Archive by Author

Barack Obama’s ‘World as It Should Be’ Related imageOriginally posted at American Thinker

Dog eating zithromax - Zithromax pfizer leaflet - March Maple Weekends. Pond Skimming March 18. This Week's Articles. Buy zithromax . The former president, Barack Obama’s presence on the world stage has coincided with chaos springing up everywhere globalists seek to make an impact. Obama’s stance is not surprising especially because the community organizer hasn’t kept secret his affinity for the Marxist/communist worldview as detailed in the late Saul Alinsky’s textbook for militants titled, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. precio flomax bioaigua flomax compresse 350 mg prezzo most shots of trees in the sopranos show wind flomax 350 bustine prezzo Alinsky once warned:

| Best sale🔥 |. The offer is limited. online,Free pills with every order! Free shipping, quality, privacy, secure.. Buy Society has good reason to fear the radical. Every shaking advance of mankind toward equality and justice has come from the radical. He hits, he hurts, he is dangerous. Conservative interests know that while liberals are most adept at breaking their own necks with their tongues, radicals are most adept at breaking the necks of conservatives. at the start, the talks appeared to give promising signs of lasting peace as israel agreed to remove troops from the west bank and Like his mentor before him, unabashed radical Barack Obama’s goal has always been “breaking the necks of conservatives.” One of Barack’s original Chicago mentors Mike Kruglik described Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, as “the best student he ever had,” a “natural… undisputed master of agitation,” a description that explains why Obama has been capable of inspiring turmoil via propaganda cleverly disguised as global concern and non-partisan politics. During his presidency, Barack recited the “world as it should be” mantra in every nation he visited. On tour, he blamed the United States for the world’s woes and promised a future where the planet would heal from American domination.

Buy see In India betnovate crema para que sirve para que sirve betnovate 1 mg/g crema like that i would just play my wii which i don8217;t What Obama failed to articulate was that in his “world as it should be” there is a class of power elite that rule over useful eaters who possess limited rights, are unarmed, are forced to share the wealth, and whose numbers are controlled via abortion and government-run healthcare. Obama never disclosed that his anti-American world would be gender neutral, militarily weak, antagonistic toward white males, Western Civilization, and prosperity, Muslim friendly, success adverse, and racially volatile.

| instock🔥 |. Price is special in this period. ☀☀☀ go here only in australia ☀☀☀,buy online without a doctor is prescription.. Although Obama’s presidential tenure ended two years ago, the former president continues to tirelessly goad the world’s youth toward implementing the Alinsky agenda. If anything, he is even more motivated to fundamentally transform “the world as it is” into “the world as [Alinsky thought] it should be.”

Cost Propecia Cvs The mpharma founders are offered by family ways affiliated to study leading to minimum into the canada volume certification. I will apply my public, approval, and medicines to the zithromax overnight delivery canada best of my pharmacy to assure personal practices for my funds. Recently, when radical leftist types surfaced in response to the shooting in Parkland, Florida, Obama used it as an opportunity to address the raw potential he sees in America’s youth. Unable to contain himself, Obama appeared on Twitter to laud anti-gun activist teens and to applaud chaos, rebellion, and unpatriotic sentiment.

Doxycycline Hyclate Price Walmart SafeOnlineCanadianPharmacy. Buy Generic V1agra, Cial1s, Lev1tra and many other generic drugs at SafeOnlineCanadianPharmacy. Lowest prices for Generic and Brand drugs. Bonus 10 free pills, discounts and FREE SHIPPING. Cheapest drugs online - buy and save money.

In his tweet, Obama quoted Saul Alinsky when he flattered the student protesters for attempting to “remake the world as it should be,” which translated means, “the world as it should be” per Barack Obama’s anti-Constitutional vision.

More recently, the former president cited Alinsky again. This time his commentary was in response to his $500-million presidential library, located in war-torn Chicago, being given the green light. In part, Obama’s tweet said that the presidential center, “[i]s for the leaders of tomorrow who are ready to step up and build “the world as it should be.”

Again, Obama used Twitter to issue a clarion call to young people asking them to pick up the transformational torch and to help change the world into the Marxist communitarian enclave Barack and Michelle Obama think it should be.

The good news for Obama is that, of late, the Chicago-based presidential library isn’t the only training ground available to do what Alinsky described as “rubbing raw the sores of discontent.”

The ability for Obama to foment problems began on Southside of Chicago and then advanced to the Oval Office. Now, thanks to a multiyear Netflix deal, Obama’s community organizing platform is about to ascend to a global stage. The paid cable entertainment enterprise will assist Obama in his effort and pay him millions to agitate international restlessness concerning things like racial, gender, and economic inequity.

Recently, at a Okta tech conference, held in Las Vegas, when asked about his plans for Netflix, the former president shared that, right out of college, an older well-practiced community organizer (probably Mike Kruglik) counseled him to spend time listening to people’s stories before suggesting solutions to problems he didn’t understand.

If Barack were truthful, he would have told the audience that the entertainment company will pay him exorbitant amounts of money to tell stories he hopes will prompt people to believe they’ve been mistreated. Despite what Obama says, his aim at Netflix will be to advance a venue where a particular brand of story is considered fair, valued, and contributory toward “the world as it should be.”

After mentioning Bruce Springsteen and Lin-Manuel Miranda, Obama went on to criticize America, and offer the techy audience “world as it should be” answers that feigned a disingenuous desire to cultivate “institutions based on rule of law,” principles, and recognition of “the dignity and worth of every individual” — none of which Barack Obama believes in.

The former president then expounded further by inserting references to racism and gender equality issues he has successfully employed in his ongoing effort to generate the type of antagonism Alinsky taught was necessary to usher in “world as it should be” modifications.

Politicizing what was supposed to be apolitical, Obama said, “We are all human. I know this sounds trite, and yet, right now globally, we have competing narratives.” Then, without mentioning President Trump by name, Obama hinted, “And now there’s a clash in those two ways of seeing the world.”

On the point of “two ways of seeing the world,” Barack Obama is 100% correct; currently, there is a clash of world visions. Unlike his predecessor, President Trump sees the world as a place where an exceptional America is powerful, human life respected, and borders are secure. A world where racial enmity minimized, patriotism strong, and America preeminent, which, according to Alinsky pupil, Barack Obama, is not “the world as it should be.”

Pro-choice Pelosi touts ‘spark of divinity’ within MS-13

Originally posted at American Thinker

Someone must have let Nancy Pelosi out on a weekend pass, because the woman is losing it.  At her press conference this week, the House minority leader mumbled, zoned out, and chuckled inappropriately.  The only thing missing from the event was drool dripping out the corner of Nancy’s mouth onto her expensive silk scarf.

The most peculiar thing Nancy had to say concerned the “spark of divinity” she believes resides within the violent street gang, MS-13.

Currently, most of these so-called Salvadoran “divine creatures” roam the streets of America illegally.  According to Robert Hur, an official with the Justice Department, the culturally diverse MS-13’s motto is “mata, viola, controla” – which translates “kill, rape, control.”

Notorious for their hand signs, machetes, and full body tattoos, MS-13 participate in activities that involve things like human- and drug-trafficking, child prostitution, kidnapping, gun-smuggling, murder, and gruesome styles of retribution.

In the Northeast, on Long Island alone, MS-13 committed 25 killings in the past two years.

Recently, President Donald Trump, a man who calls it like it is, referred to MS-13 residing in U.S. prisons as “animals.”  Based on the bedlam the gang has wrought within America’s borders, Trump calling them “animals” was more a compliment than an insult.

Simply put, MS-13 is a band of marauding illegals from Central America who threaten members with death if they attempt to leave the ranks and who wreak havoc wherever they go.

Speaking on behalf of the Democratic Party, Nancy Pelosi said Trump calling illegal rapists and murderers “animals” is offensive and harsh.

So, in between holding up five fingers while referring to the number six and staring out into space mid-sentence, during Pelosi’s press conference, the House minority leader also chided the POTUS for insulting MS-13.

Waxing spiritual, it happened during the former Speaker’s comments on “food insecurity.”  After mentioning “God’s children,” Nancy had this to say about Trump’s MS-13 comments:

When the President of the United States says about undocumented immigrants, “These aren’t people; these are animals,” you have to wonder: does he not believe in the spark of divinity?  The dignity and worth of every person?

Democrats are the ones who justify bestowing immigrant status on illegals while denying human status to unborn humans, and now Mrs. Pelosi is suddenly touting the “dignity and worth of every person”?

Nancy Pelosi must have forgotten that she advocates for the unfettered slaughter of 3,000 American babies per day.  Based on Nancy Pelosi’s own words, if a “spark of divinity” is infused into a fertilized egg, then supporting abortion is far worse than Trump calling MS-13 names.

Either way, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi is still the official spokesperson for a political party that publicly honors the “spark of divinity” in vicious street gangs and does it while disregarding the “spark of divinity” residing within the guiltless unborn.

In other words, when it comes to shedding innocent blood, pro-choice liberals and Central American street gangs are similar.  Therefore, before accusing Trump of being hostile toward violent gang members, maybe loopy Nancy Pelosi and her ilk need to acknowledge that the gruesome procedure that ends the life of the innocent and helpless inside the womb is on par with the murder and mayhem MS-13 inflicts on enemies outside the womb.

Consensual diaper changing

Originally posted at American Thinker

When not commenting on politically correct diaper protocol, Australian sexuality educator, speaker, and author, Deanne Carson teaches kids about body safety and how to express sexual consent.  Recently, Deanne appeared on government-owned The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (The ABC) to comment on a controversial rape case and to share her expertise concerning how to change a diaper. Resplendent in Women’s March pink pussy hat-colored hair, an unapologetic Deanne told the ABC reporter that if parents agree to learn to ask babies for permission before swapping out a dirty diaper for a clean one the culture of consent can begin in the home.

Carson shared with the interviewer that thru meaningful eye contact infants can be taught to indicate whether they feel good or bad about Desitin®, baby powder, and flushable tushy wipes.  In other words, in progressive circles, changing tables are now training grounds for future sexual encounters.

In all fairness, Deanne Carson does seem sincere in her belief that, regardless of the reason, infants should have a say whether or not their privates are exposed to the air for hygienic purposes.  Carson shared with the interviewer: “We work with children from three years old. We work with parents from birth”  — to which the startled reporter responded, “From birth?”

Pink hair and all, Ms. Carson replied:

Yes, just about how to set up a culture of consent in their homes so ‘I’m going to change your nappy now, is that OK?’ Of course a baby’s not going to respond ‘Yes mum, that’s awesome I’d love to have my nappy changed.’ But if you leave a space and wait for body language and wait to make eye contact then you’re letting that child know that their response matters.

First female progressives floated the narrative that all men are rapists, and now Mama and Papa need permission from Junior before a poopy Pampers can make its way from a baby’s bottom to the wastebasket? Which raises the question as to why it is that the same individuals who claim to be the most appalled with sexual assault are usually the most sexually suspicious and genitally fixated?

Moreover, who is Carson’s clientele?In all seriousness, are there really new parents who, right after the birth of a child, rush out and hire a sexuality expert to learn how to “set up a culture of consent in their home?”

And, even worse then Carson’s idea that consent is needed to change a newborn born baby’s diaper is her subtle insinuation that such an innocuous act has sexual connotations.  To believe that infants are uncomfortable having a parent change their diapers portrays as prospective sexual predators those whose calling is to protect their offspring.

Instead of burdening parents with unfounded anxiety, wouldn’t it be wonderful if Deanne Carson extended the same courtesy she extends when discussing parents touching infants to unborn children denied the right to life?

In fact, based on how Deanne Carson feels about bodily autonomy, one can’t help but wonder where the sexuality educator stands concerning the topic of abortion.

Judging from her unorthodox consent training theory, coupled with her feminist hair color and negative view of the traditional teen sex ed material used by evangelical Christian volunteers in Australia’s public schools, it’s likely secularist Deanne Carson leans to the left on the issue of choice.

And if that’s the case, it would also mean Deanne believes that although unborn babies have no right to life, if they should miraculously make it out of the womb in one piece, they have a right to signal “Yea” or “Nay” to a clean diaper.

In other words, if Carson believes a minutes-old baby, via body language, can convey diaper change consent, shouldn’t that also mean a child squirming in the womb is indicating it wants to remain alive?  Therefore, if consistency matters at all, women who believe in the right to suction, saline, or scalpel unborn children to death should refrain from touting the need to grant non-verbal newborns consent power over diaper changes.

And so, instead of advocating on behalf of changing table etiquette, maybe Australian sexuality educator Deanne Carson’s efforts might be better spent speaking on behalf of unborn baby body safety and how, even within the womb, infants signal to their mothers not to abort.

Michelle Obama, Oracle for the ‘United State of Women’

Originally posted at American Thinker

It’s hard to believe that 6,000 oppressed women could break free of their race and gender-imposed manacles to attend another women’s summit, but somehow they did.  The latest Obama-initiated conference was held in Los Angeles on May 5-6th and was titled: “The United State of Women Summit.”

In 2016 the Obama White House started United State of Women (USOW). This year, the event continued to advance community organizing workshop efforts, which encompassed victimization, racial agitation, gender ingratitude, a global vision, and overall left-wing blather.

Let’s remember, that even godless liberals appreciate the Biblical principle that “If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand,” (Mark 3:25).  Hence, the Obama-inspired left works tirelessly to divide the occupants of America’s house by stressing inequality and racial and gender barriers.

The USOW website states the purpose of the organization’s existence is the following:

The United State of Women is a national organization for any woman who sees that we need a different America for all women to survive and thrive — and wants to work collectively to achieve it. USOW amplifies the work of organizations and individuals at the forefront of the fight for women’s equality, and provides tools; access and connections that help women see and step into their power to break down the barriers that hold women back.

With that in mind, since the Obamas left the White House, the duo have managed to provide a conflict-ridden community organizer training venue to fit every gender, race, and ethnicity.

In fact, two of this weekend’s red flag workshops were proudly entitled: “Sheroes of Community Organizing 101” and “What the Tech?! A Crash Course for Tech-Curious Change makers and Community Organizers.”

Simply put, the women’s summit was chock full of radical activism, lessons in civic engagement, homages to organizations like Planned Parenthood and Get out the Vote schemes to ensure liberal Democrats seize back and continue to run the country.  The Community Partners section on the USOW proudly lists left-wing sponsors ranging from the National Center for Transgender Equality to California Latinas for Reproductive Justice to the ACLU.

Therefore, what took place in Los Angeles was an Obama-style gathering of victimized liberal females who feel that in America they can neither “survive” nor “thrive.” The illogicality of those accusations is that those running the conference are women who have become successful and wealthy telling other women that achievement is unattainable if you’re a female in America.

Summit voices included the likes of actress Hanoi Jane Fonda, who took to the podium to publicly lament her whiteness, and Obama’s “former” advisor, Valerie Jarrett, who still works behind the scenes to assist Barack Obama in his continuing effort to take out America.

As usual, the keynote Oracle was gender and racial agitator Michelle Obama who, despite her ranting is both “striving and thriving.” In truth, Mrs. Obama pads her bank account with speaking fees earned making empty innuendos about how some women have failed other women by doing things like electing Donald Trump.

As part of her repertoire, Michelle mentioned a topic more aptly directed toward abortion.  During her remarks, pro-choice advocate Michelle Obama demeaned a woman’s “right to choose” when she commented that “In light of this last election, I’m concerned about us as women and how we think. What is going on in our heads where we let that happen, you know?”

Apparently, Michelle Obama’s idea of fostering female empowerment includes criticizing women who dare to be independent thinkers.

Nevertheless, and in addition to judging female Trump voters, during the discussion with actress/interviewer Tracee Ellis Ross, Michelle spewed her usual poor me childhood story.  Then the former first lady reiterated that she isn’t interested in running for president right now because the state of the nation indicates that “it doesn’t matter who runs” until the U.S. becomes unified.

The subject of unity came up when communalist Michelle was urged by an audience member to seek office.  That’s when the former first lady replied:

Well, that’s a whole other story because that’s not the answer either. And when I hear people say, ‘you run,’ it’s part of the problem. We still didn’t get ‘yes we can’ right.’ It’s not ‘yes you can,’ it’s ‘yes we can.’ And until we get that right, it doesn’t matter who runs.

Michelle Obama’s assessment of unity is curious indeed. Here the former FLOTUS bemoans lack of national unity while nurturing the disunity she claims hinders America. So, based on that contradiction, what Michelle Obama is advocating for is dogged agreement.

In other words, when the whole country agrees with the Obama vision for “fundamental transformation,” then, according to Michelle Obama, there will be the type of harmony needed for a Democratic dictator to run for office.

Reaffirming the premise that street-level activism accomplishes more than occupying the Oval Office ever could, Michelle admitted to Tracee Ellis-Ross that “Change starts close to home,” i.e., Chicago-style community organizing.

The former FLOTUS also stressed that she thinks being president is a “distraction.”  Mrs. Obama said that “[l]ooking for the next person to run… that’s been our distraction. We’re going to wait for the next person to save us. We thought it was going to be Barack Obama, but he didn’t end racism.”

Calling the quest for a so-called unifying president a “distraction” may be why the Obamas set up less distracting non-profit/tax-exempt organizations like Organizing for Action and the United State of Women.  After all, the Obamas do believe arm bending, in the form of Alinsky-style community organizing, is a sure way to further staunch agreement.

Moreover, fashioning divisive organizations that categorize Americans into separate militant groups may be the most effective means of “dividing the house,” and overthrowing what the Obamas believe to be a White patriarchal power base.

