Tag Archives: Glamour magazine

Zoinks! Lena Dunham’s Liberal Lunacy

lena-dunham-picOriginally posted at The Clash Daily

Most people don’t care what Golden-Globe-winning 27-year-old Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO’s hit show Girls, says or does. However, in an attempt to understand a liberal’s approach to life, any opportunity a conservative gets to study how those on the left think is an opportunity to grow in both knowledge and discernment.

One woman who never disappoints when it comes to providing insight into how irrational, disingenuous, and baffling liberal thinking and behavior are is the deliberately ordinary Barack Obama sycophant, Lena Dunham.

Actor/television and film director/ screenwriter/television producer Lena acts up every chance she gets and does it by pretending eccentric behavior is the norm. Lena is so good at acting up, she’s earned $10 million doing it.

In a recent interview, Ms. Dunham told Glamour magazine, “I don’t know if I’m going to want to act anymore. I’m always relieved on the days I don’t have to,” which explains why Lena stars in her own HBO show.

Ms. Dunham, who prides herself on being unglamorous, told Glamour magazine, “I’d rather give parts to other women than be the woman having the parts.”

Based on her “parts” usually being in a brazen state of undress, maybe what Lena really meant to say was that she’d rather be the woman “exposing her girly parts.” Or maybe not, because the title of the article is “Girls‘ Lena Dunham: Why she’s OVER talking about her body.”

To the liberal mindset, Lena saying she’s “OVER talking about her body” doesn’t mean she’s “OVER” exposing her body. Clearly a committed exhibitionist, Lena just doesn’t want anyone noticing she’s naked, and although she plans on continuing to be naked doesn’t want to talk about being naked anymore.

After announcing she was done with acting and talking about being in the buff, Lena hosted SNL, where she starred in an “Adam and Eve” sketch that overlaid a Girls attitude on the Genesis story in which Lena (playing an unclothed Eve, of course), didn’t squander the chance to call attention to, you guessed it – her naked physique, such as it is.

Despite what she says, liberal Lena bares her anatomy with predictable regularity. She maintains that her unembellished butt depicts real life, because as Lena explains, “it’s a realistic expression of what it’s like to be alive.”

In Lena’s case, maybe she identifies with nudity so much because her parents are Laurie Simmons, a photographer/artist, and Carroll Dunham, also an artist, both of whose artwork fixates on women, female mannequins, mammary glands, and gargantuan cartoonish genitals.

Artists Carroll and Laurie create art that features explicit renderings of women in provocative poses. Their progeny bypasses all that, strips down herself, strikes awkwardly provocative poses, and calls it art.

Lena’s parents must believe that over-sexualized art exhibits convey the message that nude women, mammary glands, and shockingly gargantuan cartoonish genitals should be seen as unremarkable, which may be why Lena is now trying to convince America that all her gratuitous nudity is really very boring.

As is always the case with liberals, especially Hollywood liberals, things can get confusing.

For instance, Ms. Lena is a woman who has built a career typecasting herself as a girl who refuses to be typecast by daring people not to notice that she’s strutting around in her birthday suit.

Furthermore, because the career of Adam Driver, the male star of Girls, has exploded, Ms. Dunham is upset because she believes the female stars of Girls are being pigeonholed – as girls. If Lena didn’t want to be typecast as a “girl”, maybe she should have called her show something else.

Here’s an idea! Instead of threatening to quit acting, Ms. Dunham should put her funky shrunken girl clothes back on, take those ridiculous plastic baby-girl barrettes out of her hair, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll stop being typecast as a naked girl working hard to typecast herself as a frumpy girl who refuses to be typecast.

So, for today, Lena Dunham is the naked liberal poster child whose muddled view of the world lends valuable insight into how those currently in charge of America really think, or better yet, fail to think.

Most people don’t care what Golden-Globe-winning 27-year-old Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO’s hit show Girls, says or does. However, in an attempt to understand a liberal’s approach to life, any opportunity a conservative gets to study how those on the left think is an opportunity to grow in both knowledge and discernment.

One woman who never disappoints when it comes to providing insight into how irrational, disingenuous, and baffling liberal thinking and behavior are is the deliberately ordinary Barack Obama sycophant, Lena Dunham.

Actor/television and film director/ screenwriter/television producer Lena acts up every chance she gets and does it by pretending eccentric behavior is the norm. Lena is so good at acting up, she’s earned $10 million doing it.

In a recent interview, Ms. Dunham told Glamour magazine, “I don’t know if I’m going to want to act anymore. I’m always relieved on the days I don’t have to,” which explains why Lena stars in her own HBO show.

Ms. Dunham, who prides herself on being unglamorous, told Glamour magazine, “I’d rather give parts to other women than be the woman having the parts.”

Based on her “parts” usually being in a brazen state of undress, maybe what Lena really meant to say was that she’d rather be the woman “exposing her girly parts.” Or maybe not, because the title of the article is “Girls‘ Lena Dunham: Why she’s OVER talking about her body.”

To the liberal mindset, Lena saying she’s “OVER talking about her body” doesn’t mean she’s “OVER” exposing her body. Clearly a committed exhibitionist, Lena just doesn’t want anyone noticing she’s naked, and although she plans on continuing to be naked doesn’t want to talk about being naked anymore.

After announcing she was done with acting and talking about being in the buff, Lena hosted SNL, where she starred in an “Adam and Eve” sketch that overlaid a Girls attitude on the Genesis story in which Lena (playing an unclothed Eve, of course), didn’t squander the chance to call attention to, you guessed it – her naked physique, such as it is.

Despite what she says, liberal Lena bares her anatomy with predictable regularity. She maintains that her unembellished butt depicts real life, because as Lena explains, “it’s a realistic expression of what it’s like to be alive.”

In Lena’s case, maybe she identifies with nudity so much because her parents are Laurie Simmons, a photographer/artist, and Carroll Dunham, also an artist, both of whose artwork fixates on women, female mannequins, mammary glands, and gargantuan cartoonish genitals.

Artists Carroll and Laurie create art that features explicit renderings of women in provocative poses. Their progeny bypasses all that, strips down herself, strikes awkwardly provocative poses, and calls it art.

Lena’s parents must believe that over-sexualized art exhibits convey the message that nude women, mammary glands, and shockingly gargantuan cartoonish genitals should be seen as unremarkable, which may be why Lena is now trying to convince America that all her gratuitous nudity is really very boring.

As is always the case with liberals, especially Hollywood liberals, things can get confusing.

For instance, Ms. Lena is a woman who has built a career typecasting herself as a girl who refuses to be typecast by daring people not to notice that she’s strutting around in her birthday suit.

Furthermore, because the career of Adam Driver, the male star of Girls, has exploded, Ms. Dunham is upset because she believes the female stars of Girls are being pigeonholed – as girls. If Lena didn’t want to be typecast as a “girl”, maybe she should have called her show something else.

Here’s an idea! Instead of threatening to quit acting, Ms. Dunham should put her funky shrunken girl clothes back on, take those ridiculous plastic baby-girl barrettes out of her hair, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll stop being typecast as a naked girl working hard to typecast herself as a frumpy girl who refuses to be typecast.

So, for today, Lena Dunham is the naked liberal poster child whose muddled view of the world lends valuable insight into how those currently in charge of America really think, or better yet, fail to think.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/03/zoinks-lena-dunhams-liberal-lunacy/#M0LMEu6qaPB4FhqF.99

people don’t care what Golden-Globe-winning 27-year-old Lena Dunham, the creator of HBO’s hit show Girls, says or does. However, in an attempt to understand a liberal’s approach to life, any opportunity a conservative gets to study how those on the left think is an opportunity to grow in both knowledge and discernment.

One woman who never disappoints when it comes to providing insight into how irrational, disingenuous, and baffling liberal thinking and behavior are is the deliberately ordinary Barack Obama sycophant, Lena Dunham.

Actor/television and film director/ screenwriter/television producer Lena acts up every chance she gets and does it by pretending eccentric behavior is the norm. Lena is so good at acting up, she’s earned $10 million doing it.

In a recent interview, Ms. Dunham told Glamour magazine, “I don’t know if I’m going to want to act anymore. I’m always relieved on the days I don’t have to,” which explains why Lena stars in her own HBO show.

Ms. Dunham, who prides herself on being unglamorous, told Glamour magazine, “I’d rather give parts to other women than be the woman having the parts.”

Based on her “parts” usually being in a brazen state of undress, maybe what Lena really meant to say was that she’d rather be the woman “exposing her girly parts.” Or maybe not, because the title of the article is “Girls‘ Lena Dunham: Why she’s OVER talking about her body.”

To the liberal mindset, Lena saying she’s “OVER talking about her body” doesn’t mean she’s “OVER” exposing her body. Clearly a committed exhibitionist, Lena just doesn’t want anyone noticing she’s naked, and although she plans on continuing to be naked doesn’t want to talk about being naked anymore.

After announcing she was done with acting and talking about being in the buff, Lena hosted SNL, where she starred in an “Adam and Eve” sketch that overlaid a Girls attitude on the Genesis story in which Lena (playing an unclothed Eve, of course), didn’t squander the chance to call attention to, you guessed it – her naked physique, such as it is.

Despite what she says, liberal Lena bares her anatomy with predictable regularity. She maintains that her unembellished butt depicts real life, because as Lena explains, “it’s a realistic expression of what it’s like to be alive.”

In Lena’s case, maybe she identifies with nudity so much because her parents are Laurie Simmons, a photographer/artist, and Carroll Dunham, also an artist, both of whose artwork fixates on women, female mannequins, mammary glands, and gargantuan cartoonish genitals.

Artists Carroll and Laurie create art that features explicit renderings of women in provocative poses. Their progeny bypasses all that, strips down herself, strikes awkwardly provocative poses, and calls it art.

Lena’s parents must believe that over-sexualized art exhibits convey the message that nude women, mammary glands, and shockingly gargantuan cartoonish genitals should be seen as unremarkable, which may be why Lena is now trying to convince America that all her gratuitous nudity is really very boring.

As is always the case with liberals, especially Hollywood liberals, things can get confusing.

For instance, Ms. Lena is a woman who has built a career typecasting herself as a girl who refuses to be typecast by daring people not to notice that she’s strutting around in her birthday suit.

Furthermore, because the career of Adam Driver, the male star of Girls, has exploded, Ms. Dunham is upset because she believes the female stars of Girls are being pigeonholed – as girls. If Lena didn’t want to be typecast as a “girl”, maybe she should have called her show something else.

Here’s an idea! Instead of threatening to quit acting, Ms. Dunham should put her funky shrunken girl clothes back on, take those ridiculous plastic baby-girl barrettes out of her hair, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll stop being typecast as a naked girl working hard to typecast herself as a frumpy girl who refuses to be typecast.

So, for today, Lena Dunham is the naked liberal poster child whose muddled view of the world lends valuable insight into how those currently in charge of America really think, or better yet, fail to think.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/03/zoinks-lena-dunhams-liberal-lunacy/#M0LMEu6qaPB4FhqF.99

Obama-Induced Unemployment and America’s Libido

Thanks in great part to randy American women clamoring for free birth control, at least for now, Barack Obama’s slippers can remain parked beside the bed in the living quarters of the White House. So, after the election, as company after company began firing workers, I got to thinking:  “Do unemployed people even feel like having sex?” I sure do hope so, because it would be a huge waste of the taxpayers’ money if all those free contraceptives Barack Obama promised to dole out sat idle.

Notwithstanding one of the President’s more ardent same-sex constituencies, women usually prefer men as sex partners and vice versa.  With that in mind, after being laid off following Barack’s inspirational post-election victory speech, one can’t help but wonder if men forgot the dread of joblessness, cast aside those pink slips, and got down to business with those ladies still orgasmic over Obama’s reelection.

Let’s face it – with Barack Obama in charge, in the casual sex department, men have it pretty good here in America.  Think about it – what greater aphrodisiac is there for a woman than knowing the man in the poster hanging on the ceiling over her bed cares so deeply about her reproductive rights?

Unfortunately, Obama’s free birth control also comes with unemployment checks, food stamps, and foreclosure notices, which has made me curious about the state of America’s libido. After all, if the promise of consequence-free sex is what kept the President in the White House for another term, it would be a tragedy if interest in copulating waned because standing on an unemployment line put a damper on ardor.

So, with that in mind, I decided to do a little research of my own on the subject.

Because sex sells, I figured that just about any semi-trashy women’s magazine would hold the answer to my query.  I was also of the belief that the Cosmo set would certainly support a job killer like Barack Obama if he promised them free accoutrements to facilitate the killer sex these publications are always talking about.

I chose Glamour magazine because for one of his many hard-hitting pre-election interviews, Glamour editor-in-chief Cindi Leive secured a face-to-face with Mr. Obama. On behalf of Glamour’s large female audience, in an article that appeared in the magazine’s November issue, Leive broached the subject that unemployment is higher for women since the President took office in 2009, but then predictably segued from joblessness into abortion and contraception.

Regrettably, Ms. Leive never thought to bring up the possible effect being unable to put food on the table or gas up the car might have on libidos of the female recipients of the free birth control Obama is always peddling, or their sex partners.

Instead, the general gist of Leive’s article suggested that even though 12.5 million people are currently unemployed – many of whom are women – depression and dumpster-diving do nothing to diminish the need for readily available government-funded contraceptive devices.

Quite frankly, if I were doing the interview I would have asked the President how women standing on unemployment lines find the time to fit fornication into their busy schedules.  Understandably, I was not the one posing that question to Mr. Obama.

However, before Ms. Leive interviewed the provider of female prophylactics, maybe she should have checked some of the blog entries of her own sex-crazed magazine, and more specifically the contributions of “Sex, Love & Life” blogger Gena Kaufmann.

In the February 2012 issue of Glamour, Kaufmann posted an article entitled “Ugh, The Stupid Economy Is Still Ruining Everything, Including Your Sex Life. In it, Gena makes the following observation:

With the upcoming presidential election, I’m hearing a lot of conflicting statements about the state of the economy in various political ads and debates. I don’t know if it’s really any better or not, but it appears one thing is still down in the dumps and unfortunately, it’s libidos.

Ya think? Just ask the Greeks. Anyway, Ms. Kaufman even cited her own “Economic Sex Woes.”  According to Gena, her libido went south after a sluggish economy forced her to move back home with Mom and Dad.

Offering solutions on how to rev up an economically-suppressed sex drive, the author suggested that her temporarily celibate readers “[r]emember to spend time together and make each other feel good, even if you’re both feeling pretty crappy over unemployment or money problems.”

I can’t say for sure what happened on November 6th at the Ohio polling place where Gena cast her vote.  However, based on her admiration for the first couple, I would venture a guess that Kaufmann, who gushed, “Gah, I’m just crazy about these two,” likely cast a vote for the same guy whose sex life-demolishing policies forced her back onto her parents’ couch.

Nonetheless, as a result of my research project, I’ve come to the conclusion that Obama’s female supporters have yet to fully grasp the fact that birth control is probably the last thing they’ll be needing in the days ahead.  Like it or not, Barack Obama’s ongoing fiscal nightmare will continue to negatively impact America’s libido to such an extent that even Sandra Fluke’s need for contraceptives is about to take a nosedive.

So if Americans are wondering why, less than a week after the reelection of Barack Obama, so many people are being laid off, it’s because an impressive number of the women who voted were more concerned with free contraceptives then they were jobs. What those women fail to recognize is that the man promising to facilitate hours of baby-proof sex is also the overseer of an economy that even Obama-loving women’s magazines admit is ruining their chances for realizing the sex life they seek with anyone other than chronically unemployed men.

%d bloggers like this: