Just like annual Iftar* dinners for Muslims and $4-million vacations in Martha’s Vineyard for Michelle, each year, in an attempt “to reflect upon the progress [LGBTs have] made and recommit to the work that lies ahead,” Barack Obama makes it a priority to host a White House gala for the gay community.

This year, as the President gears up to tear down the institution of marriage, just as he’s also about the business of doing the same to the First, Second, and Fourth Amendment, the ploy is to shamelessly pretend that he’s doing it on behalf of innocent victims like Zea and Luna Weiss-Wynne.

Zea and Luna are two adorable little girls who are the daughters of Lara Weiss and Nora Wynne, two lesbian marriage equality activists, and a sperm donor friend.  Zea and Luna of Humboldt, California are the latest additions to the Barack Obama ‘Cute Children Props’ collection because the cutie pies are the ones who introduced the President at this year’s LGBT Pride celebration at the White House on June 13th.

That’s right – while the nation is embroiled in scandals that threaten every American’s liberty and while the drums of war thump away in Syria, Barack Obama took an afternoon to fête alternative lifestyles on the taxpayers’ dime flanked by Joe Biden and surrounded by a room full of gay lesbians, gay gays, gay bisexuals and really gay transgenders.

Wait! Was Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts also on the guest roster?  Not because he’s LGBT, but because with his historical influence over the Obamacare debate, having Roberts mingle with the crowd and dip into the hors d’oeuvres would have certainly lent an air of twisted Constitutional optimism to the same-sex marriage argument.

John Roberts or no John Roberts, the president clearly thought it would be fitting to commemorate atypical sexual preferences by having two eight-year-old girls, whose parents are both women, introduce his comments.

Which White House staffer was assigned the job of explaining to the cherubs why the tall lady in the glittery pink hot pants has a huge Adam’s apple and a man’s voice was not made public.

Way back in January when Obama signed 23 executive orders on gun control, he had four guests about Zea and Luna’s age at the ceremony, all of whom were supposedly chosen based on the heartfelt letters they wrote to him about how they wanted him to implement tighter gun controls.  It was a real tearjerker.

At the time, the president’s goal was to make weakening the Second Amendment more palatable to the American public by having children in attendance while he dramatically maintained that “[o]ur first task as a society… [is to] …keep children safe.”

Now, to undermine the traditional meaning of marriage, the president decided that Zea and Luna Weiss-Wynne, as well as seven other authors of inspiring letters about gay issues, would guilt America into agreeing with the gay lobby ‘for the sake of the children.’

The hope is that America will believe the lil’ darlins’ were uncoached when they begged in writing for Obama to assist their activist mothers in their starry-eyed quest to officially become Mrs. and Mrs. Weiss-Wynne, or vice versa

In other words, if you didn’t agree with Obama on gun control, you wanted to see children shot and killed. And if you don’t agree with Obama on the same sex marriage issue, you’re a hardhearted beast who wants to deprive children like Zea and Luna the simple joy of being part of a legitimate loving family.

Nonetheless, subjecting children to an afternoon where sexual preference is the crux of the discussion is not even the most disturbing part of the Pride Month get-together at the White House.

Why? Because suddenly Barack ‘LGBT’ Obama has time to chit-chat around the buffet table with a gaggle of gays, that’s why.

Isn’t he the guy who hasn’t had time to comment on more pressing issues like where he was on the night Ambassador Christopher Stevens was being sodomized and murdered in Libya?  Shouldn’t the gay lobby be pressing him for an answer to that question?

Or why, after mocking and castigating President GW Bush for counterterrorism surveillance, is the president suddenly accelerating the process of ‘fundamentally transforming’ the United States of America into Oceania?

And what exactly were he and Doug Shulman discussing those other 149 times when they weren’t busy rolling Easter eggs?

Meanwhile, as America careens headlong into a vortex of adversity, it’s clear that the LGBT community’s ‘best man’ is Barack Obama.

And Best Man Barack’s top priority is to promote Zea and Luna as two little girls who just want to don hair ribbons, dress up like flower girls, and walk their two mommies down the aisle into a future of LGBT legally-wedded bliss.

__________________________

*a meal eaten by Muslims to break their fast after sunset every day during Ramadan

In 2012, when Barack Obama was fairly unpopular, Organizing for America helped get him reelected by convincing voters who were basically ambivalent about reelecting the president to walk like mindless zombies to the polls and vote for Obama.

Now, Barry finds himself in a similar unpopular situation because 54% of Americans abhor Obamacare.  So, in an effort persuade healthcare reform detractors that they adore something they despise, the president is addressing the issue by employing those reelection magicians, Organizing for America.

Jon Carson, Executive Director of OFA, is currently in the process of rallying the 43% of those who still support the calamitous nightmare called Obamacare.  In an effort to convince a nation teetering on healthcare hell that what they’re already experiencing really isn’t happening, Jon’s job is to persuade the drones to employ sheer obnoxiousness to get people crawling around on their hands and knees to “Stand Up for Obamacare.”

Preaching directly to the choir, and without explaining exactly what he meant, Carson injected the spirit of camaraderie into the discussion when he said “People like you have been fighting to improve access to affordable health care since day one.”  Huh?

Okay, somebody please explain why people who didn’t do a damned thing are being led to believe they were integral in the passage of healthcare reform?

Oh wait, I know!  It’s “Because [Jon said] no one should ever have to go bankrupt because they get sick.” However, if you happen to be 10 years old and have cystic fibrosis, while you may not go bankrupt because you’re sick, it is quite possible you might die prematurely after a government advisory panel denies you a lung transplant.

Instead of going bankrupt from illness, Americans will be driven to sickness and bankruptcy after attempting in vain to pay premiums for unaffordable health care.  Not to mention shouldering the burden of slackers, 30 million illegal aliens, the non-taxpaying citizenry, and twenty-somethings who refuse to grow up and accept personal responsibility for their own lives.

Sounding as if he was downloading a campaign speech into Obama’s Teleprompter, Carson finished up his recruiting rant by reminding the faithful who’s to blame for ‘standing up’ being necessary:

[e]ven though Obamacare has been the law for more than three years, the other side is still trying to chip away at it. The House of Representatives has voted to repeal it 37 times, and conservative state legislatures across the country are passing laws that make it harder for their constituents to get access to affordable care.

Obamacare’s not going anywhere. And neither are we.

What Jon really meant to say was that Obama’s not going anywhere, which is 99.44% of the problem, and because he’s not going anywhere, that’s why neither are we.

Nevertheless, the OFA Obamacare brainwashing plan is this:  Convince supporters to “Say you’re on Team Obamacare.”  Then, get them to agree to help spread the word on a grassroots level that Obamacare, which is already making people’s lives miserable, is “improving the lives of millions of Americans.”

Sign on – and for lying straight to people’s faces about the ‘Unaffordable We Don’t Care Act,’ Obamacare disciples will be rewarded with a free “Stand Up for Obamacare” bumper sticker (yippee) which will be sent directly to the mailbox at the address of a foreclosed home where it will then move directly to the rear bumper of a repossessed car, right next to the ‘Co-Exist’ decal.

Hence, in the spirit of “Stand Up for Obamacare,” here are a few ideas for more fitting, custom-designed bumper stickers that should be placed in full view on the rear ends of Smart Cars driven by dumb people, as well as Priuses and the always-trendy and super-cool liberal favorite, the Mini Cooper.

Originally  posted at The Blacksphere

Could it be that Nancy Pelosi’s $20,000 Tahitian pearls were too tight? Either that, or the House Minority Leader had her oxygen cut off by the ponytail of surgeon-stretched skin that she hides under her coif constricting the blood flow to her brain.

Clearly, since being demoted the San Francisco Grandma must miss swinging around her huge gavel. Therefore, every time she opens her yapper she exploits the opportunity and proceeds to smack America over the head with a sledgehammer of stupidity.

Still, whenever the former Speaker bares her dentures, one does learn a lot.  This time while pitching bills that would keep a bankrupt government in the job of subsidizing student loans and federal support for jobs, what Nancy had to say certainly proved that when it comes to intellect, Mrs. Pelosi is what’s in need of a subsidy.

On her latest foray into farcicality, Ms. Nancy said this:  “To some of us the role of government is about doing things for the American people to help them reach fulfillment.”  Reach fulfillment?

Nancy saying stupid stuff is not news to anyone who’s ever heard her speak. Remember when Nancy spoke at the Asian American and Pacific Islanders Summit on Capitol Hill in 2010?  That was when the former Speaker informed the ethnically Asian group that she viewed Obamacare as an “entrepreneurial bill.”

Pelosi said the ‘Unaffordable We Don’t Care Act’ was:

…a bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your passion, your aspirations because you will have health care.

In other words, go strum your guitar, join a dance troupe, and spend a couple of years learning to juggle, because the government will cover your sorry ass.

And Ms. Pelosi didn’t stop with her “fulfillment” comments either. She also complained that while Democrats push for more spending to create jobs, Republicans are seeking restrict abortions beyond 20 weeks.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Restricting late-term abortion must really bother Nancy, because mentioning it in the same breath as job creation reveals that in her quest for “fulfillment’ she’s really just making sure fiends like Leroy Carhart and James Scott Prendergraft have plenty of work.

Devout Catholic mantilla-wearing, Holy Communion-receiving abortion advocate Nancy Pelosi also pointed out that asking questions about late-term abortion indicated that the reporter doing the asking had an “agenda” and was “savoring” asking a question about a subject Mrs. Pelosi considers “sacred ground.”

Nancy explained it this way: “For [the Republicans] to decide to disrespect a judgment a woman makes about her reproductive health is reprehensible.”

In other words, in Grandma Nancy’s world, slaughtering unborn babies right up until they’re actually exiting the womb is what she defines as “judgment…about reproductive health.”  But then again, this is the same woman who defined Obamacare as “entrepreneurial” and bankrupting the American economy as “fulfillment.”

So there you have it. Democrats let Nancy Pelosi out of her pen to promote government spending and what Americans got was a double dose of geriatric dementia.

To sum up, Nancy Pelosi advocated for government taking and spending taxpayers’ hard-earned money on frivolities she defines as “fulfillment” and defined late-term abortion as “sacred ground.”

Originally posted at American Thinker

In Madhya Pradesh, the second largest state in India and home to over 75 million people, the government takes sharing the wealth to new levels. In the tribal district of Betul in the Hardu village of Chicholi block, the state government under a social welfare scheme called Mukhyamantri Kanyadan Yojana sponsors a mass marriage ceremony to ensure poor women without dowries marry.  Part of the draw includes a government-provided wedding gift of 15,000 rupees, which amounts to a $256 payment. Under the contract, couples from “economically weaker sections” receive items like a mangalsutra, a bicycle, some utensils, and clothing.

Despite the big payoff, things must be pretty rough in Hardu village because, in order to qualify for the $256 wedding gift, under government order, the women recently had to first undergo a virginity/pregnancy test.  Why anything other than a virginity test would be necessary is a mystery. Obviously, pregnant women are not virgins, so if you fail the virginity test, why bother with the pregnancy test?

Nonetheless, minutes before the ceremony was due to start, while waiting in line to get married, 400 women were herded over to a nearby government school where two district health workers were assigned the public service job of inspecting genitals to see if the ladies remained uncorrupted. As suspected, nine pregnant welfare cheats were attempting to fraudulently dupe the government out of the wedding gift.

Although the criteria are different, the situation in India proves that government involvement in the sex lives of its citizens is an international phenomenon.

In India a bride’s virginity is highly prized and pre-marital sex is forbidden. The Mukhyamantri Kanyadan Yojna sponsors weddings and then, if the bride has never had sex, endows the new couples with their government-sanctioned gift items/15,000-rupee reward.

In America, it’s quite the opposite; the government not only encourages premarital sex, it practically pays you to indulge in it. Sexually active American women who are single, and especially those who are single and pregnant, receive more government gifts than women who preserve their virginity and wait until marriage before having sex.

In America the government also provides free birth control and abortions and establishes an open-ended government gifting system that facilitates a woman’s sexual escapades for life.

In Betul, some people were offended that the government workers spent the afternoon confirming the maidenhood of 400 aspiring wives.  That’s why the Betul district collector, Rajest Prasad Mishra, said “I have given the orders to probe the complaints on alleged virginity and pregnancy tests conducted on would-be-brides.”  Not for nothing, but couldn’t Mr. Mishra come up with another word besides “probe” to explain his plans to look into grievances concerning the “alleged virginity and pregnancy tests?”

Mr. Mishra wasn’t the only person upset about the pre-marriage probing; the chairperson of the Indian National Commission for Women, Girija Vyas, was also appalled.  Ms. Vyas said, “Such a shameful act where girls had to reportedly undergo tests to prove their chastity to avail the government’s financial aid were sinful and could not be tolerated in a sane society.”

Apparently, numbers of women didn’t mind. They submitted to the look-see, and those with child were disqualified while the remainder, after passing the test, smoothed out their saris, got back in line, draped a garland, and left with a husband and $256 worth of household items.

Based on comments, female empowerment advocate Girja would probably like it better in America.  In America, no one ever gets a virginity test, although they do get pregnancy tests, and whether they pass or fail, young girls still qualify for morning after-pills, free contraceptives, and if need be, a government-funded abortion.

Unlike the Hardu village, things are much more civilized in America.  In America, shameful behavior is applauded and virginity is ridiculed.  American society is so insane that government financial aid is bestowed upon the sinful and chastity “could not be tolerated.”  In fact, young women proudly go to Capitol Hill to beg for free contraceptives and boast that $3,000 per year in birth control isn’t enough to keep them properly outfitted for premarital sex.

In the end, the tribal custom of the government checking out the goods prior to a mass wedding may seem peculiar to Americans. After all, why should government generosity be associated with intimate issues like virginity and pregnancy?

However, in an upside-down kind of way, the Mukhyamantri Kanyadan Yojana custom isn’t all that different from a government who demonstrates its benevolence by subsidizing the sex lives of millions of Americans by providing free contraception and abortion on the national level. In India if you’re not sexually active before marriage, the government pays you; in America if you are sexually active before marriage, the government pays you.

So, although in America the health workers aren’t inspecting female genitalia, the sex lives of the wedded versus the unwedded certainly seem to be the measure of the government’s gifting decisions.

Originally posted on American Thinker blog

One incident took place in Las Vegas, Nevada and the other on Long Island in Massapequa, New York.  One had to do with ice cream, and the other had to do with being stuck on the tarmac for four hours, stranded on an Allegiant Air flight bound for Phoenix, Arizona.

In Massapequa, a long-anticipated Dairy Queen opened, and like crazed zombies, disregarding the recent epidemic of explosive lactose intolerance, people with Dilly Bars on the brain have been lining up for days anxious to partake of Grill-Burgers and Blizzards.

Waiting in the rain for a chocolate-dipped soft-serve is one thing, but what transpired in Las Vegas wasn’t as pleasant an experience.  Bound for Phoenix, passengers boarded an Allegiant Air jet, where they waited for 45 minutes.  The plane was pulled back to the terminal, where the passengers sat and waited some more.  Then, after attempting to depart again, the plane was pulled back again.

The second time, the passengers were allowed to exit.  Then, 40 minutes later, the passengers boarded another plane, which was also pulled back and caused those bound for Arizona to sit on the tarmac for another 40 minutes.  The second plane then taxied back to the terminal, where the passengers remained on the plane.  After about an hour of waiting, just about the time some of the people in the Dairy Queen line in Massapequa were finally digging into an Oreo Brownie Earthquake, the plane took off for Phoenix.

Out in Las Vegas, a Lemon-Lime Arctic Rush would have been a welcome respite, because allegedly there was no air, and several passengers became ill and were told there was no water on the plane.  One trapped passenger claimed, “People were getting nose bleeds, they were throwing up in the bathrooms because of the heat.”

Now, one might ask how these two situations are comparable.  Well, aside from the pleasantness of Dairy Queen and the unpleasantness associated with vomit, heatstroke, and dehydration, with President Obama’s health care reform on the horizon, there are benefits to be gleaned from the waiting experience in both situations.

For starters, waiting in line for hours during intermittent thunderstorms or in a 110-degree airplane inside a 110-degree airplane hangar with the air on half-power is perfect preparation for waiting in understaffed, overcrowded clinics, ERs, or at home writhing around on the living room floor with a burst appendix for lack of access to health care.  So right there, what appears to be just a grand opening of an ice cream franchise and a budget airline calamity are really makeshift boot camp opportunities tailor-made to toughen up the American public for the road ahead.

Moreover, based on the reaction of those who endured the more difficult of the two situations, the airline passengers proved that despite waiting in long lines in crappy conditions, even sick, frustrated Americans are resilient and can maintain a sense of humor in the midst of hardship — all of which will be needed when ObamaCare is fully rolled out in January of 2014.

Instead of starting a riot and/or busting out of the plane, one passenger on the Allegiant plane began singing the uplifting R. Kelly tune, “I Believe I Can Fly.”  Then, rather than express anger, the passengers crammed like sardines into a steamy airplane decided to sing along.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Out on Long Island, after waiting for hours, those who dived into Hawaiian Blizzard Treats, whether they realized it or not, were paying homage to our, ahem, Hawaiian-born president — a president who, much like the Allegiant Air people, has promised Americans the health care equivalent of a hot aircraft, free air-temperature beverages, and a $100 credit we’ll never receive.

Nonetheless, mired in tribulation, the group in Las Vegas may have unintentionally provided a public service by suggesting an apt anthem for ObamaCare that will be fitting for long waits, inferior service, and bacteria-laden facilities.

If the lyrics of “I Believe I Can Fly” are revised just a tad and the title altered, Americans will have something to do while biding their time, waiting in blisteringly hot clinics, hoping to God we can survive long enough not to end up in the morgue.

Not included in the American Thinker blog:

In the meantime, everybody sing along to a tune that’s bound to eventually become the national Obamacare anthem: “I Believe I Might Die:”

I used to think that I could go on
But life’s now nothing but an awful song
Now that the meaning of healthcare

Means leaning on Obama’s everlasting arms

If I can’t see it, they’ll make me do it
If they believe it, there’s nothing to it

[Chorus]
I believe I might die

I believe I will touch the sky
I think about it every night and day
Spread my wings and fly away
I believe I can soar
I see me running through that open door
I believe I might die

I believe I might die

The Obama Administration said that it “strongly objects” to a proposed amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which was drafted in response to evangelical Christian service members facing growing opposition and discrimination.

After an Air Force officer was instructed to remove a Bible from his desk lest it give the impression that he was sanctioning one particular religion, the National Defense Authorization Act was drafted to attempt to protect the religious liberties of soldiers.

Authored by Congressman John Fleming (R-La) the amendment “required the Armed Forces to accommodate ‘actions and speech’ reflecting the conscience, moral principles or religious beliefs of the members.”

The Obama Administration’s reaction to the proposal was that allowing soldiers to verbalize their religious and moral convictions would have a “significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale, and mission accomplishment.”

Apparently, Barack and Company agrees that Christian soldiers should be admonished for sharing their faith or – OMG, worse yet – reading a Bible or leaving it out in plain sight.

However, diversity remains a high priority for the president – discriminatory diversity, that is.

Therefore, sharing your sexuality, especially if you’re homosexual, is perfectly acceptable.  After all, it was Barack Obama who pompously lifted “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” and allowed gays in the military to ask and tell.

Hence, if you are gay and in the military, the president supports both your asking and telling, and if the mood should strike, even…oh, never mind.

On the other hand, if you’re a heterosexual, or worse, a heterosexual Christian, according to the DADT President, asking and telling anything about your faith is strictly prohibited because of the “significant adverse effect” the truth of God’s Word may have on fellow soldiers, especially the asking-and-telling soldiers.

But if you’re Muslim and want to wear your prayer cap on base, Obama is perfectly fine with that.  Repeat after me:  Kufi – good; Bible – bad.

Obama’s opposition to Judeo-Christian religious liberty coincides with very similar political discrimination.

If you support Obama, you’re welcome to share your politics; but if you’re a conservative tea party supporter, pro-Israel, or a pro-lifer, the president will find a way to shut you up and shut you down.

So there you have it.  America’s ‘Christian,’ Scripture quoting, once-a-year church-attending, pro-choice, crucifix-covering president wants God out of the military – but only if He’s Jesus, the Son of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.  If he’s the gay God, or the Allah God, or best of all the Obama God – feel free to proudly share your faith.

Kathleen Sebelius must be a little upset.  Why?  Because despite her “some will live and some will die” comment the worst has happened: 10-year-old Sarah Murnaghan, a little girl with cystic fibrosis, got her lungs and is still alive.

That’s right – despite Kathleen Sebelius’ refusal to waive the law so that Sarah, who was eligible for non-available pediatric lungs and too young for available adult lungs, could get a pair of healthy adult lungs – Sarah prevails!

Talk about a humiliating turn of events for the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Just last week, waxing philosophical, Kathleen said “No” to Sarah getting an adult double-lung transplant.  Then a judge intervened and said, “Yes!” Now Sarah, who Kathleen Sebelius handed over to death, has a new lease on life.

Barring complications like rejection and infection, as it stands right now little Sarah will be around for a while. Sarah Murnaghan was one sick little girl.  After the surgery, her ecstatic family was “thrilled” to share the good news that, thus far, despite Sebelius’s attempt to send Sarah to the morgue, the transplant was a smashing success.

The whole Sarah Murnaghan situation opens a can of worms for Ms. Sebelius because it appeared the government was gearing up to use a little girl with cystic fibrosis as sort of a trial balloon to gage public reaction to the Obama goons denying medical care for a deathly ill child.  If Sarah had done what Kathleen had hoped, and died, saying “No!” would have set a precedent.

In essence, by refusing to waive the adult lung law so that Sarah could live, Kathleen Sebelius was rehearsing her role as God so that in the future, when the new healthcare law kicked in, she’d have already practiced saying “No!”

Then Kathy S. could have said “No!” to Grandma’s pacemaker, “No!” to chemo for Uncle Harry and “No!” to neonatal care for premature babies who the Obama administration would have much rather seen aborted.

Therefore, saying “No!” to everyone would have been a piece of cake, or as pie-sharer Michelle Obama likes to call it:  ’A piece of pie.’

The problem Ms. Sebelius must now grapple with is that she publicly declined to waive the rules for a deathly ill little girl whose life could have easily been saved.  As a result, Americans are now aware that the Secretary of Health and Human Services is has no problem handing over helpless little girls and boys, who would otherwise be saved, to premature death.

Instead, much to Kathleen the Ghoul’s chagrin, instead of going to Sarah’s funeral, her friends, family and a nation anticipating the ramifications of government-run healthcare will all be watching Sarah use her new lungs to blow out the candles on her 11^th birthday cake.

Ross engaged Zack Snyder, the director of Superman: Man of Steel, to quiz him about what Ross McD calls “Kal-El’s …religious baggage.”

According to a smarmy Ross, Superman is Jesus because Superman and his father Jor-El have a beard.  Superman and his dad have superpowers.  Superman’s dad sent him to Earth to save humanity from itself and to “be a god to them.”  Superman was born in a stable, his earthly father was a tradesman, and Superman’s earthly mother obviously wasn’t seen around the neighborhood in maternity clothes.

When earthly people were cruel to Superman he remained kind.  Not to mention walking on water, the betrayal for money, the unselfish sacrifice of his life at 33-years-old for the good of mankind, and all the religious inferences and symbols, like Superman striking the crucifix pose.

Interviewing Snyder at Warner Bros. studios in Los Angeles, Ross McD, insulting Jesus and all, probably didn’t expect the serious answers Snyder provided him with. After all, Ross writing that one of the reasons Superman is like Jesus is “He’s friends with Batman,” and because Superman “Punches Darwinites who believe ‘evolution always wins,’” clearly shows that Ross McD wasn’t making a serious connection.

Snyder was a little more thoughtful and acknowledged the Biblical comparisons, then said, “I think the relationship between Jesus and Superman is not a thing we invented in this film, it is a thing that has been talked about since the creation of Superman.”

According to Snyder, “in a weird way,” Superman’s resemblance to Jesus was probably “talked about more when Superman was created than it is now.”

Maybe that’s because society has seen to it that Jesus is majorly uncool – just ask Ross McD.  Zack Snyder said that Superman’s resemblance to Jesus is “one of those things mythologically you take for granted, a little bit.” You mean like Ross McD associating Jesus with Superman because the Man of Steel is “Mortal enemies with an evil dude with a goatee?” That kind of taking-for-granted?

Waxing mythological, Snyder said that personally he tends toward the fairy-tale nature of the Man of Steel story but said “I think it’s drawing on all mythology: comic book, religion, ancient, philosophical.”

Clearly, the Movie Battleground snarkster wasn’t interviewing Zack Snyder to engage him in thoughtful conversation about the Biblical Jesus, but instead was using sarcasm as a vehicle to démodé Jesus Christ to a cartoon character who, as Ross put it, “[d]idn’t use his superpowers to kick [his enemy’s] asses.”

The New York Times “inadvertently” posted an “article on the women involved in Anthony Weiner’s sexting scandal — and then deleted it.”

In other words, the New York Times pulled Weiner’s … never mind.

In June of 2011, Lil’ Anthony Weiner claimed he had been hacked and was subsequently forced to resign from Congress when it was revealed that for three years he had been tweeting pictures of his underwear-clad crotch and other more sexually explicit photos in online exchanges with a bevy of women.

With Weiner in a quest for mayoral-ship, gassing up his Weiner mobile and venturing forth on the streets of the Big Apple, Michael Barbaro of the New York Times  must have thought it might be in the public’s best interest to find out that “For Women in Weiner Scandal, Indignity Lingers.”

Lisa Weiss is a Las Vegas blackjack dealer, one of six women over three years (that we know of) involved in Weiner’s 2011 weiner-tweeting scandal.  Lisa claims she’s still taunted by customers who say things to her like “Talk dirty to me…We know you like it.”

In September 2012, Ms. Weiss posted an apology on Weiner’s Facebook page that said “Please let me apologize again for any pain I caused your [sic] or the beautiful Huma. It was unintentional … I still think you are our liberal hero and we need you back in politics!!”

Apparently, although he’s not sending pictures of his erection to Lisa anymore, Mr. Weiner did respect Ms. Weiss enough to take her political advice.

As a result, Mr. Barbaro wanted to alert the voting public in New York that although Lil’ Weiner considers his lewd behavior a thing of the past, there are women whose lives are still being impacted by his tasteless behavior.

In the meantime, while Huma dreams of life in Gracie Mansion, Barbaro wrote: “For those on the other end of Anthony D. Weiner’s sexually explicit conversations, the episode damaged careers, disrupted educations.”

Barbaro’s story was posted on the web and then suddenly the article was scrubbed from the Times website.  New York Times director of communications Danielle Rhoades Ha explained the article’s sudden disappearance this way: “This story was published inadvertently, before it was ready. As a general rule, we do not discuss stories in advance.”  Ahem, yeah right.

Margaret Sullivan, Times public editor, who called a New York Times Magazine story entitled “Huma and Anthony: The Private Life of a Former Power Couple” a “sweet stop on Mr. Weiner’s redemption tour,” wrote that “from what I’ve been able to piece together, there was a miscommunication among Times editors.”

Yeah, sort of like Weiner’s miscommunication when he tweeted the following message over the Internet to a willing female participant:  “ridiculous bulge in my shorts now. wanna see?” – to which the woman responded, “Yea! can u send a pic?”  Weiner shot back: “jeez, im rushing. let me take a quick pic.”

Now, two years later and despite his photographic improprieties, Weiner has left his pussy cat and Weinergate humiliation behind him to compete in a multi-candidate Democratic mayoral candidate field in which, in liberal New York City, he is in second place.

In their ongoing effort to prop up the Weiner, the New York Times has once again proved their affection for the aspiring mayor by pulling it off for Weiner.

Michelle skipped the Xi Jinping visit because she’s such a dedicated mom that she chose instead to stay home with her young daughters to close out the school year and to celebrate Sasha’s 12^th birthday.

Barack’s a dedicated dad too, because just in time for Sasha’s coming of age the president agreed to lift the age limit on abortion pills, making it possible for girls Sasha and Malia’s age to buy abortifacients if the need arises.

The morning-after pill, previously only available without a prescription to women 17 and older, has been the subject of a court ruling demanding that Plan B be sold to all females, without proof of age or point-of-sale restrictions. That’s right, over-the-counter abortion pills for even girls who are victims of statutory rape!

In April US district Judge Edward Korman said the US Food and Drug Administration’s decision to put age limits on sales had been “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.”

Before the 2012 election, Barack Obama supported age restrictions on the sale of emergency contraception and even invoked his daughters in citing the reasons why he thought removing age limits was a problem.  But that was then, this is now.

President Obama, bastion of personal conviction, is clearly a man hostile toward social conservatives, anxious to undermine the authority of parents, and always willing to end the lives of the unborn “miracles,” which must be why he changed his mind.

An ecstatic Annie Tummino, coordinator of National Women’s Liberation, believes “Women cannot be on equal footing with men if we can’t decide when and if we will bear a child.”  In other words, if women want to be on equal footing with men, they need to be able to kill their children.

After hearing the news that Obama’s all for underage abortion, activist Annie proclaimed with unspeakable joy:

This decision by the administration affirms what feminists have been fighting for all along: the morning-after pill should be available to females of all ages, on the shelf at any convenience store, just like aspirin or condoms.

Now on Aisle 11: Over-the-counter abortion pills, glittery nail polish, and bubble gum-flavored lip gloss!

We all know the Obama administration has always been emergency-contraceptive-committed.  So it’s nice to know that if Obama is in California strolling Rancho Mirage with Xi Jinping, and Michelle is off Mom dancing with Jimmy Fallon, at least if the Secret Service drops the first daughters off at CVS to buy some Plan B One-Step, they won’t need documentation of any kind.

Good to know – because if Obama’s little girls make a “mistake,” even if Mom and Dad are off seizing parental control from other Americans, neither one of them would want their precious underage daughters to be “punished with a baby.”