For example, the former FLOTUS combined race and gender when she recounted the time she “choked” on reading the word “white” as a kindergartner.  Then Michelle, who doesn’t apply these standards to her husband said, “[w]atching men fail up — it is frustrating… to see a lot of men blow it and win.”

Michelle Obama, who made millions after she shifted her attention from organic gardening to racial activism, said she believes bigotry persists in America.  Mrs. Obama pointed out, “Like, I voted for the black man.  And we’re still living in racism.” The subject Michelle chose not to broach was how the racism she condemns became far worse after the black man she voted for ameliorated division via politically correct race baiting.

In the end, the “The United State of Women Summit 2018” was a gathering of 6,000 disgruntled women who attended community organizing lectures and workshops to train them to be gender and racial activists.  For the rest of America, the overriding message of the weekend summit is that instigators Michelle and Barack are still coming up with creative ways to generate chaos and unrest.

Michelle Obama: America’s ‘forever first lady’

Originally posted at American Thinker

Former first lady Michelle Obama surfaced at a Reach Higher 2018 College Signing Day event at Temple University in the City of Brotherly Love, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Speaking on behalf of her Better Make Room initiative, Michelle was gussied up in a black jumpsuit and a denim jacket and sounded a bit like rapper Common.

During her keynote speech, the former FLOTUS paused in all the right places and used ghetto-talk and hip-hop hand gestures to keep with the flow of her sing-songy exhortation to 8,000 Philadelphia high school students signing up for college.  After sharing sad experiences from her childhood, the former first lady officially announced that despite the discouragement of  “haters,” she became America’s “forever first lady.”

In other words, despite Melania Trump being the current “first lady,” much as Michelle’s husband Barack fancies himself “forever president of the United States,” according to Mrs. Obama, she is, and always will be, America’s “forever first lady.”  Based on the cheering coming from the audience, the kids agreed.

Here’s what Rapping Michelle had to say:

Seeing as breaking it down is what rappers do, let’s break down some of what the forever first lady shared.

For starters, why does Michelle always try to strengthen her comments by speaking in plurals?  During one part of her speech, she said, “We have such high hopes for you.”  Question: Is Barack the mystery half of the “we” who have “such high hopes” for 8,000 future college students?

Michelle Obama excited the cheering crowd when she told them “[she] knows that [they] have everything it takes to succeed.”  Then, Michelle reminded the kids, “See, I am not one of those doubters.”

Why does Mrs. Obama always make vague references to nonexistent individuals from her past?  Thankfully, Shelley is “not one of those doubters” who doubt that the 8,000 School District of Philadelphia schoolchildren can succeed.  However, unlike Michelle Obama, some nameless, faceless doubter apparently thinks otherwise.

After Michelle made obscure references to anonymous doubters, she played the predictable “you are me” card, telling the audience, “I know you are me.”

Let’s not forget that both the Obamas have made it known that their goal is to have millions of tiny little Barack and Michelle clones running around like automaton facsimiles, doing what the two progressive programmers command them to do.

Recently, the former president shared with an Asian audience that he and Michelle both realize that the presidency constrained their ability to propagate “a million young Barack Obamas or Michelle Obamas.”  So, when Michelle tells an audience full of high school students “you are me,” for her, it’s not clever wordplay; it’s a call to service.

Michelle ended her upbeat, breathy rap-style exhortation by informing the potential “little mes” that if she could be standing there as “forever first lady,” then “[they] can do anything [they] put [their] mind to.”

Everyone was so exhilarated by the drivel; neither the Princeton grad nor her audience realized that if taken literally, what was said could be construed to mean that if the students put their mind to it, they could become America’s “forever first lady” – which would cancel out the “forever” part for Michelle.

The keynote speaker ended her nine-minute speech by reminding the students that when they are out there, they will hit roadblocks.  Then the “forever first lady” urged the students, when meeting those barriers, to think fondly of 2018 College Signing Day at Temple University and remember that when not vacationing or out stirring up racial tension, she’d be “thinking and praying” for all 8,000 of them.

‘Predictable’ Obama Praises the Parkland Five

Originally posted at American Thinker

Former president Barack Obama is a man who exhibits selective outrage based upon how a tragedy can benefit advancing the utopian vision.  If an event includes changing “the world as it is” into the world Obama thinks it “should be,” the former president will commend whomever he has to.

With that in mind, recently, via a piece written for Time magazine entitled “Cameron Kasky, Jaclyn Corin, David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez and Alex Wind,” Obama praised the five Parkland student-activists who made Time’s 100 Most Influential People list.

The former president wrote, “America’s response to mass shootings has long followed a predictable pattern.”  Obama’s article was even more “predictable.”

For starters, the ex-POTUS chided Americans for our behavior after a mass shooting:

We mourn.  Offer thoughts and prayers.  Speculate about the motives.  And then – even as no developed country endures a homicide rate like ours, a difference explained largely by pervasive accessibility to guns; even as the majority of gun owners support commonsense reforms – the political debate spirals into acrimony and paralysis.

Those sentiments come from a fellow whose whole career hinges on the debate that “spirals into acrimony and paralysis.”  After all, Obama is the one who laments death by guns while supporting “pervasive accessibility” to abortion on demand.  In fact, the most glaring contradiction in Obama’s Parkland stance is that 18 years ago, he would have heartily supported aborting the five teens to whom he pays Time tribute.

Nevertheless, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, every year, there are still approximately 33,000 gun violence deaths in the US, two thirds of which are from suicide, a right to choose Democrats likely support.  Therefore, if former President Obama is concerned about violent death, why does he ignore the statistic that says every ten days, 30,000 Americans lose their lives in an abortion facility?

As for “commonsense reforms” for firearms, isn’t it Obama who refuses to respect the fact that a majority of Americans also want “commonsense reforms” banning abortion after 20 weeks?

Either way, Obama’s words extolled the future of student activism by expressing the complimentary view that:

This time, something different is happening.  This time, our children are calling us to account[.] … [T]he Parkland, Fla., students don’t have the kind of lobbyists or big budgets for attack ads that their opponents do.  Most of them can’t even vote yet.

Despite all his talk about lack of lobbyists, big budgets, and attack ads, in truth, Obama is well aware that anti-gun billionaires organize and fund marches and recruit the media to demonize both the Second Amendment and the NRA.  Trust me: above all, Barack Obama is a wily twister of minds.  Whenever the former president says something isn’t happening, it should call attention to what he’s probably helping bring to pass.

In addition to deception, Obama’s written homage to youthful activism included the opinion that Parkland activists possess the “power so often inherent in youth: to see the world anew; to reject the old constraints, outdated conventions and cowardice too often dressed up as wisdom.”

Someone needs to ask the former U.S. president whether he considers adherence to the Bill of Rights an “old constraint, outdated convention and cowardice too often dressed up as wisdom.”  And, notwithstanding the opinion that radicalized youth exercise “[t]he power to insist that America can be better,” if the Constitution he considers “deeply flawed” manages to survive the left’s assault, is Obama saying America will be worse because of it?

Meanwhile, Obama’s obsequious rant continued with the following words:

Seared by memories of seeing their friends murdered at a place they believed to be safe, these young leaders don’t intimidate easily.  They see the NRA and its allies – whether mealy-mouthed politicians or mendacious commentators peddling conspiracy theories – as mere shills for those who make money selling weapons of war to whoever can pay.  They’re as comfortable speaking truth to power as they are dismissive of platitudes and punditry.  And they live to mobilize their peers.

Wait!  Barack Obama suddenly cares about safety?  This man displays zero compassion for babies slaughtered by the millions in the womb, “a place they believed to be safe.”  Moreover, during his tenure, when police officers were assassinated in the safety of a police cruiser and Americans murdered in cities once deemed safe, then-president Obama either remained silent or used the tragedy to commiserate with the perpetrators.

With that in mind, maybe mendacity and mealy-mouthedness are not character faults a person like Obama should be highlighting.

Furthermore, one can’t help but wonder what the five educationally “dumbed down” high school students, who Obama claims “speak truth to power” and “dismiss … platitudes and punditry,” would think if they knew he had handed murderous Mexican drug cartels “weapons of war” that resulted in Americans dying.

Anyway, in typical, Obama sullied the NRA and the Republican Congress and so-called “conspiratorial” conservative pundits.  Then, while attempting to “sway” the swayable, Obama condemned political adversaries for using the “scare tactics [he uses] on much of the country” every time he speaks.

Then Obama wrote: “But by bearing witness to carnage, by asking tough questions and demanding real answers, the Parkland students are shaking us out of our complacency.”  Sorry, but the words “carnage” and “complacency” are much more fitting to discussions concerning liberal policies with high body counts.

Then, without citing that the “disproportionate victims of gun violence” live in cities where gun laws are the strictest, America’s most famous community organizer demonized, prophesied, patronized, and attempted to get out the vote through ethnic and racial “common cause” when he wrote:

The NRA’s favored candidates are starting to fear they might lose.  Law-abiding gun owners are starting to speak out.  As these young leaders make common cause with African Americans and Latinos – the disproportionate victims of gun violence – and reach voting age, the possibilities of meaningful change will steadily grow.

In conclusion, Obama pronounced:

Our history is defined by the youthful push to make America more just, more compassionate, more equal under the law.  This generation – of Parkland, of Dreamers, of Black Lives Matter – embraces that duty.  If they make their elders uncomfortable, that’s how it should be.

Undoubtedly, based on those words, what remains clear is that our nation’s 44th president continues to side with anti-gun activists, illegal aliens, and radical racist groups, all of whom believe that this country is unjust, lacks compassion, and endorses inequality.

In like manner, Obama’s piece provokes the youthful to make elder Americans “uncomfortable,” which for Barack Obama is “the world” as “it should be.”

In the end, the Parkland students are five manipulable youths Barack Obama hopes to employ in his mission to craft a “future [that] isn’t written [by] us [or them], but by [himself].”  And so, in the progressive effort to revise America, the “kids” Obama would have cheerfully aborted 18 years ago are now his new recruits.

Liberals celebrate a deadly fire on Twitter

Originally posted at American Thinker

A word to the wise: If one wants sympathy from a liberal, try to die in a shooting committed by a white male with an AR-15, not in a residential fire in a high-rise owned by a conservative president who supports the NRA.

Recently, a mental health counselor perhaps in need of mental health counseling named Jeffrey Guterman and an aging hippie atheist/sperm donor for lesbian rock stars, David Crosby, allegedly took to Twitter to cheer on a four-alarm fire that took the life of 67-year-old art dealer Todd Brassner.

One would think David Crosby, who spent time in jail for weapons and drug charges, and who nearly died without the liver transplant rocker Phil Collins paid for, would be more compassionate.  Instead, after hearing about the fire in Trump Tower, Crosby posted and then deleted a disco-themed Tweet that read: “[O]h boy…burn baby burn.”

Unlike David Crosby, Florida mental health counselor Jeffrey Guterman, who on occasion does exhibit compassion by publicly condemning domestic violence if a gun owner committed the crime…

…wasn’t as bashful.

At first, Guterman tweeted: “There is a fire in Trump Tower.  I hope everyone is safe, but I am excited.”

Question for the wise counselor: What are the chances that everyone would be safe in a fire in a 68-floor building that houses office and residential space?

Evidently, if a building belonging to someone of a differing political persuasion catches fire, the prospect of human beings burning to death is cause for Mr. Guterman to get “excited.”

Nevertheless, after being called out on Twitter for his unreserved joy concerning Trump’s Manhattan property burning, Guterman felt compelled to defend his original statement:

I got excited when I heard there was a fire at Trump Tower while also hoping there were no injuries.  So what.  I am human.  These #tRump supporters need to get a grip.  I am less excited now, but still glad.  Hoping there is major damage.

After the flames were doused and after the “major damage” was assessed, Jeffery had just cause to be delighted because four New York City firefighters were injured and the coroner removed a civilian from Trump Tower in a body bag.

Maybe it wasn’t said outright, but what could be gleaned from Guterman’s and Crosby’s public expression is that for the sin of purchasing an apartment from Donald Trump, occupants of Trump Tower deserved to have their lives threatened and property destroyed.  If Trump Tower had burned to the ground and killed everyone inside, would Guterman and Crosby have danced in the street like Muslims in New Jersey watching the World Trade Towers fall on 9-11?

The situation is sad, but selective compassion isn’t exclusive to liberals on Twitter.  It’s pervasive to progressives on the whole.

Typically, liberals cry if a catastrophe advances their agenda, but they often ignore the tragic demise of those who oppose their viewpoint.  So Guterman’s and Crosby’s opinions are symptomatic of what is probably the consensus on the left.

Take for instance the slaughter of 3,000 innocent unborn babies every day.  While innocents die, rather than weep, liberals march in pink hats and get as “excited” as Guterman at the thought of death and destruction.

If some babies miraculously make it out of the womb alive, survive until high school age, and then sadly die at the hand of a white male with an AR-15, the liberals who once marched for the right to abort those killed by the gunman publicly mourn.

Moreover, if a vegan animal rights activist Muslim female with a registered 9mm handgun shoots up and wounds three people, and then commits suicide in the food court of YouTube HQ, the culprit’s political profile determines whether or not people like Guterman and Crosby acknowledge the event on Twitter.

On the other hand, if a white madman with an affinity for the Confederate flag should happen to shoot black churchgoers, a liberal president who usually mocks Bibles and Christianity will gladly turn a funeral into a racially charged anti-gun rally by singing “Amazing Grace.”

Motivated strictly by agenda, liberals like Crosby and Guterman disregard gun deaths in an anti-gun zone like Chicago, where innocent children are laid out in coffins in numbers too high to comprehend.  Meanwhile, if shedding a tear defames police officers, those of Guterman’s and Crosby’s ilk replace professional mourners on Twitter by paying tribute to thugs killed by police in self-defense.

Even though illegal aliens murder Americans inside sanctuary cities and kill 3,000 Americans a year in DWI-related road accidents, those who think like Guterman and Crosby either downplay the sorry state of affairs or try to find a reason to speak out on behalf of the perpetrators.  However, if illegal aliens die sneaking into America, left-leaners are frequently the ones to post links to articles that memorialize the fallen by displaying skulls like saintly relics.

In the end, it took fire at Trump Tower for Jeffery Guterman and David Crosby to reveal the attitude of liberals who laugh at misfortune and shed tears – not over a lost life, but in joyful anticipation that tragedy can help advance an agenda or prove a point.


Photo credit: NYC Emergency Management.

Behold the Lowlights of Michelle Obama’s Trump-Bashing Tour

Judging from their vocal criticism of President Trump, it’s clear that neither Mr. nor Mrs. Obama shares G.W. Bush’s viewpoint that it’s terrible for the country and the presidency to undermine a current president.

Barack does it by praising anything and anyone who opposes the president’s policies and, by doing so, manages to disparage the man who took his place.  Michelle, on the other hand, is much less diplomatic.  Instead of using discretion, Mrs. Obama vomits out anti-Trump venom wherever she goes.

Michelle’s Trump-Bashing Tour started right after the 2016 election, when Mrs. Hope and Change told Oprah Winfrey that because Trump was elected, “now we’re feeling what not having hope feels like.”

In May of 2017, Mrs. Obama spoke out against Trump when he dared loosen the stringent dietary restrictions connected to her unpopular school lunch program.  Months later, at an Inbound marketing conference in Boston, Michelle rebuked a segment of the sisterhood when she declared, “Any woman who voted against Hillary Clinton voted against their [sic] own voice.”

The following month, at a Pennsylvania Conference for Women, Mrs. Obama used a hand motion to imply that Trump lowered the bar concerning women and minorities.  Then, forgetting that she did the same thing to Laura Bush in 2009, Michelle mocked First Lady Melania Trump for handing her a boxed gift on the steps of the White House on Inauguration Day 2017.

Simply put, Michelle Obama switched focus from dancing with The Tonight Show‘s host, Jimmy Fallon, to stirring up hatred towards Trump.  Instead of organic gardening, the former president’s outspoken wife now advocates for minorities and women by belittling a male president.

Let’s not forget that before being elected, both Mr. and Mrs. Obama believed they were the “ones we’ve been waiting for.”  Now, that Obama’s Tenure of Terror is over, the twosome’s newest goal is to find a way to reproduce thousands, if not millions, of little Michelle and Barack facsimiles to dispatch across the planet in hopes of furthering the gospel of discord.

In the meantime, the former first lady furthers that cause by sharing Trump putdowns at professional development gatherings for women.

Recently, at the Simmons Leadership Conference in Boston, the former first lady told the audience that the Obama presidency “was like having the ‘good parent’ at home.  The responsible parent, the one who told you to eat your carrots and go to bed on time.”  Ratcheting up the hyperbole, Michelle then pointed out, “And now we have the other parent.  We thought it’d feel fun – maybe it feels fun for now because we can eat candy all day and stay up late and not follow the rules.”

Judging from her comments about carrots and bedtime, Michelle must still be of the opinion that without Obama diktats concerning vegetable portions and salt quotas, sleep schedules, and general guidelines for survival, with “the other parent” in charge, Americans (children that we are) have devolved into hog-wild, candy-eating, sleep-deprived rule-breakers.

In addition to criticizing Trump for allowing grownups to make decisions about what they eat, how long they sleep, and how they exercise freedom, in Boston, Michelle also expressed disappointment about that famous politician in a pantsuit who keeps babbling to covens of women about why she lost.

Michelle besmirched Trump by stating that Clinton was “the best-qualified candidate” but also explained that “[Hillary] wasn’t perfect, but she was way more perfect than many of the alternatives.”  Put another way, Michelle “Feels Fun” Obama considers “wasn’t perfect … way more perfect.”

Michelle also told the ladies that in addition to Putin, Comey, misogynists, Stepford Wives, WikiLeaks, cable news, and voter suppression, Trump defeated incoherent loser Hillary because of low voter turnout.  After all, without the New Black Panthers and ACORN to inspire the electorate in 2016, voters were unwilling to go out and elect a woman who can’t walk up or down stairs without falling.

Choosing not to expand upon the other possible reasons Hillary couldn’t “get out the vote,” Michelle also reminded “wes” in the audience that “[w]e’ve got to be willing, when we do find qualified people, to vote for them.  And we didn’t do that in this election.”

Then, demonstrating a level of hubris surpassed only by Barack, Michelle soothed the “disheartened” in the room with thoughts concerning herself and BFF Oprah:

So I think people should be less … disheartened that me and Oprah don’t want to run, and more disheartened by the fact that Hillary Clinton, probably the most qualified person to ever seek the office of the presidency, lost.  She lost.

If Michelle Obama thinks that in the history of this nation, Hillary Clinton was the “most qualified person to ever seek the office of the presidency” then the former FLOTUS clearly believes that high levels of corruption are what qualifies a person to run for president.  Either that or Michelle has finally conceded that Barack wasn’t the most qualified person to seek the office of the presidency.

Whatever her intent, after showering Hillary’s orthopedic sandals with accolades, Michelle announced, yet again, that she, Michelle, isn’t running for president and explained her decision in the following way:

And you can’t just say, “You’re a woman.  Run.”  And we can’t look for women like that.  We can’t just say “let’s find the women we like and ask them [sic] to do it,” because there are a million women who are inclined and who do have the passion for politics.

Then Michelle praised herself and unwittingly demeaned Barack by saying:

Just because I gave a good speech, and I’m smart and intelligent doesn’t mean I should be the next president.  That’s been our problem.  We’re very shortsighted about how we think about selecting the commander in chief.

And so, based on those and other insightful ruminations, as of today, Mrs. Obama isn’t running for president – not because the former first lady believes she’d lose if she were to run, but because, at this juncture, “good parent” Michelle Obama prefers stroking her ego on a nationwide Trump-Bashing



Dystopia: How The Multi-Cultural Fairytale Became An Absolute Nightmare

Originally posted at  CLASH Daily

After being chided by Democrats for years for wanting to maintain the western influence over our traditional American culture, and after being labeled xenophobic by liberals who falsely believe all cultures are equal, the diversity fairytale is rapidly morphing into a multicultural nightmare.

Currently, dwelling among us are people from cultures that believe in terrifying things such as honor killing, genital mutilation, and the stoning of women. In addition to jihadists, El Salvadoran MS-13 gang members are on a nation-wide rape and murder spree.

Joining illegals who come from countries where defecating on the street is a common practice, the existing tapestry of multicultural gloriousness also embraces Third World diseases, English taking a back seat to Spanish and an influx of machismo invaders from countries where femicide, spousal abuse, and sex with underage females is the norm.

In other words, illegals disrespect America’s immigration laws for reasons other than “wanting to do jobs Americans won’t do.” Moreover, contrary to liberal opinion, not all illegal immigrants are innocent college student or hardworking heads of loving families.

Take for example, Miguel Paloalto Lucas. Miguel came to America from Mexico where in some areas the age of consent is 12-years-old. In 2012, Miguel was charged with sodomizing a 15-year-old girl. When that happened the illegal immigrant helped introduce the state of Missouri to the culturally diverse practice among some foreign men of sexually assaulting children.

In 2016, in Bill Clinton’s home state of Arkansas, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico named Jose-Manuel Garcia Gonzalez was arrested for raping and “sexually grooming” a five-year-old girl. Last year, a similar crime was perpetrated on a young child when it’s alleged a 19-year-old illegal immigrant named Douglas Hus-Flores sexually assaulted a 3-year-old girl in Connecticut.

In Cedar City, Utah, 32-year-old Victor Francisco Michel-Lara sexually assaulted a 7-year-old girl not once, but “thousands of times.” Not to be outdone by Victor, an illegal immigrant named Edgar Mendoza, broke into a New Jersey home, climbed into the bed of a 6-year-old girl, and raped her while her unaware father sat downstairs.

The following month, a man of diverse cultural practices, Leonel Vazquez, after being deported back to Mexico twice, returned to America to rape a mentally disabled girl in Kentucky. Then, around Christmas 2017, multiculturalism paid a visit to Kansas when a Mexican man with nineteen deportations raped an underage girl on a Greyhound bus.

In February of 2018, in the state of North Carolina alone, twelve illegals were charged with 88 instances of child rape.

Recently, in a Louisiana Walmart, the national bastion of multicultural shopping, a “possible illegal immigrant” who, thank God didn’t have a gun, but did have a machete, adhered to cultural tradition when he tried to kidnap two children.

In the middle of the afternoon, Billy Yoe Budier-Herrera entered Walmart where he approached a mother with a 2-year-old toddler strapped into a shopping cart. Budier-Herrera told the woman that if she didn’t do what he said, she would die.

When the mother attempted to get away from Budier-Herrera with her child, he blocked her passage and signaled a threat by placing his hand on his 10-inch machete.

According to the police, the “possible illegal immigrant” threatened to kill the toddler if his mother didn’t obey. The mother didn’t obey so Budier-Herrera grabbed hold of the boy and attempted to yank him out of the grocery cart and run off.

While struggling with the machete-wielding immigrant, the child’s mother pulled the boy back. At one point, the mother ran behind the deli counter with the child begging for someone to help. That’s when store employees intervened.

In response, Budier-Herrera ran into the meat and poultry section where he pulled the machete out of his waistband and swung it around before running away. On his way out of Walmart, Budier-Herrera attempted to grab another infant from a grocery cart but couldn’t because the baby was strapped in tightly with the safety belt.

Store employees and an off-duty police officer tackled the man who not only had a machete; he also had pepper spray and a handmade shiv. Budier-Herrara was arrested and charged with an immigration detainer as well as two counts of kidnapping of a child and other offenses.

What Budier-Herrara wanted with the two children can only be surmised but based on an illegal immigrant in Las Vegas who videotaped himself on his iPhone raping a 4-year-old girl the possibilities are endless.

And so, Democrats and open border advocates will continue to try to make Americans feel guilty for opposing the type of diversity that comes via an influx of people whose cultural reality is opposed to ours. Meanwhile, because of the illegal pedophiles the left welcome into America with open arms, children are no longer safe riding in the front seat of a shopping cart at Walmart.


Oh, goody: A ‘million young Barack or Michelle Obamas’

Originally posted at American Thinker

One of the fundamental tenets of Christianity is that as disciples of Jesus Christ, believers are called “to put off our old selves … and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God” (Ephesians 4:22).  In the secular world, where humanity often esteems itself a deity, a counterfeit option now exists among self-proclaimed man-gods who encourage lesser beings to emulate whatever it is they tell them to do.

Emulation is what the resurrected community organizer and former president and his radical wife now say they hope will occur with disciples.

Recently, at a Klick Health’s Muse event in New York City, Michelle Obama talked about passing the baton to followers.  The former first lady sounded somewhat like Jesus, saying, “Whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do because I am going to the Father” (John 14:12).

Simply put, despite the commandment that says, “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3), Michelle spoke of the Obama Foundation as if it were a religion.  And if that’s the case, rest assured: Marxism is the gospel, and community organizing is the tool of evangelism, and Barack and Michelle are gods.

During the Klick-Q&A, Michelle denied rumors that she aspires to “wake up [again] in a house built by slaves.”  Instead, the former first lady explained to saddened voters: “I’m not going to run for president.  Because I think it’s a better investment to invest in creating thousands of mes.  We don’t need just one – we need thousands and thousands.”

Sorry, but “thousands and thousands” of mini-Michelle Obamas clogging the highways and byways sounds more like a nightmare than an encouraging dream for the future.

Nevertheless, half the Obama team apparently feels that multitudes of angry, racist, bitter partisans, made in the image and likeness of a woman who hates America, could do more to advance the cause of chaos than one singular entity who, quite frankly, would rather be doing yoga in Hawaii.

When Michelle Obama said, “As an older leader, I think an important part of leadership is stepping out of the way and making room,” it sounded more like Jesus’s Great Commission than an attempt to recruit “civic innovators.”

It’s 2018 A.D., and Michelle Obama announces that she’s fading into the background, but before she does, she will bequeath authority to a vast horde of Obama-supporters?

By “stepping out of the way and making room,” the former first lady authorized believers to go forth “and make disciples of all nations.”  In other words, Michelle commissioned Obama followers to baptize the faithful in the name of Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, and Barack Obama, and to teach him “who has ears to hear” to obey whatever the fundamental transformist tells him to do.

At the event, Michelle also lamented that in politics, “[w]e’re not finding that new energy out there.”  So, rather than allow the “bright young people doing some amazing things” – to do those amazing things – America’s previous FLOTUS said she plans to duplicate none other than herself and to dispatch, to the four corners of the earth, Michelle doubles.

If Shelley’s narcissistic self-love weren’t enough to scare the daylights out of anyone with half a brain, the popish leader of the Obama Foundation, former president Barack Obama himself, confirmed his wife’s self-serving sentiments by taking the sermon about Obama-replication all the way to Asia.

In Japan, Barack established that both he and Mrs. Obama agree that individualism is a quality to avoid.

Instead, the head of the Obama Foundation preached that the only two people on the planet worthy of imitation are he and his wife.  If the former president’s comments were to be analyzed in the biblical sense, what’s evident is that Barack believes he and Michelle are “the way the truth and the life” (John 14:6).

The former president shared with the Asian audience that he and Michelle both realize that the presidency constrained their ability to create “a million young Barack Obamas or Michelle Obamas.”  Now, free of restrictions, the duo is committed to inspiring young people to drop those nets and follow “the ones we’ve been waiting for[.]”

Put differently, the gospel Barry and his helpmeet currently preach stresses that uniqueness be shunned and Obama-conformity embraced.

Apparently, the strategy is that with the right amount of indoctrination, impressionable young Americans will grab the baton Obama hands them in the “relay race that is human progress” and use it to beat freedom-loving people into submission.  Wait!  Is Barry’s “relay race” in any way related to the “marathon” Obama housemate Valerie Jarrett mentioned in her March for Our Lives tweet?

Either way, it appears as if the Obama Foundation is to Barack what Capernaum was to Jesus: a base of operation to venture forth from in the quest to achieve a higher ministerial goal.  For Jesus, the objective was to preach the Kingdom of God.  For Obama, the aim is to raise an army of community organizers to follow in his footsteps ushering in dictatorial statism via the instigation of worldwide chaos.

Obama expressed it this way:

The single most important thing I can do is to help develop the next generation[.] … After I left office, what I realized is that the Obama Foundation could potentially create a platform for young, up-and-coming leaders, both in the United States and all around the world to come together, meet together, create a digital platform where they could exchange information.

If I could do that effectively, then I would create a hundred, or a thousand, or a million young Barack Obamas or Michelle Obamas.

Sounding like the Creator, Obama once tweeted, “I’m asking you to believe.  Not in my ability to create change – but in yours.”

Thus, what is becoming abundantly clear is that the Obama Foundation is neither a benign non-profit organization nor an all-inclusive institution to groom “young, up-and-coming leaders.”  Instead, is a refuge where professed messiah Barack and wife Michelle work to create a generation of subversive anarchists to help usher in the utopian religion of the progressive left.

%d bloggers like this: