Tag Archives: Ellis Island

Obama embraces illegals with STDs

young-illegals-obama-291f7ce33d769c5bOriginally posted at American Thinker

Sadly, the latest segment in Barack Obama’s national makeover includes granting access to the U.S. to immigrants with venereal diseases.  Unlike the process on New York’s Ellis Island, where early 20th-century immigrants afflicted with benign non-communicable conditions like varicose veins, hernias, and poor vision were denied entry, this president must think humanitarianism is best exhibited by exposing healthy Americans to foreigners with contagious genital lesions.

What’s next – based on their skill set on the open sea, Obama unilaterally invites Somali pirates to be the official captains of America’s tugboats?

In 2009, the president pulled HIV from the list of diseases that bar immigrants from coming to the U.S.  Now, according to a report issued by the nonpartisan Center for Immigration Studies, Obama’s Health and Human Services has publicly stated that the cost of handling and treating immigrants with STDs does not impact taxpayers in a significant way.

Moreover, even though, by nature, venereal disease is contagious, the Obama administration has decreed that specific communicable diseases are no longer “of public health significance.”  Unfortunately, that opinion applies only to those who are thankfully not among the victims sexually abused by one of the 2,000 illegals in Texas, who, with or without a sore on their private parts, were deported because of sex crimes.

That “not … in a significant way” guarantee comes from the same government that had a virtual non-response when undocumented workers illegally employed in places like Chipotle passed along pathogens, which, sorry to say, were likely transported into customers’ intestines via Crispy Corn Tacos contaminated with human feces.

So, if having an oozing genital sore does not prohibit a person entry into the U.S., how is the Obama administration going to ensure that immigrants, who tend to gravitate toward food service, diligently follow proper hygiene protocol after manhandling their genitalia?

They’re not.

Law 360, a website tool for those in the legal profession, reported that under the new immigration rule, despite being infected with a sexually transmitted disease, persons will still be granted entry into the U.S. with things like granuloma inguinale, which is spread through vaginal and anal intercourse; chancroid, which produces a contagious fluid; and bloody/pus-forming lymphogranuloma venereum, a bacterium common in Central and South America.

HHS maintains that although these three bacterial infections are “transmitted through sexual contact, [they] have never been common in the United States and over the past two decades are observed to be increasingly rare throughout the world.”

That said, it appears as if importing individuals afflicted with abscesses on their genitals may just be HHS’s way of assisting Obama’s ongoing effort to level the playing field.  And if that’s the case, pioneering STD sufferers with a mind to relocate will have easy access into a country where, with the government’s help, they are free to pursue a vigorous sex life.  Then, after those who are currently uncontaminated become contaminated, Barack can pat himself on the back for making another thing that’s “never been common in the United States” common.

In any case, similar health- and wealth-sharing processes have already been underway for almost eight years.  By admitting what was once inadmissible, Barack Obama’s effort to turn America into a third-world hellhole has thus far been quite effective.  For example, syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, and leprosy are still on America’s list of inadmissible communicable diseases.  Nonetheless, along with the unmonitored influx of illegals came syphilis and gonorrhea, both of which are currently on the rise.  As for leprosy, that nasty organism has officially landed, as have plagues like the deadly multi-drug-resistant  tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and death-defying super-lice.  Maybe the president’s rationale is that in the ongoing quest to dilute what little is left of American culture, citizens contracting exotic third-world diseases, or being infected with an STD from a hardworking immigrant, is a tolerable tradeoff.

In an article entitled “Obama Opens the Border to More STDs,” Jon Feere of The Center for Immigration Studies said that the administration considers the STD rule changes beneficial because physicians who would otherwise be administering physical exams on incoming immigrants “will be able to devote more time and training to other, more common and/or more serious health issues.”

That’s brilliant!  If HHS is to be taken seriously, STDs are being permitted to arrive aboard the genitals of immigrants to further the common good.  In other words, rather than wasting time running a whole battery of tests on pilgrims with penile pustules, stressed out Obamacare doctors will be freed up to focus on more severe health issues.

And just because the immigration system will be less likely to protect Americans from communicable diseases, Jon Feere writes that when it comes to STDs, Americans are “not to worry” because:

HHS … explains that these ‘primarily tropical infections can be prevented through improved personal hygiene and protected sex’ and that if you do get them, the STDs can be cured ‘with a short, uncomplicated course of antibiotic therapy.’

Wait!  Can Cipro also cure beheading?  Because that sounds reminiscent of the reasoning behind accepting Syrian refugees with the full knowledge that the incoming group will likely be infected with a smattering of saber-bearing subversives.

Either way, notwithstanding the inevitability that ISIS will probably lop off a few heads, when did providing antibiotics and hand-washing seminars to sexually promiscuous immigrants become America’s priority?  Furthermore, aren’t our veterans dying on VA waiting lists, and isn’t there an impending antibiotic shortage?

Even still, Barack Obama, who knows better, obviously feels that spending $100 million a year to care for immigrants with STDs is a great way to invest the money of those who will ultimately end up suffering as a result of yet another in a long list of imprudent policies.

And so, on the path to “fundamental transformation,” it’s nice to know that if an immigrant with a seething chancroid ulcer should happen to rape an American, the ill-fated event can be promptly remedied by an “uncomplicated course of antibiotic therapy.”

How Liberal Pseudo-Kindness is Killing America

1701556-300x225Liberals apparently no longer have a problem with the evil European white man invading the pristine Americas and killing the red man with infectious diseases. Either that or they’ve appointed themselves arbiters of a communicable-disease version of “What goes around comes around.” Of late, it seems the left’s goal is to have third-world types infect Americans with maladies long eradicated from within our borders.

Beginning in the late 1890s when the largest wave of immigration began, the United States took controlling disease at the nation’s borders very seriously. Although at the time bio-terrorism was unheard of, the realization of the detrimental impact infectious illness could have on America was a consideration not taken lightly.  Unfortunately this is no longer the case.

During the height of 19th century immigration, all émigrés were suspect of being disease carriers and were treated as such. Instead of burdening the system, endangering American citizens, and allowing people to enter the country who were of no benefit to our nation medically, economically, or socially, families were split up and potential earners sent home.

Read the rest of the article at The Blacksphere

Willy the Wedded One Opines

Originally posted at American Thinker

Marriage expert and relationship pundit Bill Clinton has stepped forward on the issue of legalizing gay marriage in the state of New York.  If there ever was a person in support of an alternative view of marriage, Slick Willy the Wedded One sure is.

Why should Hill and Bill be the only two people in the world allowed to classify marriage according to their own skewed definition when there are so many colorful and eclectic possibilities? Heck, these are the two who feel comfortable living out of carpetbags and calling themselves New Yorkers.

The last time the connubial couple was seen within 500 feet of one another was for Chelsea’s $6 million heterosexual nuptials. Nevertheless, Bill Clinton’s views on marriage have not ceased to evolve even though he and Hillary have sacrificially chosen to conduct their idyllic union living apart.

During his sex-crazed tenure as president, while in the throes of adultery, Bill opposed gay marriage:

As president in 1996, Clinton signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act, which bans federal recognition of gay marriage. He has said he didn’t like signing the measure into law, explaining that at the time he was dealing with a GOP-led Congress and trying to ward off the prospects of a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Of late the ex-president strongly favors “legalizing gay marriage in New York.”  America’s Renaissance man changed his mind because as he ages, marriage-minded Bill said he has come to realize that above all, he is someone who “personally supports people doing what they want to do.”  Bill even expressed to an audience of impressionable college students his personal code of ethics when it comes to gay wedded bliss: “I think it’s wrong for someone to stop someone else from doing that.”

Struggling with the issue, the morally relativistic, open-minded, laissez-faire Clinton, in a 2009 interview with now- openly gay CNN reporter Anderson Cooper, spoke about how undermining the societal glue provided by traditional marriage ensures “coherence and strength and commitment and mutually reinforce[s] loyalties.”  Said Bill: “If gay couples want to call their union marriage and a state agrees, and several have now, or a religious body will sanction it, and I don’t think a state should be able to stop a religious body from saying it, I don’t think the rest of us should get in the way of it.”

It can be summed up simply in this way: As always for Clinton, “It depends on what the meaning of the word marriage is” and if a “herf” made up solely of a White House intern and a randy President sanction certain cigar aficionado activities, “the rest of us should{n’t] get in the way of it.”

Remember when Bill moved into an office in Harlem where, within the traditionally God-fearing black community, gay marriage continues to be frowned upon?  Clinton’s pro-gay marriage statement, issued “through Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group,” maintained that same-sex marriage would help “strengthen the bonds of community,” and may be why America’s first black president recently moved out of the largely African-American neighborhood to a new office downtown.

Bible-carrying Clinton may just be taking a Christian “Do unto others” attitude in order to woo back anti-gay marriage/churchgoing blacks.  Opposed to being stopped from doing what he wants to do – which includes God knows what – Bill’s Christianity may have matured to the level where he understands it is wrong for him to stop monogamous homosexuals from doing whatever they want to do, even if by doing so his political clout contributes to undermining a God-ordained institution.

And so Clinton’s ‘more perfect union’-via-homosexual-matrimony HRC statement reads as follows:

Our nation’s permanent mission is to form a ‘more perfect union’ – deepening the meaning of freedom, broadening the reach of opportunity, strengthening the bonds of community. That mission has inspired and empowered us to extend rights to people previously denied them. Every time we have done that, it has strengthened our nation. Now we should do it again, in New York, with marriage equality.

Clinton continued: “For more than a century, our Statue of Liberty has welcomed all kinds of people from all over the world yearning to be free. In the 21st century, I believe New York’s welcome must include marriage equality.”

I must say, America’s most notorious Philanderer-in-Chief’s émigré/homophile connection is so bizarre and convoluted that if taken seriously, it insults the gay community, taints the historic relevance of Ellis Island, and could cause millions of immigrants to hightail it back to the Mother country.

A clueless Clinton throws around the concept of extending rights, but appears to be oblivious to the fact that marriage is a God-ordained institution.  The ex-president’s reputation as a womanizer explains his skewed idea of what makes a ‘perfect union,’ and why his own marriage to Hillary is the weakest, most pathetic example of a committed relationship known to man.

It would be in the nation’s best interest if Willy the Wedded One, henceforth and in perpetuity, spared himself further embarrassment by refraining from proselytizing and undermining the sacred bond between a man and a woman, which is a subject he has proven, time and again, to know absolutely nothing about.

%d bloggers like this: