Tag Archives: Israel

Obama’s election minions descend on Israel

obama-netanyahuOriginally posted at American Thinker

Barack Obama doesn’t appreciate anyone treating him like he treats everyone else.  That’s why the president will not be meeting with Israeli prime minister Bibi Netanyahu when, in response to an invitation from House Speaker John Boehner, he comes to the U.S. to address a joint session of Congress on the threat a nuclear Iran poses to Israel and the world.

Petulant child Barack Obama doesn’t take perceived insult well.  His response is usually spiteful, and disproportionately so.  The president embodies what Robert Kennedy meant when he said, “Don’t get mad; get even.”

On more than one occasion Barack Obama has reminded his political adversaries that he won.  The president has publicly rebuked congressmen, dressed down Supreme Court justices at a State of the Union address, and scolded reporters, political adversaries, and anyone else he perceives as critical of his one-sided, left-leaning progressive vision.

On occasion, in the process of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America,” Obama has been known to throw temper tantrums, stomp out of meetings, mock Republicans, and issue threats.

And the ingenious Barack Obama has also been known to display his vindictiveness in more creative ways.

Take for instance sending non-verbal messages of approval or disapproval with his selective attendance at funerals.  If a conservative ally or war hero passes away or a black thug or a border-crossing illegal murders a law enforcement officer, their deaths are ignored.  On the other hand, liberal celebrities, civil rights activists, Saudi dictators, communist South African presidents, and any other individuals whose deaths further his liberal agenda are all recognized with effusive condolences.

But skipping funerals and bubble-wrapping and sending back to Britain Winston Churchill’s bust pale in comparison to Obama’s vile approach toward Israeli prime minister Bibi Netanyahu.

Caught on an open mic talking with Nicolas Sarkozy, Obama responded to the former French president, who said he could not stand Netanyahu and called him a liar, by saying, “You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him every day!”

The year prior, Obama had presented Mr. Netanyahu with a list of 13 demands designed to mend fences with Palestine, one of which was for all construction in East Jerusalem be halted.  When Bibi balked, the president stood up, announced, “I’m going to the residential wing to have dinner with Michelle and the girls,” and stormed out of the room, leaving the Israeli prime minister sitting alone for over an hour.

In 2011, Scott Wilson of the Washington Post described the relationship between Bibi and Barack perfectly when he wrote that “Obama and Netanyahu are allies only by tradition, and their relationship lacks personal warmth and is tested often by their differing political views.”

In other words, the relationship is cold, confrontational, and at times openly hostile.

Netanyahu is offended by Obama’s wanting to negotiate with a nation whose former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said, “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation’s fury,” and whose Ministry of Defense stated that “[t]he day will come when the Islamic people in the region will destroy Israel and save the world from this Zionist base.”

That’s why, when invited by John Boehner to address a problem Barack Obama refuses to deal with, for the safety and well-being of both America and Israel, Netanyahu graciously accepted the invitation to deliver a message to a Congress craving a dose of reality.

Evidently, Obama is furious that Boehner invited Netanyahu.  A White House spokesperson speaking on Mr. Obama’s behalf said that Bibi accepting the invitation is equivalent to spitting in the president’s face.

If I may, saying Prime Minister Netanyahu “spat in our face publicly,” referring of course to President Obama’s face, is a dramatic word picture.

When the anonymous spokesperson stressed that “Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price,” it was exactly the kind of nasty Chicago-style threat Barack the community organizer is now known for.

Then, just a few days after the “price to pay” warning, Obama refused to meet with the Israeli leader.  Citing “the proximity to the Israeli election,” National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said:

As a matter of long-standing practice and principle…[and]…to avoid the appearance of influencing a democratic election in a foreign country… we do not see heads of state or candidates in close proximity to their elections.

And while that seems like a noble practice, we now come to find out that the “price to pay” may involve the Obama administration doing the exact opposite of “long-standing practice and principle.”  In fact, from the looks of things, Barack Obama may be very interested in “influencing a democratic election in a foreign country.”

According to Israeli media outlet Haaretz, the “Anyone but Bibi” V-2015 campaign is being assisted by Harvard-educated Jeremy Bird, Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns’ Organizing for Action deputy national field director.  The V-2015 plan is to defeat Bibi by engaging in an Israeli ground operation similar to the one that helped secure Obama a two-term U.S. presidency.

