Tag Archives: gay rights

Obama’s Persian Peace Pact

Iran-Obama-copertinaOriginally posted at American Thinker blog

After proselytizing the Kenyans on the subject of gay rights, Barack Obama, the man who becomes irate if people disagree with him, dropped in on Washington D.C.’s American University to badger Iran deal critics into submission with a baffling amount of bombast.

The premise of the president’s argument is that it’s not fair to oppose the Iran deal, or justify war, without first giving a diplomatic agreement the chance to fail.

Barack Obama’s posturing began when he linked his anti-war stance with JFK’s “concrete actions and effective agreements,” which, according to Obama, “avoided nuclear catastrophe…and…created time and space to win the Cold War without firing a shot at the Soviets.”

After admitting that the agreement with Iran “does not resolve all problems,” the Nobel Peace Prize winner contended that the deal with Iran is his effort to avoid the unilateral U.S. action vs. international consensus and exaggerated “mindset” that led us into the Iraq war.

Then, without accepting one iota of responsibility for the obliteration of everything that was accomplished in Iraq prior to his taking office in 2009, Obama the Arbitrator said that when dealing with a lying regime that vows to wipe Israel off the map and declares “Death to America, his “preference [is] for a peaceful diplomatic solution.”

Barack Obama began setting the opposition straight by injecting political put-downs and references to “partisan prisons, headline-grabbing headlines… [and]…virulent opposition.”

Among other things, the president clarified that even though the process for resolving inspections of an Iranian “suspicious undeclared site,” could take up to 24 days, inspectors “will be allowed daily access to Iran’s key nuclear sites.”

Great. If the Iranians deny inspectors daily access, a mere 24 days after being denied, access will be granted.

Obama also mentioned that he didn’t believe the Iranians would behave like Bruce Jenner did for 65 years and hide nuclear material, because “nuclear material isn’t something you hide in a closet.”

What the president didn’t elaborate upon was whether or not Iranians would bury nuclear material in a covert facility similar to the secret enrichment facility discovered in Fordo.

Either way, no worries, because although Obama has been unable to find Lois Lerner’s emails or been successful at catching illegal felons with stolen guns running around sanctuary cities, and despite his inability to catch Jihadi John, Barack Obama vowed that after 24 days, “The bottom line is, if Iran cheats, we can catch them, and we will.”

When referring to prohibition of weapons-related research, the president threw around the word “permanent,” but then went on to admit that the peaceful program limitations would last only 15 years, which is a far cry from permanent.

Then, after reassuring the supportive audience that his diplomatic expertise alone can prevent war, the president offered the disclaimer that if the permanent measures fail, in 15 years the U.S. will have better tools to stop what could have been prevented 15 years earlier.

From there Obama segued to the $56 billion in sanctions relief Iran will receive, which is probably enough money to finally accomplish the full ushering in, via world chaos, of the 12th and final Imam/savior of humankind, aka Muhammad ibn Hasan al-Mahdī.

In the president’s limited, one-sided mind, disagreeing with sanctions is on par with rejecting diplomacy. In other words, just to make a new friend, Barack Obama would hire a known pedophile to run a preschool based purely on the child abuser’s promise to keep his hands off the children.

Conciliator Barack did concede that Iran would funnel money into their military, as well as other “pernicious activities” America objects to. However, according to President Mediation Expert’s estimation, Iran will use most of the sanction relief to improve the lives of the Iranian people.

So the president, who doesn’t trust law-abiding Americans with legal firearms, believes that a terrorist regime, rather than use the money to advance their nuclear capability, will fund pensions, pay salaries, and pave the very streets where Iranian leaders hold public beheadings.

Then, in an effort to convince those who oppose the diplomatic deal with Iran, the president acknowledged that the group we’re about to bestow $56 billion upon “supports terrorist organizations like Hezbollah… proxy groups that threaten our interests and the interests of our allies, including proxy groups who killed our troops in Iraq…[and]… tried to destabilize our Gulf partners.”

Barack Obama explained that with or without the sanctions relief, Iran has been engaged in these sorts of nefarious activities for decades. So in other words, giving Iran money is similar to the liberal ‘they’re going to do it anyway’ argument that drug addicts should be provided with clean needles and that free condoms should be handed out to sexually active 13-year-olds.

The president also contended that risking Iran getting the bomb is reasonable because although “Iranian hardliners chant ‘Death to America’ [that] does not mean that that’s what all Iranians believe.” In fact, said Obama:

[i]t’s those hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hardliners chanting ‘Death to America’ who have been most opposed to the deal. They’re making common cause with the Republican Caucus.

So, in an attempt to convince Congress to support his diplomatic deal with a genocidal terrorist state, Barack Obama gave a pass to Iranians he doesn’t know while comparing the Republican Caucus, not to mention 50% of the American people, to Iranian hardliners who chant ‘Death to America.’

Leaving no stone unturned, the president rationalized that if he agreed with Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu’s defiant stance against the Iranian deal he would be “act[ing] against his better judgment,” which would be an “abrogation of [the] constitutional duty,” he habitually flouts.

Then, for good measure, to those who he says “have no compunction with being repeatedly wrong,” repeatedly wrong Obama issued the same confrontational dare he posed concerning Obamacare and immigration reform when he “challenge[d] anyone opposed to this deal to put forward a better, more plausible alternative.”

Finishing up his Iran-bad/Iran-deal-good spiel, peacenik Obama placed the full onus on Congress:

If Congress kills this deal, we will lose more than just constraints on Iran’s nuclear deal or the sanctions we have painstakingly built. We will have lost something more precious: America’s credibility as a leader of diplomacy. America’s credibility is the anchor of the international system.

On the other hand, if Congress doesn’t kill this deal and Iran does acquire a nuclear bomb, what the world stands to lose thanks to Barack Obama will be more precious than our “credibility as a leader of diplomacy” or our standing as the “anchor of the international system.”

‘Back of the Bus’ Banisher Barack Strikes Again

DownloadedFileOriginally posted at American Thinker

Barack Obama must have forgotten what he said at the dedication of Rosa Parks’ statue in the Capitol’s National Statuary Hall. Not only has he been throwing everyone, including his friends, under it, now he’s being accused by a black activist of telling blacks to sit in the back so that gays and lesbians can have the seat Rosa Parks warmed up in the front.

Right before the 2010 mid-term elections, when Barack Obama was given a veritable spanking at the ballot box, the ever racially-sensitive uniter, when speaking about Republicans, said:

Republicans had driven the economy into a ditch and then stood by and criticized while Democrats pulled it out. Now that progress has been made we can’t have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.

That’s right — Barack Hussein Obama, champion of racial unity, just prior to an important election relegated the Republican Party to a location on the bus where Rosa Parks refused to sit.

Now, leftist radical, philosopher, educator, and prominent member of the Democrat Socialists of America Dr. Cornel West is addressing Obama’s habit of banishing certain people to a section on the bus that’s filled with noxious fumes.

Cornel West is a brazenly outspoken man who in the past has called Barack “a Rockefeller Republican in Blackface” and accused MSNBC’s black hosts like Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, and MSNBC guest host Michael Eric Dyson of selling their “souls for a mess of Obama pottage.”

Now, immediately following the Supreme Court’s DOMA decision, Dr. West again has some harsh words for America’s first black socialist president concerning buses, black people, and seats in the farthest reaches of public transportation.

In response to Obama’s orgasmic reaction to all the groundbreaking advances gays are making in America, West told radio host Tavis Smiley that gays and lesbians advancing means “we black folk are just being pushed to the back of the bus.”

In Cornel West’s all-or-nothing world, there’s no room for straphangers.

In other words, Cornel West interprets the president’s activism concerning LGBT rights as a slight against black people in America. West told Smiley, who probably wasn’t all that smiley at the time:

Again this has something to do of course with what history books will say. The irony of the age of Obama in which black folks found themselves pushed to the back, [and] our gay brothers and lesbian sisters more and more pushed to the center.

What West didn’t elaborate on is whether the people “pushed to the center” also included black gays and lesbians. Nor did he expound upon the fact that there’s no room left at the back of the bus after all those selfish, racist Republicans took up all the seats.

Lest Mr. West forget, when speaking about Rosa Parks, Barack Obama did say that Ms. Parks, “In a single moment, with the simplest of gestures… helped change America — and change the world.”

Could it be that Mr. Obama is secretly taking Cornel West’s advice and attempting to change America? After all, the prominent Democratic Socialist did once say that “You can’t move forward until you look back.” Using that logic, Obama moving blacks to the back could be a clever maneuver on the president’s part to ultimately move blacks forward.

Either way, Cornel West need not worry, because without a doubt, the gays currently occupying the seats in the front of the bus would likely be more than happy to share their new seating arrangement, but only so that blacks don’t have to remain in the back. And as long as the anti-gay-marriage blacks don’t realize who they’re sharing derriere space with on those front-of-the-bus seats, that may be a seating plan everyone, including Cornel West, can live with.

GetEQUAL Ellen Saves America from Michelle Obama

imagesOriginally posted at Clash Daily

Under most circumstances, Michelle Obama supports lesbians. However, America’s first lady doesn’t put up with being heckled by anyone, even if the person doing the heckling is part of a protected class. After all, didn’t Shelly non-judgmentally demonstrate her support for lesbians when she danced it up with Ellen on the Ellen DeGeneres Show? The first lady is also pro-gay marriage and in almost every public address finds a way to introduce the standard liberal pro-gay slogan: “regardless of whom you love.”

One would think the gay community would view these efforts as commendable. Apparently that’s not the case because, after all of Michelle’s efforts, an ungrateful GetEQUAL activist, later identified by Heather Cronk, co-director of the LGBT rights group GetEQUAL as Ellen Sturtz, caused Mrs. Obama to lose her cool when she heckled her at a $10K per-person fundraiser held at a wealthy lesbian couple’s home in Washington DC.

Ms. Sturtz was riled over Barack’s failure to sign a promised executive order mandating that federal contractors stop discriminating against gays and lesbians. Forgetting all about homosexual etiquette, the first lady responded by publicly scolding Ms. Sturtz and in the process informing the world that when Michelle Obama speaks, you listen – or else!

Maybe Ms. Sturtz missed it, but Michelle commands undivided attention, and after issuing her diktats she demands follow-up obedience. So when Sturtz interrupted the first lady, rather than hear the protester out, Michelle O behaved like a spoiled child and threatened to abandon the festivities.

According to Amanda Terkel of the Huffington Post, a huffy Michelle, who apparently doesn’t realize that there are many, many things she doesn’t do well, responded to the jeering by saying, “One of the things I don’t do well is this.”

Terkel reported that Michelle came out from behind the lectern, “moved over to the protester,” which means she got up in the protester’s face, Chicago-style, and said “Listen to me or you can take the mic, but I’m leaving. You all decide. You have one choice … Do you understand?”

Whoa! Although the first lady did respect the coveted liberal right to choose, gone was her usual engaging charm and the unwavering compassion for the alleged oppressive bias LGBT people endure in the workplace. Now either the first lady ate something from the White House garden that didn’t agree with her, or maybe it was the Midol time of the month, but it caused Michelle Obama to expose her normally well-hidden talons.

Sturtz, who paid $500 to attend the function, claimed she was stunned by Obama’s response.  “She came right down in my face. I was taken aback.”

After accepting the first lady’s offer to take the mic, which GetEQUAL Ellen says seemed to agitate Michelle, the crowd “started shouting that they wanted FLOTUS to stay.” According to the pool report, after the edgy interaction Sturtz was promptly ushered out of the event while shouting something like “I’m a lesbian looking for federal equality before I die.”

Based on the way Mrs. Obama reacted to being challenged, another angry outburst like that and GetEQUAL Ellen’s death will become a reality that has nothing to do with a lack of federal equality.

During the exchange, Michelle exposed her inability to quickly compose herself. Consequently, the White House attempted to maintain the first lady’s reputation by omitting the girl-on-girl verbal smack-down from the event’s transcript on the White House website. Keeping up the charade is especially important in light of the scandals that are currently revealing that, try as they might to fake it, neither of the Obamas has an affinity for the First Amendment.

The truth is that the inability to accept criticism is not exclusive to Michelle and Barry. The Obamas are quintessential liberals, and liberals have an aversion to criticism like vampires have an aversion to sunlight.

Leftists like to promote themselves as being all daisies, Patchouli, love, hugs, and compassion – until you cross them. In front of 200 generally like-minded Democratic Party stalwarts when she rudely interrupted the first lady, Ellen Sturtz found that lesbian or not, any jugular in close proximity to a vexed liberal is in extreme danger of being savagely ripped open, in public, whether the mic is on or off.

All Ms. GetEQUAL Ellen was trying to point out was that President Obama failed to stay true to his 2008 campaign promise to issue an executive order forcing (which is something liberals love to do) federal contractors to stop discriminating against gay and transgendered job applicants.

In response to Sturtz’s rancorous protest, Mrs. Obama vigorously protested right back by forcing Ms. Sturtz to either shut up or be responsible for the ramifications of the first lady leaving a gathering attended by large numbers of adoring lesbians. Let’s just say, it could have gotten very ugly.

Mr. Obama also bristles at criticism, and from the looks of things has his own ways of convincing dissenters to shut up. If Barack Obama is among friends and everyone in the bleachers has their FORWARD t-shirts facing the camera and their Big Barack Obama Balloon Hats on straight, all is well. However, for those who cause problems, the president has creative ways to ensure silence.

Even Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu knows that if a person doesn’t agree with Barack Obama, the president will throw a hissy fit, stomp off and abandon the discussion.

With that in mind, Ellen Sturtz may be responsible for exposing something a lot more important than the plight of LGBT federal workers. After the GetEQUAL activist’s outburst, America now knows that talking over the first lady is all it takes to get Michelle “Let’s Move” Obama to leave the stage and discontinue haranguing the nation. Hurray! With that in mind, it’s time for America to join GetEQUAL Ellen, grab the mic, turn up the volume, and refuse to be silenced!

%d bloggers like this: