussion. “Leading scientist” Holdren is so committed to limiting reproduction that the Obama Science Czar even suggests forced sterilization, adding sterilants to drinking water and the food supply, or possibly enforcing government “implantation of contraceptive[s].”

James Lee’s rant hit upon many topics but centered mostly on what the madman coined as “parasitic babies.” Quite a shocking term, but then again isn’t our esteemed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in “awe” of the pioneer of “parasitic baby” disposal, eugenicist and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger?  Didn’t America’s former First Lady proudly accept the Margaret Sanger Award?

Margaret Sanger said the following:

The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.

In full concurrence with both Hillary Clinton and Margaret Sanger, the late James Lee’s manifesto recommended the following:

All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions. In those programs’ places, programs encouraging human sterilization and infertility must be pushed. All former pro-birth programs must now push in the direction of stopping human birth, not encouraging it.

Based on Hillary’s lauding comments concerning Sanger, James Lee and the occasionally more coherent Clinton are on the same eugenic page.  Take the crazy mask off James Lee and what do you find?  None other than a liberal woman in an aquamarine pantsuit, respectably touting the same leftist ideology as a lunatic in a baseball cap.

James Lee also included in his raging Discovery Channel demands an opinion on war and military technology.  Lee recommended “All programs promoting war and [war] technology … must cease.” The guy pointing a gun at a hostage suggested “solutions to solving global military mechanized conflict… instead of just repeating the same old wars with newer weapons.”  Lee’s opinion was in accord with Obama’s view on war and disarmament and an unrestricted pacifist “solution” called negotiating with dictators.

Wasn’t it candidate Barack Obama who promised to end “misguided defense policies” and “slow our development of future combat systems?” Then, after being elected, wasn’t it Obama who proceeded to sign a nuclear arms reduction pact with Russia?

James Lee would surely agree with the President’s inspirational disarmament exhortation that reminds those who believe in a strong military presence that “There is violence and injustice in our world that must be confronted.  We must confront it not by splitting apart, but by standing together, as free people.”

In between raving about liberal mainstays like “stopping the human race from breeding…disgusting human babies,” attacking oil and deriding capitalism, defined by Lee as a “disastrous Ponzi-Casino economy,” Lee expounded on the same tigers Obama’s daughter Malia supposedly begs her father to save.

Lee reminded the Discovery Channel that beside exterminating babies, nothing is more important than saving “lions, tigers, giraffes, elephants, froggies, turtles, apes, raccoons, beetles, ants, sharks, bears, and of course, the squirrels.”

The pervading thread throughout the whole invective was a guttural cry on behalf of a dying planet. Lee appealed to the Discovery Channel to lead the way in finding “solutions for global warming, automotive pollution, international trade, factory pollution and the whole blasted human economy.”

President Obama maintains, “If the international community does not act swiftly to deal with climate change that we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe. The security and stability of each nation and all peoples—our prosperity, our health, and our safety—are in jeopardy…And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out.”

In essence, President Obama concurs with a “crazed eco-terrorist.” James Lee’s left-wing agenda and determination to force the Discovery Channel to indoctrinate the masses just shows that the hostage-taker wasn’t tuning in to the right cable station.  It’s too late now, but over at MSNBC Lee would have found out that liberal allies in the Democrat Party are diligently committed to bring to pass a world vision that even a dead gunman could have heartily endorsed.

%d bloggers like this: