Originally posted at at American Thinker
Last year, the first lady, Michelle Obama, gave a commencement speech at Alabamaâ€™s Tuskegee University that sounded more like she was paying homage toÂ black activist W.E.B. DuBoisÂ than the schoolâ€™s founderÂ Booker T.Â WashingtonÂ who, as an ex-slave, believed character and hard work were key to improving the plight of the black man.
Then again, Michelle is part of the illiterate gang who ousted evil slave owner Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill without researching the philosophies escaped slave Harriet Tubman stood for. Wait until Obama, whoÂ misquoted MLKÂ on his Oval Office rug, realizes Underground Railroad conductor Tubman was a devout Christian whose pistol-packing ways mirror Sarah Palin, notÂ Maxine Waters.
Nonetheless, Michelle recently returned from a trip with theÂ guy who lecturesÂ continents on gay rights and who, after wishing Queen Elizabeth happy 90th birthday, threatened Britain by warning that voting â€œYesâ€ on a referendum toÂ bow out of the EUÂ would place the UK at the â€˜end of theÂ TTIP trade deal queue.â€™ Sorry, but that sounds more like Chicago-style coercion than a friendly suggestion to an ally.
Either way, Mrs. Obama is not unlike her Saul Alinsky-trained husband. The FLOTUS also â€˜sees the worldÂ not as it isÂ but as it should beâ€™ and feels itâ€™s her duty to set the non-compliant straight.
Thatâ€™s why, after returning from making enemies overseas, Michelle quickly donned her tam and gown and headed to give a confrontational commencement speech in aÂ state still stigmatizedÂ by a dark image concerning civil rights.Â It was at historically blackÂ Jackson State UniversityÂ that Michelle chose to include in her remarks a rebuke to Mississippi for daring to uphold the First Amendment.
As part of the discourse, the FLOTUS used voting rights as the vehicle to refer disparagingly to the â€œreligious freedom billâ€ recently signed into law by governor Phil Bryant. The basis of the bill is to protect those who, because of a religious opposition to things like same-sex marriage, extramarital sex, or transgenderism, refuse to provide services to whose behavior falls outside what they believe to be Scriptural precepts.
Governor Bryant maintains that the â€œreligious freedom billâ€ was passed “to protect sincerely held religious beliefs and moral convictions… from discriminatory action by state government.” Bryant said the new law “merely reinforces” existing religious freedom rights on the state level, “does not limit any constitutionally protected rights or actions,” and does not challenge federal law.
The bottom line is that Americans are still free to live any way they choose. With that in mind, religious freedom should mean that no one is strong-armed to accept or accommodate conduct that runs contrary to a personâ€™s deeply held faith.
Much like her husband, Michelle Obama disagrees.
Itâ€™s good to know that, in the name of nondiscrimination, dear FLOTUS can always be counted on to verbally discriminate against anyone who desires to remain true to constitutional or religious convictions.
Thatâ€™s why; by comparing the God-given civil rights of black Americans to gender identity confusion and illegal immigration Mrs. Obama pretty much exploited Jackson State University graduates.Â Michelle got all preachy saying, “We see it right here in Mississippi — just two weeks ago -â€“ how swiftly progress can hurtle backward. How easy it is to single out a small group and marginalize them because of who they are or who they love.”
Itâ€™s obvious from that statement the FLOTUS believes that if â€˜who you are and what you believeâ€™ make you hesitant to share a restroom with a transgender; you are worthy to be discriminated against. Otherwise, according to Michelle, â€˜singling out and marginalizingâ€™ is unacceptable.
And so, rather than commend her audienceâ€™s achievements, or inspire black graduates to forthcoming success, the FLOTUS turned a graduation into an opportunity to publicly reprimand a Republican governor and to stir animosity by insinuating that Mississippi is reverting back to civil rights abuses.
Mrs. Obama pressed on:
So we’ve got to stand side by side with all our neighbors â€“- straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender; Muslim, Jew, Christian, Hindu immigrant, Native American — because the march for civil rights isn’t just about African-Americans, it’s about all Americans. It’s about making things more just, more equal, more free for all our kids and grandkids.
The FLOTUS must have gotten confused because, while secretly viewing Christians as the oneâ€™s doing the oppressing, she mistakenly included Jesus-following, gun, and Bible-clingers in her â€œmarch for civil rightsâ€ appeal.
More importantly, since when is a force against oneâ€™s will to benefit anotherâ€™s will the definition for the upholding of civil rights? And if that is how things now work in Obamaâ€™s fundamentally transformed America, shouldnâ€™t Halal butchers be mandated, despite religion, to sell legal pork products to customers who demand bacon?
Besides, ifÂ â€˜justice, equality and freedomâ€™ are the goals, how does one carp about laws being passed that seek to ensure the right to â€œfreedom of religion?â€ Moreover, in what way does the president saying, while in the UK, that a law â€œshould be overturnedâ€ that preserves religious liberty make America â€œmore just, more equalâ€ and freer?
In the end, Michelleâ€™s anti-freedom/ averse-to-equality rant are just more drivel issuing forth from a woman who, together with her subversive spouse, profess love for America and adherence to the Christian faith, but exhibit neither.
Instead, in an effort to destabilize the Constitution, disparage Biblical values, and chop away at conventional social mores, every year, Michelle â€œturns up like a bad pennyâ€ at historically black commencement ceremonies where she attempts to stir up racial divisiveness and gain political points by playing the victim card.
At the end of the day, Mrs. Obama can be counted upon to defend against intolerance by speaking prejudicially against the foundational principles held dear by great historical figures such as theÂ Christian freedom fighterÂ about to be memorialized on the front of the $20 bill.