Flush with American money, Bird and a team of Obama community organizers are working with “One Voice International,” a U.S. State Department-funded grassroots movement whose goal is to “amplif[y] the voice of mainstream Israelis and Palestinians, empowering them to propel their elected representatives toward the two-state solution.”

Coincidentally, the former COO of Soros Fund Management, Gary Gladstein, sits on the “One Voice” Honorary Board of Advisors.

That’s why Barack Obama is undoubtedly anxious to see his nemesis, for repeatedly defying the president’s demands, and for treating the PLO and the soon-to-be-nuclear Iran like nothing more than common terrorists, crushed by a two-state-friendly opponent.

Bottom line: once again, the malicious, spiteful Barack Obama, whose minions have successfully placed in office a leader who intrinsically despises the nation he leads – twice – may be attempting to get his own way by replacing a leader who loves Israel with a leader who does not.

NO SURPRISE: Pro-Choice Obama Versus Israel

Ob-Net-300x180Originally posted at The Clash Daily

After six years of Barack Obama’s fervent pro-abortion philosophy it comes as no surprise that the left is completely comfortable verbalizing their disdain for Israel and her right to life.

Liberals as a group generally err on the side of evil while attempting to portray their revulsion for everything near and dear to the heart of God as righteousness.

Think about it – Barack Obama attempts to portray murderous MS-13 gang members as “children” requiring care and compassion while insisting that innocent unborn babies are not human beings, thereby sanctioning the exile of 4,000 of them to red biohazard bags a day. Continue Reading →

Barack Obama’s Excellent Israeli Adventure

Obama-Israel-holocaust-muse-horizontalOriginally posted at American Thinker

It’s Passover, and although Barack Hussein Obama’s lineage is far removed from that of Abraham, the man should at least put a little of the emergency transfusion blood that they bring along in the president’s motorcade over the lintels of his door.

Mr. Obama’s first trip to Israel as president was similar to his Jakarta jaunt in 2010 and his “Return to Moneygall” tour in 2011.  In Indonesia, the trip was cut short when Java’s Mount Merapi began spewing ash in Air Force One’s direction.  In Ireland, while revisiting his roots, Obama’s limo got hung up on a bump as it left the U.S. embassy.

In Israel, the trouble started when someone filled the engine of the president’s $1.5-million armored limo with gasoline instead of diesel fuel.  Then the vehicle biblically dubbed “The Beast” had to be towed like a busted parade float through the streets of Tel Aviv on a flatbed truck.

It’s unlikely that Obama recognized the parallel, but filling up a diesel-powered car with gasoline is a perfect analogy for what he has done to America.  A clueless Obama insists on filling the nation’s tank with the wrong energy, and now America is broken, in need of repair, and praying to God that an alternate vehicle comes along to save us.

Nonetheless, after “The Beast” was demoted, Barack Obama, who everyone knows is perfect, was overheard apologizing to Bibi Netanyhu for his 600-person back-up team, saying, “It’s embarrassing, our entourage.  My wife, Michelle, teases me mercilessly.”

Instead of blaming the help, Obama should have apologized for the conversation he had with Nicolas Sarkozy at the 2011 G20 summit that was picked up on an open microphone.  It was there that Sarkozy said of Netanyahu, “I cannot bear Netanyahu; he’s a liar,” to which Obama responded, “You’re fed up, but I have to deal with him every day.”  As Air Force One touched down at Ben Gurion Airport, an observant Israelinews commentator concisely summed up the Bibi/Barack relationship: “To tell the truth, they can’t stand one another.

Rising above the rancor and deciding to let bygones be bygones, Obama greeted Netanyahu, saying, “Good to see you…and it’s good to get away from Congress.” The president’s best effort at mending fences was to tell Bibi Netanyahu, who knows full well that Obama despises him, that there’s actually an entity he despises even more.

Immediately following those cordialities, there was a state reception with Israeli President Shimon Peres, whom Obama called “brother,” and Mr. Netanyahu, whom Obama did not call “brother,” after which the president inspected the Iron Dome battery and met with Israeli Defense Forces.

From there Obama flew to Jerusalem for another reception at Peres’s home.  That was where the Teleprompter Thespian put on his best Talmudic storyteller face and quoted from Honi and the Carob Tree.

Barack Obama, who’s so adept at planting seeds of dissension and division here at home, left his mark in Israel by planting symbolic “seeds of progress … security … [and] peace.”  Calling to mind Jesus’s words — “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots” — the Israeli government plans to inspect the Jackson magnolia Obama planted in the Holy Land.  If the sapling fails the inspection, the newest addition to Peres’s presidential garden will be uprooted.

After the tree ceremony, Obama visited Israel’s Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem.  Disregarding the 55 million humans tragically slaughtered since 1973, it was at Yad Vashem that the man who supports another holocaust called abortion emphatically declared that “[a] holocaust will never happen again.”

Donning a yarmulke, Obama relit an “eternal flame next to a stone slab above ashes recovered from extermination camps after World War Two.”  While there, President Pro-Choice said, “We have a choice to acquiesce to evil or make real our solemn vow — never again.”

Obama pointed out that “we could come here 1,000 times, and each time your heart would break.”  If the patron saint of NARAL really wants to comprehend heartbreak, he should check out abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell’s murder trial up in New Black Panther poll-watching territory.

After Yad Vashem, Obama visited Mt. Hertzel and the graves of the founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl and slain Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.  From there it was off to Netanyahu’s residence to discuss Iran, Syria, and the fate of Israeli spy/U.S. citizen Jonathan Pollard, currently serving life in a maximum-security prison in Illinois.  Then a press conference and a dinner unlike the dinner Obama didn’t invite Mr. Netanyahu to when he left the Israeli prime minister sitting alone in the Roosevelt Room of the White House.

At Binyamei Ha’uma, the president addressed a group of Arab and Israeli students that understandably excluded those irritated with Obama for inflicting himself on Jerusalem during the wind-up to Passover.  Obama dined with Peres, went sightseeing, and breakfasted with Netanyahu at the lavish King David Hotel, where he and his crew took up 233 rooms, and did it all before scurrying off to spend time with King Abdullah in Jordan.

It’s common knowledge that the president has a history of attracting fliesratslightning, and volcanic ash.  Therefore, it was standard fare when a fierce sandstorm grounded Obama’s helicopter, forcing him to travel instead by car to Palestine-controlled Bethlehem in a slow-moving motorcade, where he met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah.

Not counting car repairs and travel costs, the excursion totaled $500 million in unblocked aid to the Palestinians, $200 million to the Jordanians, and a tow truck full of meaningless platitudes to Israel.

And so, at the end of Obama’s Israeli vacation, the broken-down Beast and the backup blood were loaded back onto a cargo plane for the flight home.  Barry and his souvenir kippah departed the Holy Land possibly liking Netanyahu a teeny bit more than Congress.  Left behind were angry Israelis and Palestinians, a still-pending Jackson magnolia, a wreath at Yad Vashem, remnants of an Exodus-like sandstorm, and visions of Barack’s big, butch, 18-foot-long armored limo being castrated by a tank of gas.

Putting Obama on Hold

Originally posted at American Thinker blog

From the very beginning of his presidency, Barack Obama has set the tone for his relationships with world leaders.  It is pretty much accepted that unless you’re a non-Western monarch, don’t expect Barack Obama to bow to you.

Now we come to find out that David Cameron purportedly preferred playing a third set of tennis with an old friend named Charlie Brooks over taking a telephone call from the US president.  Charlie Brooks claims that he was playing tennis with Cameron at his official residence in Chequers when Obama rang up the British Prime Minister.

According to Mr. Brooks, in the heat of intense competition Prime Minister Cameron allegedly said to his opponent, who had already won two sets, “I think we’ve got time for a third set.” He then turned to the person relaying the message and requested that they tell the caller that he’d phone him back later.

Mr. Cameron has had to put distance between himself and his neighbor/former Eton schoolmate Charlie Brooks and Brooks’ tabloid editor wife Rebekah, both of whom are embroiled in a phone-hacking scandal.

Now Downing Street is questioning Mr. Brooks’ story, claiming that “‘we are scratching our heads’ over Charlie’s recollection of the match and Mr. Obama’s intervention.”  Damian McBride, a former press adviser to Gordon Brown, speculated that what happened might have been a “ruse designed to get the Prime Minister out of the tennis match.”

President Obama is reaping what he’s sown. Either way, there is cosmic justice in Mr. Brooks’ telephone tale.  For starters, it’s no secret that Barack Obama is habitually tardy.  As a senator he was renowned for “running late,” and as president, well let’s just say Obama hasn’t exactly been punctual.  Therefore, David Cameron may have felt a man who asks everyone to wait for him shouldn’t balk at being put on hold.

Also, Barack Obama’s continued aloofness toward Binyamin Netanyahu may have set a global precedent that it’s acceptable to be dismissive of world leaders.  In 2010, after “failing to extract a written promise of concessions on settlements,” Obama walked out of his meeting with Netanyahu and retired to the White House private quarters for supper with Shelley and the girls.

In the overall scheme of mutual discourtesy, which is worse — telling Obama “I’ll ring you back after the next set,” or humiliating an ally by leaving him sitting in a room while you go upstairs and have a leisurely dinner with the wife and kids? It could be that, by refusing Obama’s phone call, David Cameron was merely emulating a man notorious for being flippant, standoffish, and rude toward others.

In lieu of meeting with Binyamin Netanyahu, leader of a nation currently being threatened with nuclear annihilation,Obama chose to whoop it up with Whoopi Goldberg on “The View,” attend some key fundraisers, and crack jokes with late night comedian David Letterman.  So, if he really was told, “Sorry Mr. President, Mr. Cameron is unavailable and will have to get back to you,” the President was simply getting back a small portion of what he regularly dishes out.

Furthermore, second only to Barack Obama, who is “very fond” of playing basketball and “chillaxing,” David Cameron is also said to be “very fond” of playing tennis and “chillaxing.”  Who better than a hoopster like Barack to understand a world leader refusing a phone call because he’s in the midst of a sweaty tennis match?

In the end, whether true or false, the story that the Prime Minister refused a call from President Obama while playing tennis does seem plausible.  After all, it’s Barack Obama who has set a contemptuous tone whereby, in pursuit of frivolous non-priorities, a world leader can now feel perfectly justified dismissing a call from a ‘close’ ally.

Surrendering Israel to Alinsky

Posted at Renew America

Whenever self-anointed arbiter of border etiquette Barack Obama awkwardly interjects Scripture into a speech, his disingenuous inner core is exposed. Recently, in defense of an unaddressed porous US border, the President attempted to add weight to his argument by introducing Bible verse into the discussion. Barack misconstrued Scripture so badly he compared illegal usurpers with ancient Hebrews enslaved in a foreign land whose escape from bondage required ten plagues and Moses parting the Red Sea.

To support a liberal stance on amnesty, Bible opportunist Barack misquoted the Book of Deuteronomy citing “moral imperative” and “a greater understanding from our faith.”  In defense of officially pardoning illegal aliens and in an effort to cultivate guilt and project a false image of righteousness, Obama revealed a counterfeit identity by dragging out a Bible Bazooka and haphazardly shooting poorly-interpreted verse at those who oppose granting lawbreakers a reprieve.

In a more recent border debate, Obama requested Israel relinquish land to Ishmael. This time Obama supported the appeal by choosing to disregard Deuteronomy 30:5, which refers to Israel when it says: “The LORD your God will bring you into the land which your fathers possessed, and you shall possess it; and He will prosper you and multiply you more than your fathers.”

Although Obama attempts to prove otherwise, his Bible knowledge is clearly limited to specific, out-of-context verses scrolling by on the Teleprompter.  Yet, when quoting Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals, a flow takes place that lacks the clumsiness of Barack misusing Scripture to lend validity to imprudent solutions to the U.S. border dispute.

Even Barack Obama is astute enough to realize that citing Scripture in a Middle East and North Africa speech would contradict the proposition of Israel surrendering God-given land to people who’ve vowed to push the Jewish nation into the sea. Instead, tucked within Obama’s proposal to core the apple of God’s eye lies a direct quote from a tactical primer promoting “realistic” radicalism.

Speaking from the State Department, self-appointed international border expert Barack Obama presented a “new chapter in American diplomacy” that includes advancing America’s values (as defined by Obama), as well as tried-and-true Obama-style change as it applies to the Israeli/Palestinian border dispute.

The President’s lengthy speech chronicled ongoing, rapid-fire adjustments presently coming about “Square by square, town by town, country by country,” in a portion of the world engulfed by a set of circumstances where “the people have risen up to demand their basic human rights,” in a manner strangely similar to the Saul Alinsky technique.

Speaking like a true community organizer, Obama said: “It’s not America that put people into the streets of Tunis or Cairo — it was the people themselves who launched these movements, and it’s the people themselves that must ultimately determine their outcome.”

In what sounded like the present state of affairs in America and Barack Obama’s Middle East rhetoric described an all too familiar “relentless tyranny…refusal to pay taxes to a king… power concentrated in the hands of a few” and “change that cannot be denied.”

Obama, who heartily sanctions the “slaughter of innocents…for a better life” in America, also argued that in the Middle East, “the slaughter of innocents [does] not answer [the people’s] cries for a better life.”

Slowly winding his way toward the borders of Israel, the President – broached “fresh air” in Cairo; the “end of night” in Sanaa; words of freedom in Bengazi; “dignity” in Damascus, and an expository review of the situation in Libya. Failing to provide details, Border Patrol President Obama warned, “We will not tolerate aggression across borders, and we will keep our commitments to friends and partners,” a pledge that came with a committed resolve to “change our approach” to avoid a “spiraling of division” between the US and the Arab world.

Then, in order to avoid further division, in a telling use of words Obama, clearly more familiar with Saul Alinsky than Saul of Tarsus, took Middle East cues not from the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but rather from Alinsky’s controversial handbook Rules for Radicals.

Alinsky tenets maintain that: “The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.“ Based on the President’s constant promotion of reckless chaos, one would assume Obama’s world is not a world as he thinks it should be – at least not yet.

Without a doubt, the President’s ‘standards of judgment’ remain ‘rooted in’ more concern over Palestinian border issues than those of Arizona, Texas and California.  Which may explain why Barack chose to insert Alinsky principles into the Middle East solution when he said: “after decades of accepting the world as it is in the region, we have a chance to pursue the world as it should be.”

Obama’s ‘wished-for fantasy’ concerning Israel was revealed with the shocking suggestion that 40+ years later the “borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.”

America’s President explicitly stated “The United States,” which in his mind is represented solely by the opinions of Barack Obama, “believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine.”

Texas and California should proceed with caution, because with Alinsky’s Lucifer-lauding “world as it should be” guiding the way the next thing Obama may decide to do in an initial effort to resolve yet another border crisis is to return the two states to Mexico.

Either way, one important issue has finally been resolved.  In a misguided attempt to grant America’s Promised Land to illegals through the exploitation of out-of-context Scripture and then the attempt to deny the actual Promised Land to its rightful heirs using a quote from the mouth of an atheistic mentor, the world as Barack Obama believes “it should be” has been finally been laid bare.

Cartoon by SooperMexican

 

Amanpour reaps what she’s sown

Originally posted at American Thinker blog

Christiane Amanpour has spent her entire career pretending to be an impartial journalist.  Yet, the dark-haired Iranian with the British accent has taken every opportunity to use journalism as a tool to undermine America and her ally Israel’s reputation on the world stage.

Ms. Amanpour has had many low points in her quest to portray the United States in a less than favorable light. In the Muslim world, America’s standing was severely damaged when, in an unbiased way, the London-raised journalist commiserated with radical terrorists by suggesting that the Bush administration’s use of enhanced interrogation mirrored Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge.

In Dharamsala, India, while Christiane interviewed the Dalai Lama, she peppered her commentary with innuendo. Amanpour suggested that the Dalai Lama successfully evading Chinese Communist forces on horseback in 1959 was a “somber remembrance that is a little like what the Palestinians do every year.” Christiane said: “They call it al-Nakba, or ‘catastrophe,’ which marks 1948 when they lost much of their land as the state of Israel was founded.”

Amanpour’s pathetic attempt to demean the nation of Israel is rivaled only by her describing American Christianity in the same breath as radical Islam.  Referring to the CNN special God’s Warriors, the neither fair, nor impartial host shared: “Wherever I go, what the believers do all have in common is that they want to bring the politics of faith into the very center of public life – we are seeing this now on almost every continent.”

Amanpour’s comments implied little difference between theocratic Islamists imposing Sharia law on whole nations and evangelical Christians in the United States choosing to participate in government and politics.

On a personal note, Christiane is married to James Rubin, former State Department spokesman in the Clinton administration. Rubin “worked as a foreign policy adviser on Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign…[and] would like to work in the Obama administration.”

Even after Christiane expressed the partisan opinion that merely having Barack Obama as President abated global disdain for America, Mrs. Rubin remains convinced, “Nobody knows [her] biases.”

Defending Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize Amanpour said, in just six months, the President had “Obviously done something very significant, and that is, after eight years in which the United States was really held in contempt,” thanks to Barack, the United States has “a new relationship with the rest of the world.”

Two years later, while embedded as a reporter in Cairo, Amanpour personally experienced the result of Obama’s Middle East peace effort. After spending decades promoting anti-American sentiment, Christiane ironically became a victim of the type of hostility her journalistic bias has helped foster around the world.

Reporting from Tahir Square, the ABC News reporter was attacked by an “angry mob of pro-Mubarak protesters” that surrounded Ms. Amanpour and chased her car, shouting hate for America as well as hate for the American media.

Stranded in Cairo, being pursued by a furious anti-American mob, Amanpour must have secretly been wishing she were home in the mean old US of A, especially when protesters “kicked in the doors” and “broke [the] windshield” as she and her cameramen drove away.

Imagine the twist of fate! After years of portraying the United States in a negative light, to find yourself defenseless against the very people you’ve strived to ingratiate. Far from the safety of America’s shores, struggling with an “overwhelming sense of fear,” would a person like Christiane Amanpour even stop to consider that maybe the words she’s built her America/Israel-hating career upon could be what helped fuel an atmosphere that endangered her life and threatens the world?

Barry “Zawistowski’s” Choice

Slide1

Obama needs to learn that if you attempt to explain, discuss or entertain evil…this is what you get.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KczxsvVvqGE[/youtube]

President Barack Obama saunters confidently around on the world stage and is “beautiful,”  in  the eyes of those who hate America and especially Israel.  Obama is someone to politically “bed” as a trophy by world dictators. The aroma of his misguided hope fills the nostrils of tyrants reeking of sulphur.

Those who desire the eradication of Israel eye the prey disembarking from the political cattle car.  They survey the crowd for those who are willing to comply, submit or believe there is a way of escape. Dressed in the uniform of death, neatly pressed but splattered with innocent blood, they scan the slow moving crowd for anyone who will obediently line up and move forward at their command. Drawing near they have found who they are looking for in Barack Obama.

Obama compliantly shuffles along thinking he is leading as they map out his course.  Chin up, he haughtily believes he knows the direction and formula for survival and that everything is under his measured control.  Obama falsely believes he can quell the seething, snorting dragon with conversation, pacification and reassurance in his own exceptionalism. He perceives himself unlike any one else, in his mind he is the global savior and promoter of world peace.  Little does he know that as he bends to spit shine Hitler’s shoes striped pajamas are being packed into his duffel bag.

Barack Obama is the new Sophie Zawstowski from “Sophie’s Choice.” Sophie dealt with oppressors in the same way as Obama does and she and her children paid the highest price for poor judgment and fatal decisions.

Then, as now, the goal is to find someone on the line to call out to make an example of.  Who better than Obama to punish for thinking he possesses the power to deter those bent on slaughter of a better way? Obama, harbinger of “change,” seems unaware that the plan has not changed, it is still replete with horror too brutal to contemplate and involves mass extermination without regret. Obama may be the perfect Sophie, who, when forced to make a “choice,” will hand over the greatest and most precious prize … very possibly sealing Israel’s demise in the process if not for Yahweh’s covenant hand of protection on His chosen people and nation.

Obama attracts dictators in the same way Sophie attracted the attention of the Gestapo.  They come near sniffing and drinking in the aroma of his hubris. Looking into his eyes they peer deeply  into his soul as he intermittently looks away.  Like Sophie one wonders what could be going through Obama’s mind as he entertains devils?  The SS seduced Sophie into conversation, so too has Obama been lured into a conversation he has no control over. Jew haters know that compliments soften Obama and use them as a distraction to make room for taking the pulse of his political sway.  The assessment is correct positive headway is being made.

Obama, like Sophie, beckons iniquity to participate “without preconditions” in peaceful discussion. Just as Sophie believed she could befriend malevolence, so too does Obama believe he has the ability to convince those who hate and that his is a better and higher way.   Sophie’s plea for the life of her daughter, as she was carried to her death, was met with a sinister smile. Obama too, falsely believes he has the ability to persuade despots to surrender plans for a modern day Auschwitz, but above the roar of rhetoric, are the screams of a dying world he has surrendered and by doing so branded for death.

Obama is deluded if he thinks that his influence stands out from the crowd.  He perceives himself as exceptional, different.  In response, our enemies view him as infantile and chortle wildly behind his back. Barack Obama would be wise to refer to back to Sophie who mistakenly engaged depravity attempting to save her life saying, “I am different, I am not like them…I stand out.”  Sophie believed in her ability to convince and assuage but was quickly and cruelly proven wrong. Barack Hussien Obama naive and misguided will realize the devastating result of engaging dictators in conversation when those he befriends reveal themselves to be malicious beasts they really are. Begging, acting confused, crying and protesting didn’t help Sophie and will be of little benefit to Obama on the day they implement the global Final Solution.

Shouting to an enemy the reasons to view her as unworthy of death cost Sophie the life of her baby girl as evil turned and strode back into Sophie’s sphere threatening and using against her the thing she thought set her apart.  Sophie believed killers respond to Christianity—Ha!  Instead, they perverted  God’s word saying, Jesus said, “Suffer the little children to come unto me…choose one or they both die.”  Sophie was confronted by her own words and learned discussion with the enemy is a “choice” that haunts and destroys lives.  Barack thinks his foreign policy is a way of being “His brothers keeper” someone should tell him Mahmoud, Hugo and Fidel are not his brothers.

Obama may believe timidity and diverting his eyes from evil is enough…if he does…he is dead wrong.   Like Sophie, Obama views himself able to convince those who have murder and sadism in their hearts. Holding hands with  allies, while speaking to demons is dangerous business. Sophie held onto her two children tightly…Obama, on the other hand holds loosely and when asked to make a choice will likely leave go of Israel’s hand.  Mahmoud Amadinejad’s nuclear ambition is a present day revamping of the showers and a stoking of the  ovens.  A hateful dictator tells the world  he believes in cleanliness and loves fresh baked bread and gullible, greenhorn Obama believes him.

Presently, Obama, like Sophie, is being pressured to a make quick and clear  “choice.” If history is any indicator of future behavior, Barack Obama will probably do what is in his own best interest and save himself first!  It is likely Obama will place Israel into the  executioner’s arms and justify his decision necessary to prevent an even worse fate. Soon after Barack Obama, like Sophie Zawistowski, will find himself alone with a world void of meaning too late learning the gambled “choice” he made was the wrong one.

Obama’s Israeli Hoopoe Flip

hoopoe_madj-crest1The greatest messages recorded in history have been those conveyed without words. Theses have been spoken in moments of silence, which is the case with orator extraordinaire Barack Obama who, while feigning innocence, speaks volumes with middle fingers and soles of shoes.

Obama knows how to manipulate speechifying to express messages other than the ones spoken. Yet, amidst the multitude of words, there are profound communiqués residing in his gestures. Obama is a master of words and has enthused many by his unmatched ability to finesse language and wring gold dust from pregnant pauses. However, for the visually astute, Obama’s calculated gesticulations can speak louder than his inspiring rhetoric.

Obama is neither sloppy or naïve. He is so well scripted the teleprompter follows him everywhere he goes making sure he does not deviate from script. Rest assured every nuance and gradation in the Obama color wheel is carefully designed and considered. Yet, despite his controlled coolness, one obvious character flaw is Obama’s defensive inability to respond well to opposition or criticism. When public opinion runs contrary to his policy plans for enforced Nirvana or his racial, cultural or religious affections Obama’s brows furrow and unmistakable tension blankets his face. In those moments, if observed closely, Obama has been known to incorporate body signals toward his opposition to augment dialogue with strong rebuke and mocking scorn.

Speaking softly but scratching an uncontrollable itch, on occasion, Obama has been known to “flip the bird.” The president camouflages contempt while scratching his cheek with his middle finger accomplishing mouthfuls of communication without the spoken word.

Isolating a middle finger is an uncomfortable and awkward sensation for anyone. It is hard to believe someone as self-aware as Obama could be oblivious to his mid-finger ingenuously wandering over his cheek in the middle of a speech. Obama has scratched his face with that precarious finger twice, once when referring to Hillary and then another time mocking John McCain. His motivation toward Hillary, was in response to her irking his ego during the campaign by using “…every opportunity to get a dig,” so Barry reciprocated with a dig of his own. Obama flipped Mrs. Clinton the proverbial bird to the delight of a supportive audience well aware of its subliminal meaning.

Flipping the bird is offensive but can be viewed as playfully benign. Hillary’s bird flip transformed into a stuffed quail of a Secretary of State position, which relieved her presidential prickle. Moderate Republican, John McCain’s bird flip was a senatorial salute, jettisoning him back to the coop with the other turkeys that scratch each other’s back. Both were harmless. Yet, Obama’s more recent flip off had nothing to do with his fingers and everything to do with his toes. When it comes to Israel, one has to wonder what Barack’s gripe is.

In the Arab world, exposing the soles of your shoes carries the same weight of contempt as giving someone the middle finger in Western culture. When George W. Bush was in the midst of a news conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki last year, an Iraqi television journalist Mantadar al-Zaidi, “flipped the bird” at President Bush by shouting, “…this is a goodbye kiss from the Iraqi people, dog” before hurling a shoe at the former president.

Recently, while on the phone with Israeli Prime Minister Bebe Netanyahu, the worn out, dirty soles of Obama’s size twelve’s were photographed rudely propped up on the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office. One has to wonder whether Barack Hussein, who prides himself on being well versed in Middle Eastern culture, idioms and traditions, realized that allowing someone to take pictures of the soles of his shoes would be viewed as an insult in Eastern culture. When it comes to sending non-verbal messages, Barack Hussein is either arrogant or ignorant. Likely well aware, Obama’s feet on the desk sent two resolute messages, one of insolence toward the Office of the President, and one of condescension to the leader of the Jewish State and his Obama-affronted people.

Obama has been on a five-month romantic courtship with the Arab world. He bowed and then kissed King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, cast the United States in a guilty light, apologized exhaustively for American exceptionalism and portrayed the Arab/Muslim world as the proprietors of knowledge, culture, “religious tolerance and racial equality.” He then followed up this quixotic Islamic reverie with his own goodbye kiss to Israel by flinging a shoe of his own in their face.

Israel, one of our nation’s strongest allies, has been relegated to beneath the scud missile launcher by Barack Obama’s Mideast policy. Obama has his own plan for peace in the Middle East and views Israel as the barrier. Netanyahu was told Tuesday by an American official in Jerusalem that, ‘We are going to change the world. Please, don’t interfere.’ Netanyahu’s aides interpreted this as a threat.”

In his Cairo speech, Obama proudly identified his familial roots deep within the Muslim culture and faith. He contrived the breath of Islam to reach from the glorious European Renaissance to the dusty shelves of Thomas Jefferson’s library. Obama’s compliments minimized Western civilization and the Founding Father’s genius by placing their extraordinary accomplishments squarely at the feet of Islam.

Israel remains embedded in a tenuous position surrounded on all sides by an Arab world desirous of their annihilation. Obama’s perfectly cadenced chant of “Assalamu alaikum” was a blatant flip off, directed toward the Jewish State. The question is why did he extend prayers of peace and mercy toward those yearning for Israel’s demise?

Obama spent twenty years sitting at the feet of an anti-Semitic, anti-American, racist pastor who openly speaks disparagingly of the Lord’s chosen people.  Obama’s mentor and longtime spiritual adviser, obviously doesn’t appreciate Obama fraternizing with “Zionists” based on revealing remarks at the 95th Annual Hampton University Minister’s Conference where he complained, “…them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me.”  Could it be when the Reverend called Obama was otherwise occupied, via long distance telephone, instructing Bebe on proper Israeli etiquette toward Muslims?

Obama’s flippant, discourteous treatment of Israel and her people and his constant submissive stance toward Islam is troubling. Wright’s influence, coupled together with Obama’s boyhood immersion in a Quran, which states, “O believers, do not take the Jews and the Christians as your friends … they are friends of each other, ” (Quran 5:51-52) has caused informed citizens to question Obama’s allegiance and obsessive dedication to the Muslim world.

The president’s “later for Israel” attitude has been met with great criticism in the Jewish state, as well as the US. In typical Obama fashion, when criticized, his imprudent response has been to “flip the bird” at his critics and send them a wordless message of rebuke. For the past week, Obama has likely been quietly absorbing the ridicule initiated by the inappropriate moral equivalencies he made between the Holocaust and the Palestinian refugee situation. His failure to include a stopover in Israel during his second Mideast jaunt, coupled with statements deriding the United States and Israel have not fared well with the American public. All these factors provided the perfect scenario needed to inflame Obama to concoct a way to flip off detractors…and flip he did!

Barack Hussein, who is paparazzi perceptive, allowed photos of the bottom of his large probably Dsquared2 shod extremities to be taken, while speaking with the Israeli leader. He knew full well they’d be splashed, by way of AP, all over the world. In one photo op, Obama addressed the “dogs”, both in Israel and in the United States, who dared disparage his actions or question his fondness for the Muslim Middle East. Obama had a specific itch to scratch and did so by stretching forth his middle finger in the form of a shoe.

Many wordless messages have impacted the world down through history, both good and bad. Yet, Barack Hussein’s ”flipping the hoopoeat Yisrael and all her American supporters may well be unrivaled as the ultimate gesture revealing the state of a president’s “sole.”

%d bloggers like this: