Tag Archives: Lena Dunham

Obama chillin’ in Chilmark

president-first-lady-host-girls-scouts-at-first-ever-white-house-campoutOriginally posted at American Thinker blog

President Barack Obama must have felt that after doing a decent amount of damage to the country this week, he earned the right to leave early for his 17-day vacation in Martha’s Vineyard.  This year the president will be kicking back at the same $12-million Chilmark seven-bedroom, nine-bathroom estate that he and Michelle and their entourage rented last year.

The president’s convoy includes the usual tagalongs and top aides, among whom are the gravelly-voiced national security adviser Susan Rice and Obama’s Iranian-born senior adviser/muse Valerie Jarrett.

Also accompanying him on the trip are younger daughter Sasha and wife Michelle and her donut-shaped hair bun, which, of late, she’s been balancing like a bird’s nest on the top of her head.

Oldest daughter Malia is still in New York City, where she’s summer-interning with Lena Dunham.

Lena is the writer/producer/star of the raunchy HBO series Girls.  In addition to dreaming up Girls, Malia’s summer supervisor, whose father Caroll does giant-sized paintings of giant-sized women with giant-sized genitals, also admitted to sexually molesting her younger sister Grace when they were kids.

So while Sasha is learning to boogie-board and taking leisurely hikes with Mom and Dad, 16-year-old Malia will be doing more important things like watching Lena Dunham roll around nude on the set of Girls, learning how to get a woman to crawl on all fours before participating in rough sex, and getting a close-up view of things like flesh-colored pasties and prosthetic penises.

As for the rest of the family, while Congress considers the shameful Iran deal, Dad Obama will be eating “Barack My World” ice cream at Mad Martha’s, donning a ridiculous-looking helmet to go biking, and, before tearing up the links, probably slip into those nerdy-looking khaki shorts and saddle shoes.

Also, while in between a few arm-twisting phone calls to Jewish congressman Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who is reportedly opposed to giving Iran nuclear bomb, Obama will undoubtedly join Sasha and Michelle and that huge bun of hers on outings to Oak Bluff for lobster rolls and fried clams at Nancy’s and delicacies like Fontina Ravioli at the upscale Sweet Life Café.

One potential highlight of the trip does include the prospect of Obama bumping into former secretary of state and presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, who will also be visiting the tony enclave for the annual birthday soirée for Ann Jordan, wife of Democratic adviser Vernon Jordan.

Last year the Clintons and the Obamas all self-consciously bit their bottom lips as they robotically danced the night away at Ann Jordan’s 80th birthday.

Speaking of dancing, while the five American service men killed in a terrorist attack in Chattanooga were being buried, Obama was line-dancing in Kenya.  So, who better than the Lipala expert to set an example for the partiers by demonstrating how efficient he’s become at conveying a message of coldhearted indifference.

Hopefully, this year there won’t be another hurricane, flare-up of Middle East unrest, ISIS beheading of an American, or a black thug shot by a white police officer to distract Obama from hanging out in a vacation spot frequented by those he disparagingly calls “life’s lottery winners.”

Either way, 17 days from now, before returning home to Washington, D.C., a fully rested and energized Barack will have had enough time to have thought of a way to exempt himself from his phony crusade against income inequality.

After he figures out a way to relate to the little people, the president can busy himself with illegally overriding any and all opposition to the Iraq deal and negotiating another crushing federal budget.  Then, in September, he’ll welcome to the White House a provocative pope who shares his obsession with nonexistent climate change.

As if all that weren’t enough, the president also has plans to roll out the red carpet for Chinese President Xi Jinping, who, unlike Obama, rather than purge and emasculate the Chinese military, is plotting future world domination by promoting his top military generals.

Zoinks! Lena Dunham’s Liberal Lunacy

lena-dunham-picOriginally posted at The Clash Daily

Most people don’t care what Golden-Globe-winning 27-year-old Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO’s hit show Girls, says or does. However, in an attempt to understand a liberal’s approach to life, any opportunity a conservative gets to study how those on the left think is an opportunity to grow in both knowledge and discernment.

One woman who never disappoints when it comes to providing insight into how irrational, disingenuous, and baffling liberal thinking and behavior are is the deliberately ordinary Barack Obama sycophant, Lena Dunham.

Actor/television and film director/ screenwriter/television producer Lena acts up every chance she gets and does it by pretending eccentric behavior is the norm. Lena is so good at acting up, she’s earned $10 million doing it.

In a recent interview, Ms. Dunham told Glamour magazine, “I don’t know if I’m going to want to act anymore. I’m always relieved on the days I don’t have to,” which explains why Lena stars in her own HBO show.

Ms. Dunham, who prides herself on being unglamorous, told Glamour magazine, “I’d rather give parts to other women than be the woman having the parts.”

Based on her “parts” usually being in a brazen state of undress, maybe what Lena really meant to say was that she’d rather be the woman “exposing her girly parts.” Or maybe not, because the title of the article is “Girls‘ Lena Dunham: Why she’s OVER talking about her body.”

To the liberal mindset, Lena saying she’s “OVER talking about her body” doesn’t mean she’s “OVER” exposing her body. Clearly a committed exhibitionist, Lena just doesn’t want anyone noticing she’s naked, and although she plans on continuing to be naked doesn’t want to talk about being naked anymore.

After announcing she was done with acting and talking about being in the buff, Lena hosted SNL, where she starred in an “Adam and Eve” sketch that overlaid a Girls attitude on the Genesis story in which Lena (playing an unclothed Eve, of course), didn’t squander the chance to call attention to, you guessed it – her naked physique, such as it is.

Despite what she says, liberal Lena bares her anatomy with predictable regularity. She maintains that her unembellished butt depicts real life, because as Lena explains, “it’s a realistic expression of what it’s like to be alive.”

In Lena’s case, maybe she identifies with nudity so much because her parents are Laurie Simmons, a photographer/artist, and Carroll Dunham, also an artist, both of whose artwork fixates on women, female mannequins, mammary glands, and gargantuan cartoonish genitals.

Artists Carroll and Laurie create art that features explicit renderings of women in provocative poses. Their progeny bypasses all that, strips down herself, strikes awkwardly provocative poses, and calls it art.

Lena’s parents must believe that over-sexualized art exhibits convey the message that nude women, mammary glands, and shockingly gargantuan cartoonish genitals should be seen as unremarkable, which may be why Lena is now trying to convince America that all her gratuitous nudity is really very boring.

As is always the case with liberals, especially Hollywood liberals, things can get confusing.

For instance, Ms. Lena is a woman who has built a career typecasting herself as a girl who refuses to be typecast by daring people not to notice that she’s strutting around in her birthday suit.

Furthermore, because the career of Adam Driver, the male star of Girls, has exploded, Ms. Dunham is upset because she believes the female stars of Girls are being pigeonholed – as girls. If Lena didn’t want to be typecast as a “girl”, maybe she should have called her show something else.

Here’s an idea! Instead of threatening to quit acting, Ms. Dunham should put her funky shrunken girl clothes back on, take those ridiculous plastic baby-girl barrettes out of her hair, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll stop being typecast as a naked girl working hard to typecast herself as a frumpy girl who refuses to be typecast.

So, for today, Lena Dunham is the naked liberal poster child whose muddled view of the world lends valuable insight into how those currently in charge of America really think, or better yet, fail to think.

Most people don’t care what Golden-Globe-winning 27-year-old Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO’s hit show Girls, says or does. However, in an attempt to understand a liberal’s approach to life, any opportunity a conservative gets to study how those on the left think is an opportunity to grow in both knowledge and discernment.

One woman who never disappoints when it comes to providing insight into how irrational, disingenuous, and baffling liberal thinking and behavior are is the deliberately ordinary Barack Obama sycophant, Lena Dunham.

Actor/television and film director/ screenwriter/television producer Lena acts up every chance she gets and does it by pretending eccentric behavior is the norm. Lena is so good at acting up, she’s earned $10 million doing it.

In a recent interview, Ms. Dunham told Glamour magazine, “I don’t know if I’m going to want to act anymore. I’m always relieved on the days I don’t have to,” which explains why Lena stars in her own HBO show.

Ms. Dunham, who prides herself on being unglamorous, told Glamour magazine, “I’d rather give parts to other women than be the woman having the parts.”

Based on her “parts” usually being in a brazen state of undress, maybe what Lena really meant to say was that she’d rather be the woman “exposing her girly parts.” Or maybe not, because the title of the article is “Girls‘ Lena Dunham: Why she’s OVER talking about her body.”

To the liberal mindset, Lena saying she’s “OVER talking about her body” doesn’t mean she’s “OVER” exposing her body. Clearly a committed exhibitionist, Lena just doesn’t want anyone noticing she’s naked, and although she plans on continuing to be naked doesn’t want to talk about being naked anymore.

After announcing she was done with acting and talking about being in the buff, Lena hosted SNL, where she starred in an “Adam and Eve” sketch that overlaid a Girls attitude on the Genesis story in which Lena (playing an unclothed Eve, of course), didn’t squander the chance to call attention to, you guessed it – her naked physique, such as it is.

Despite what she says, liberal Lena bares her anatomy with predictable regularity. She maintains that her unembellished butt depicts real life, because as Lena explains, “it’s a realistic expression of what it’s like to be alive.”

In Lena’s case, maybe she identifies with nudity so much because her parents are Laurie Simmons, a photographer/artist, and Carroll Dunham, also an artist, both of whose artwork fixates on women, female mannequins, mammary glands, and gargantuan cartoonish genitals.

Artists Carroll and Laurie create art that features explicit renderings of women in provocative poses. Their progeny bypasses all that, strips down herself, strikes awkwardly provocative poses, and calls it art.

Lena’s parents must believe that over-sexualized art exhibits convey the message that nude women, mammary glands, and shockingly gargantuan cartoonish genitals should be seen as unremarkable, which may be why Lena is now trying to convince America that all her gratuitous nudity is really very boring.

As is always the case with liberals, especially Hollywood liberals, things can get confusing.

For instance, Ms. Lena is a woman who has built a career typecasting herself as a girl who refuses to be typecast by daring people not to notice that she’s strutting around in her birthday suit.

Furthermore, because the career of Adam Driver, the male star of Girls, has exploded, Ms. Dunham is upset because she believes the female stars of Girls are being pigeonholed – as girls. If Lena didn’t want to be typecast as a “girl”, maybe she should have called her show something else.

Here’s an idea! Instead of threatening to quit acting, Ms. Dunham should put her funky shrunken girl clothes back on, take those ridiculous plastic baby-girl barrettes out of her hair, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll stop being typecast as a naked girl working hard to typecast herself as a frumpy girl who refuses to be typecast.

So, for today, Lena Dunham is the naked liberal poster child whose muddled view of the world lends valuable insight into how those currently in charge of America really think, or better yet, fail to think.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/03/zoinks-lena-dunhams-liberal-lunacy/#M0LMEu6qaPB4FhqF.99

people don’t care what Golden-Globe-winning 27-year-old Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO’s hit show Girls, says or does. However, in an attempt to understand a liberal’s approach to life, any opportunity a conservative gets to study how those on the left think is an opportunity to grow in both knowledge and discernment.

One woman who never disappoints when it comes to providing insight into how irrational, disingenuous, and baffling liberal thinking and behavior are is the deliberately ordinary Barack Obama sycophant, Lena Dunham.

Actor/television and film director/ screenwriter/television producer Lena acts up every chance she gets and does it by pretending eccentric behavior is the norm. Lena is so good at acting up, she’s earned $10 million doing it.

In a recent interview, Ms. Dunham told Glamour magazine, “I don’t know if I’m going to want to act anymore. I’m always relieved on the days I don’t have to,” which explains why Lena stars in her own HBO show.

Ms. Dunham, who prides herself on being unglamorous, told Glamour magazine, “I’d rather give parts to other women than be the woman having the parts.”

Based on her “parts” usually being in a brazen state of undress, maybe what Lena really meant to say was that she’d rather be the woman “exposing her girly parts.” Or maybe not, because the title of the article is “Girls‘ Lena Dunham: Why she’s OVER talking about her body.”

To the liberal mindset, Lena saying she’s “OVER talking about her body” doesn’t mean she’s “OVER” exposing her body. Clearly a committed exhibitionist, Lena just doesn’t want anyone noticing she’s naked, and although she plans on continuing to be naked doesn’t want to talk about being naked anymore.

After announcing she was done with acting and talking about being in the buff, Lena hosted SNL, where she starred in an “Adam and Eve” sketch that overlaid a Girls attitude on the Genesis story in which Lena (playing an unclothed Eve, of course), didn’t squander the chance to call attention to, you guessed it – her naked physique, such as it is.

Despite what she says, liberal Lena bares her anatomy with predictable regularity. She maintains that her unembellished butt depicts real life, because as Lena explains, “it’s a realistic expression of what it’s like to be alive.”

In Lena’s case, maybe she identifies with nudity so much because her parents are Laurie Simmons, a photographer/artist, and Carroll Dunham, also an artist, both of whose artwork fixates on women, female mannequins, mammary glands, and gargantuan cartoonish genitals.

Artists Carroll and Laurie create art that features explicit renderings of women in provocative poses. Their progeny bypasses all that, strips down herself, strikes awkwardly provocative poses, and calls it art.

Lena’s parents must believe that over-sexualized art exhibits convey the message that nude women, mammary glands, and shockingly gargantuan cartoonish genitals should be seen as unremarkable, which may be why Lena is now trying to convince America that all her gratuitous nudity is really very boring.

As is always the case with liberals, especially Hollywood liberals, things can get confusing.

For instance, Ms. Lena is a woman who has built a career typecasting herself as a girl who refuses to be typecast by daring people not to notice that she’s strutting around in her birthday suit.

Furthermore, because the career of Adam Driver, the male star of Girls, has exploded, Ms. Dunham is upset because she believes the female stars of Girls are being pigeonholed – as girls. If Lena didn’t want to be typecast as a “girl”, maybe she should have called her show something else.

Here’s an idea! Instead of threatening to quit acting, Ms. Dunham should put her funky shrunken girl clothes back on, take those ridiculous plastic baby-girl barrettes out of her hair, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll stop being typecast as a naked girl working hard to typecast herself as a frumpy girl who refuses to be typecast.

So, for today, Lena Dunham is the naked liberal poster child whose muddled view of the world lends valuable insight into how those currently in charge of America really think, or better yet, fail to think.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/03/zoinks-lena-dunhams-liberal-lunacy/#M0LMEu6qaPB4FhqF.99

Duck Dynasty Critics are Ducking Up

The ‘Ducks’ are back and thank God they are.  That’s right – Duck Dynasty  Season 5 has finally premiered and squirrel-brain-eating Phil, Willie, Jase, Jep, Uncle Si and the camouflage gear, as well as fidelity, faith, family, and the type of common decency sorely lacking in today’s culture are back in America’s living room.

However, the day after the premiere there were those who seemed a bit giddy with vindictive joy based on the viewership numbers that were being interpreted to mean that Duck Dynasty was being penalized by America for its unwavering refusal to submit to secular pressure.

Variety reported that the season 5 debut had a smaller audience than season 4 and that the “A&E juggernaut returned… less than a month after a firestorm of controversy engulfed the show…to strong but far from record-breaking ratings.”

Rick Kissell of Variety had this to say:

Duck Dynasty exploded when it kicked off its fourth season last August, with its 11.8 million total viewers the largest audience for a nonfiction series telecast in cable history. The show about a Louisiana family also set an A&E record as the biggest telecast in the network’s history in all key demos.

It went on to average 9.15 million same-night viewers for its summer episodes.

Kissell’s insinuation was that although 8.5 million viewers tuned in for the new season’s first show (that’s right, 8.5 million), Phil’s comments about homosexuality may have caused viewers to be turned off to the popular cable reality show.

Based on the gay news outlet Advocate.com, Variety wasn’t the only predictor of woe.

From the tone of an article entitled “Duck Dynasty Ratings Plummet: The A & E reality series saw its ratings fly south for the winter after the show’s season 5 premiere,” One would thing that it was “all over but the shouting,” and that Phil’s supposed homophobia had ushered in a Robertson family “plummet.”

Jase Peeples of the Advocate wrote this?

The reality series saw a significant drop in ratings after A&E aired the premiere episode of the show’s fifth season on January 15. Some 8.5 million viewers tuned in to follow the flock’s latest adventures – a 28 percent nosedive from the record 12 million who quacked for the show’s season 4 debut.

Apparently indulging in some wishful thinking, Peeples ended his bad-news-for-the-Ducks column by saying, “Duck season may have just kicked off on A&E, but if the new season’s ratings continue to slide, we could be witnessing the beginning of this dynasty’s end.”

One can only surmise that the liberal media was secretly hoping that Phil Robertson would be publicly humiliated for his beliefs and that liberal, gay, promiscuous America would be vindicated for its immorality by seeing Duck Dynasty permanently banished along with racist chef Paula Deen, who’s already taken up permanent residence in the cable TV woodshed.

Dire Duck predictions aside, based on their best numbers being anywhere from seven- to six million fewer than A&E’s Duck Dynasty on its worst day, an HBO heavy hitter would probably be thrilled to have 8.5 million season debut viewers.

Unfortunately for them, and fortunately for everyone else, they never do.

Instead, the station that entertains viewers with beheadings, full frontal nudity, promiscuity, and all-around vulgarity is considered a leader in successful cable series.

Take for instance the “hit” show Girls, starring director, writer, and creator Lena ‘First Time’ Dunham.  For the Girls’ third season debut, 1.1 million viewers dying to see “overtly sexualized” Lena, the daughter of an artist who creates “overtly sexualized pop art,” tuned in to watch.

Twenty-something tattooed Lena Dunham, the woman who puts the ‘Ruben’ in rubenesque‎, has even subjected her audience to watching her play Ping-Pong in the nude, which apparently is considered acceptable in hip and trendy circles, but is certainly more offensive to most than Phil Robertson citing Scripture to substantiate traditional beliefs.

It’s not surprising that Girls’ viewers were so thrilled with the recent premiere that for the second episode, 219,000 of Lena’s fans, about 20% of the 1.1 million initially interested in watching a chunky girl with OCD eat Doritos and fornicate, decided to watch something else.

As for other HBO premieres, the same holds true for the highly-touted, violent, sex-laden prohibition era/Steve Buscemi hit show Boardwalk Empire, which premiered in 2010 with 4.8 million viewers. The other sex-saturated, blood-soaked, HBO debauch-fest, the fantasy drama Game of Thrones, debuted in 2011 with a rousing 2.2 million viewers, which is also a far cry from the 8.5 million viewers that tuned in on a Wednesday night to watch the premiere of Duck Dynasty.

In the wake of the Phil Robertson GQ controversy, the entertainment media, the gay lobby, and Hollywood will likely band together to try to elevate hit shows that feature story lines and characters whose focus is quite the opposite of the wholesome, family-oriented Duck Dynasty, with its supposedly paltry 8.5 million viewers.

The truth is that half of America is comprised of people who were not offended by Phil Robertson’s beliefs and in fact agree with what he said, and most assuredly support his right to say it. The reason Duck Dynasty is reviled by liberals is because much to the left’s chagrin, by and large America is a nation that appreciates seeing a family love one another and hearing them close their show with a moral message being summed up with a prayer.

Voting for Obama is like First-Time Sex in the City

Originally posted at American Thinker blog

Cyberspace is all atwitter about a new Obama campaign-paid ad starring HBO series Girls star Lena Dunham entitled “My first time was with Obama.”  The ad uses a sexual double-entendre that equates Dunham voting for the first time with losing her virginity to the very married Barack Obama.

Dunham has been nicknamed the “voice of a generation” for her show’s funny portrayal of life as a middle- to upper-class romantic woman living in New York City.  Therefore, it’s not too far-fetched to call this ad “Voting for Obama is like First Time Sex in the City.”

The twenty-something HBO star says, “Your first time shouldn’t be with just anybody.  You want to do it with a great guy.”

Lena does not expound upon how she knows that Barack Obama is a “great guy,” or whether her actual “first time” really was with a “great guy.”

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6G3nwhPuR4&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

Nonetheless, Dunham instructs virginal females both in and outside the voting booth by telling them that “your first time” should be with “someone who really cares about and understands women — a guy who cares whether you get health insurance and specifically whether you get birth control.”

It’s true — before losing your virginity to a “great guy,” it’s always good to first find out how he feels about whether or not you have health insurance and whether or not you brought along your free birth control.  In other words, whether it’s losing your virginity or voting, “your lady parts” depend on picking the right guy.

Lena also doesn’t explain how she knows that Barack Obama “really cares about and understands women.”  Is it his smooth line, his engaging smile, his willingness to pay for the campaign ad, or his major line of bull?  Because if those are the criteria the virtuous Ms. Dunham uses to measure whether a potential lover cares about her or not, then she’s the type of easy-sleazy that men joke about when women aren’t around.

However, what Lena does know is that when pulling the lever, “[t]he consequences are huge.”  Huge consequences are certainly applicable, whether choosing a man for sex or voting for the first time.

While the “first time” ad is shocking to some, it’s really quite telling.  Barack Obama was actually willing to pay for an ad that admits what he’s truly good at: majorly screwing America.  Better yet, majorly screwing the American women who think he has their best interests at heart.

Obama’s screwing started four years ago with the help of semi-virginal voters like Lena Dunham, and he is hoping to keep up the screwing for another four years.  Unfortunately, while it might have been good for Obama, Ms. Lena is too inexperienced and naïve to realize that her first time wasn’t as good she thought it was.

And if it’s a happy ending with Barack Obama that Lena Dunham and the twenty-somethings she’s appealing to are looking for, she and the “Girls” are setting themselves up to be very disappointed.

%d bloggers like this: